Closed nhoffman closed 11 years ago
This should have been fixed by 398b949b4dfd75464654bae9917c8863f7534410. Would you mind testing against master?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Noah Hoffman notifications@github.comwrote:
% cat > seqs.fasta
one AGAGAGAGAGAGAGGA % seqmagick convert --sample 2 seqs.fasta sampled.fasta Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/seqmagick", line 9, in
load_entry_point('seqmagick==0.5.0', 'console_scripts', 'seqmagick')() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/seqmagick/scripts/cli.py", line 29, in main return action(arguments) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/seqmagick/subcommands/convert.py", line 341, in action transform_file(src, dest, arguments) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/seqmagick/subcommands/convert.py", line 273, in transform_file records = function(records) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/seqmagick/transform.py", line 471, in sample return random.sample(list(records), sample) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/random.py", line 320, in sample raise ValueError("sample larger than population") ValueError: sample larger than population This is a problem, for example, when iterating over multiple sequence files: it's nice to be able to define a fixed value for --sample without worrying if one or more of the files doesn't have at least that many sequences.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/fhcrc/seqmagick/issues/35 .
Connor McCoy Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave N. Seattle, WA 98109-1924 cmccoy@fhcrc.org
Yup, it's fixed in master. Should have specified that I was using v0.5.0
Noah, no offense, but the score is
@cmccoy: 15 everyone else: 0
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Connor McCoy notifications@github.comwrote:
Closed #35 https://github.com/fhcrc/seqmagick/issues/35.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/fhcrc/seqmagick/issues/35 .
Frederick "Erick" Matsen, Assistant Member Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center http://matsen.fhcrc.org/
Ha - you might add: https://github.com/fhcrc/deenurp/pull/5 https://github.com/fhcrc/seqmagick/pull/32 etc. to your calculations.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:48 PM, bunnyhutch notifications@github.com wrote:
Noah, no offense, but the score is
@cmccoy: 15 everyone else: 0
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Connor McCoy notifications@github.comwrote:
Closed #35 https://github.com/fhcrc/seqmagick/issues/35.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/fhcrc/seqmagick/issues/35> .
Frederick "Erick" Matsen, Assistant Member Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center http://matsen.fhcrc.org/
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/fhcrc/seqmagick/issues/35#issuecomment-28018863 .
Connor McCoy Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave N. Seattle, WA 98109-1924 cmccoy@fhcrc.org
This is a problem, for example, when iterating over multiple sequence files: it's nice to be able to define a fixed value for --sample without worrying if one or more of the files doesn't have at least that many sequences.