Closed Sai-Anudeep47 closed 1 year ago
So the spec is kind of confusing on that part:
Here is a definitions in the protected header:
$$COSEProtectedHeaders /= ()
The only time the header contains any algorithms is in Voucher:
$COSEProtectedHeaders //= (
1: OVSignType
)
I do agree that we should be specifying it, and have added it to the latest build.
But it does need to be addressed in the spec: @GeofCooper
To simplify issue resolution process, please provide network logs, and or test voucher. to2_msg61_invalid_protected_header_logs.txt
What part of the spec are you testing?
What protocol are having issue with?
Issue description
Log is attached for reference