In message 32, conformance client sends undesired and invalid values in EATPayloadBase as follows
256: h'0000000000000000000000000000000000' -> This value should be EAT-UEID which is EAT-RAND + current GUID that is mentioned at https://tinyurl.com/eatuid
-257:[null] -> This value should not be sent in message 32, as EATPayloads tag is not defined as part of message 32 and mentioned at https://tinyurl.com/msg32eat
In message 64, conformance client sends invalid value in EATPayloadBase as follows
256: h'0000000000000000000000000000000000' -> This value should be EAT-UEID which is EAT-RAND + current GUID that is mentioned at https://tinyurl.com/eatuid
Logs are attached for reference that has messages sent by conformance client as part of TO1 and TO2
To simplify issue resolution process, please provide network logs, and or test voucher. msg32_eatpayloadbase_err.txt msg64_eatpayloadbase_err.txt
What part of the spec are you testing?
What protocol are having issue with?
Issue description