Closed fiedl closed 6 years ago
Plot the simulation with parameters from the H2 hole-ice model (#80) in comparison to Dima's model.
[2018-08-05 18:24:33] fiedl@fiedl-mbp ~/hole-ice-study/scripts/lib master ⚡
▶ ./plot_angular_acceptance.py --no-reference-curve --dima-reference-curve ../../results/angular_acceptance_karle_h2
Comparison of Dima's model to the a priori angular-acceptance curve. The curve called H2 in this plot is the reference plot (#10).
Image source: https://wiki.icecube.wisc.edu/index.php/File:H2_Dima_baselines.png
The H1, H2, H3 curves are fitted to polynomials. The parameters are here:
[2018-08-07 18:20:45] fiedl@fiedl-mbp ~/hole-ice-study/scripts/lib master ⚡
▶ ./plot_angular_acceptance.py --dima-reference-curve
Dima's function is described above.
[2018-08-07 18:21:23] fiedl@fiedl-mbp ~/hole-ice-study/scripts/lib master ⚡
▶ ./plot_angular_acceptance.py --dima-reference --h0-reference --h2-reference
https://wiki.icecube.wisc.edu/index.php/MSU_Forward_Hole_Ice
https://docushare.icecube.wisc.edu/dsweb/Get/Document-75847/20151116_jpamdeandre_DC_holeice.pdf
https://github.com/fiedl/hole-ice-study/issues/80#issuecomment-410478799
Compare this to the new simulations.