Open ctrueden opened 9 years ago
From an ImageJ mailing list thread:
Doing some stitching of a "large" dataset I encountered a « bug ». Stitching parameters Issue : Weird pixel attribution DATASET : Channel : 1 Each Z-stack: 2048x2048x92 (around 750Mb / stack) Total Positions : 112 (16x7) Eachtiled-slice is around 700Mb,(total around 85 Go) Downscaled dataset Channel : 1 Each Z stack: 512x512x23 (around 11Mb / stack) Total Positions : 112 (16x7) Each tiled-slice is around 30Mb, (total around 1.25 Go) Computer : CPU IntelXeonx64, 16 Cores, 2.6Ghz,RAM 128Gb GPU : Quadro6000 If the stitching of the original dataset is done with computing the overlap. We observed a weird pixel attribution. a bug ? If the stitching of the original dataset is done without computing the overlap. We don’t observed anymore the bug. Using a downscaled version of the data set, we don’t observed a bug if the stitching is done with or without computing overlap
Doing some stitching of a "large" dataset I encountered a « bug ».
Stitching parameters
If the stitching of the original dataset is done with computing the overlap. We observed a weird pixel attribution. a bug ?
If the stitching of the original dataset is done without computing the overlap. We don’t observed anymore the bug.
Using a downscaled version of the data set, we don’t observed a bug if the stitching is done with or without computing overlap
From an ImageJ mailing list thread: