I think before adding a third player to an alliance, I'd want to
institute a rule to keep it fair. What about something like this:
1) Two players may always ally to form a new team, no matter how
dominant that new team would be.
2) A player may not join an existing team (of at least two players) if
by joining that team they would more than double the score of the next
largest team.
This would encourage underdogs to band together to defeat the top
team, and discourage the top team from snowballing to victory with a
bunch of hangers on.
I think I could implement this change in a fairly straightforward
manner.
Regarding player ranking. I like Templar's suggestion of keeping
total wins, %wins, and total victory points as three separate scores
and simply report on all of them and let the player community decide
which one they care about the most.
If we ever get enough players, I will implement a ranking system that
takes into account the ranking of the players you defeated. But We'd need to
have a lot more players before it would be worth implementing that.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by khstev...@gmail.com on 20 Jun 2011 at 3:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
khstev...@gmail.com
on 20 Jun 2011 at 3:01