Closed luhong123 closed 1 week ago
Overall retrieval rate looks good
Hi @luhong123 - we think it is important for all clients to start providing more details of data preparation. See my proposal https://github.com/filecoin-project/Allocator-Governance/issues/125 any thoughts?
Hi @luhong123 - we think it is important for all clients to start providing more details of data preparation. See my proposal #125 any thoughts?
Check back later.
Hello! Shifting the response and continue of this review into this issue: https://github.com/filecoin-project/Allocator-Governance/issues/140. Will close this issue (when 140 closes)
Review of Allocations from QC_Data_center Allocator Application: https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/1071
All SPs support Spark
First example: DataCap was given to: https://github.com/luhong123/QC-Data-center/issues/3
First: 512TiB • Second:1PiB • Third: 1PiB • Fourth:2PiB Due diligence was conducted before each signing. Pay close attention to Spark data, SP disclosure, etc.
SP disclosure: f02363181 Huhehaote f02368946 Huhehaote f02362412 California f02639492 California f03166666 Hongkong f03166668 Hongkong f02822222 Hong Kong f02588263 Hong Kong
Actual data storage report: https://check.allocator.tech/report/luhong123/QC-Data-center/issues/3/1722912731582.md
The client actually sealed 7 SPs, and the latest 2 can already see the retrieval rate on spark