Core Devs 50 Meeting Agenda

[kaitlin-beegle]

Filecoin Core Devs Meeting 50 Agenda

• Meeting Date & Time: Thursday, October 6, 2022 @ [16:00 UTC] (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210903T180000&p1=1440)
• Meeting will be recorded.

Agenda

• Welcome & Agenda
• Governance Discussion: Confirming Network v17 Scope and Timeline
• Engineering Discussion: TBD
• Q&A

[Stebalien]

Let's add a presentation on the f4 address class proposal (https://github.com/filecoin-project/FIPs/discussions/459). I'll have submitted a (maybe draft) FIP by then.

[jennijuju]

@adlrocha might talk about HC !

[luckyparadise]

@adlrocha might talk about HC !

Hi @jennijuju please can you clarify what you mean by "HC". Thank you!

[luckyparadise]

Hi @jennijuju I am preparing the agenda for the Core dev's meeting. Still stuck on the meaning of "HC". Thanks

[luckyparadise]

Hi @Stebalien I am Lucky the new Governance Project Manager at Filecoin Foundation. I am just double-checking if the f4 Address Class Proposal has a FIP draft yet? I want to include it in the presentation ahead of the Core Dev meeting next week. Otherwise, I can just provide the link to the discussion thread. Thanks - Lucky

[jsoares]

@luckyparadise HC stands for Hierarchical Consensus, though we're not calling it InterPlanetary Consensus (IPC).

https://github.com/filecoin-project/FIPs/discussions/419 https://research.protocol.ai/talks/hierarchical-consensus-a-horizontal-scaling-framework-for-blockchains/

[Stebalien]

Hi @Stebalien I am Lucky the new Governance Project Manager at Filecoin Foundation. I am just double-checking if the f4 Address Class Proposal has a FIP draft yet? I want to include it in the presentation ahead of the Core Dev meeting next week. Otherwise, I can just provide the link to the discussion thread. Thanks - Lucky

There's just the discussion thread for now (https://github.com/filecoin-project/FIPs/discussions/459) but I'm hoping to make a final FIP draft in the next few days.

[anorth]

I think we should have a discussion about FIP governance process, after FIP-0036. I'm not seeking a retro here, or any decision-making, but a high-bandwidth place for core devs to share their take-aways and suggestions for how we might do anything differently in the future. My impression is that people have some fairly different ideas about some things like the role of polls, and we need to start the process of aligning.

Edit: I think the topic of network planning, below, is more urgent than this one. But this governance one possibly interacts.

[anorth]

I would also like to open a discussion about network upgrade planning, confirming nv17, and our options for subsequent upgrades. A particular point is how to get something addressing the issues that FIP-0036 was addressing into the network sooner rather than later. cc @whyrusleeping