Closed fmwxyz closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find your Filecoin address in the information provided We could not find any Region in the information provided
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided.
Expected DataCap units in PiB or TiB.
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
https://whois.whoisxmlapi.com/lookup-report/1E2N7Apw56 It seems that this website has been established for 123 day. Can you give more description about your organization? Can you explain your data composition and provide sufficient data samples separately? How many copies will you store? What's the relationship between you and the organization? Can you provide more detailed information about other storage providers participated in this program, such as you can list SPs you have contacted with at present?
Hello, our company is a web3 company focusing on BTC mining. We are headquartered in Canada and manage 5 factories with 80+ employees. As the data sample shows you, our company's data comes from the business content of our company's daily operations, such as company video surveillance, mining video surveillance, related design documents, promotional pictures/videos, etc. We plan to store 5 copies so that our data can be stored more securely. I am the person in charge of our company We are still in communication with SP. Since we are not sure about your approval time, we have not yet fully determined the SP. We have contacted 5 SPs, f01652952, f01691327, f023467, f0137489, and f02576, but we have not yet confirmed that we will reach a cooperation.
company video surveillance, mining video surveillance, related design documents, promotional pictures/videos, etc.
Surveillance seems not be suitable for storing as public data.
company video surveillance, mining video surveillance, related design documents, promotional pictures/videos, etc.
Surveillance seems not be suitable for storing as public data.
develop app source files: https://gitee.com/syre-blockchain-corp/syre-blockchain-corp
Promotional Materials: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1F9UNlnCIGHOrpTI-7T9ORb8v3eTU7oay?usp=share_link
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
How much design documents, promotional pictures/videos, etc. here?
这里有多少设计文档、宣传图片/视频等?
100t of design pictures, 400t of promotional materials, 150t of videos, about 650t of data, 5 backups
Total DataCap requested
3PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
Client address
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
f02049625
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
50TiB
4978cddb-6aaa-4c08-86c0-4dccc2f6a26b
1:can you send email to [[filplus-app-review@fil.org] 2:Which nodes do you want to store?
1:can you send email to [[filplus-app-review@fil.org] 2:Which nodes do you want to store?
2:f0503420 f01566485 f01988266 f01988261
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceatvvatybkdxciorq2xx2umbreay5cdrhxjrawtftcvip355p7e2e
Address
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1q6bpjlqia6iemqbrdaxr2uehrhpvoju3qh4lpga
Id
4978cddb-6aaa-4c08-86c0-4dccc2f6a26b
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceatvvatybkdxciorq2xx2umbreay5cdrhxjrawtftcvip355p7e2e
The previous KYC information is relatively complete, and the first round of support
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacectoa4jhebumcvf3zkcfpyjov4oqsv4jk6rw2pk4h4kdnq4cyzbhe
Address
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq
Id
4978cddb-6aaa-4c08-86c0-4dccc2f6a26b
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacectoa4jhebumcvf3zkcfpyjov4oqsv4jk6rw2pk4h4kdnq4cyzbhe
checker:manualTrigger
SYRE BLOCKCHAIN CORP.
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
1
newwebgroup1
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ f01566485 has sealed 70.13% of total datacap.
⚠️ f01566485 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01566485 | UnknownUnknown |
16.44 TiB | 70.13% | 16.44 TiB | 0.00% |
f01699999 | Zhongshan, Guangdong, CNChina Unicom IP network China169 Guangdong province |
7.00 TiB | 29.87% | 7.00 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
23.44 TiB | 23.44 TiB | 1 | 100.00% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 576.00 GiB | 1 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup2 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
f02049625
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
100TiB
6092faa3-8cf1-4338-bfb9-5f01e619aae4
f01858410
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
newwebgroup & llifezou
100% of weekly dc amount requested
100TiB
50TiB
2.95PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1070 | 3 | 50TiB | 50.09 | 64GiB |
SYRE BLOCKCHAIN CORP.
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
1
newwebgroup1
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0469055 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKANLIAN NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED |
256.00 GiB | 0.76% | 256.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01699999 | Zhongshan, Guangdong, CNChina Unicom IP network China169 Guangdong province |
16.00 TiB | 48.95% | 16.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01566485 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
16.44 TiB | 50.29% | 16.44 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
32.31 TiB | 32.31 TiB | 1 | 98.85% |
192.00 GiB | 384.00 GiB | 2 | 1.15% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 576.00 GiB | 1 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup2 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Dear Applicant,
Due to the increased amount of erroneous/wrong Filecoin+ data recently, on behalf of the entire community, we feel compelled to go deeper into datacap requests. Hereby to ensure that the overall value of the Filecoin network and Filecoin+ program increases and is not abused.
Please answer the questions below as comprehensively as possible.
Customer data
We expect that for the onboarding of customers with the scale of an LDN there would have been at least multiple email and perhaps several chat conversations preceding it. A single email with an agreement does not qualify here.
Did the customer specify the amount of data involved in this relevant correspondence?
Why does the customer in question want to use the Filecoin+ program?
Should this only be soley for acquiring datacap this is of course out of the question. The customer must have a legitimate reason for wanting to use the Filecoin+ program which is intended as a program to store useful and public datasets on the network.
(As an intermediate solution Filecoin offers the FIL-E program or the glif.io website for business datasets that do not meet the requirements for a Filecoin+ dataset)
Files and Processing
Hopefully you understand the caution the overall community has for onboarding the wrong data. We understand the increased need for Filecoin+, however, we must not allow the program to be misused. Everything depends on a valuable and useful network, let's do our best to make this happen. Together.
checker:manualTrigger
SYRE BLOCKCHAIN CORP.
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
1
newwebgroup1
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0469055 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKANLIAN NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED |
4.06 TiB | 10.91% | 4.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f01699999 | Zhongshan, Guangdong, CNChina Unicom IP network China169 Guangdong province |
16.69 TiB | 44.80% | 16.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01566485 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
16.50 TiB | 44.30% | 16.50 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
29.25 TiB | 29.25 TiB | 1 | 78.52% |
4.00 TiB | 8.00 TiB | 2 | 21.48% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 576.00 GiB | 1 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup2 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
The CID Checker results look average The distribution of SPs is not very decentralized
But because it is the second round, I am willing to support it temporarily Please contact more SPs and list specific improvement plans; You can use BDE, Slack, Filswan, etc
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaced7l26n4ilk2lfilpx6nmmt6rxzglekkr6slb3oo4wdi3xlxfmc7k
Address
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq
Id
6092faa3-8cf1-4338-bfb9-5f01e619aae4
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced7l26n4ilk2lfilpx6nmmt6rxzglekkr6slb3oo4wdi3xlxfmc7k
The round is temporarily supported. For the next round of notaries, please check the report again to understand the rectification.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaskqa62knb6vlzhzhyxstl7hrvsdpatmf4a7tvk3eopsmlhv5q64
Address
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1tfg54zzscugttejv336vivknmsnzzmyudp3t7wi
Id
6092faa3-8cf1-4338-bfb9-5f01e619aae4
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaskqa62knb6vlzhzhyxstl7hrvsdpatmf4a7tvk3eopsmlhv5q64
f02049625
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
200TiB
f4b9e779-d660-44c7-a761-7e70af6b8ccf
f01858410
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
Joss-Hua & newwebgroup
200% of weekly dc amount requested
200TiB
50TiB
2.95PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1600 | 3 | 100TiB | 33.50 | 0B |
SYRE BLOCKCHAIN CORP.
f1gk6ku7nkvip3upyzdit4tznerqba2ty7a2yss6y
1
Joss-Hua2
newwebgroup1
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ f01699999 has sealed 44.80% of total datacap.
⚠️ f01566485 has sealed 44.30% of total datacap.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0469055 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKANLIAN NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED |
4.06 TiB | 10.91% | 4.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f01699999 | Zhongshan, Guangdong, CNChina Unicom IP network China169 Guangdong province |
16.69 TiB | 44.80% | 16.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01566485 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
16.50 TiB | 44.30% | 16.50 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
29.25 TiB | 29.25 TiB | 1 | 78.52% |
4.00 TiB | 8.00 TiB | 2 | 21.48% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 576.00 GiB | 1 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup2 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
@newwebgroup why did you sign without due diligence?
“The CID Checker results look average The distribution of SPs is not very decentralized”
Why sign the application? @raghavrmadya @galen-mcandrew @Sunnyiscoming
@Joss-Hua Why did you sign the application with the CID report showing huge issues and there has been no further client due diligence?
Love to have clear and open discussion with the client, data packer and storage providers before we continue here.
@fmwxyz Hi! Congratulations on your DataCap approval! BDE is a trusted deals auction house helping you to get paid storing your data with reliable storage providers. If you need any help, please get in touch.
@newwebgroup @Joss-Hua Can you explain about that?
Hi @herrehesse @Sunnyiscoming,
There is a book in China that contains four words. Through learning them, people can communicate more effectively with each other. They are facts, opinions, positions, and beliefs. It mainly wants to express that communication should be based on "facts" and not on "opinions", because that will lead to conflicts in advance. What's more, if "position" or "belief" is different, it is bound to be a communication with gunpowder.
As one of the notaries, based on the same position as you, for improving the Fil+project and the community, my statement will not have any strange feelings.
To answer your question here, that is why I signed. When I signed the last round, I didn't think there were "huge issues" with it at that time. This is my view.
The fact is, the report shows that, “ ✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy", no exception; “ ⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers", more SPs and more replicas are needed to improve dispersion; “ ⚠️ CID sharing has been observed”, there are very few CID shares; So the fact is that it has "issues". But it is not "huge". I do not recommend drawing conclusions until there is no universal standard.
Since this LDN was in its early stage, even if there were "issues", I thought it could be improved with the help of the notary, so I supported it because the notary and the governance team need to help the client, not just the trial.
Finally, add: As I said earlier, I will keep looking at this. Now another round has passed, and it has not been improved, so it will not be supported by me.
There is massive abuse going on inside the program, so trust has to be earned by facts.
Help the client ---> make them earn trust ---> then sign & support. This is the path.
@fmwxyz Can you give us an explanation of the situation?
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 14 days, so for now it is being closed. Please feel free to contact the Fil+ Gov team to re-open the application if it is still being processed. Thank you!
Client f01993430 does not follow the datacap usage rules. More info here. This application has been failing the requirements for 7 days. Please take appropiate action to fix the following DataCap usage problems. | Criteria | Treshold | Reason |
---|---|---|---|
Cid Checker score | > 25% | The client has a CID checker score of 6%. This should be greater than 25%. To find out more about CID checker score please look at this issue: https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/986 |
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?