Closed Pierofree closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for applying. I have the following question :
@xingjitansuo Thank you for your question!
It is a large dataset which we have been working very hard to download for more than a few months, current size of the it is about 355TiB, and I plan to find 8-10 SPs to store copies.
No problem! These are the live pictures from the hackathon took by us, we are lucky and happy to get the good ranking.
I'm eager to get approval from community and I am looking forward to participating in the Filecoin community. I love it!
Total DataCap requested
5PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
Client address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
f02049625
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
50TiB
82279376-4555-4dcb-94a8-cb39f3fd34f4
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecb3bxflgw5eqkp7yzq5uxt7qvnsm2zkbwdwzhuaui3turhuthzya
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1o3twrcpwjtpcd4q36lpq4qmy2qfbgtyy5h6tsty
Id
82279376-4555-4dcb-94a8-cb39f3fd34f4
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecb3bxflgw5eqkp7yzq5uxt7qvnsm2zkbwdwzhuaui3turhuthzya
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacect2rzzkp3qv5pykr7m7dvc6i2tx5vrdjvyo5grmoenmef5ley4fg
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1tbxqwjxfyv7swsdin4einirlsfquv3vnmlapley
Id
82279376-4555-4dcb-94a8-cb39f3fd34f4
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacect2rzzkp3qv5pykr7m7dvc6i2tx5vrdjvyo5grmoenmef5ley4fg
@Pierofree Hi! Great to see that you have gotten approval for DataCap! BDE is a verified deals auction house helping you to get paid storing your valuable data with reliable storage providers. If you need any help, we are always here for you!
f02049625
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
100TiB
7778acd2-e8a2-491e-9a29-8f2844013bc9
f01858410
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
MatrixStorage & BlockMakeronline
100% of weekly dc amount requested
100TiB
50TiB
4.95PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1017 | 5 | 50TiB | 31.47 | 6.96TiB |
Digital Earth Africa Water Observations from Space---Piero
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
1
BlockMakeronline1
MatrixStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ f02009761 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f02019788 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01757676 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
10.00 TiB | 28.96% | 10.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f02009761 | UnknownUnknown |
10.00 TiB | 28.96% | 10.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f02019788 | UnknownUnknown |
10.00 TiB | 28.96% | 10.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01939377 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. |
2.75 TiB | 7.96% | 2.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f01939387 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. |
1.78 TiB | 5.16% | 1.78 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
31.22 TiB | 31.22 TiB | 1 | 90.41% |
1.66 TiB | 3.31 TiB | 2 | 9.59% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceakhobslv5qbpnm6vd4mpbfbxqfbmmiznbyao6li26ymsauxxyndk
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f17xdri3wunqgld7dm23e4f3eqsntjakwc47xjo6i
Id
7778acd2-e8a2-491e-9a29-8f2844013bc9
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceakhobslv5qbpnm6vd4mpbfbxqfbmmiznbyao6li26ymsauxxyndk
Please check the connectivity of nodes @Pierofree
@UnionLabs2020
You have signed of here on an applicant who has been in very much trouble in the past. I strongly recommend that you revoke your signature immediately.
https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1338#issuecomment-1372185795
https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1112
As you can see other notary's are also in trouble over signing this.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacea4tuckesz3nmr44ncyhy7itidabc4mompnyesk76h2jwz2sizmwm
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ktlkcxnmzxcdaoqfsunrg3vocfbmgv4n3mrn74a
Id
7778acd2-e8a2-491e-9a29-8f2844013bc9
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacea4tuckesz3nmr44ncyhy7itidabc4mompnyesk76h2jwz2sizmwm
Both @UnionLabs2020 and @MetaWaveInfo Signed this problematic application from a known bad actor without due diligence and should be put on "disputed" status right away. This behaviour is unacceptable.
Tagging for visibility: @simonkim0515 @galen-mcandrew @dkkapur @raghavrmadya
This application was flagged on the T&T WG call today. For specifics on what the flags were, please refer to the comments above as well as this recording - https://protocol.zoom.us/rec/share/ddNjjWp4rZ5LBh3UdHkneGs9R23NLv-F3nKLteIje6eWZpbA1Uy3xvsPcBoXl7z1.ukOgWhKSNiCZOvcj Passcode: 0Kwi+cnU
Until the client and notaries provide a response to this flag, T&T WG recommends no further signing of this application
In this case, I have tested that all nodes can be connected and retrieved, but the bot-checker is not normal, so I remind the client to keep the SPs stable.
Also, I want to remind the guys from Dcent to pay attention to your words, which may cause disputes in the community. Strongly disagree with the definition of clients as "bad actor“. Even though he/she has operated irregularly before, we need to judge objectively and fairly in this case.
I suggest that other notaries can review this application and decide whether to sign it.
@UnionLabs2020
You signed an application for an applicant who abused the FIL+ program without the applicant or you explaining where / when and why. It is bad for Filecoin and for everyone involved.
https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues?q=is%3Aissue+Piero
@cryptowhizzard I think you may have misunderstood the rules of FIL+. We welcome all applicants who have bad records to correct again, not to kick them out of the Filecoin community completely. @dkkapur has stressed this point many times. I think you should also study hard. This is a web3 world with an inclusive spirit, not a courtroom.
In addition, including Dcent, Kernelogic and Filswan, these active participants have had their bad records exposed. Do they all need to be banned?
@cryptowhizzard I think you may have misunderstood the rules of FIL+. We welcome all applicants who have bad records to correct again, not to kick them out of the Filecoin community completely. @dkkapur has stressed this point many times. I think you should also study hard. This is a web3 world with an inclusive spirit, not a courtroom.
In addition, including Dcent, Kernelogic and Filswan, these active participants have had their bad records exposed. Do they all need to be banned?
Ahhh … enlightening, we are making progress here. I am happy that we agree that this applicant has a bad record as you stated. Secondly, there has been no explanations given by the applicant what went wrong? Who was the person causing this? You signed without proper explanation and due diligence? Right??
Since you keep administrative records and have a bookkeeping plan as stated in your notary application i kindly ask you to share with us who this applicant is. Can you share before Monday? It helps the process to move faster for decision making.
Thanks!
To be more specific @UnionLabs2020
https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/416
This is your commitment to the community. I would like to see 1, 2 and 3 please.
I quote:
Client Due Diligence
How will you vet the clients that are applying for DataCap? What questions will you ask to ensure your trust is placed well and that clients can properly handle the DataCap you intend to allocate to them?
There will be three stages in verification process to ensure the DataCap is used properly. Moreover, the greater the amount of DataCap requested, the more restricted the client scrutiny will be. The details are as follows:
[1] Details include but not limited to these:
[2] Punishment actions may include disqualify the applicant certification, public its wrong actions in the community, stop further allocation forever, fine the FIL pledged by the client etc. In the extreme scenario, legal option will also be taken based on the aforementioned DataCap allocation agreement.
Question for clients:
Firstly, from the questions about use plan and further investigation, I can know some details about his allocation plans. When scoring applicants according to the above sheet, the more geographical distribution, use cases and miners assign, the higher score he will get and the more datacap clients are likely to get.
Next, we will keep tracking clients’ information such as the DataCap distribution records, related miner addresses and storage providers, to ensure that they are consistent with their words and deeds.
Finally, a reward and punishment mechanism will be established. If someone over-allocating datacap to a single entity, I will refuse further allocation and issue a warning which will be public to the Filecoin community. On the contrary, reputable client have the opportunity to obtain more datacap.
Bookkeeping Plan
Do you plan on conducting all your allocation decisions in public (e.g. Github repo), private (e.g. over email, Telegram, etc), or both?
The record of my allocation decisions will be accessible and in public(tentatively on GitHub) to be supervised by Filecoin Community. Where do you plan on keeping a publicly accessible record of all your allocation decisions?
All allocation decisions will be open in the following website: https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-client-onboarding https://filplus.info/#/
@cryptowhizzard I think you need to explain and answer carefully why @f8-ptrk questioned you before you are qualified to attack others everywhere. Very disappointed with you guys' behavior.
@UnionLabs2020 don't quote me out of context. the point i am making in that conversation is not aimed at dcent or anyone in particular, but FIL+ as a concept. In an intellectual sparring session with @cryptowhizzard 's boy....
they put the work in, so should you. so go and answer the questions or resign. you're a notary and it is your obligation to do so. thanks
Ok, I will ignore them later. TKS.
@UnionLabs2020 being right in the center of everything that is happening on the FIL+ front I find it astonishing that you do not try and answer the questions of @cryptowhizzard.
I would suggest you give it a try at least.
f02049625
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
200TiB
4049501a-1d15-4de7-bfe2-87a1b302aa5d
f01858410
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
MetaWaveInfo & UnionLabs2020
200% of weekly dc amount requested
200TiB
250TiB
4.75PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
6746 | 7 | 100TiB | 26.09 | 17.46TiB |
Digital Earth Africa Water Observations from Space---Piero
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
1
BlockMakeronline1
MatrixStorage1
MetaWaveInfo1
UnionLabs2020
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01939387 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. |
35.34 TiB | 16.38% | 35.34 TiB | 0.00% |
f01939377 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. |
10.00 TiB | 4.63% | 10.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01757676 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
55.00 TiB | 25.49% | 55.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01757700 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
45.00 TiB | 20.85% | 45.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f02009761 | Beijing, Beijing, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
15.50 TiB | 7.18% | 15.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01894158 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHK Broadband Network Ltd. |
9.97 TiB | 4.62% | 9.97 TiB | 0.00% |
f02019788 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKTowngas Telecommunications Fixed Network Ltd |
44.97 TiB | 20.84% | 44.97 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
105.78 TiB | 105.78 TiB | 1 | 49.02% |
55.00 TiB | 110.00 TiB | 2 | 50.98% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.[^3]
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Based on the chat history and fellow notaries' reviews, I would like to get this application moving forward. Please follow the feedback and update us if there's any change or if you need any help.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedzjzj726q5zyv7vkbqblvdd4vpstu2qoiz2sogkprisjwdi7khig
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1d4yb3wags3mtddzesxoo63jv7dmlec3bq4yteni
Id
4049501a-1d15-4de7-bfe2-87a1b302aa5d
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedzjzj726q5zyv7vkbqblvdd4vpstu2qoiz2sogkprisjwdi7khig
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecjsoahwd3qepkkkgr3r7phovd53xcw7lntiknyqwli7xnzmkul34
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1irqs2gmctiv3jcdfwuch7oxvf4ixh3k4b2wc24i
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecjsoahwd3qepkkkgr3r7phovd53xcw7lntiknyqwli7xnzmkul34
We have found some problems in the information provided in the Approved Comment. We could not find Id** field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the comment and edit the body of the comment providing all the required information.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceddyazkf5issg755ftzfepnydmli3wodzbvmbucm6b3nqz22pryzw
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f15impf3j2zcaex4lhyxndxswuuhv24vzstuqtxsi
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceddyazkf5issg755ftzfepnydmli3wodzbvmbucm6b3nqz22pryzw
The client has contacted me several times and I'll sign for this allocation. But @Pierofree you need at minimum 4 notaries to support your application for the following rounds. Please contact other noatry in the next round.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebejkvgefuam7pvlpegwlnfzwh226lclmbgq7xvcule7bzmww6c34
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ihv7gz3vn3xqvikpt4rwryecgisl7745lodx3yi
Id
4049501a-1d15-4de7-bfe2-87a1b302aa5d
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebejkvgefuam7pvlpegwlnfzwh226lclmbgq7xvcule7bzmww6c34
Open datasets bring great value to the network. Happy to see more of them join Filecoin. Please keep the allocation in line with Filplus guidlines.
f02049625
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
800TiB
8b11b132-7326-4a5a-bfc7-e20cd063b48f
f02049625
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
800% of weekly dc amount requested
800TiB
1.8189894035458582e+49YiB
-2.19B
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
8345 | 7 | 200TiB | 36.61 | 67.84TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecs4hhiyrgi6t3linitc7z2qoa4wh4q7dpibh226bbfnti4yad3a4
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1vxbqrf7rfum3n6m5u6eb4re6xj7amvsaqnzu64y
Id
8b11b132-7326-4a5a-bfc7-e20cd063b48f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecs4hhiyrgi6t3linitc7z2qoa4wh4q7dpibh226bbfnti4yad3a4
Peformed due diligence before and the report looks good. Willing to help onboard this application again.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedleyawjdvio6iev3qumqszzcw7m57yqpp2hm3adscxcw7s6oikwk
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1d4yb3wags3mtddzesxoo63jv7dmlec3bq4yteni
Id
8b11b132-7326-4a5a-bfc7-e20cd063b48f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedleyawjdvio6iev3qumqszzcw7m57yqpp2hm3adscxcw7s6oikwk
The client followed the allocation plan. Willing to help onboard this application again.
f02049625
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
400TiB
86372bc3-83b1-4f8c-a696-243c1c1bf815
f02049625
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
400% of weekly dc amount requested
400TiB
7.275957614183427e+64YiB
7.275957614183427e+64YiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
24250 | 14 | 800TiB | 19.06 | 198.09TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacec4scwoxloxtuxf7zt5gbb25clvfggcsoifp26venspnla3st45cy
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1irqs2gmctiv3jcdfwuch7oxvf4ixh3k4b2wc24i
Id
86372bc3-83b1-4f8c-a696-243c1c1bf815
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec4scwoxloxtuxf7zt5gbb25clvfggcsoifp26venspnla3st45cy
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced5lgalcfglzbdguqpnrbijmeqcyk6rfowdvp2yds3l5qkebbeidg
Address
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f174fg3bqbln3zjnkxtyf6s54txqkr7yqkj6cig7y
Id
86372bc3-83b1-4f8c-a696-243c1c1bf815
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced5lgalcfglzbdguqpnrbijmeqcyk6rfowdvp2yds3l5qkebbeidg
f02049625
f1copg5qrg6js7rlz6dlvqbyqfcdgzllnt5vx5rsq
400TiB
9ec0d637-5193-4969-aff3-9731855dbd64
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?