Closed hengdingy closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Total DataCap requested
3PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
Client address
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
f02049625
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
50TiB
1da98eb6-b724-4d30-87da-9b78e0b0002b
@hengdingy It seems that the retrieval frequency is relatively high. Will there be any problem for the SPs you work with?
Looks like this is public data and FogMeta have done LDNs before. Willing to support.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecuek4xjyreyvojb6d7nahmqlzh2qniikafsz5fx45wxmjqnmybhg
Address
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
1da98eb6-b724-4d30-87da-9b78e0b0002b
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecuek4xjyreyvojb6d7nahmqlzh2qniikafsz5fx45wxmjqnmybhg
Aborting. Exit Code is Non 0
@hengdingy It seems that the retrieval frequency is relatively high. Will there be any problem for the SPs you work with?
@IreneYoung We want to support more people in running ETH nodes. And we'll definitely select suitable SPs with enough retrieval capability.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacec6jwhyc7r5m2ozwe26alw2t7atacopt6jr6t4e7d4qtg4vbrdmke
Address
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
Id
1da98eb6-b724-4d30-87da-9b78e0b0002b
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec6jwhyc7r5m2ozwe26alw2t7atacopt6jr6t4e7d4qtg4vbrdmke
FogMeta Lab
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 3.51 TiB | 9.37% | 3.07 TiB | 12.46% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.45 TiB | 9.21% | 2.89 TiB | 16.29% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 3.23 TiB | 8.63% | 2.80 TiB | 13.53% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.01 TiB | 8.02% | 2.50 TiB | 16.75% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 2.98 TiB | 7.94% | 2.54 TiB | 14.70% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 2.91 TiB | 7.75% | 2.38 TiB | 18.28% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 2.72 TiB | 7.25% | 2.25 TiB | 17.24% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 2.69 TiB | 7.17% | 2.25 TiB | 16.28% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 2.54 TiB | 6.77% | 2.23 TiB | 12.31% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.19 TiB | 5.84% | 2.00 TiB | 8.57% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 1.85 TiB | 4.93% | 1.82 TiB | 1.69% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 1.79 TiB | 4.77% | 1.51 TiB | 15.72% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.56 TiB | 4.17% | 1.34 TiB | 14.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.31 TiB | 3.50% | 1.19 TiB | 9.52% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 896.00 GiB | 2.33% | 896.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 896.00 GiB | 2.33% | 800.00 GiB | 10.71% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
32.00 GiB | 64.00 GiB | 1 | 0.17% |
208.00 GiB | 448.00 GiB | 2 | 1.17% |
612.00 GiB | 2.02 TiB | 3 | 5.38% |
1.45 TiB | 6.34 TiB | 4 | 16.92% |
1.59 TiB | 8.41 TiB | 5 | 22.43% |
896.00 GiB | 5.63 TiB | 6 | 15.01% |
224.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 7 | 4.67% |
64.00 GiB | 512.00 GiB | 8 | 1.33% |
32.00 GiB | 288.00 GiB | 9 | 0.75% |
96.00 GiB | 1.56 TiB | 12 | 4.17% |
224.00 GiB | 3.81 TiB | 13 | 10.17% |
256.00 GiB | 4.88 TiB | 14 | 13.01% |
96.00 GiB | 1.81 TiB | 15 | 4.84% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
checker:manualTrigger
FogMeta Lab
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
1
IreneYoung1
kernelogic
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 2nd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f02017390 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
11.00 TiB | 18.41% | 11.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
1.85 TiB | 3.09% | 1.82 TiB | 1.69% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
1.31 TiB | 2.20% | 1.19 TiB | 9.52% |
f01970622 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED |
6.25 TiB | 10.46% | 6.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | UnknownUnknown |
5.00 TiB | 8.37% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, USCharter Communications Inc |
896.00 GiB | 1.46% | 896.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, USCyxtera Technologies Inc |
2.72 TiB | 4.55% | 2.25 TiB | 17.24% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DEDeutsche Telekom AG |
3.23 TiB | 5.41% | 2.80 TiB | 13.53% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, USHurricane Electric LLC |
2.69 TiB | 4.50% | 2.25 TiB | 16.28% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, USIsomedia, Inc. |
1.56 TiB | 2.62% | 1.34 TiB | 14.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
2.54 TiB | 4.25% | 2.23 TiB | 12.31% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
896.00 GiB | 1.46% | 800.00 GiB | 10.71% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, USKrypt Technologies |
3.51 TiB | 5.88% | 3.07 TiB | 12.46% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RUMTS PJSC |
3.45 TiB | 5.78% | 2.89 TiB | 16.29% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RUMTS PJSC |
3.01 TiB | 5.04% | 2.50 TiB | 16.75% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RUPJSC Rostelecom |
2.91 TiB | 4.87% | 2.38 TiB | 18.28% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SGStarHub Ltd |
1.79 TiB | 3.00% | 1.51 TiB | 15.72% |
f010088 | Kirkland, Washington, USWholesail networks LLC |
2.19 TiB | 3.66% | 2.00 TiB | 8.57% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CAZayo Bandwidth |
2.98 TiB | 4.98% | 2.54 TiB | 14.70% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 2nd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
12.28 TiB | 12.31 TiB | 1 | 20.61% |
5.20 TiB | 10.44 TiB | 2 | 17.47% |
612.00 GiB | 2.02 TiB | 3 | 3.37% |
1.45 TiB | 6.34 TiB | 4 | 10.62% |
1.59 TiB | 8.41 TiB | 5 | 14.07% |
896.00 GiB | 5.63 TiB | 6 | 9.42% |
224.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 7 | 2.93% |
64.00 GiB | 512.00 GiB | 8 | 0.84% |
32.00 GiB | 288.00 GiB | 9 | 0.47% |
96.00 GiB | 1.56 TiB | 12 | 2.62% |
224.00 GiB | 3.81 TiB | 13 | 6.38% |
256.00 GiB | 4.88 TiB | 14 | 8.16% |
96.00 GiB | 1.81 TiB | 15 | 3.03% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 1 storage providers have unknown IP location - f01981571
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 1 storage providers have unknown IP location - f01981571
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
checker:manualTrigge
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
f02049625
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
100TiB
f84c4975-36ef-4872-884a-3e9c3f0fec5d
f01858410
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
IreneYoung & kernelogic
100% of weekly dc amount requested
100TiB
285TiB
2.72PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
8871 | 32 | 50TiB | 15.18 | 11.33TiB |
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebunjert64choxycnurkcwdiyt4zjkjx3xf5jn63fds2uqzvoqg2g
Address
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
f84c4975-36ef-4872-884a-3e9c3f0fec5d
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebunjert64choxycnurkcwdiyt4zjkjx3xf5jn63fds2uqzvoqg2g
f02049625
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
200TiB
c876ce4d-d123-4439-b444-77a0ada17959
f01858410
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
cryptowhizzard & IreneYoung
200% of weekly dc amount requested
200TiB
285TiB
2.72PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
8978 | 33 | 100TiB | 14.99 | 8.54TiB |
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
@hengdingy Looks good! Do you have repaired the snapshots data for the next stage?
@hengdingy Looks good! Do you have repaired the snapshots data for the next stage?
@nj-steve we have stored the data schema in the repo, everybody can restore the data to the original snapshot.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaaehk2eyz7vdnvnej26pc6a3n6bmac26urfquh4c5na6ha73zo66
Address
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1xx6555qijma7igpnjspyvdunc4vfxkawnpqy5ii
Id
c876ce4d-d123-4439-b444-77a0ada17959
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaaehk2eyz7vdnvnej26pc6a3n6bmac26urfquh4c5na6ha73zo66
The checker report and retrieval are both healthy.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecvkgdltim5kvldrygep36d4jehiemkgx74znubmhrbgyismpr3mk
Address
f1x4jjrsot2gevrxiqwgzgjh7kzh6c6kv3kkuyv6a
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1nknj7ayq4o43czrtdoauggtwl43fbqatmqis3yy
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecvkgdltim5kvldrygep36d4jehiemkgx74znubmhrbgyismpr3mk
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?