Closed yaoyuanww closed 11 months ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Hello @yaoyuanww - thank you for completing an exceptions proposal with SP information to support this application for E-Fil+.
Also, I can confirm for the Fil+ team that you are the first to complete the Synaps.io KYC/KYB check, which is a complete check of applicant and business and have passed it successfully.
Total DataCap requested
1PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
50TiB
Client address
f1sshymsne7x3cndwflpk57ozerlzkxgzv7aknadq
f01940930
f1sshymsne7x3cndwflpk57ozerlzkxgzv7aknadq
25TiB
fd627dad-dca2-460c-9105-0e708ab64a30
Hello @bmcnabb25 - @xingjitansuo , please sign the datacap request
There is no previous allocation for this issue.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
I can confirm for the Fil+ team that you are the first to complete the Synaps.io KYC/KYB check, which is a complete check of applicant and business and have passed it successfully. Notaries let me know if you have any questions
Hello @bmcnabb25 and @xingjitansuo giving you another chance to review this application. Please let me know ASAP if you cannot.
Hi @kevzak
I don't mind stepping in and sign if the other notary's are busy during CNY.
KYC seems ok as i understand. Does this applicant have an onboarding plan? Who are the first SP's to store their data and where are they located?
Thanks @cryptowhizzard yes, KYC/KYB completed successfully and their SP details are linked in a comment above: https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1340#issuecomment-1375632391
Would love your feedback for @yaoyuanww, thanks
Hi,
As far as i can see f01736786 is not reachable over the internet, i can't verify it's owner. Is it from the applicant himself to store the real copy of the data? ( If so it is perfectly fine with me but i just would like to know )
f01906874 / f01997834 belong to Linkspeed
f01736786 is brand new and has only been seen in here. making fame on one LDN. Is it owned by Ghostbyte?
To conclude the data onboard plan is a bit slim for the start. I would prefer one or 1 extra SP to sign of with to have 4 independent partners here instead of 3. Is this possible?
Hello @yaoyuanww
Can you provide me with and extra SP/ Organization? I would like to get this moving for you.
@cryptowhizzard @Kevin-FF-USA thanks guys, I have updated sp info table https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/792 added two sps, f01901773,f02002918. make it total 4 sps. again thanks guys.
Hello @yaoyuanww
Can you contact me on slack please.
@cryptowhizzard sure, what's your slack handle?
@yaoyuanww
WijnandSchouten
Confirmed that SP's f01981059 f01996927 will be used for this allocation per slack and not f01901773 f02002918.
@kevzak
@cryptowhizzard can you see this one yet? @fabriziogianni7 FYI
There is no previous allocation for this issue.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
@cryptowhizzard any update here?
I'm also randomly assigning two new notaries. @BlockMakeronline @MatrixStorage
Reminder, this client completed full KYC/KYB via synaps product. Also, SPs are shared https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1340#issuecomment-1407353052
Let's follow the new SLA https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/discussions/807 Please comment by Feb 6th. We ask you to leave a comment on the client, data, or SPs as needed.
If you chose not to sign for any reason, please comment as well so I can assign another notary to review.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb24maj3vao675t5jqhexdjo2brnv7fgswgoi7ufw55vk4c5icmgm
Address
f1sshymsne7x3cndwflpk57ozerlzkxgzv7aknadq
Datacap Allocated
25.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb24maj3vao675t5jqhexdjo2brnv7fgswgoi7ufw55vk4c5icmgm
No comment from @BlockMakeronline @MatrixStorage. That's one missed assignment.
We're moving forward with two new randomly assigned notaries. @derricktan23 @liyunzhi-666
We're following the updated Notary SLA https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/discussions/807
Please review the application details for the Client, Data, and SPs and leave a comment. Please comment by Feb 9th.
Please also note that this client passed third party KYC/KYB check.
If you chose not to sign, please leave a comment why so I can assign another notary if needed.
Based on the confirmation information in the response, I advise the client @yaoyuanww to update the revised SP information to #792
When all information is clear and unambiguous, I will perform some due diligence. cc @kevzak
Hello @yaoyuanww , may u explain what does the backup data includes, private data from the client (confidential docs, DB backup) ?
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebmnxmg745env662fajsgs7tylwyfhed5re6tvoqs5xrynmmfj2oa
Address
f1sshymsne7x3cndwflpk57ozerlzkxgzv7aknadq
Datacap Allocated
25.00TiB
Signer Address
f1pszcrsciyixyuxxukkvtazcokexbn54amf7gvoq
Id
fd627dad-dca2-460c-9105-0e708ab64a30
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebmnxmg745env662fajsgs7tylwyfhed5re6tvoqs5xrynmmfj2oa
Based on the information #792, everything looks good.
I also tried to search for the list of SPs disclosed and all were successful.
Since it is the first round, I only see plans stored in two continents so far, and hope to see SPs from other continents in subsequent allocations. @yaoyuanww
@cryptowhizzard @liyunzhi-666 @kevzak Thanks guys. I appreciated the effort. We will strictly follow the FIL+ standard to finish the allocations. We are new to this, so if there is anything we did not do it right, please let us know asap.
I have not received a reply from @yaoyuanww . Therefore, the delay in signing.
f01940930
f1sshymsne7x3cndwflpk57ozerlzkxgzv7aknadq
50TiB
bca56161-d563-4fc2-9c82-29b0ceb5a933
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
@derricktan23 did you ever hear back from @yaoyuanww ?
We're moving forward with the next allocation and two new randomly assigned notaries. @jamerduhgamer @PluskitOfficial
We're following the updated Notary SLA https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/discussions/807
Please review the application details for the Client, Data, and SPs and leave a comment. Please comment by March 23rd.
Everything looks good. Willing to support.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacearf7af2edbrn2k3tdk5uupaqhtaauw3pizeyr2qinxip6el6pzlu
Address
f1sshymsne7x3cndwflpk57ozerlzkxgzv7aknadq
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1tgnlhtcmhwipfm7thsftxhn5k52velyjlazpvka
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacearf7af2edbrn2k3tdk5uupaqhtaauw3pizeyr2qinxip6el6pzlu
We have found some problems in the information provided in the Approved Comment. We could not find Id** field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the comment and edit the body of the comment providing all the required information.
We have found some problems in the information provided in the Approved Comment. We could not find Id** field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the comment and edit the body of the comment providing all the required information.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 98.77% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 98.77% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
@jamerduhgamer can you take a look?
We're following the updated Notary SLA https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/discussions/807 and randomly assigning: @laurarenpanda @xnmatrixsv Please review application details and comment by March 29th. Thanks!
About the 1st round, there is only one thing I'd like to point out: all SPs are located in Texas, US. If there aren't any strict limation, geographically, it would be better to have other SPs in different regions. However, this could be improved in the 2nd round. Still willing to support.
@laurarenpanda thanks, but it seems that you signed the third round which is 100TiB, we are just into the second round, that is why I can not see the new quota. can you take a look?
@laurarenpanda thanks, but it seems that you signed the third round which is 100TiB, we are just into the second round, that is why I can not see the new quota. can you take a look?
@yaoyuanww she is talking about the results of the CID Checker report: https://github.com/data-preservation-programs/filplus-checker-assets/blob/main/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1340/1679425498517.md
It shows Texas. You mentioned the following SPs would be involved: SP ID | SP org | SP region |
---|---|---|
f01901773 | China | |
f02002918 | China | |
f01906874 | Linkspeed | USA |
f01997834 | USA |
@laurarenpanda thanks, but it seems that you signed the third round which is 100TiB, we are just into the second round, that is why I can not see the new quota. can you take a look?
Hi, @yaoyuanww. It seemed the bot jumped over the 2nd round, and I could do nothing about it. However, if another Notary signs for this application, then you could get 100 TiB DC.
@kevzak Thanks for the assignment, I am on it :) @yaoyuanww Can you share more info on the sample data with me? You could email them to me: notary@xnmatrixs.com
Deleted the past request and proposal because this proposal was not approved yet: https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1340#issuecomment-1477839430
@laurarenpanda can you sign this again? We had to delete the past trigger and proposal because they were not syncing
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?