Closed mutablepunk closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Total DataCap requested
2PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
Client address
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
f01858410
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
50TiB
5d356a10-1e4a-4c92-b776-d3468688e436
1.can you send email to [filplus-app-review@fil.org]; 2.Have you establish cooperation with storage providers? If yes, please list them. If not, please explain how to find them.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedqsgjr33ph4huw3kr4gyfyfffuwassjqc2l25drjw2rd2habydna
Address
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f122qmy25wdtt5mxd77kndiq7z5x2n3iwiuz2wdsa
Id
5d356a10-1e4a-4c92-b776-d3468688e436
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedqsgjr33ph4huw3kr4gyfyfffuwassjqc2l25drjw2rd2habydna
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacechoo4a2cd2ifhporpcnxbhxya2bhegmkczsqlcwk56w2evrr6psu
Address
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
5d356a10-1e4a-4c92-b776-d3468688e436
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacechoo4a2cd2ifhporpcnxbhxya2bhegmkczsqlcwk56w2evrr6psu
First allocation, looking forward to next milestone
The email address for sending KYB emails is not an authorized email address. Could you send an email to filplus-app-review@fil.org with your official domain in order to confirm your identity? Email name should includes the issue id #1419.
Sorry, the email address used to send the email before was wrong, the new email has been sent, please see the screenshot.
Also the email address previously used on the company's official website has been discontinued and has now been updated to a new email address
checker:manualTrigger
No active deals found for this client.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
f01858410
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
100TiB
0be0d103-a186-4baf-8d11-ed25f82b4a78
f01858410
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
kernelogic & jggapp
100% of weekly dc amount requested
100TiB
50TiB
1.95PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
906 | 3 | 50TiB | 33.33 | 11.84TiB |
Fujian ZhanXun Geographic Information Co., Ltd
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
1
kernelogic1
xiaoyuaiheshui
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01949260 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CNFuzhou |
9.44 TiB | 33.33% | 9.44 TiB | 0.00% |
f01949267 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CNFuzhou |
9.44 TiB | 33.33% | 9.44 TiB | 0.00% |
f02016677 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKKaopu Cloud HK Limited |
9.44 TiB | 33.33% | 9.44 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
9.44 TiB | 28.31 TiB | 3 | 100.00% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
@mutablepunk First allocation does not seem regionally spread out, even though your application states Asia only. I want a clear plan of distribution and a list of SP's and business names before moving forward with the next trench.
Trying to retrieve the data what's in here. Will report back shortly.
checker:manualTrigger
Fujian ZhanXun Geographic Information Co., Ltd
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
1
kernelogic1
xiaoyuaiheshui
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01949260 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CNFuzhou |
9.44 TiB | 23.48% | 9.44 TiB | 0.00% |
f01949267 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CNFuzhou |
9.44 TiB | 23.48% | 9.44 TiB | 0.00% |
f02016677 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKKaopu Cloud HK Limited |
9.44 TiB | 23.48% | 9.44 TiB | 0.00% |
f060754new |
Xiamen, Fujian, CNKaopu Cloud HK Limited |
6.97 TiB | 17.34% | 6.97 TiB | 0.00% |
f054420 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKSkyExchange Internet Access |
4.91 TiB | 12.21% | 4.91 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
11.88 TiB | 11.88 TiB | 1 | 29.55% |
9.44 TiB | 28.31 TiB | 3 | 70.45% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
@herrehesse @cryptowhizzard The encapsulation speed of some SP is relatively slow, and now they are all on the chain. Can you support me?
Hi @mutablepunk
Thanks for your message. The SP's that stored your data don't see to support retrieval. I will attempt a second try over the weekend to see if i can retrieve your data. Retrievability is a key component of the FIL+ rules to enable me to check what the data is that is stored.
Thanks for your understanding.
@cryptowhizzard There is one SP that does not support retrieval, and other SPs support retrieval. We have informed SP by email that we need to open the online retrieval mode. Can you sign for me before that? I will solve this problem in the second round.
@mutablepunk We recommend not signing anything before retrievals on all SP's are working properly. As soon as you can show us proper results we will take another look at your application
Thanks for your understanding.
@cryptowhizzard @C00kies77 The SP f054420 cannot be retrieved. SP is also trying to solve the problem. I will not send a new order to this SP until the problem is solved. Can you help me enter the second round first. Until it solves the retrieval problem, I will issue it again.
F054420 email replies can already support retrieval. Can you help me enter the second round? @cryptowhizzard
Hi,
I checked on f054420 but they are listed in our system as abusive SP connected to abuse LDN's. I have it in my system under #1214 , the owner of that ticket deleted it.
Tbh, i would like you to replace this SP for another one. I will test retrievals on the others.
Feb 14 10:55:03 proposals dealscanner-f01997810-f060754: ERROR: failed to find offer satisfying maxPrice: 0 FIL. Try increasing maxPrice Feb 14 10:55:03 proposals dealscanner-f01997810-f060754: Feb 14 10:55:03 proposals dealscanner-f01997810-f054420: ERROR: failed to find offer satisfying maxPrice: 0 FIL. Try increasing maxPrice
Btw ... the issue is still not fixed. The price above is 0.1 . Retrieval should be free according to the FIL+ rules!
Feb 14 10:55:03 proposals dealscanner-f01997810-f060754: ERROR: failed to find offer satisfying maxPrice: 0 FIL. Try increasing maxPrice Feb 14 10:55:03 proposals dealscanner-f01997810-f060754: Feb 14 10:55:03 proposals dealscanner-f01997810-f054420: ERROR: failed to find offer satisfying maxPrice: 0 FIL. Try increasing maxPrice
Btw ... the issue is still not fixed. The price above is 0.1 . Retrieval should be free according to the FIL+ rules!
@cryptowhizzard I have helped SP solve this problem.
Hi,
I checked on f054420 but they are listed in our system as abusive SP connected to abuse LDN's. I have it in my system under #1214 , the owner of that ticket deleted it.
Tbh, i would like you to replace this SP for another one. I will test retrievals on the others.
We had in-depth exchanges before reaching cooperation with the SP. If we can't store the data according to the Fil+rule, we will stop distributing the data at any time. There is still a retrieval problem in the early stage. SP has fixed this problem yesterday. If there are other problems in the future, we will terminate the cooperation with this SP at any time
@herrehesse @cryptowhizzard Hello, what can I do for you? Continue to wait?
I would like to see a list of SP's and their business names and regions. And why are you only storing in "Asia", if you can reach HK, SG and JP from your location you can also distribute to EU and USA.
@herrehesse At present, the partners are mainly in Asia. We are also looking for suitable SP in the United States and Europe
@mutablepunk Love to assist you in that process, let me know if you need any assistance. Love to support if you can distribute your dataset better.
@herrehesse Thanks, glad to have your help! I will choose more regions to distribute my data at a later stage! Can you help me pass this round?
Nope, first an SP list with more regions, then we can (if the retrieval is OK) help you sign this next round!
f01949260 Fuzhou f01949267 Fuzhou f02016677 HK f060754 HK f01907578 PuTian f0123931 Fuzhou f01807707 ShenZhen Frankfurt confirming @herrehesse Here is our SP list for the second round There is also a partner of Frankfurt who is communicating. If appropriate, he will start Boost!
Awesome! What are their business names? Locations are noted.
@herrehesse f01949260 Fuzhoushuidiwangluo Technology Co. Ltd f01949267 Fuzhoushuidiwangluo Technology Co. Ltd f02016677 Personal f060754 Shenzhenshuidixinxijishu Technology Co. Ltd f01907578 Personal f0123931 Fuzhou Blue Coast Network Technology Co. LTD f01807707 ShenzhenXingyuecunchu Technology Co. Ltd
@mutablepunk Thank you for being transparent. Will put the data inside our database and discuss with @cryptowhizzard about next steps. If all is in order love to sign your application.
Hi @mutablepunk
Thanks for this. Based on above information you are almost good to go. I only have a problem with SP f01807707. It is in a subnet where much abuse has been going on.
Can we agree that you will not use that SP and onboard with the others? If so, i am ok to sign.
@cryptowhizzard Thank you for your reminding and suggestion. I agree with your suggestion and terminate the cooperation with the SP
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacectqeicwbzvr6uuu6ryta2yf4pfageqs6ml4sonb2t36ytx35erxo
Address
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
0be0d103-a186-4baf-8d11-ed25f82b4a78
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacectqeicwbzvr6uuu6ryta2yf4pfageqs6ml4sonb2t36ytx35erxo
The previous information is disclosed completely, and I tried to retrieve it without problems, I will support it。
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceau4pr5dwxz775hz77xvmzaa4m5o3zozzkvpl76sqryciqd4n3lpa
Address
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1fg6jkxsr3twfnyhdlatmq36xca6sshptscds7xa
Id
0be0d103-a186-4baf-8d11-ed25f82b4a78
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceau4pr5dwxz775hz77xvmzaa4m5o3zozzkvpl76sqryciqd4n3lpa
f01858410
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
200TiB
aeb81f52-1795-40fa-b00a-70f32553b007
f01858410
f1jqrcpugschakigqqvivbk3mfr6hx6jkf42kyqya
fireflyHZ & cryptowhizzard
200% of weekly dc amount requested
200TiB
50TiB
1.95PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1521 | 5 | 100TiB | 20.74 | 2.52TiB |
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?