search

filecoin-project / filecoin-plus-large-datasets

Hub for client applications for DataCap at a large scale
109 stars 62 forks source link

[DataCap Application] <Shanghai Zhongyun Culture Media Co., Ltd.> #1476

Closed cici00000 closed 11 months ago

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

Data Owner Name

Shanghai Zhongyun Culture Media Co., Ltd

Data Owner Country/Region

China

Data Owner Industry

Information, Media & Telecommunications

Website

http://www.hjfcn.com/

Social Media

http://www.hjfcn.com/

Total amount of DataCap being requested

5PiB

Weekly allocation of DataCap requested

400TiB

On-chain address for first allocation

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

Custom multisig

Identifier

No response

Share a brief history of your project and organization

The Zhongyun media team comes from top creative talents at home and abroad
Average working experience more than 8 years
Both film and television planning, senior director, photography director, art director
Lighting director, visual effects director, 3D director, post-production, etc.
Whole-chain personnel covering production and creation
Won the praise of countless customers
we will never be satisfied with the status quo
Constantly surpass ourselves, achieve customers and achieve team value!

Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?

No

If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders

No response

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

Corporate video、Product promotional video、Brand film/TVC、MG animation、3D CG animation、short video etc.

Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from

My Own Storage Infra

If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

How do you plan to prepare the dataset

IPFS, lotus

If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

Please share a sample of the data

https://www.aliyundrive.com/s/YUoad6fPjYN
https://www.aliyundrive.com/s/ndCLng8Ah1c

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network

If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason

No response

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data

Yearly

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin

More than 3 years

In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals

Greater China, Asia other than Greater China

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers

Shipping hard drives

How do you plan to choose storage providers

Slack

If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use

No response

If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below

No response

How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers

Boost client, Lotus client

If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline

Yes

NewHuoPool commented 1 year ago

74283753cf80562a812180b6a9914ad The retrieval result is OK, willing to support this round.

NewHuoPool commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacebbdj2l2plgkecrcuqe6phvabis3xe2k5fgy4opoleszy4vkvip5q

Address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

Datacap Allocated

400.00TiB

Signer Address

f16karfxq7lxdy7izqrzrk75jf3not34k6sg6zvcy

Id

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebbdj2l2plgkecrcuqe6phvabis3xe2k5fgy4opoleszy4vkvip5q

Joss-Hua commented 1 year ago

look nice

Joss-Hua commented 1 year ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacecrvs5foffpr4pdkd7gh64yhmlejndtdyr73zxc6l77ug7eatpy4i

Address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

Datacap Allocated

400.00TiB

Signer Address

f1tfg54zzscugttejv336vivknmsnzzmyudp3t7wi

Id

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecrvs5foffpr4pdkd7gh64yhmlejndtdyr73zxc6l77ug7eatpy4i

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 4

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

DataCap allocation requested

1.56PiB

Id

533f9ac0-b63b-4a5f-a1b1-e632673176bc

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

400% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

1.56PiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

363797880709171445760.0YiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (5PiB)

363797880709171445760.0YiB

Stats

Number of deals Number of storage providers Previous DC Allocated Top provider Remaining DC
15917 5 400TiB 33.38 86.90TiB
sxxfuture-official commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Retrieval Statistics

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 57.57% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.

sxxfuture-official commented 1 year ago

@cici00000 According to the CID checker report, almost most of them look good, but there is one point that must be noted and resolved in the future: image Most of the data currently only has 1 replica, and I hope to urge different SPs to make up this part of the data as soon as possible.

I will support this time and continue to pay attention.

sxxfuture-official commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceaxqwm2xeex7l3uqm75wz2v4iue443cbgcmre3v7lsozqukg3rkwu

Address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

Datacap Allocated

1.56PiB

Signer Address

f1foiomqlmoshpuxm6aie4xysffqezkjnokgwcecq

Id

533f9ac0-b63b-4a5f-a1b1-e632673176bc

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaxqwm2xeex7l3uqm75wz2v4iue443cbgcmre3v7lsozqukg3rkwu

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

The success rate of the search looks OK

Retrieval Statistics Overall Graphsync retrieval success rate: 42.86% Overall HTTP retrieval success rate: 0.00% Overall Bitswap retrieval success rate: 0.00%

Need to pay attention to the dispersion of replicas

Deal Data Replication ⚠️ 57.57% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceb5lq2oi3k7bs32onlydc4ec3j44zodmmiwb3ai56chvj5wesq3p6

Address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

Datacap Allocated

1.56PiB

Signer Address

f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq

Id

533f9ac0-b63b-4a5f-a1b1-e632673176bc

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb5lq2oi3k7bs32onlydc4ec3j44zodmmiwb3ai56chvj5wesq3p6

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

It looks like there are some bugs that cause Proposed to appear twice at the same time

zcfil commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Retrieval Statistics

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 57.57% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.

zcfil commented 1 year ago

⚠️ 57.57% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers. May I ask how your next round of data is planned, and are there any more SPs that can be allocated?

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

⚠️ 57.57% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers. May I ask how your next round of data is planned, and are there any more SPs that can be allocated?

57.57% are stored in 4 SPs in compliance with FIL+ regulations. Our early estimate was to store 3-5 backups. Recently, many SPs do not have the willingness to add new packages, and we will work hard to find more SPs.

zcfil commented 1 year ago

66c2a9c138e5c80dea65084f6432a15 The retrieval is normal, and I hope to improve this issue as soon as possible. I support this round, but I will follow up on the data situation in the future.

zcfil commented 1 year ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacedkn6z7v6dqh66wqwtr6dumnpshq6pudhlr2d4x7yjawnwvoua2l2

Address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

Datacap Allocated

1.56PiB

Signer Address

f1cjzbiy5xd4ehera4wmbz63pd5ku4oo7g52cldga

Id

533f9ac0-b63b-4a5f-a1b1-e632673176bc

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedkn6z7v6dqh66wqwtr6dumnpshq6pudhlr2d4x7yjawnwvoua2l2

zcfil commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Retrieval Statistics

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 51.59% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

Still in the works, please keep it open. Thank you so much

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Seems not all your SP's are online. Can you check that please?

cat 1476-f02100442-f01261113-36458604-baga6ea4seaqo47thfwbcu54bxzv4nzzfswo2jksds3i23vul5bgn2ageru65mhy.log 2023-07-26T20:34:52.831+0200 WARN rpc go-jsonrpc@v0.3.1/client.go:615 unmarshaling failed {"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b:\n [/ip4/183.2.199.100/tcp/24001] failed to negotiate security protocol: peer id mismatch: expected 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b, but remote key matches 12D3KooWGz1oQXUbdLkVvBx1JoJSniCEiBQcZHH5HAQkA73Gm98W\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01261113\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01261113\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} 2023-07-26T20:34:52.831+0200 INFO retry retry/retry.go:17 Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' 2023-07-26T20:37:30.903+0200 WARN rpc go-jsonrpc@v0.3.1/client.go:615 unmarshaling failed {"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b:\n [/ip4/183.2.199.100/tcp/24001] failed to negotiate security protocol: peer id mismatch: expected 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b, but remote key matches 12D3KooWGz1oQXUbdLkVvBx1JoJSniCEiBQcZHH5HAQkA73Gm98W\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01261113\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01261113\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} 2023-07-26T20:37:30.903+0200 INFO retry retry/retry.go:17 Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' 2023-07-26T20:39:52.034+0200 WARN rpc go-jsonrpc@v0.3.1/client.go:615 unmarshaling failed {"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b:\n [/ip4/183.2.199.100/tcp/24001] failed to negotiate security protocol: peer id mismatch: expected 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b, but remote key matches 12D3KooWGz1oQXUbdLkVvBx1JoJSniCEiBQcZHH5HAQkA73Gm98W\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01261113\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01261113\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} 2023-07-26T20:39:52.034+0200 INFO retry retry/retry.go:17 Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' 2023-07-26T20:42:26.760+0200 WARN rpc go-jsonrpc@v0.3.1/client.go:615 unmarshaling failed {"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b:\n [/ip4/183.2.199.100/tcp/24001] failed to negotiate security protocol: peer id mismatch: expected 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b, but remote key matches 12D3KooWGz1oQXUbdLkVvBx1JoJSniCEiBQcZHH5HAQkA73Gm98W\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01261113\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01261113\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} 2023-07-26T20:42:26.760+0200 INFO retry retry/retry.go:17 Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' 2023-07-26T20:44:19.610+0200 WARN rpc go-jsonrpc@v0.3.1/client.go:615 unmarshaling failed {"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b:\n * [/ip4/183.2.199.100/tcp/24001] failed to negotiate security protocol: peer id mismatch: expected 12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b, but remote key matches 12D3KooWGz1oQXUbdLkVvBx1JoJSniCEiBQcZHH5HAQkA73Gm98W\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01261113\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01261113\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWSS2R7ABXxvHmJuU1nfNhpD5ZLho79NZhkuX5QCUvwg8b\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} 2023-07-26T20:44:19.610+0200 ERROR retry retry/retry.go:29 Failed after 5 attempts, last error: RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' ERROR: RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"'

Scherm­afbeelding 2023-07-28 om 14 39 53

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Good morning,

I managed to download some of your data and made it available through the link here:

http://datasetcreators.com/downloadedcarfiles/1476-f02100442-f01969746-49584005-baga6ea4seaqcygmsfnz5e2t3wuazfohmdnigbshopsxkxr5mo44sap757cl4gdi/

You stated that you would store : Corporate video、Product promotional video、Brand film/TVC、MG animation、3D CG animation、short video etc.

However i don't see that here. Please explain?

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Retrieval Statistics

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

-- Commented by Stale Bot.

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

keep it open

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Hello,

I have been downloading your data and made it available here:

http://www.datasetcreators.com/downloadedcarfiles/downloadedcarfiles/1476-f02100442-f01969746-49584005-baga6ea4seaqcygmsfnz5e2t3wuazfohmdnigbshopsxkxr5mo44sap757cl4gdi

This data does not match the data you indicated you were going to store?

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 5

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

DataCap allocation requested

1.56PiB

Id

d06e005e-4f4d-4d0d-ab58-3f99186cc471

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f172zurpjgt6a7kgjoka5q3e375zakyihqw5uhdia

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

400% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

1.56PiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

1.4528632164001472e+36YiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (5PiB)

1.4528632164001472e+36YiB

Stats

Number of deals Number of storage providers Previous DC Allocated Top provider Remaining DC
57738 10 1.56PiB 28.69 367.90TiB
cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Good morning,

I managed to download some of your data and made it available through the link here:

http://datasetcreators.com/downloadedcarfiles/1476-f02100442-f01969746-49584005-baga6ea4seaqcygmsfnz5e2t3wuazfohmdnigbshopsxkxr5mo44sap757cl4gdi/

You stated that you would store : Corporate video、Product promotional video、Brand film/TVC、MG animation、3D CG animation、short video etc.

However i don't see that here. Please explain?

Reminder.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

-- Commented by Stale Bot.

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

keep it open

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

-- Commented by Stale Bot.

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

keep it open

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

-- Commented by Stale Bot.

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 36.71% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.

Sunnyiscoming commented 1 year ago

Hello, @cici00000 per the https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/922 for Open, Public Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.

This information will be reviewed by Fil+ Governance team to confirm validity and then the application will be allowed to move forward for additional notary review.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

-- Commented by Stale Bot.

cici00000 commented 1 year ago

@Sunnyiscoming OK, I'll submit it as soon as possible, thank you

cici00000 commented 12 months ago

@Sunnyiscoming Already submitted, please confirm, thank you 20231113173921

herrehesse commented 12 months ago

also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.

ghost commented 11 months ago

SP list provided:

f01927252 | S&C | England | no | no f01932183 | TK | US | no | no f02274508 | H&W | HK | no | no f02127382 | IndeCom | AU | no | no f02145020 | Longcang | CN | no | no

ghost commented 11 months ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 11 months ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 40.50% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.

ghost commented 11 months ago

SPs taking deals: f01738789 | Osaka, Ōsaka, JPARTERIA Networks Corporation | 60.59 TiB | 2.73% | 60.59 TiB | 0.00% f0130556 | Guangzhou, Guangdong, CNChina Mobile communications corporation | 58.31 TiB | 2.63% | 58.31 TiB | 0.00% f01969746 | Beijing, Beijing, CNChina Unicom Beijing Province Network | 405.28 TiB | 18.25% | 405.22 TiB | 0.02% f02226869 | Nanchang, Jiangxi, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone | 490.22 TiB | 22.08% | 490.22 TiB | 0.00% f01261113new | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE | 313.97 TiB | 14.14% | 283.78 TiB | 9.61% f02059207 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE | 127.75 TiB | 5.75% | 127.75 TiB | 0.00% f01261218 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE | 8.31 TiB | 0.37% | 8.31 TiB | 0.00% f02329561 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKDREAM POWER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED | 244.25 TiB | 11.00% | 244.25 TiB | 0.00% f02121645new | Hanoi, Hanoi, VNDREAM POWER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED | 134.31 TiB | 6.05% | 134.31 TiB | 0.00% f02051716 | Seattle, Washington, USGTHost | 26.50 TiB | 1.19% | 26.50 TiB | 0.00% f02212982 | Santa Clara, California, USMajestic Hosting Solutions, LLC | 183.78 TiB | 8.28% | 183.78 TiB | 0.00% f02235190new | Warsaw, Mazovia, PLOVH SAS | 166.91 TiB | 7.52% | 166.91 TiB | 0.00%

SP list does not match. Closing until a clear list of SP entities and distribution is provided