Closed NDLABS-Leo closed 1 year ago
FYI, about the data replication on the checker report. Please pay attention to the final result rather than each allocation. The final result will be reasonable. Cause even though ND has sent backups to some SPs, each SP has its onboarding plan which ND cannot control.
@NDLABS-OFFICE - 5TB on 500TB is not an issue for me. What is an issue is the VPN use of most of your SP's. Can you give me a clear list with business names and locations of the SP's you work with?
Until it is all clear I suggest not to sign this application or its follow-ups.
@herrehesse Please check again, our joint sp is sure that no VPN has been used, the location seen in the check bot is the actual location of the computer room. May I ask what is the basis for judging the VPN of this software?
@NDLABS-OFFICE You are talking about the Los Angeles miner or the HK ones?
@herrehesse Like these, his report is 75% probability, but these are 100% sure not vpn
Hey, @herrehesse Just got in touch with Hidde on slack and with his help, I understand what you are saying. I got 100% confirmation from those SPs that they are not using VPN. Everyone knows that due to the policy issue within Mainland China, Most Chinese SPs migrated their CDN to another country and used the same ISP. Regarding the disclosure of node ownership, I am afraid that it cannot be fully disclosed. As the lead SP, I have a responsibility to protect the information of others. If these SPs participate in mining and are reported by some people, this is illegal. Also, More SPs will collaborate with ND in the next allocation.
The package is relatively healthy and supports retrieval. I am willing to support him
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebyvaba3vs5hrrebbhznsyjxq32lob5ncu2e3wejsdyqihrex6owm
Address
f1q6rat3ob7c56ea4hghcj7fkgmjvmqo2lammjxvy
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1q6bpjlqia6iemqbrdaxr2uehrhpvoju3qh4lpga
Id
fb23b6f6-0776-4834-b2ea-a1659bbb4c57
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebyvaba3vs5hrrebbhznsyjxq32lob5ncu2e3wejsdyqihrex6owm
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedi7p57tvcsea4nlkm7xaw34oywnivmd7co3cbiax27b4nra2pyys
Address
f1q6rat3ob7c56ea4hghcj7fkgmjvmqo2lammjxvy
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1fg6jkxsr3twfnyhdlatmq36xca6sshptscds7xa
Id
fb23b6f6-0776-4834-b2ea-a1659bbb4c57
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedi7p57tvcsea4nlkm7xaw34oywnivmd7co3cbiax27b4nra2pyys
@Tom-OriginStorage As stated during multiple governance calls you were asked not to sign any applications, and first do your due diligence on 50 new applications. I am surprised to see you signing this application and would kindly suggest to revert your signature.
Due diligence is not what you performed and your statement "The package is relatively healthy and supports retrieval. I am willing to support him" is not sufficient.
For transparency tagging: @cryptowhizzard @raghavrmadya @dkkapur @galen-mcandrew @Sunnyiscoming
@herrehesse For #811 Origin Storage has given a sufficient explanation and has been recognized by everyone. We have confirmed that we can carry out new signatures. Origin Storage has the obligation and responsibility to participate in what the notary should do, just like what we said before Regarding the compliance and inspection of LDN, Origin Storage will continue to conduct inspections according to the rules. Origin Storage also summarizes some inspection methods and tools, which we will share for everyone to use later.
So you can confirm yourself that "We can carry out new signatures." that seems highly inappropriate. You indeed had the "obligation and responsibility" to act as a notary which you used to an extreme amount of abusive behaviour.
"Origin Storage will continue to conduct inspections according to the rules" to 50 applications without signing to prove to the community that you are not bad actors.
Proof this, then sign. Trust has to be earned and is not given. Unfortunately @YuanHeHK signed so you can not remove your signature anymore.
@herrehesse @Tom-OriginStorage Let's conclude at the notary meeting.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 78.78% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
f01858410
f1q6rat3ob7c56ea4hghcj7fkgmjvmqo2lammjxvy
1.95PiB
da1248d9-0e33-4510-a8b7-67efb110c50a
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 79.39% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
This SP has a problem that cannot be retrieved. The rest looks good
@xiaoyuaiheshui It may be a network problem, this node supports retrieval
@xiaoyuaiheshui you can try again.
lotus client retrieval-ask f01985611 bafykbzaceb4h6cqr7dv4tx4iwy6n7uocul52jp7gz7okwz6iggrrkh5tdidk6
Ok, I'll try again. Come back later.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebvfa7a7drmyh3aiz5be33ihzhkgem7fknndiea5tmgv3q7ruzasa
Address
f1q6rat3ob7c56ea4hghcj7fkgmjvmqo2lammjxvy
Datacap Allocated
1.95PiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
Id
da1248d9-0e33-4510-a8b7-67efb110c50a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebvfa7a7drmyh3aiz5be33ihzhkgem7fknndiea5tmgv3q7ruzasa
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedhcslfxsqrjwsn65vcy63calf7erdl3qipicc3gulx7cyzbs3nn6
Address
f1q6rat3ob7c56ea4hghcj7fkgmjvmqo2lammjxvy
Datacap Allocated
1.95PiB
Signer Address
f122qmy25wdtt5mxd77kndiq7z5x2n3iwiuz2wdsa
Id
da1248d9-0e33-4510-a8b7-67efb110c50a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedhcslfxsqrjwsn65vcy63calf7erdl3qipicc3gulx7cyzbs3nn6
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 82.59% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Hi community members and notaries, FYI, here are clarifying data replication: Cause the SPs we cooperate with are located in different areas and their onboarding speed is not in line. The report of data replication will be back to normal when they finish the all data sealing.
During our regular check, there was some CID sharing between some LDNs that we are not aware of. We have located the mistaken SPs (f02000936&f02006374) requiring them to stop data onboarding and hopefully give the solution for this mistake they made. until then, we will not send deals to them. ND has always followed the community's norms to be open and transparent. It is difficult for us to fully guarantee technical issues caused by other SPs. We also kindly wish the notary to support our storage project.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaced6i2uhyyauuctsh5isjsn6rw5i7btr6jof7coatzocj3o6pdodqa
Address
f1q6rat3ob7c56ea4hghcj7fkgmjvmqo2lammjxvy
Datacap Allocated
1.95PiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
da1248d9-0e33-4510-a8b7-67efb110c50a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced6i2uhyyauuctsh5isjsn6rw5i7btr6jof7coatzocj3o6pdodqa
Hi community members and notaries, FYI, here are clarifying data replication: Cause the SPs we cooperate with are located in different areas and their onboarding speed is not in line. The report of data replication will be back to normal when they finish the all data sealing.
During our regular check, there was some CID sharing between some LDNs that we are not aware of. We have located the mistaken SPs (f02000936&f02006374) requiring them to stop data onboarding and hopefully give the solution for this mistake they made. until then, we will not send deals to them. ND has always followed the community's norms to be open and transparent. It is difficult for us to fully guarantee technical issues caused by other SPs. We also kindly wish the notary to support our storage project.
Looking forward to the results.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 79.27% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Based on the CID checker and the responses in the comments, I support this round and look forward to changes in subsequent allocation plans.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebprbmntkk7zkdd3x5i6mbg5s2lepbyivz3j2qqy4z355pp72l2to
Address
f1q6rat3ob7c56ea4hghcj7fkgmjvmqo2lammjxvy
Datacap Allocated
1.95PiB
Signer Address
f1pszcrsciyixyuxxukkvtazcokexbn54amf7gvoq
Id
da1248d9-0e33-4510-a8b7-67efb110c50a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebprbmntkk7zkdd3x5i6mbg5s2lepbyivz3j2qqy4z355pp72l2to
This user’s identity has been verified through filplus.storage
Data Owner Name
NDLABS
Data Owner Country/Region
Singapore
Data Owner Industry
Life Science / Healthcare
Website
https://www.ndlabs.io/#/
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
5PiB
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
500TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1q6rat3ob7c56ea4hghcj7fkgmjvmqo2lammjxvy
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
Yes
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
How do you plan to prepare the dataset
IPFS, lotus
If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
years
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
1 to 1.5 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
Cloud storage (i.e. S3), HTTP or FTP server, IPFS, Shipping hard drives, Lotus built-in data transfer
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Filmine, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Lotus client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes