[DataCap Application] Nebula Block - Common Crawl[1/10]

bq1024 commented 1 year ago

Data Owner Name

Nebula Block

Data Owner Country/Region

Canada

Data Owner Industry

Web3 / Crypto

Website

https://www.nebulablock.com/

Social Media

https://twitter.com/nbfsdata 
https://www.linkedin.com/company/nebula-block/ 
https://medium.com/@nbdata

Total amount of DataCap being requested

5PiB

Weekly allocation of DataCap requested

100TiB

On-chain address for first allocation

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Custom multisig

[ ] Use Custom Multisig

Identifier

No response

Share a brief history of your project and organization

As a data center services provider and blockchain practitioner, Nebula Block is one of the earliest participants in the Filecoin ecosystem in North America and has been contributing to the Filecoin network and ecosystem since 2020. We were selected as minerX fellow, participated in early-stage testing, participated in slingshot v2 and v3, helped improve louts and support with ecosystem projects like Filmine, Estuary, and FilSwan. Nebula Block is also in charge of this dataset storage and deal preparation in slingshot v3.

Currently, Nebula block is one of the biggest web3 hosting providers in North America, which works with 4 data centers across the world, and hosts more than 3000 servers with 700 PiB storage.

Nebula Block is seeking to onboard data to meet the high demand of FIL+ for itself and its partners.

Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?

No

If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders

No response

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

The Common Crawl corpus contains petabytes of data collected since 2008. It contains raw web page data, extracted metadata, and text extractions.

Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from

AWS Cloud

If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

How do you plan to prepare the dataset

singularity, others/custom tool

If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here

We will use multiple tools to prepare the dataset, such as singularity and go-swan-client. https://github.com/filswan/go-swan-client

Please share a sample of the data

https://download2.nbfsdata.com/CC-MAIN-2022-27-out/baga6ea4seaqpzzxy6qvb6f7mhazdycsgn6qocu6uz7gzsw7l2py7dgdjlk4f2ay.car

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network

[X] I confirm

If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason

No response

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data

Monthly

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin

2 to 3 years

In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals

Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, Africa, North America, South America, Europe, Australia (continent), Antarctica

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers

HTTP or FTP server, IPFS

How do you plan to choose storage providers

Others

If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use

We will create auto-bid tasks on the FilSwan platform, and the platform will help up find suitable storage providers based on its reputation system (https://docs.filswan.com/filswan-platform/overview/reputation-system)

If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below

Some storage providers registered on the FilSwan platform and accepting auto-bid deals are as follows:
f010088
f02301
f08399
f047419
f0187709
f01163272
f01402814
f0240185
f0143858
f0408717
f01225882
f0717969
f01211558
f03223
f01801091
f0240456
f032824
f01931631
f01907556
f01877184
f02003005

How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers

Others/custom tool

If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here

We will use go-swan-client to make deals. https://github.com/filswan/go-swan-client

Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline

Yes

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

simonkim0515 commented 1 year ago

Datacap Request Trigger

Total DataCap requested

5PiB

Expected weekly DataCap usage rate

100TiB

Client address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

DataCap allocation requested

50TiB

Id

5b08dc6b-cc9a-4d50-9788-4095dcd74895

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

There is no previous allocation for this issue.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

kernelogic commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacedry3swy5ntppw455zruumhbufao2xqevzruvj2tmudbmhsdrucgw

Address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Datacap Allocated

50.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

Id

5b08dc6b-cc9a-4d50-9788-4095dcd74895

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedry3swy5ntppw455zruumhbufao2xqevzruvj2tmudbmhsdrucgw

kernelogic commented 1 year ago

FilSwan/Nebula is long time community participant. Willing to support whole series.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceaa7iqsjzhsh7bc6ft6vupczpzpph4ya6e7um4vk2wqj7kvuvk3gi

Address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Datacap Allocated

50.00TiB

Signer Address

f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa

Id

5b08dc6b-cc9a-4d50-9788-4095dcd74895

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaa7iqsjzhsh7bc6ft6vupczpzpph4ya6e7um4vk2wqj7kvuvk3gi

filplusapp commented 1 year ago

Dear Applicant,

Due to the increased amount of erroneous/wrong Filecoin+ data recently, on behalf of the entire community, we feel compelled to go deeper into datacap requests. Hereby to ensure that the overall value of the Filecoin network and Filecoin+ program increases and is not abused.

Please answer the questions below as comprehensively as possible.

Customer data

Could you demonstrate exactly how and to what extent customer contact occurred? We expect that for the onboarding of customers with the scale of an LDN there would have been at least multiple email and perhaps several chat conversations preceding it. A single email with an agreement does not qualify here.

Did the customer specify the amount of data involved in this relevant correspondence?

Why does the customer in question want to use the Filecoin+ program?

Should this only be soley for acquiring datacap this is of course out of the question. The customer must have a legitimate reason for wanting to use the Filecoin+ program which is intended as a program to store useful and public datasets on the network.

Why is the customer data considered Filecoin+ eligible? (As an intermediate solution Filecoin offers the FIL-E program or the glif.io website for business datasets that do not meet the requirements for a Filecoin+ dataset)

Files and Processing

Could you please demonstrate to us how you envision processing and transporting the customer data in question to any location for preparation? Would you demonstrate to us that the customer, the preparer and the intended storage providers all have adequate bandwidth to process the set with its corresponding size? Would you tell us how the data set preparer takes into account the prevention of duplicates in order to prevent data cap abuse? Hopefully you understand the caution the overall community has for onboarding the wrong data. We understand the increased need for Filecoin+, however, we must not allow the program to be misused. Everything depends on a valuable and useful network, let's do our best to make this happen. Together.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Schermafbeelding 2023-02-07 om 10 41 13

filplusapp commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NebulaBlock
Client: f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi
Approvers

1cryptowhizzard
1kernelogic

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

Storage provider should not exceed 70% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ f01946551 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA `Astute Hosting Inc.`	2.78 TiB	15.59%	2.78 TiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US `AT&T Services, Inc.`	128.00 GiB	0.70%	128.00 GiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE `Deutsche Telekom AG`	1.44 TiB	8.06%	1.44 TiB	0.00%
f01907556	Sharjah, Sharjah, AE `Emirates Telecommunications Corporation`	576.00 GiB	3.15%	576.00 GiB	0.00%
f01443744	Leipzig, Saxony, DE `Hetzner Online GmbH`	448.00 GiB	2.45%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US `Isomedia, Inc.`	1.00 TiB	5.60%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US `Krypt Technologies`	2.53 TiB	14.19%	2.53 TiB	0.00%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU `MTS PJSC`	2.88 TiB	16.11%	2.88 TiB	0.00%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU `PJSC Rostelecom`	2.94 TiB	16.46%	2.94 TiB	0.00%
f010088	Kirkland, Washington, US `Wholesail networks LLC`	2.44 TiB	13.66%	2.44 TiB	0.00%
f01946551	Unknown `Unknown`	736.00 GiB	4.03%	736.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

No more than 70% of unique data are stored with less than 3 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
192.00 GiB	192.00 GiB	1	1.05%
288.00 GiB	576.00 GiB	2	3.15%
256.00 GiB	768.00 GiB	3	4.20%
1.09 TiB	4.38 TiB	4	24.52%
1.38 TiB	6.88 TiB	5	38.53%
608.00 GiB	3.56 TiB	6	19.96%
224.00 GiB	1.53 TiB	7	8.58%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplusapp commented 1 year ago

lotus client retrieve --provider f08399 --pieceCid baga6ea4seaqpzmmxzhonpqfsdttx3lrmzpvjz3s7rmlr45veqel36r6of6wncei mAXASIDDFymrK2x7SfC17PQJNVPFmPlke4Im63A+z6v5x8ISx test.file Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, Open (New), 0s Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptance), 3ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealRejected (RetryLegacy), 263ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptanceLegacy), 267ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealRejected (Rejecting), 497ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, BlockstoreFinalized (Rejected), 497ms ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Rejected: deal rejected: miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

herrehesse commented 1 year ago

@filplusapp - What is your name on the Filecoin Slack? Love to talk to you!

Carohere commented 1 year ago

ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Rejected: deal rejected: miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

@bq1024 as the earliest member of Filecoin, i think you are well aware that all miners should be reachable. Please contact the sp above and update when it gets fixed. @cryptowhizzard @herrehesse, i don't understand your role in this application. Is speedium involved somehow?

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Rejected: deal rejected: miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

@bq1024 as the earliest member of Filecoin, i think you are well aware that all miners should be reachable. Please contact the sp above and update when it gets fixed. @cryptowhizzard @herrehesse, i don't understand your role in this application. Is speedium involved somehow?

No, none whatsoever

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 2

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

DataCap allocation requested

100TiB

Id

a2e144a5-4520-4dbb-af19-70f3c36a3d01

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Last two approvers

cryptowhizzard & kernelogic

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

100% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

100TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

50TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (5PiB)

4.95PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
1152	15	50TiB	14.15	8TiB

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NebulaBlock
Client: f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi
Approvers

1cryptowhizzard
1kernelogic

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

Storage provider should not exceed 70% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ f01946551 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA `Astute Hosting Inc.`	4.91 TiB	14.04%	4.91 TiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US `AT&T Services, Inc.`	320.00 GiB	0.89%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN `CHINANET-BACKBONE`	1.53 TiB	4.38%	1.53 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE `Deutsche Telekom AG`	3.13 TiB	8.94%	3.13 TiB	0.00%
f01907556	Sharjah, Sharjah, AE `Emirates Telecommunications Corporation`	1.31 TiB	3.76%	1.31 TiB	0.00%
f01443744	Leipzig, Saxony, DE `Hetzner Online GmbH`	480.00 GiB	1.34%	480.00 GiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US `Isomedia, Inc.`	1.63 TiB	4.65%	1.63 TiB	0.00%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US `Krypt Technologies`	4.53 TiB	12.97%	4.53 TiB	0.00%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU `MTS PJSC`	5.09 TiB	14.58%	5.09 TiB	0.00%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU `PJSC Rostelecom`	4.91 TiB	14.04%	4.91 TiB	0.00%
f02012951	Vilnius, Vilnius, LT `Telia Lietuva, AB`	3.06 TiB	8.77%	3.06 TiB	0.00%
f010088	Kirkland, Washington, US `Wholesail networks LLC`	2.69 TiB	7.69%	2.69 TiB	0.00%
f01946551	Unknown `Unknown`	1.38 TiB	3.94%	1.38 TiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

No more than 70% of unique data are stored with less than 3 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
512.00 GiB	512.00 GiB	1	1.43%
224.00 GiB	448.00 GiB	2	1.25%
256.00 GiB	768.00 GiB	3	2.15%
1.66 TiB	6.63 TiB	4	18.96%
2.44 TiB	12.19 TiB	5	34.88%
1.44 TiB	8.63 TiB	6	24.69%
704.00 GiB	4.81 TiB	7	13.77%
128.00 GiB	1.00 TiB	8	2.86%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

bq1024 commented 1 year ago

lotus client retrieve --provider f08399 --pieceCid baga6ea4seaqpzmmxzhonpqfsdttx3lrmzpvjz3s7rmlr45veqel36r6of6wncei mAXASIDDFymrK2x7SfC17PQJNVPFmPlke4Im63A+z6v5x8ISx test.file

I contacted the SP and the issue is fixed.

filplusapp commented 1 year ago

lotus net connect f01946551 f01946551 -> {12D3KooWRj5hM6KtShBNnKHNFbfEghZ4XHgGhAPoRUd5TvyW8Yw5: []} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f01946551": must begin with /

claydrone commented 1 year ago

i think Nebula Block can add send deals to more SPs as a supplemental of FilSwan Engine. Maybe allocated 3 copies in some fixed SPs as the primary SPs while others as redundant SPs

claydrone commented 1 year ago

client retrieve --provider f08399 --pieceCid baga6ea4seaqpzmmxzhonpqfsdttx3lrmzpvjz3s7rmlr45veqel36r6of6wncei mAXASIDDFymrK2x7SfC17PQJNVPFmPlke4Im63A+z6v5x8ISx test.file Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, Open (New), 18ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptance), 45ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealAccepted (Accepted), 896ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, PaymentChannelSkip (Ongoing), 903ms Recv 60 B, Paid 0 FIL, BlocksReceived (Ongoing), 928ms Recv 128 B, Paid 0 FIL, BlocksReceived (Ongoing), 944ms Recv 184 B, Paid 0 FIL, BlocksReceived (Ongoing), 957ms Recv 1.827 KiB, Paid 0 FIL, BlocksReceived (Ongoing), 972ms Recv 1.94 KiB, Paid 0 FIL, BlocksReceived (Ongoing), 986ms Recv 51.95 KiB, Paid 0 FIL, BlocksReceived (Ongoing), 1.034s Recv 1.051 MiB, Paid 0 FIL, BlocksReceived (Ongoing), 1.757s Recv 2.051 MiB, Paid 0 FIL, BlocksReceived (Ongoing), 2.133s

works for me

lotus client retrieve --provider f08399 --pieceCid baga6ea4seaqpzmmxzhonpqfsdttx3lrmzpvjz3s7rmlr45veqel36r6of6wncei mAXASIDDFymrK2x7SfC17PQJNVPFmPlke4Im63A+z6v5x8ISx test.file Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, Open (New), 0s Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptance), 3ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealRejected (RetryLegacy), 263ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptanceLegacy), 267ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealRejected (Rejecting), 497ms Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, BlockstoreFinalized (Rejected), 497ms ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Rejected: deal rejected: miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

Carohere commented 1 year ago

@claydrone no offence, but you work for Nebula block. A second opinion would be more neutral, could @cryptowhizzard @herrehesse you guys take a look?

lvschouwen commented 1 year ago

I got a different reply from f08399 now ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Rejected: deal rejected: Deal rejected | Too many retrieval deals received, retry later

Another miner not really working f03624 ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Rejected: deal rejected: miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

Currently retrieving a deal from miner f01443744 and Ill report once done.

bq1024 commented 1 year ago

I got a different reply from f08399 now ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Rejected: deal rejected: Deal rejected | Too many retrieval deals received, retry later

Another miner not really working f03624 ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Rejected: deal rejected: miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

Currently retrieving a deal from miner f01443744 and Ill report once done.

f08399 and f03624 are able to retrieve now. Filswan cannot guarantee that all deals are retrievable from SP currently, however, if there are any retrieval issues, we will do our best to contact and help SP resolve them.

flyworker commented 1 year ago

miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

@bq1024 is the information from Lotus, boost or other 3rd party software?

claydrone commented 1 year ago

owo 9:40 AM my new SP is f03624, Please activate it. thank you @ribasushi - PLFD

found this on slack, we can talk to him if needed, but still it is not part of the Filecoin Protocol consensus at the moment

bq1024 commented 1 year ago

miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

miner is not accepting online retrieval deals

@bq1024 is the information from Lotus, boost or other 3rd party software?

I believe it's from Lotus.

flyworker commented 1 year ago

So people shut it down by purpose.

nj-steve commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers have unknown IP location - f01946551

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the full report.

nj-steve commented 1 year ago

Please tell us where is the ip address of the provider id f01946551.

bq1024 commented 1 year ago

Please tell us where is the ip address of the provider id f01946551.

Thanks for asking! Please refer to https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1530#issuecomment-1458366486

kernelogic commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacecouwm57h7xbes4l3epbraqleugrtzxmqcupbjhzx43e6zxlzf63w

Address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Datacap Allocated

100.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

Id

a2e144a5-4520-4dbb-af19-70f3c36a3d01

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecouwm57h7xbes4l3epbraqleugrtzxmqcupbjhzx43e6zxlzf63w

xinaxu commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaced7iqiev365yfijaovkxw6ms2emkfjdq3ueobicm3ag55edv4leaw

Address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Datacap Allocated

100.00TiB

Signer Address

f1k3ysofkrrmqcot6fkx4wnezpczlltpirmrpsgui

Id

a2e144a5-4520-4dbb-af19-70f3c36a3d01

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced7iqiev365yfijaovkxw6ms2emkfjdq3ueobicm3ag55edv4leaw

IreneYoung commented 1 year ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacedksqgptarzhnpcaz3msysjb5h4rfdehjigcsbnp5bw7jdjy5jvni

Address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Datacap Allocated

100.00TiB

Signer Address

f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq

Id

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedksqgptarzhnpcaz3msysjb5h4rfdehjigcsbnp5bw7jdjy5jvni

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

We have found some problems in the information provided in the Approved Comment. We could not find Id** field in the information provided

Please, take a look at the comment and edit the body of the comment providing all the required information.

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

We have found some problems in the information provided in the Approved Comment. We could not find Id** field in the information provided

Please, take a look at the comment and edit the body of the comment providing all the required information.

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 3

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

Id

5ed9e26a-a964-40bf-92ea-957f5373495b

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Last two approvers

IreneYoung & xinaxu

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

200% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

50TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (5PiB)

4.95PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
1525	17	100TiB	12	0B

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the full report.

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the full report.

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the full report.

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

https://filecoin.tools/f02011204

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceb56j4uxuzvcusrvdm4fyxb5xjsisfn2g4a4nztoihjxryjwhewae

Address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Datacap Allocated

200.00TiB

Signer Address

f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq

Id

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb56j4uxuzvcusrvdm4fyxb5xjsisfn2g4a4nztoihjxryjwhewae

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacec472zk4ojtyc4ex5n5w3oz5g7ykz7roxhacjr6c3ly6spnigg2eg

Address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Datacap Allocated

200.00TiB

Signer Address

f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq

Id

5ed9e26a-a964-40bf-92ea-957f5373495b

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec472zk4ojtyc4ex5n5w3oz5g7ykz7roxhacjr6c3ly6spnigg2eg

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

Looks like a bug was triggered 😅

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 3

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

Id

59683d1e-45ae-4986-9cd6-5b58bd241e03

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f1dxad75jyyqlemexfwbvhbnwundz4sxeu2dza6gi

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

200% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

9094.9YiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (5PiB)

-1.09B

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
1863	5	100TiB	30.76	18.21TiB

filecoin-project / filecoin-plus-large-datasets