Closed cryptowhizzard closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request!
Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
(Proposal https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1482 is broken this is a re-apply of that request)
5PiB
500TiB
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
f02049625
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
250TiB
e29f9f49-300c-480e-a37d-5d7d325cbfa2
There is no previous allocation for this issue.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacec5vdqxhm7d5nyngjqcy3iyudms25y5ekm7e2gvjkcjjog3p4dwqg
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
250.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
Id
e29f9f49-300c-480e-a37d-5d7d325cbfa2
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec5vdqxhm7d5nyngjqcy3iyudms25y5ekm7e2gvjkcjjog3p4dwqg
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedir4wepesekcm726k5ex6sdurnmycs6kfkoivpe32eo6zt3s3aua
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
250.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
e29f9f49-300c-480e-a37d-5d7d325cbfa2
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedir4wepesekcm726k5ex6sdurnmycs6kfkoivpe32eo6zt3s3aua
f02049625
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
500TiB
4dae2fb2-ee7e-4a07-a78d-089338bb7844
f01858410
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
kernelogic & megtei
100% of weekly dc amount requested
500TiB
32GiB
4.99PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 250TiB | 0 | 42.49GiB |
Speedium network
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
1
kernelogic1
mjroddy
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 28.03% of total deal sealed by f022352 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 21.61% of total deal sealed by f0855584 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 68.57% of total deal sealed by f01385207 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.12% of total deal sealed by f01199430 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 41.64% of total deal sealed by f01720359 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.24% of total deal sealed by f01771403 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 31.56% of total deal sealed by f01937642 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NOBlix Solutions AS |
326.11 TiB | 8.04% | 234.70 TiB | 28.03% |
f01240218new |
Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. |
53.88 TiB | 1.33% | 53.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01907545 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
145.06 TiB | 3.57% | 145.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f01989866new |
Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
63.84 TiB | 1.57% | 63.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f01901765 | Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
674.61 TiB | 16.62% | 674.61 TiB | 0.00% |
f01906874new |
Plano, Texas, USCogent Communications |
225.58 TiB | 5.56% | 225.58 TiB | 0.00% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
216.68 TiB | 5.34% | 213.55 TiB | 1.45% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NLFusix Networks B.V. |
360.85 TiB | 8.89% | 352.12 TiB | 2.42% |
f01926686 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNJiangxi Jiujiang IDC |
86.74 TiB | 2.14% | 86.74 TiB | 0.00% |
f01908299new |
Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
216.69 TiB | 5.34% | 174.74 TiB | 19.36% |
f0855584 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
211.97 TiB | 5.22% | 166.16 TiB | 21.61% |
f01091851 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
151.74 TiB | 3.74% | 151.74 TiB | 0.00% |
f01736668new |
Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
128.75 TiB | 3.17% | 128.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f01385207 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
1.09 TiB | 0.03% | 352.00 GiB | 68.57% |
f01933917 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
449.09 TiB | 11.07% | 447.77 TiB | 0.29% |
f01926635 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
296.30 TiB | 7.30% | 296.30 TiB | 0.00% |
f01885088 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
130.97 TiB | 3.23% | 130.97 TiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
113.86 TiB | 2.81% | 56.80 TiB | 50.12% |
f01720359 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
95.00 TiB | 2.34% | 55.44 TiB | 41.64% |
f01786387 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
89.79 TiB | 2.21% | 89.79 TiB | 0.00% |
f01771403 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
10.56 TiB | 0.26% | 4.09 TiB | 61.24% |
f01937642 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
9.41 TiB | 0.23% | 6.44 TiB | 31.56% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 3rd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
49.67 TiB | 50.08 TiB | 1 | 1.23% |
198.93 TiB | 399.30 TiB | 2 | 9.84% |
99.62 TiB | 301.56 TiB | 3 | 7.43% |
128.73 TiB | 517.63 TiB | 4 | 12.75% |
145.50 TiB | 730.29 TiB | 5 | 17.99% |
114.63 TiB | 690.66 TiB | 6 | 17.02% |
55.58 TiB | 397.41 TiB | 7 | 9.79% |
42.83 TiB | 374.53 TiB | 8 | 9.23% |
20.95 TiB | 243.77 TiB | 9 | 6.01% |
13.31 TiB | 231.72 TiB | 10 | 5.71% |
1.75 TiB | 79.44 TiB | 11 | 1.96% |
800.00 GiB | 38.72 TiB | 12 | 0.95% |
64.00 GiB | 3.47 TiB | 13 | 0.09% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceavbwx6xdbbsbllkyuow2cmiu4276sd5yvf7jaldu7szmmp72iylk
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1k3ysofkrrmqcot6fkx4wnezpczlltpirmrpsgui
Id
4dae2fb2-ee7e-4a07-a78d-089338bb7844
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceavbwx6xdbbsbllkyuow2cmiu4276sd5yvf7jaldu7szmmp72iylk
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb2b3dnsa5m7aagr2dgtw64qwia27cg3iiazua7rdni7ky2olrmt2
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
Id
4dae2fb2-ee7e-4a07-a78d-089338bb7844
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb2b3dnsa5m7aagr2dgtw64qwia27cg3iiazua7rdni7ky2olrmt2
f02049625
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
1000.0TiB
ed574fb9-8130-4fdf-83a5-8687e45b9595
f01858410
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
megtei & xinaxu
200% of weekly dc amount requested
1000.0TiB
4.26PiB
750.01TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
160661 | 22 | 500TiB | 15.68 | 10.49GiB |
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
1
kernelogic2
mjroddy1
xinaxu
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 28.03% of total deal sealed by f022352 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 21.61% of total deal sealed by f0855584 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 68.57% of total deal sealed by f01385207 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.12% of total deal sealed by f01199430 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 41.64% of total deal sealed by f01720359 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.24% of total deal sealed by f01771403 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 31.56% of total deal sealed by f01937642 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NOBlix Solutions AS |
326.11 TiB | 7.57% | 234.70 TiB | 28.03% |
f01240218new |
Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. |
53.88 TiB | 1.25% | 53.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01907545 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
145.06 TiB | 3.37% | 145.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f01989866new |
Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
63.84 TiB | 1.48% | 63.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f01901765 | Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
674.61 TiB | 15.67% | 674.61 TiB | 0.00% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
231.48 TiB | 5.38% | 228.34 TiB | 1.36% |
f01906874new |
Plano, Texas, USCogent Communications |
225.58 TiB | 5.24% | 225.58 TiB | 0.00% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NLFusix Networks B.V. |
373.30 TiB | 8.67% | 363.88 TiB | 2.52% |
f01926686 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNJiangxi Jiujiang IDC |
152.20 TiB | 3.53% | 152.20 TiB | 0.00% |
f01908299new |
Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
216.69 TiB | 5.03% | 174.74 TiB | 19.36% |
f0855584 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
211.97 TiB | 4.92% | 166.16 TiB | 21.61% |
f01091851 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
151.74 TiB | 3.52% | 151.74 TiB | 0.00% |
f01736668new |
Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
128.75 TiB | 2.99% | 128.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f01385207 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
1.09 TiB | 0.03% | 352.00 GiB | 68.57% |
f01933917 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
523.11 TiB | 12.15% | 521.80 TiB | 0.25% |
f01926635 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
377.14 TiB | 8.76% | 377.14 TiB | 0.00% |
f01885088 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
130.97 TiB | 3.04% | 130.97 TiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
113.86 TiB | 2.64% | 56.80 TiB | 50.12% |
f01720359 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
95.00 TiB | 2.21% | 55.44 TiB | 41.64% |
f01786387 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
89.79 TiB | 2.09% | 89.79 TiB | 0.00% |
f01771403 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
10.56 TiB | 0.25% | 4.09 TiB | 61.24% |
f01937642 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
9.41 TiB | 0.22% | 6.44 TiB | 31.56% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
44.10 TiB | 44.48 TiB | 1 | 1.03% |
144.05 TiB | 289.10 TiB | 2 | 6.71% |
85.09 TiB | 256.23 TiB | 3 | 5.95% |
139.98 TiB | 561.96 TiB | 4 | 13.05% |
177.57 TiB | 892.37 TiB | 5 | 20.72% |
137.78 TiB | 830.95 TiB | 6 | 19.30% |
63.77 TiB | 455.16 TiB | 7 | 10.57% |
43.36 TiB | 378.78 TiB | 8 | 8.80% |
20.95 TiB | 243.77 TiB | 9 | 5.66% |
13.31 TiB | 231.72 TiB | 10 | 5.38% |
1.75 TiB | 79.44 TiB | 11 | 1.84% |
800.00 GiB | 38.72 TiB | 12 | 0.90% |
64.00 GiB | 3.47 TiB | 13 | 0.08% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Greeting! The geographic distribution of Data looks good to me. Can you share your plan on the number of duplicates and the size in Datacap of a single copy?
Hello @xingjitansuo ! Thank you for your question.
Initially we have stored a bunch of CID duplicates due to bugs in singularity (#487). This has now been resolved by PL and our database has been purged of any duplicate CID records.
The plan is to distribute 10 to 12 full copies of the dataset, which comprises 500 TiB of carfiles. To store all of these files, approximately 900 TiB of datacap is needed per copy.
The total datacap required for 12 copies is 10.8 PiB, with the third tranche serving as a backup for any errors or duplicates and for the possibility of an SP slashing sectors. It should be noted that any unused datacap will not be refunded to our wallet. Measures will be taken to ensure that all copies are stored on-chain and the datacap from the third tranche will be reclaimed upon completion if not used.
Let me know if I can answer some more questions! Here to help.
@herrehesse you can use lotus filplus remove-expired-allocations
command to recover DC caused by expiration (slashed I'm not sure).
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaqujljuzezaq5kjm7tw47tftpxkpfyir6txsnhb3xllchzoocrrc
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
ed574fb9-8130-4fdf-83a5-8687e45b9595
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaqujljuzezaq5kjm7tw47tftpxkpfyir6txsnhb3xllchzoocrrc
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacea3d4iybdstghk4vs6ttbppv3fckfaskz663nljjsw5c3f6pmnaka
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
Id
ed574fb9-8130-4fdf-83a5-8687e45b9595
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacea3d4iybdstghk4vs6ttbppv3fckfaskz663nljjsw5c3f6pmnaka
f02049625
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
1.95PiB
3bf7d37c-3877-4107-a6be-883d4c7f40df
f01858410
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
megtei & kernelogic
400% of weekly dc amount requested
1.95PiB
5.73PiB
-824622725715722B
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
202025 | 26 | 1000.0TiB | 12.86 | 230.99TiB |
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
2
kernelogic3
mjroddy1
xinaxu
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 28.03% of total deal sealed by f022352 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 21.64% of total deal sealed by f0855584 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 68.57% of total deal sealed by f01385207 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.12% of total deal sealed by f01199430 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 41.64% of total deal sealed by f01720359 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.24% of total deal sealed by f01771403 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 31.56% of total deal sealed by f01937642 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NOBlix Solutions AS |
326.11 TiB | 6.02% | 234.70 TiB | 28.03% |
f01240218new |
Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. |
53.88 TiB | 0.99% | 53.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01907545 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
228.25 TiB | 4.21% | 228.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01989866new |
Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
63.84 TiB | 1.18% | 63.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f01901765 | Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
674.61 TiB | 12.44% | 674.61 TiB | 0.00% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
261.51 TiB | 4.82% | 254.12 TiB | 2.83% |
f01906874new |
Plano, Texas, USCogent Communications |
225.58 TiB | 4.16% | 225.58 TiB | 0.00% |
f01992630 | Dallas, Texas, USFlexential Colorado Corp. |
224.96 TiB | 4.15% | 224.96 TiB | 0.00% |
f01971600 | Dallas, Texas, USFlexential Colorado Corp. |
206.30 TiB | 3.81% | 206.30 TiB | 0.00% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NLFusix Networks B.V. |
403.52 TiB | 7.44% | 384.50 TiB | 4.71% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, USHurricane Electric LLC |
14.55 TiB | 0.27% | 14.55 TiB | 0.00% |
f01926686 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNJiangxi Jiujiang IDC |
258.75 TiB | 4.77% | 258.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f01908299new |
Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
216.69 TiB | 4.00% | 174.74 TiB | 19.36% |
f0855584 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
211.66 TiB | 3.90% | 165.85 TiB | 21.64% |
f01091851 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
151.74 TiB | 2.80% | 151.74 TiB | 0.00% |
f01736668new |
Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
128.75 TiB | 2.38% | 128.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f01385207 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
1.09 TiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 68.57% |
f01933917 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
708.78 TiB | 13.07% | 706.34 TiB | 0.34% |
f01926635 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
517.91 TiB | 9.55% | 517.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01885088 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
181.35 TiB | 3.35% | 181.35 TiB | 0.00% |
f01989888 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
42.58 TiB | 0.79% | 42.58 TiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
113.86 TiB | 2.10% | 56.80 TiB | 50.12% |
f01720359 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
95.00 TiB | 1.75% | 55.44 TiB | 41.64% |
f01786387 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
89.79 TiB | 1.66% | 89.79 TiB | 0.00% |
f01771403 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
10.56 TiB | 0.19% | 4.09 TiB | 61.24% |
f01937642 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
9.41 TiB | 0.17% | 6.44 TiB | 31.56% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
18.25 TiB | 18.25 TiB | 1 | 0.34% |
28.88 TiB | 57.86 TiB | 2 | 1.07% |
85.65 TiB | 257.51 TiB | 3 | 4.75% |
178.67 TiB | 715.75 TiB | 4 | 13.20% |
124.23 TiB | 623.56 TiB | 5 | 11.50% |
136.52 TiB | 825.48 TiB | 6 | 15.23% |
136.03 TiB | 962.34 TiB | 7 | 17.75% |
84.82 TiB | 689.23 TiB | 8 | 12.71% |
51.53 TiB | 483.72 TiB | 9 | 8.92% |
33.30 TiB | 384.80 TiB | 10 | 7.10% |
13.41 TiB | 235.84 TiB | 11 | 4.35% |
2.72 TiB | 125.63 TiB | 12 | 2.32% |
768.00 GiB | 37.53 TiB | 13 | 0.69% |
64.00 GiB | 3.53 TiB | 14 | 0.07% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Kindly requesting the assistance of a Notary in signing the next tranche of the datacap. @kernelogic @s0nik42 @steven004 @GaryGJG @mjroddy @xinaxu @xingjitansuo
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedryv57boabih6pmz4tgcycqrr6o7vmririmmr4czgewzqngfob5u
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
1.95PiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedryv57boabih6pmz4tgcycqrr6o7vmririmmr4czgewzqngfob5u
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced3yb3a7caodeyrhhybcnhag6bppp63uivoxf7cw3rxnymn4hvf3y
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
1.95PiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
Id
3bf7d37c-3877-4107-a6be-883d4c7f40df
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced3yb3a7caodeyrhhybcnhag6bppp63uivoxf7cw3rxnymn4hvf3y
f02049625
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
1.34PiB
679a25cf-f96e-463d-b6a5-1c762000be62
f01858410
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
megtei & kernelogic
800% of weekly dc amount requested
1.34PiB
5.73PiB
-824622725715722B
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
213842 | 26 | 1.95PiB | 12.74 | 7.99GiB |
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
3
kernelogic4
mjroddy1
xinaxu
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 28.03% of total deal sealed by f022352 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 21.64% of total deal sealed by f0855584 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 68.57% of total deal sealed by f01385207 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.12% of total deal sealed by f01199430 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 41.64% of total deal sealed by f01720359 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.24% of total deal sealed by f01771403 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 31.56% of total deal sealed by f01937642 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NOBlix Solutions AS |
326.11 TiB | 5.64% | 234.70 TiB | 28.03% |
f01240218new |
Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. |
53.88 TiB | 0.93% | 53.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01907545 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
228.25 TiB | 3.95% | 228.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01989866new |
Xi’an, Shaanxi, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
63.84 TiB | 1.10% | 63.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f01901765 | Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
674.61 TiB | 11.67% | 674.61 TiB | 0.00% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
261.51 TiB | 4.52% | 254.12 TiB | 2.83% |
f01906874new |
Plano, Texas, USCogent Communications |
225.58 TiB | 3.90% | 225.58 TiB | 0.00% |
f01992630 | Dallas, Texas, USFlexential Colorado Corp. |
285.34 TiB | 4.94% | 285.34 TiB | 0.00% |
f01971600 | Dallas, Texas, USFlexential Colorado Corp. |
236.13 TiB | 4.08% | 236.13 TiB | 0.00% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NLFusix Networks B.V. |
403.52 TiB | 6.98% | 384.50 TiB | 4.71% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, USHurricane Electric LLC |
24.78 TiB | 0.43% | 24.78 TiB | 0.00% |
f01926686 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNJiangxi Jiujiang IDC |
275.64 TiB | 4.77% | 275.64 TiB | 0.00% |
f01908299new |
Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
216.69 TiB | 3.75% | 174.74 TiB | 19.36% |
f0855584 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
211.66 TiB | 3.66% | 165.85 TiB | 21.64% |
f01091851 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
151.74 TiB | 2.62% | 151.74 TiB | 0.00% |
f01736668new |
Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
128.75 TiB | 2.23% | 128.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f01385207 | Lincoln, Nebraska, USLightEdge Solutions |
1.09 TiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 68.57% |
f01933917 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
753.06 TiB | 13.03% | 750.62 TiB | 0.32% |
f01926635 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
583.34 TiB | 10.09% | 583.34 TiB | 0.00% |
f01885088 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
244.69 TiB | 4.23% | 244.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01989888 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKOneAsia Network Limited |
112.12 TiB | 1.94% | 112.12 TiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
113.86 TiB | 1.97% | 56.80 TiB | 50.12% |
f01720359 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
95.00 TiB | 1.64% | 55.44 TiB | 41.64% |
f01786387 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
89.79 TiB | 1.55% | 89.79 TiB | 0.00% |
f01771403 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
10.56 TiB | 0.18% | 4.09 TiB | 61.24% |
f01937642 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
9.41 TiB | 0.16% | 6.44 TiB | 31.56% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
82.73 TiB | 82.73 TiB | 1 | 1.43% |
23.57 TiB | 47.14 TiB | 2 | 0.82% |
51.52 TiB | 154.58 TiB | 3 | 2.67% |
176.73 TiB | 708.25 TiB | 4 | 12.25% |
146.05 TiB | 732.30 TiB | 5 | 12.67% |
109.45 TiB | 661.33 TiB | 6 | 11.44% |
150.96 TiB | 1.04 PiB | 7 | 18.44% |
111.92 TiB | 903.68 TiB | 8 | 15.63% |
53.55 TiB | 487.22 TiB | 9 | 8.43% |
37.23 TiB | 389.17 TiB | 10 | 6.73% |
17.09 TiB | 229.69 TiB | 11 | 3.97% |
3.78 TiB | 133.88 TiB | 12 | 2.32% |
2.75 TiB | 138.13 TiB | 13 | 2.39% |
832.00 GiB | 43.06 TiB | 14 | 0.74% |
64.00 GiB | 3.59 TiB | 15 | 0.06% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedc4s7stelgdv4zin7jipr7tn7oanrmakdvjrxtu4codkogzsbhv2
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
1.34PiB
Signer Address
f1a2lia2cwwekeubwo4nppt4v4vebxs2frozarz3q
Id
679a25cf-f96e-463d-b6a5-1c762000be62
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedc4s7stelgdv4zin7jipr7tn7oanrmakdvjrxtu4codkogzsbhv2
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceavwkqw6xjmarsyn7dkbb6atofpqbxjkwksrsq3v2gsc3zap7utn2
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
1.34PiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
679a25cf-f96e-463d-b6a5-1c762000be62
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceavwkqw6xjmarsyn7dkbb6atofpqbxjkwksrsq3v2gsc3zap7utn2
Thanks for your request!
Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!
No client address found for this issue.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
lotus client retrieve --provider f01989888 --pieceCid baga6ea4seaqk7hjam27qux6dnynxseyqidjzkp2iuirsi2bwvj6sfdt4s26mika baga6ea4seaqk7hjam27qux6dnynxseyqidjzkp2iuirsi2bwvj6sfdt4s26mika test.file ERROR: offer error: retrieval query offer errored: failed to fetch piece to retrieve from: getting pieces for cid baga6ea4seaqk7hjam27qux6dnynxseyqidjzkp2iuirsi2bwvj6sfdt4s26mika: getting pieces containing block baga6ea4seaqk7hjam27qux6dnynxseyqidjzkp2iuirsi2bwvj6sfdt4s26mika: failed to lookup index for mh 922020af9d2066bf0a5fc36e1b79131040d3953f48a223246836aa7d228e7c96bcc428, err: datastore: key not found
@Wednesdaysof Thank you for showing us a failed retrieval. Tagging the corresponding SP below here for full transparency. Will update you below when the deal(s) from this SP are retrievable again.
@Feellin Please check minerID f01989888
Hidde explained to me that the failed retrieval was an improperly set pieceCid during deal making in the early phase and has now been fixed. The pieceCid should start with bafy instead of baga. @Wednesdaysof have you tried retrievals for the correct deals and do you see any concern here?
@xinaxu should be in order now. Will ask @lvschouwen and @cryptowhizzard to double check on Monday morning and show you the results.
Enjoy your weekend.
f02049625
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
1.03TiB
0cc99c66-3fe2-49e5-8a29-f2cd0c4183d9
f01858410
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
kernelogic & xingjitansuo
800% of weekly dc amount requested
1.03TiB
9.02PiB
-4528833419227956B
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
318292 | 30 | 1.34PiB | 12.11 | 327.52TiB |
⚠️ 6 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f022352: 27.13%, f0855584: 21.64%, f01385207: 68.57%, f01199430: 50.12%, f01720359: 41.64%, f01937642: 31.56%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedvkzpjcpoywrcxem5bw4gxdxezqdkcj4nc5us4tpteymzflmlss4
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
1.03TiB
Signer Address
f1tfg54zzscugttejv336vivknmsnzzmyudp3t7wi
Id
0cc99c66-3fe2-49e5-8a29-f2cd0c4183d9
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedvkzpjcpoywrcxem5bw4gxdxezqdkcj4nc5us4tpteymzflmlss4
⚠️ 5 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f0855584: 21.64%, f01385207: 68.57%, f01199430: 50.12%, f01720359: 41.64%, f01937642: 31.56%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecgtet2honrqucdhp7inabcl64dz3tbonaed7zfo7jrdyow5bmqxg
Address
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Datacap Allocated
1.03TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
Id
0cc99c66-3fe2-49e5-8a29-f2cd0c4183d9
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecgtet2honrqucdhp7inabcl64dz3tbonaed7zfo7jrdyow5bmqxg
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 14 days, so for now it is being closed. Please feel free to contact the Fil+ Gov team to re-open the application if it is still being processed. Thank you!
This user’s identity has been verified through filplus.storage
Data Owner Name
NASA
Data Owner Country/Region
United States
Data Owner Industry
Environment
Website
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/galaxy-evolution-explorer-galex
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
5PiB
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
500TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1kyaa43uqypbcsv5isyd4xw7lvgjcumfzqsxag7y
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
AWS Cloud
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
How do you plan to prepare the dataset
IPFS, lotus, singularity, graphsplit
If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Yearly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
1.5 to 2 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, South America, Europe, Australia (continent)
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, IPFS, Shipping hard drives, Lotus built-in data transfer
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Big data exchange, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
f01944347
f01952350
f01972364
f01972376
f02000937
f01915033
f01901765
f01953985
f0120****
f0115****
f01199430
f01786387
f01201327
f01937642
f0198****
f0188****
f01091851
f01736668
f01820744
f0855584
f01794610
f01838599
f01845552
f01885088
f01926635
f01933917
f01989888
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client, Singularity
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes