Closed laurarenpanda closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request!
Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Dear Filecoin+ Github applicant,
We have noticed that some of you are submitting merged datacap requests for datasets that are already (partly) on the chain. While we appreciate your enthusiasm to contribute to the Filecoin network, we want to remind you that this behaviour may not be beneficial to the network in the long run. In fact, this behaviour has been questioned and discussed in issue #832 on the Filecoin notary-governance Github repository.
We encourage you to review the discussions in issue #832. It's important to ensure that your datacap requests are valid, necessary, and add value to the network. By doing so, you can help to maintain the integrity and sustainability of the Filecoin network.
You can find the link to issue #832 here: filecoin-project/notary-governance#832
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
Total DataCap requested
5PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
500TiB
Client address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
f02049625
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
250TiB
0f0e317e-b29b-48a7-ab90-1d8bb5b63415
Related proposal https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/832 Hope more notaries review this application and comment on this proposal.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaced573o22b5fv3j3haflcrdugnt7gnptdqy67nqfinszrf45yybfoe
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
250.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
0f0e317e-b29b-48a7-ab90-1d8bb5b63415
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced573o22b5fv3j3haflcrdugnt7gnptdqy67nqfinszrf45yybfoe
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecn44fvnnh2d4docv57njjfkj5ef5nyivsjb3iw2fhjabxlakdszq
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
250.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
0f0e317e-b29b-48a7-ab90-1d8bb5b63415
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecn44fvnnh2d4docv57njjfkj5ef5nyivsjb3iw2fhjabxlakdszq
f02049625
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
500TiB
568d51ee-184a-4649-b93a-53ccd7cb9caf
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
The validity of the retrieval was confirmed on #1623
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebzes5r3eyziaee2mtp7fp65axzcwmvoifhnzgaam5yomstjlm4wg
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1tfg54zzscugttejv336vivknmsnzzmyudp3t7wi
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebzes5r3eyziaee2mtp7fp65axzcwmvoifhnzgaam5yomstjlm4wg
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedu7c2s25sxzqzzcr2w4e26admq3wcmqrldrlhz53sj3iceeg3lue
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1dnb3uz7sylxk6emti3ififcvu3nlufnnsjui6ea
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedu7c2s25sxzqzzcr2w4e26admq3wcmqrldrlhz53sj3iceeg3lue
f02049625
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
1000.0TiB
2521089d-2b70-41d9-852e-cc487dadd031
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
checker:manualTrigger f1bycr5r3ymkgqvkuxoemgsmnuawyawptwj44mqdi f14uhjnqrocqcenbjfaergw2uvaimysi4snv2oepy f1sejgqbuwsf74qifuxqykwotyu5aswuwhubxghqa f146dbcnpkwoabe2zu5z67ti3cfltuxxxttvgoxwa f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
⚠️ 1 storage providers have unknown IP location - f02104858
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Since FileDrvie Datasets Landing Plan is a continuing project with a group of public datasets started in 2022, the Checker Report shows CID sharing mainly because of the following reasons:
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 4 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f01228100: 27.42%, f01228089: 28.11%, f01228105: 28.11%, f01984580: 33.33%
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
There is cid sharing in the robot inspection, and the inspection of duplicate items is consistent with the applicant's description, and the retrieval is normal. Willing to support.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceded3tvyoxr7xtutwt4cuycvy5avy57bxaxtjpkg3ubonlnjgf4ug
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1tbd632f6w62glfaf7wjpimacbnjiz26poyoes2q
Id
2521089d-2b70-41d9-852e-cc487dadd031
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceded3tvyoxr7xtutwt4cuycvy5avy57bxaxtjpkg3ubonlnjgf4ug
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecc2ux6235f3lfwldlttnqkwbcaw6qz3ks52pxr3esiycwg2qgwd4
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yslbnnqzrjlyuxsmyxfbqcc7xthcavgpripjevi
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecc2ux6235f3lfwldlttnqkwbcaw6qz3ks52pxr3esiycwg2qgwd4
f02049625
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
1.95PiB
b7b3bee4-74f7-4ef5-a138-5b211fddd020
f02049625
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
400% of weekly dc amount requested
1.95PiB
909494701772928712704.0YiB
-1.09B
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
34223 | 14 | 1000.0TiB | 18.72 | 325.71TiB |
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 4 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f01228100: 27.42%, f01228089: 28.11%, f01228105: 28.11%, f01984580: 28.15%
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Since FileDrvie Datasets Landing Plan is a continuing project with a group of public datasets started in 2022, the Checker Report shows CID sharing mainly because of the following reasons:
- Share CIDs with previous FileDrive Landing Plan: some data stored less than 5 copies, so we distributed more copies with DC of this V2 LDN
- Share CIDs with other LDNs onboarding public datasets: using the same data processing tools could cause this problem with the same configuration file
No questions from my side.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceddprdn3yhf5yv25c7k356cqbt4n6kk4fqspnzprcjjgxlr63bor4
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
1.95PiB
Signer Address
f1n5wlrrhoxpkgwij25xrtt7w7g2k3fhbthmdn6ri
Id
b7b3bee4-74f7-4ef5-a138-5b211fddd020
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceddprdn3yhf5yv25c7k356cqbt4n6kk4fqspnzprcjjgxlr63bor4
Checked the Github history, the part about Sharing was explained. And got verification and support from multiple notaries.
Also retrieved whether SP supports fetching
Willing to make support in this round
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedhei6jt3mmap5oeb2tj7l5vx6v5b5ya6fqjmbyn3uyrpe7nljz7k
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
1.95PiB
Signer Address
f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedhei6jt3mmap5oeb2tj7l5vx6v5b5ya6fqjmbyn3uyrpe7nljz7k
f02049625
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
1.34PiB
c9282f1c-ad4f-4420-9b76-c8509fcbefe4
f02049625
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
800% of weekly dc amount requested
1.34PiB
1.8160790205001833e+37YiB
-2.19B
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
103740 | 15 | 1.95PiB | 13.92 | 507.18TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedf67pvzfmbql23bz5oxjs2iscmaiymqz2a762567gjz4qgit4egy
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
1.34PiB
Signer Address
f1tfg54zzscugttejv336vivknmsnzzmyudp3t7wi
Id
c9282f1c-ad4f-4420-9b76-c8509fcbefe4
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedf67pvzfmbql23bz5oxjs2iscmaiymqz2a762567gjz4qgit4egy
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecprmbholbfwueptuz57hjjn3pmbpviq6hwfi3aqqji2wrdlc3fiq
Address
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Datacap Allocated
1.34PiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
not found
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecprmbholbfwueptuz57hjjn3pmbpviq6hwfi3aqqji2wrdlc3fiq
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f01984580: 20.01%
⚠️ 81.37% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
This report has raised T&T flags. Client is requested to respond to the report before getting further allocations of DC
checker:manualTrigger f1bycr5r3ymkgqvkuxoemgsmnuawyawptwj44mqdi f14uhjnqrocqcenbjfaergw2uvaimysi4snv2oepy f1sejgqbuwsf74qifuxqykwotyu5aswuwhubxghqa f146dbcnpkwoabe2zu5z67ti3cfltuxxxttvgoxwa f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
GM, @raghavrmadya & @kevzak.
Here are my responses to the Checker Report of this LDN.
Since FileDrive Landing Plan V2 includes 5 LDNs, please review the above Checker Report with all 5 addresses: https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1626#issuecomment-1562125753
As FileDrvie Datasets Landing Plan is a continuing project with a group of public datasets started in 2022, the Checker Report shows CID sharing mainly because of the following reasons:
I support @laurarenpanda 's explanation. It is common to have less than ideal CID report for a single LDN in a series of LDNs of same purpose because of the 5PB cap.
I think in the future applicants can utilize the new 15PiB cap and even more with E-FIL+ route. But this application is a legacy limitation and is not a T&T issue.
I support @laurarenpanda 's explanation. It is common to have less than ideal CID report for a single LDN in a series of LDNs of same purpose because of the 5PB cap.
I think in the future applicants can utilize the new 15PiB cap and even more with E-FIL+ route. But this application is a legacy limitation and is not a T&T issue.
Same here. Agree with @kernelogic
This CID sharing behavior looks very similar to @kernelogic 's previous operation. I don't think it's something that would be acceptable and emulated by the community. I tend to think of it as a way for DC to be abused.
https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/457
Agree with @kernelogic @cryptowhizzard in this
Data Owner Name
FileDrive Labs
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
Life Science / Healthcare
Website
https://filedrive.io/
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
5PiB
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
500TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
How do you plan to prepare the dataset
IPFS, graphsplit
If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Weekly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
More than 3 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, Europe, Australia (continent)
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, IPFS, Shipping hard drives
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Filmine
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Lotus client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes