Closed Erreth-Akbe closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Dear applicant,
Thank you for applying for datacap. As Filecoin FIL+ notary i am screening your application and conducting due diligence.
Looking at your application i have some questions: Can you show us visible proof of the size of your data and the storage systems you have there?
As last question i would like you to fill out this form to provide us with the necessary information to make a educated decision on your LDN request if we would like to support it.
Thanks!
We have completed the documentation, the proof about the size of the stored data, and since we used pinata's service before, all we have are the CIDs of these files, and I can list them below, along with the pinata debit records. QmSnBxzqunw9xWBHGmV7Mkoq2dBrGWxgcFhKzyYg355Kbb QmTQhGVnL8bSrZNVg5ZqgSN3YXW5bHRrs8PCi8xZGpWCCx QmURYSDPFYpE7ABK4zhWw2YNtwrtvtxK9zzWQ8roScTuE5 QmWWJHVM26pa7mWwYckNzrPAVbZbD3cZwXJZfKcRKc1XZv QmeSGXg2WeaAcQ9J1ttWL7r1AoJWHt2TZPeiZCMw7LXSFh If you need the complete CID of all our files we can crawl and export them, but a large part of the files are AES symmetric encrypted
Good morning.
Thanks for sending me the data and KYC.
I am missing the data onboarding plan ( Sp's you are going to use ). Please let me know when you are ready so i can check them followed by a propose when they are ok.
I think maybe the dataset you want to store is more suitable for applying for E-Fil+. @kevzak Hope you can give him a hand.
Sorry I didn't explain clearly, to be precise only part of the file is AES encrypted, in our DAPP, the generated json when uploading these are certainly not encrypted, and then there will be a file attached to the json, it can choose whether aes encrypted, we now only about 1/4 of the NFT works choose to encrypt the release.
And the data we store is the user's data, in fact, the data that is accessed at high frequencies. For example, if a user stores an encrypted file, our server will detect whether another user has purchased this one user's NFT, and if so, we will distribute a decryption key to him. So it's actually high frequency access.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
But Large dataset is open for totally public data without any encrypted file. Can you tell me how much totally public data do you have?
Any update here?
Now we choose the filplus service only to store public data, because it is more cost-effective than indirectly using ipfs in pinata. The storage space is determined according to the number of times the user uses it. Calculated according to the average number of times of use, it will take about 50T per week. And we only store unencrypted data in this part of the space.
If you want to see more proofs, you can also search for our contract address on any NFT platform to see the NFT data generated by users. We have user records on BSC, ETH, POLYGON.
Large dataset applications are open to existing public datasets. Can you tell me how much data you already have?
We are currently using the pinata service to indirectly store hundreds of T data and are adding more data every day.
Total DataCap requested
2PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
50TiB
Client address
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. The request cannot be posted because the identifier in the issue cannot be retrieved
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Total DataCap requested
2PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
50TiB
Client address
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. The request cannot be posted because the identifier in the issue cannot be retrieved
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
2PiB
50TiB
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
f02049625
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
25TiB
38510d49-3f75-4e53-ac9d-872ab134efbf
Thank you!
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedo5tllfhtmt2iwl7tz3fzd5m2ialyp5kdmfoxo3i6t76jja4pv7k
Address
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
Datacap Allocated
25.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
38510d49-3f75-4e53-ac9d-872ab134efbf
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedo5tllfhtmt2iwl7tz3fzd5m2ialyp5kdmfoxo3i6t76jja4pv7k
Thanks for your application ~ As Filecoin FIL+ notary i am screening your application and conducting due diligence. Hope you can answer the following two questions :
Sorry we don't have a mail service set up for this domain, what should I do in this case, can I use the official contract deployment wallet address for signature verification? Or provide some other information, for example, you can see that the owner of the official github org is my github account.
We have replied to your Twitter account through our official account for verification, please confirm:https://twitter.com/sxxfuture/status/1638450562126729219
f02009673 f02008876 f02008883 f02012674
The sealing plan is in Asia minus GCR and Greater China SPs.
We have replied to your Twitter account through our official account for verification, please confirm: https://twitter.com/sxxfuture/status/1638450562126729219
Received your sealing plan, bug twitter reply not found yet. Or you can use the official twitter @@SparkLink_io to post a kyc message, and I will sign it for you this round.
OK, i found it
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceapyp7xkaeunbgg3flazepnh54ozxzlommsaapoyjyrve7ichwcpa
Address
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
Datacap Allocated
25.00TiB
Signer Address
f1foiomqlmoshpuxm6aie4xysffqezkjnokgwcecq
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceapyp7xkaeunbgg3flazepnh54ozxzlommsaapoyjyrve7ichwcpa
checker:manualTrigger
No active deals found for this client.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
f02049625
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
50TiB
0e78dad5-d61d-428b-8397-37757d499f9e
f02049625
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
100% of weekly dc amount requested
50TiB
25TiB
1.97PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 25TiB | NaN | 1.25TiB |
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
retrieval rate too low, need to be improved
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Retrieving backups doesn't look great and needs to be improved, but the retrieval rate is improving, which is an improvement. Considering this is only the second round, and the first round is only 25T, I support it for now
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecena3rjzw2nqhmi6fwr5rabi4zr4lbu2bl52idh4zbtkdbt2znx4
Address
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qnumecdypgrbaebtkdfjnwt5ndacadcuas3deiq
Id
0e78dad5-d61d-428b-8397-37757d499f9e
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecena3rjzw2nqhmi6fwr5rabi4zr4lbu2bl52idh4zbtkdbt2znx4
Retrieval rate is improving, from here(https://datacapstats.io/clients/f02031033/breakdown) the data distribution statistics shown in the report are not accurate, I will support this round
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceave2kqxsz2mx7gqdlpcktkr7pdzmfooy7frlmgwb6e24ek4obwag
Address
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1xrnysd4gimg64d4l6qi7ulzwwq22c6vfg6lpw3i
Id
0e78dad5-d61d-428b-8397-37757d499f9e
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceave2kqxsz2mx7gqdlpcktkr7pdzmfooy7frlmgwb6e24ek4obwag
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
With a smaller allocation of the first round, it's understandable that these problems were reported. I will keep an eye on it as the community rules are followed in the later rounds.
Data Owner Name
Sparklink protocol
Data Owner Country/Region
United States
Data Owner Industry
Information, Media & Telecommunications
Website
Sparklink.io
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
2PiB
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
50TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1hjiip3jr6u4a5wgrktfyvgtqrmf3xyxbhpcvbki
Custom multisig
Identifier
None
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
Yes
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
AWS Cloud
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
How do you plan to prepare the dataset
IPFS
If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Weekly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
More than 3 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Asia other than Greater China, Africa, North America, South America, Europe, Australia (continent), Antarctica
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Big data exchange
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client, Singularity
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes