Closed xinaxu closed 2 years ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@xinaxu Can you clarify the difference between this application and #181 ? Are they both for Slingshot competition?
@galen-mcandrew That's correct. They are both for Slingshot competition, however for different dataset. Per Slingshot rule, each project needs to have different client address to differentiate.
@galen-mcandrew Could you take a look at this one? Is there any concern? Anything I can do to fascilitate the grant?
500TiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01726220
f01726220
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
25TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb7dg4xqzbqbr6uq47tdhmzesfryxzqachm7t3rljr7llafhld576
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
25.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yqydpmqb5en262jpottko2kd65msajax7fi4rmq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb7dg4xqzbqbr6uq47tdhmzesfryxzqachm7t3rljr7llafhld576
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaqtdatol445iakjy3uaetc3cifzs7y4txj5eoqxkn4eznphldjwa
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
25.00TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaqtdatol445iakjy3uaetc3cifzs7y4txj5eoqxkn4eznphldjwa
Identified an edge case here where the subsequent allocation bot was not triggered since DataCap usage went from < 75% to 100% in between the daily checks. cc @fabriziogianni7 to fix as discussed on Mar 17/18.
In the meantime, going to manually trigger the next allocation.
f01726220
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
50TiB
Thanks @dkkapur
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceca3ecv4pmfi4vq6b3yxxoyxmlgbuv2xuxwft3p56q2slyyezewdu
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceca3ecv4pmfi4vq6b3yxxoyxmlgbuv2xuxwft3p56q2slyyezewdu
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebtixpm3kic4qpuve6wgaqgbrfyljdhdvsyxjmfqya4kerx5zms7e
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebtixpm3kic4qpuve6wgaqgbrfyljdhdvsyxjmfqya4kerx5zms7e
@dkkapur @fabriziogianni7 The datacap is used up and the allocation bot isn't triggered yet. Would you please take a look and help me manually trigger it? Thanks!
f01726220
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
100TiB
f01726220
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
not found & not found
20% of total dc amount requested
100TiB
75TiB
425TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 50TiB | 0 | 0B |
Current datacap allocation statistics: | Storage Provider | Number of deals |
---|---|---|
f01345523 | 691 | |
f01392893 | 1244 | |
f01732188 | 465 |
The datacap for the first 2 rounds are quite small and runs out too soon hence some of the storage providers do not have a chance to get started before the datacap runs out. More storage providers are expected to join in next rounds.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebca4tnlx4pypvta72wxcgg4mef6ioahrcnsrm3cegvvypcwvxhn2
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebca4tnlx4pypvta72wxcgg4mef6ioahrcnsrm3cegvvypcwvxhn2
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceavrrix7gmikzcajc2xtvyqafiuz3zzfxjuen2uj6tc5bthdlgnfk
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yqydpmqb5en262jpottko2kd65msajax7fi4rmq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceavrrix7gmikzcajc2xtvyqafiuz3zzfxjuen2uj6tc5bthdlgnfk
f01726220
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
200TiB
f01726220
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
not found & not found
40% of total dc amount requested
200TiB
175TiB
325TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
2401 | 3 | 100TiB | 51.81 | 480GiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceadnmauf6cuh6fbnjuzgvuyjzmuw7vyf6pw4mw5v46yssdtu7p75e
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceadnmauf6cuh6fbnjuzgvuyjzmuw7vyf6pw4mw5v46yssdtu7p75e
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb7tw7hhimhramwt7com6oi74r6kgzwy34zxt5wjq4kutwblej3j2
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb7tw7hhimhramwt7com6oi74r6kgzwy34zxt5wjq4kutwblej3j2
f01726220
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
125TiB
f01726220
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
not found & not found
80% of total dc amount requested
125TiB
375TiB
125TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
11141 | 6 | 200TiB | 28.59 | 20.56TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedytxbn4vhkrppz52kac6rz5bapl7irjku2v7xtynuscnce5d6u6a
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
125.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yqydpmqb5en262jpottko2kd65msajax7fi4rmq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedytxbn4vhkrppz52kac6rz5bapl7irjku2v7xtynuscnce5d6u6a
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceahizp3ay6z4vkwbr3a6id772iyzco5s7yig6cnsycqw6nbrtvcge
Address
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
Datacap Allocated
125.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceahizp3ay6z4vkwbr3a6id772iyzco5s7yig6cnsycqw6nbrtvcge
The issue reached the total datacap requested. This should be closed
TechGreedy
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 23.29% of total deal sealed by f01823264 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, US | 116.19 TiB | 23.31% | 106.06 TiB | 8.71% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NL | 99.53 TiB | 19.97% | 99.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01702940 | Dallas, Texas, US | 96.66 TiB | 19.39% | 95.59 TiB | 1.10% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 87.69 TiB | 17.59% | 87.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01823264 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 53.41 TiB | 10.72% | 40.97 TiB | 23.29% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, US | 20.66 TiB | 4.14% | 20.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01732188 | Chicago, Illinois, US | 14.53 TiB | 2.92% | 14.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01794835 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 6.69 TiB | 1.34% | 6.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01832393 | Seattle, Washington, US | 3.06 TiB | 0.61% | 3.06 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.06 TiB | 3.06 TiB | 1 | 0.61% |
2.66 TiB | 5.34 TiB | 2 | 1.07% |
16.41 TiB | 50.16 TiB | 3 | 10.06% |
45.84 TiB | 190.53 TiB | 4 | 38.23% |
27.72 TiB | 144.19 TiB | 5 | 28.93% |
5.91 TiB | 37.66 TiB | 6 | 7.56% |
1.72 TiB | 13.75 TiB | 7 | 2.76% |
5.97 TiB | 53.72 TiB | 8 | 10.78% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 70.16 TiB | 713 | LDN # 293 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
TechGreedy
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 23.29% of total deal sealed by f01823264 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, US | 116.19 TiB | 23.31% | 106.06 TiB | 8.71% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NL | 99.53 TiB | 19.97% | 99.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01702940 | Dallas, Texas, US | 96.66 TiB | 19.39% | 95.59 TiB | 1.10% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 87.69 TiB | 17.59% | 87.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01823264 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 53.41 TiB | 10.72% | 40.97 TiB | 23.29% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, US | 20.66 TiB | 4.14% | 20.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01732188 | Chicago, Illinois, US | 14.53 TiB | 2.92% | 14.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01794835 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 6.69 TiB | 1.34% | 6.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01832393 | Seattle, Washington, US | 3.06 TiB | 0.61% | 3.06 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.06 TiB | 3.06 TiB | 1 | 0.61% |
2.66 TiB | 5.34 TiB | 2 | 1.07% |
16.41 TiB | 50.16 TiB | 3 | 10.06% |
45.84 TiB | 190.53 TiB | 4 | 38.23% |
27.72 TiB | 144.19 TiB | 5 | 28.93% |
5.91 TiB | 37.66 TiB | 6 | 7.56% |
1.72 TiB | 13.75 TiB | 7 | 2.76% |
5.97 TiB | 53.72 TiB | 8 | 10.78% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 70.16 TiB | 713 | LDN # 293 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
TechGreedy
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 23.29% of total deal sealed by f01823264 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, US | 116.19 TiB | 23.31% | 106.06 TiB | 8.71% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NL | 99.53 TiB | 19.97% | 99.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01702940 | Dallas, Texas, US | 96.66 TiB | 19.39% | 95.59 TiB | 1.10% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 87.69 TiB | 17.59% | 87.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01823264 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 53.41 TiB | 10.72% | 40.97 TiB | 23.29% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, US | 20.66 TiB | 4.14% | 20.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01732188 | Chicago, Illinois, US | 14.53 TiB | 2.92% | 14.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01794835 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 6.69 TiB | 1.34% | 6.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01832393 | Seattle, Washington, US | 3.06 TiB | 0.61% | 3.06 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.06 TiB | 3.06 TiB | 1 | 0.61% |
2.66 TiB | 5.34 TiB | 2 | 1.07% |
16.41 TiB | 50.16 TiB | 3 | 10.06% |
45.84 TiB | 190.53 TiB | 4 | 38.23% |
27.72 TiB | 144.19 TiB | 5 | 28.93% |
5.91 TiB | 37.66 TiB | 6 | 7.56% |
1.72 TiB | 13.75 TiB | 7 | 2.76% |
5.97 TiB | 53.72 TiB | 8 | 10.78% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 70.16 TiB | 713 | LDN # 293 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
TechGreedy
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 23.29% of total deal sealed by f01823264 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, US | 116.19 TiB | 23.31% | 106.06 TiB | 8.71% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NL | 99.53 TiB | 19.97% | 99.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01702940 | Dallas, Texas, US | 96.66 TiB | 19.39% | 95.59 TiB | 1.10% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 87.69 TiB | 17.59% | 87.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01823264 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 53.41 TiB | 10.72% | 40.97 TiB | 23.29% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, US | 20.66 TiB | 4.14% | 20.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01732188 | Chicago, Illinois, US | 14.53 TiB | 2.92% | 14.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01794835 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 6.69 TiB | 1.34% | 6.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01832393 | Seattle, Washington, US | 3.06 TiB | 0.61% | 3.06 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.06 TiB | 3.06 TiB | 1 | 0.61% |
2.66 TiB | 5.34 TiB | 2 | 1.07% |
16.41 TiB | 50.16 TiB | 3 | 10.06% |
45.84 TiB | 190.53 TiB | 4 | 38.23% |
27.72 TiB | 144.19 TiB | 5 | 28.93% |
5.91 TiB | 37.66 TiB | 6 | 7.56% |
1.72 TiB | 13.75 TiB | 7 | 2.76% |
5.97 TiB | 53.72 TiB | 8 | 10.78% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 70.16 TiB | 713 | LDN # 293 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
TechGreedy
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 23.29% of total deal sealed by f01823264 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, US | 116.19 TiB | 23.31% | 106.06 TiB | 8.71% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NL | 99.53 TiB | 19.97% | 99.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01702940 | Dallas, Texas, US | 96.66 TiB | 19.39% | 95.59 TiB | 1.10% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 87.69 TiB | 17.59% | 87.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01823264 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 53.41 TiB | 10.72% | 40.97 TiB | 23.29% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, US | 20.66 TiB | 4.14% | 20.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01732188 | Chicago, Illinois, US | 14.53 TiB | 2.92% | 14.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01794835 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 6.69 TiB | 1.34% | 6.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01832393 | Seattle, Washington, US | 3.06 TiB | 0.61% | 3.06 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.06 TiB | 3.06 TiB | 1 | 0.61% |
2.66 TiB | 5.34 TiB | 2 | 1.07% |
16.41 TiB | 50.16 TiB | 3 | 10.06% |
45.84 TiB | 190.53 TiB | 4 | 38.23% |
27.72 TiB | 144.19 TiB | 5 | 28.93% |
5.91 TiB | 37.66 TiB | 6 | 7.56% |
1.72 TiB | 13.75 TiB | 7 | 2.76% |
5.97 TiB | 53.72 TiB | 8 | 10.78% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 70.16 TiB | 713 | LDN # 293 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
TechGreedy
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 23.29% of total deal sealed by f01823264 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, US | 116.19 TiB | 23.31% | 106.06 TiB | 8.71% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NL | 99.53 TiB | 19.97% | 99.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01702940 | Dallas, Texas, US | 96.66 TiB | 19.39% | 95.59 TiB | 1.10% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 87.69 TiB | 17.59% | 87.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01823264 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 53.41 TiB | 10.72% | 40.97 TiB | 23.29% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, US | 20.66 TiB | 4.14% | 20.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01732188 | Chicago, Illinois, US | 14.53 TiB | 2.92% | 14.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01794835 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 6.69 TiB | 1.34% | 6.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01832393 | Seattle, Washington, US | 3.06 TiB | 0.61% | 3.06 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.06 TiB | 3.06 TiB | 1 | 0.61% |
2.66 TiB | 5.34 TiB | 2 | 1.07% |
16.41 TiB | 50.16 TiB | 3 | 10.06% |
45.84 TiB | 190.53 TiB | 4 | 38.23% |
27.72 TiB | 144.19 TiB | 5 | 28.93% |
5.91 TiB | 37.66 TiB | 6 | 7.56% |
1.72 TiB | 13.75 TiB | 7 | 2.76% |
5.97 TiB | 53.72 TiB | 8 | 10.78% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 70.16 TiB | 713 | LDN # 293 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
TechGreedy
f1uhc5v6w4fkxu6qnecyjkwkcscfuz55mirzosbfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 23.29% of total deal sealed by f01823264 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, US | 116.19 TiB | 23.31% | 106.06 TiB | 8.71% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NL | 99.53 TiB | 19.97% | 99.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01702940 | Dallas, Texas, US | 96.66 TiB | 19.39% | 95.59 TiB | 1.10% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 87.69 TiB | 17.59% | 87.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01823264 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 53.41 TiB | 10.72% | 40.97 TiB | 23.29% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, US | 20.66 TiB | 4.14% | 20.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01732188 | Chicago, Illinois, US | 14.53 TiB | 2.92% | 14.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01794835 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 6.69 TiB | 1.34% | 6.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01832393 | Seattle, Washington, US | 3.06 TiB | 0.61% | 3.06 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.06 TiB | 3.06 TiB | 1 | 0.61% |
2.66 TiB | 5.34 TiB | 2 | 1.07% |
16.41 TiB | 50.16 TiB | 3 | 10.06% |
45.84 TiB | 190.53 TiB | 4 | 38.23% |
27.72 TiB | 144.19 TiB | 5 | 28.93% |
5.91 TiB | 37.66 TiB | 6 | 7.56% |
1.72 TiB | 13.75 TiB | 7 | 2.76% |
5.97 TiB | 53.72 TiB | 8 | 10.78% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 70.16 TiB | 713 | LDN # 293 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?