Closed BobStaring closed 9 months ago
This application has not seen any responses in the last 14 days, so for now it is being closed. Please feel free to contact the Fil+ Gov team to re-open the application if it is still being processed. Thank you!
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
Hello @Sunnyiscoming this client is still in use.Please help us reopen it.
Hello @fabriziogianni7 @Sunnyiscoming this client is still in use.Please help us reopen it.
Dear BobStaring,
As notary I am doing due diligence on your LDN. I could not get retrieval to work. Can you please upload the car file of CID baga6ea4seaqklgex4pdflnz2tqym2z7wm63zweiu3nocunci52ff4bpfg7ooaea ?
You can use our upload system at http://send.datasetcreators.com. Please select 7 days for the system to keep the file and post the link you received here so I (and other notaries) can download your content.
Reminder.
Hello, @BobStaring per the https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/922 for Open, Public Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.
This information will be reviewed by Fil+ Governance team to confirm validity and then the application will be allowed to move forward for additional notary review.
Ok, Thanks Sunny,we will contact SP for corresponding information.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
The cid sharing, we investigated, should be a cooperative SP, test data only 4TiB, shared our data externally. All partners have been notified, they should be careful not to share data in the future. There won't be any more.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
Retrieval normal
The cid sharing, we investigated, should be a cooperative SP, test data only 4TiB, shared our data externally. All partners have been notified, they should be careful not to share data in the future. There won't be any more.
As for it is the test data and it is less than 10T that makes the mistake, i hope you don't cooperate with the SP in the future. Support for the current stage and check your report next time.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceat2g2ewtzkvzliiag7d34ntlkzimxsrf5deo7kz5o7mrdo4rdlqm
Address
f1gsvxh5lqvayqgaoxkjwie7swc2lgihgdgjdnaca
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1mdk7s2vntzm6hu35yuo6vjubtrpfnb2awhgvrri
Id
0277adc4-dce3-43a9-9a61-c7d7873eff04
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceat2g2ewtzkvzliiag7d34ntlkzimxsrf5deo7kz5o7mrdo4rdlqm
The cid sharing, we investigated, should be a cooperative SP, test data only 4TiB, shared our data externally. All partners have been notified, they should be careful not to share data in the future. There won't be any more.
We will pay attention to the subsequent data allocation and reporting situation, please follow the relevant rules, and this round will support
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced4wvg6wpwpalo6ogpqkfjsjj7qzvunr6t5yky4drusjcmms5ptqi
Address
f1gsvxh5lqvayqgaoxkjwie7swc2lgihgdgjdnaca
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1cjzbiy5xd4ehera4wmbz63pd5ku4oo7g52cldga
Id
0277adc4-dce3-43a9-9a61-c7d7873eff04
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced4wvg6wpwpalo6ogpqkfjsjj7qzvunr6t5yky4drusjcmms5ptqi
@Sunnyiscoming Thanks , we have filled out the registration form.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
Manual Retrieval Test Passed
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedrzhj7hmrijc3dgbbrhnjdetlpro2bcsfnk2zdonlasg74l7kjru
Address
f1gsvxh5lqvayqgaoxkjwie7swc2lgihgdgjdnaca
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1a2lia2cwwekeubwo4nppt4v4vebxs2frozarz3q
Id
0277adc4-dce3-43a9-9a61-c7d7873eff04
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedrzhj7hmrijc3dgbbrhnjdetlpro2bcsfnk2zdonlasg74l7kjru
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecgktryypzaiwrcadwnykfv4levsyj7druburmbazksqjv3mlq3p6
Address
f1gsvxh5lqvayqgaoxkjwie7swc2lgihgdgjdnaca
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f12mckci3omexgzoeosjvstcfxfe4vqw7owdia3da
Id
0277adc4-dce3-43a9-9a61-c7d7873eff04
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecgktryypzaiwrcadwnykfv4levsyj7druburmbazksqjv3mlq3p6
Entity is fully self-dealing and hiding under VPN. Thanks for signing this shit again abusive notaries, thank you.
@kevzak Please close this asap and remove cap.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 55.39% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
Entity is fully self-dealing and hiding under VPN. Thanks for signing this shit again abusive notaries, thank you.
@kevzak Please close this asap and remove cap.
Hello, @BobStaring per the https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/922 for Open, Public Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.
This information will be reviewed by Fil+ Governance team to confirm validity and then the application will be allowed to move forward for additional notary review.
Hello, @Sunnyiscoming we have submitted the form , please check it.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 55.39% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
@BobStaring why aren't you replying on my question? I found multiple entities sealing huge amounts of datacao with false locations under VPN. Suggest halting this LDN before more information is public.
SPs taking deals:
f02836485 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. | 85.56 TiB | 10.28% | 85.56 TiB | 0.00% f02092901 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CNChina Telecom (Group) | 39.06 TiB | 4.69% | 39.06 TiB | 0.00% f02029115 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CNChina Telecom (Group) | 39.03 TiB | 4.69% | 39.03 TiB | 0.00% f02229707new | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKChina Unicom Global | 71.57 TiB | 8.60% | 71.57 TiB | 0.00% f02236570 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKChina Unicom Global | 41.45 TiB | 4.98% | 41.45 TiB | 0.00% f02237709 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKChina Unicom Global | 41.29 TiB | 4.96% | 41.29 TiB | 0.00% f02825666 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE | 41.06 TiB | 4.93% | 41.06 TiB | 0.00% f02132642 | Singapore, Singapore, SGSingNet | 174.84 TiB | 21.01% | 174.84 TiB | 0.00% f02236033new | Singapore, Singapore, SGThe Constant Company, LLC | 48.37 TiB | 5.81% | 48.37 TiB | 0.00% f02182251 | Stockholm, Stockholm, SEThe Constant Company, LLC | 39.09 TiB | 4.70% | 39.03 TiB | 0.16% f02827777 | Mumbai, Maharashtra, INThe Constant Company, LLC | 35.25 TiB | 4.24% | 35.25 TiB | 0.00% f02826888 | Toronto, Ontario, CAThe Constant Company, LLC | 34.63 TiB | 4.16% | 34.63 TiB | 0.00% f02238701new | Los Angeles, California, USUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED | 46.17 TiB | 5.55% | 46.17 TiB | 0.00% f01981571 | London, England, GBUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED | 39.09 TiB | 4.70% | 39.09 TiB | 0.00% f02098007 | Singapore, Singapore, SGUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED | 34.47 TiB | 4.14% | 34.34 TiB | 0.36% f02237106 | London, England, GBUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED | 21.39 TiB | 2.57% | 21.39 TiB | 0.00%
SPs listed upfront:
f02132642 | laura |SingaporeSingapore | no | none f02229707 | elio |HongKong | no | Elio f02092901 | Zhengcheng | Chia | no | Cheng f02098007 | Jiezhou | SingaporeSingapore | no | none f02238701 | joe | US | no | Joe
Not all SPs match - not all SPs provided have emails or contact to confirm entity and location. Closing until updated
Data Owner Name
reachauto
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
IT & Technology Services
Website
https://www.reachauto.com/
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
5PiB
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
500TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1gsvxh5lqvayqgaoxkjwie7swc2lgihgdgjdnaca
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Dataset (Research/Non-Profit)
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
AWS Cloud
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
How do you plan to prepare the dataset
IPFS, lotus, graphsplit
If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Monthly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
1.5 to 2 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, Europe
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, IPFS, Shipping hard drives
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes