Open sxxfuture-official opened 1 year ago
Thanks for your request!
Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
The public time node table of its data. http://www.lamost.org/lmusers/
OK, I will modify it.
@sxxfuture-official It appears that you have submitted applications for 10PiB in issue #1992 and another 10PiB in issue #1993, resulting in a combined total of 20PiB. Can you clarify the reason behind the revised application requesting a reduced capacity of 15PiB. Additionally, could you kindly provide details regarding the dataset size and the number of replicas that will be necessary?
@simonkim0515 Until July 2017, LAMOST has completed its pilot survey which was launched in October 2011 and ended in June 2012, and the first five years of regular survey which was initiated on September 2012. After this six-year-survey, we totally obtain 9,026,365 spectra. The fifth data release (DR5) has published online (http://dr5.lamost.org/), and released data products include:
The main data occupation is spectral image data, in order to accurately retrieve the CID of each image, we will not compress the data before sealing. The uncompressed data size of each spectral data is ≈ 205MByte.
Originally we planned to save 6-7 replicas to different SPs. 205MB 9,026,365 Spectra / 18GB per sector 6 replicas = 601757 sectors = 18.36 PiB DataCap
So I applied for two 10PiB LDNs for the first time, but you asked me to close one of them and only keep one LDN, but the maximum capacity of a single LDN is only 15PiB, so I can only reduce the number of replicas for some data during the sealing process.
@sxxfuture-official Thank you for providing an explanation. It is worth noting that the DataCap application limit is not limited to 15PiB. Applicants have the option to apply for a higher amount by selecting the "More Than 15PiB" option, which will prompt contact from @Kevin-FF-USA.
@simonkim0515 Thank you very much for your reminder ! At the current stage, 15PiB is enough to save 5-6 replicas to avoid complicating the process. The current application quota is acceptable.
Could you send an email to filplus-app-review@fil.org with your official domain in order to confirm your identity? Email name should includes the issue id #1992.
@Sunnyiscoming The email has been sent, please check~
Total DataCap requested
15PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
500TiB
Client address
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
f02049625
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
250TiB
c88af20a-820a-4d81-b2f8-fcde9f6f8111
Hello @sxxfuture-official How much data have you prepared? How many copies do you plan to send?
@nj-steve
The main data occupation is spectral image data, in order to accurately retrieve the CID of each image, we will not compress the data before sealing. The uncompressed data size of each spectral data is ≈ 205MByte.
Now, we planned to save 5-6 replicas to different SPs. 205MB 9,026,365 Spectra / 18GB per sector 6 replicas = 601757 sectors = 18.36 PiB DataCap
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebc57vbxm5l763r3ixvyj2mwc5pecg4rbw6sqr5katcofqgs27jfq
Address
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
Datacap Allocated
250.00TiB
Signer Address
f1xx6555qijma7igpnjspyvdunc4vfxkawnpqy5ii
Id
c88af20a-820a-4d81-b2f8-fcde9f6f8111
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebc57vbxm5l763r3ixvyj2mwc5pecg4rbw6sqr5katcofqgs27jfq
In support for public dataset, especially something outside of AWS S3
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceco4ln3setfcidyz2aobcm43cv4ie3kdqtzrg3r5xgjtdkmkz6gd2
Address
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
Datacap Allocated
250.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
c88af20a-820a-4d81-b2f8-fcde9f6f8111
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceco4ln3setfcidyz2aobcm43cv4ie3kdqtzrg3r5xgjtdkmkz6gd2
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 14 days, so for now it is being closed. Please feel free to contact the Fil+ Gov team to re-open the application if it is still being processed. Thank you!
@simonkim0515 @galen-mcandrew Data is being sealed continuously
This user’s identity has been verified through filplus.storage
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
f02049625
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
500TiB
8f69ef04-a2ea-422c-a8d2-06fc8fdac3c7
f02049625
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
100% of weekly dc amount requested
500TiB
250TiB
14.75PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
5943 | 3 | 250TiB | 33.65 | 59.81TiB |
Hi @sxxfuture-official
Seems you sealed 62% of this datacap with your own miners. Can you explain us why this is?
Secondly none of your data is retrievable.
As notary you need to have an example function for the community and clean sheet. What is your plan here?
@cryptowhizzard Because it is the first round of quota, our Miner packaging will be faster, and other SPs will follow the pace of packaging. Regarding the retrieval problem, we will definitely solve this problem. More SPs is on the way.
Since we have been using lotus publish storage deals before, the technical team has been studying how to support http retrieval, and I believe it will be improved in the near future.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
@sxxfuture-official According to the results of the Retrieval Report, only one (f01964215) of the current 4 Miners can be part retrieved. What is the situation of the other 3 miners? Is there a plan?
@Bitengine-reeta Up to now, our SPs have solved the retrieval of most of the data. The results of my lotus test are as follows. The update of RetrieveBot's results may need to wait. I hope you can provide signature support. We will gradually increase the retrieval ratio and http retrieval in the following process .
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaxbeztowwv3gwzhawlevtww2yw7x6mtxyahigsq2xn3zjx2cogcc
Address
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1jyvhxp4kmwreo22ke4itspraznpudw3uqaink5i
Id
8f69ef04-a2ea-422c-a8d2-06fc8fdac3c7
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaxbeztowwv3gwzhawlevtww2yw7x6mtxyahigsq2xn3zjx2cogcc
Hi there, @sxxfuture-official How's your HTTP retrieval going? Will you keep inviting more sps for your project?
@ipollo00 HTTP retrieval need boost sever, since lotus has been used before, this part still needs time to be overcome, but we will support it eventually. More SPs will be added soon, sure to include the following: f02144581, f02169409, f02169395, f02169396
Fine, Those sps can be reached. Will catch up with the latest update.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceanywvnem5v7gmahdjrgglmqotx5c7gy3vd7lxa42z2ehfkyxfkm4
Address
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1n5wlrrhoxpkgwij25xrtt7w7g2k3fhbthmdn6ri
Id
8f69ef04-a2ea-422c-a8d2-06fc8fdac3c7
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceanywvnem5v7gmahdjrgglmqotx5c7gy3vd7lxa42z2ehfkyxfkm4
@sxxfuture-official You state BOOST will be added later, but graphsync should always work as long as the miners have retrievals enabled.
Your application has: Overall Graphsync retrieval success rate: 2.33%
How are you contacting your SP's to get this up to 20-30--->100% ?
@herrehesse Yes, we are contacting all related SPs to optimize the retrievability issue, the situation will improve in the near future
Please correct the sealing percentage. You are > 50% to your own miners.
@cryptowhizzard The data has been sent to other SPs through the hard disk. Since the data transfer takes time, the seal progress of our own SPs is faster, and this will be resolved soon.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
under sealing
f02049625
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
1000.0TiB
b6c9fa92-d562-4215-81ca-6659228eae4a
Data Owner Name
SXX Future Data
What is your role related to the dataset
Data Preparer
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
Not-for-Profit
Website
https://www.sxxfuture.com/
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
15PiB
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
500TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1j4jxcfyqkzxivzwktseo6dtbhd7mczlkg5uhrpq
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Dataset (Research/Non-Profit)
Custom multisig
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
Other
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
How do you plan to prepare the dataset
lotus, singularity, graphsplit
If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Yearly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
2 to 3 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, Europe
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, Shipping hard drives
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client, Singularity
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes