Closed CaptaiNLP closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request!
Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
The above is our previous application form, because LDN reported an error, so we can not continue, hope to resubmit a new application form to continue
Hi there,
f099132 Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN Hangzhou Alibaba Advertising Co.,Ltd. 4.72 TiB 10.07% 4.69 TiB 0.66% f021704new Shanghai, Shanghai, CN Hangzhou Alibaba Advertising Co.,Ltd. 2.47 TiB 5.27% 2.47 TiB 0.00% f01878534 Los Angeles, California, US Zenlayer Inc 11.81 TiB 25.22% 11.81 TiB 0.00% f01853104 Los Angeles, California, US Zenlayer Inc 11.16 TiB 23.82% 11.16 TiB 0.00% f01893023 Los Angeles, California, US Zenlayer Inc 9.94 TiB 21.21% 9.94 TiB 0.00% f01890456 Los Angeles, California, US Zenlayer Inc
These are the storage providers we have contacted previously, and we plan to contact a few more for joint storage
This list has a most providers flagged in applications with FIL+ not following on the rules.
Any update here?
Please close this application.
@Sunnyiscoming The 2077 application is a continuation of the 880 LDN, please help me close the 880 and open the 2077.
@herrehesse I'll close 880.
@CaptaiNLP Please respond to the above: https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/2077#issuecomment-1615154347
@herrehesse Hi, thanks for the kind reminder.
As sps, they have done ok with 880, no mixing of my datastores, etc. they are qualified sps to me. as for your comment about them not following the rules of the community as sps, it could be some other project they are working with that has nothing to do with my application.
I will however contact other sps again for storage of our data to reduce the percentage of storage for these sps you mentioned. If the sps is not following the rules of the community, we will stop working with them.
@herrehesse Hi, thanks for the kind reminder.
As sps, they have done ok with 880, no mixing of my datastores, etc. they are qualified sps to me. as for your comment about them not following the rules of the community as sps, it could be some other project they are working with that has nothing to do with my application.
I will however contact other sps again for storage of our data to reduce the percentage of storage for these sps you mentioned.
If the sps is not following the rules of the community, we will stop working with them.
This is what i meant to say ;)
@herrehesse That's for sure.
Best practice for storing large datasets includes ideally, storing it in 3 or more regions, with 4 or more storage provider operators or owners. You should list Miner ID, Business Entity, Location of sps in one more region.
@Sunnyiscoming f02185816 Hong Kong f01972110 Beijing f02037700 South Korea f02192496 Guangdong f02199413 Vietnam
In addition to the SPs we have cooperated with before, the following are also the SPs we plan to cooperate with, and they are located in different regions. And as I mentioned above, I will no longer work with these sps if they have violations in my LDN reports
The initial request for 4 PiB using a newly created account and without establishing trust within the community is concerning. I highly recommend close the application and reconsider by starting with a smaller amount to build credibility and trust before making larger requests.
Advising notaries not to engage.
SP f02199413 is not online and open for deals. It does not have it's public address set on chain yet.
@Sunnyiscoming 1, yes 2、Yes, #880 is our previous project 3、The current data are stored in our own server, we will provide the download method to the cooperating sp. The sp will assist us to store the data 4、The data will be prepared by us and downloaded and stored by the sp. 5、The data was not stored on filecoin before, because our server cost is too high, we need to do some space release.
@cryptowhizzard Apart from this one sp node, our other nodes have met the requirements in 4 different geographies, and we will be contacting other sp nodes in the future.
Hello,
Zenlayer does not provide physical hosting for equipment of miners and storage. It is a cloud/ VPN provider. Please provide us with the right locations of the SP's you intend to work with.
Hello @CaptaiNLP per the new guidelines https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/922 for Open Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.
This information will be reviewed by Fil+ Governance team to confirm validity toward the Fil+ guideline of a distributed storage plan and then the application will be approved for notary review. Let us know if you have any questions.
Any update here?
@Sunnyiscoming @Filplus-govteam Thanks for the reply, I've submitted the form, please check it out.
We received the same SP list posted above with no way to contact these SPs: f02185816 Hong Kong f01972110 Beijing f02037700 South Korea f02192496 Guangdong f02199413 Vietnam
Any notaries can do due diligence here on SP entities? Do they have a good record? Do they support retrievals?
In my system I have f01972110 flagged in #1084 for CID sharing and non-retrievability.
f02185816, f02037700, f02192496 are in the same /24 as other SP's flagged for CID sharing and non-retrievability
f02199413 is clean and ok
@CaptaiNLP there seems to be some concerns over your SPs. Please ensure you are choosing SPs that meet distribution and retrievability of Fil+ guidelines.
Total DataCap requested
4PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
500TiB
Client address
f1ofjicywsxwx6nzuz36upvsziibcsw2c7jsfrola
f02049625
f1ofjicywsxwx6nzuz36upvsziibcsw2c7jsfrola
204.79TiB
2f1a478a-c12f-487e-9fcb-5a38a02a2470
@Filplus-govteam Regarding the application for 880, you can see that our storage project inspection reports fully comply with the Fil+ guidelines for distribution and retrievability. This is because we have rigorously monitored the entire process. Due to the issues with LDN reporting, our project has been put on hold for a long time. We hope to receive the support of community members and also look forward to seeing the results in the next round of the check bot. Thank you.
Since the previously partnered SPs couldn't initiate immediately due to issues like pledge coins and data center adjustments, we now have an update on SPs that can be collaborated with immediately: f02212669 china hangzhou Cryptomage f0411877 hongkong FTM f02226892 china shenzhen Blackhole f02320270 USA R1
OK @CaptaiNLP let's check the storage progress after your first allocation.
It seems @Filplus-govteam has cleared all the questions and since this is the first round with reasonable amount of DC requested, I will support this round.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebn6nww3jazqemqlpzsekbqydk376ljt2amjlsunb62ro6wjx457u
Address
f1ofjicywsxwx6nzuz36upvsziibcsw2c7jsfrola
Datacap Allocated
204.79TiB
Signer Address
f1xzff5xup63o5sygr2swp4zvcajg54lotliimdty
Id
2f1a478a-c12f-487e-9fcb-5a38a02a2470
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebn6nww3jazqemqlpzsekbqydk376ljt2amjlsunb62ro6wjx457u
Support based on the information that you offered!
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedbcdzpdaufaa2viiu4hoa4oukvfg27crrgg5lo2qvuiqtidfspqa
Address
f1ofjicywsxwx6nzuz36upvsziibcsw2c7jsfrola
Datacap Allocated
204.79TiB
Signer Address
f1mdk7s2vntzm6hu35yuo6vjubtrpfnb2awhgvrri
Id
2f1a478a-c12f-487e-9fcb-5a38a02a2470
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedbcdzpdaufaa2viiu4hoa4oukvfg27crrgg5lo2qvuiqtidfspqa
Since the previously partnered SPs couldn't initiate immediately due to issues like pledge coins and data center adjustments, we now have an update on SPs that can be collaborated with immediately: f02212669 china hangzhou Cryptomage f0411877 hongkong FTM f02226892 china shenzhen Blackhole f02320270 USA R1
update: f02212669 china hangzhou Cryptomage --shortage of collateral f0411877 hongkong FTM --shortage of collateral f02226892 china shenzhen Blackhole --shortage of collateral
update to: f02329119 - HZ - Cryptomage f02274508 - HK - H&W f02211572 - HK - MicroAnt
@Filplus-govteam
f02211572 is not in HongKong. You are not storing according to your storage plan and not following distribution rules and guidelines.
checker:manualTrigger
@cryptowhizzard @Filplus-govteam
Hello, I apologize for the confusion. It was just an editing error. We haven't started the allocation yet. I was simply disclosing the SPs we are preparing to cooperate with in advance, as requested by the community. Here is the updated list: f02329119 - china hangzhou - Cryptomage f02274508 - HK - H&W f02211572 - china sichuan - MicroAnt
f02049625
f1ofjicywsxwx6nzuz36upvsziibcsw2c7jsfrola
500TiB
43cf7a13-2291-4536-a499-c24727969374
f02049625
f1ofjicywsxwx6nzuz36upvsziibcsw2c7jsfrola
100% of weekly dc amount requested
500TiB
204.78TiB
3.80PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
3691 | 6 | 204.78TiB | 28.17 | 66.32TiB |
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Dear CaptaiNLP,
As notary I am doing due diligence on your LDN. I could not get retrieval to work. Can you please upload the car file of CID baga6ea4seaqhq7v72wn6732tc5idehru7ecqzoylggy6x5stfm4aveabqpnxqky ?
You can use our upload system at http://send.datasetcreators.com. Please select 7 days for the system to keep the file and post the link you received here so I (and other notaries) can download your content.
SPs provied: f02329119 - china hangzhou - Cryptomage f02274508 - HK - H&W f02211572 - china sichuan - MicroAnt
SPs currently taking Deals: f02211572 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. | 11.59 TiB | 9.08% | 11.59 TiB | 0.00% f02226869new | Nanchang, Jiangxi, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone | 256.00 GiB | 0.20% | 256.00 GiB | 0.00% f02274508 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKChina Unicom Global | 30.00 TiB | 23.51% | 30.00 TiB | 0.00% f02329119 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNCT-HangZhou-IDC | 29.94 TiB | 23.46% | 29.94 TiB | 0.00% f01853077 | Singapore, Singapore, SGZenlayer Inc | 35.25 TiB | 27.62% | 35.25 TiB | 0.00% f01852363 | Singapore, Singapore, SGZenlayer Inc | 20.59 TiB | 16.14% | 20.59 TiB | 0.00%
@CaptaiNLP Seeing more SPs taking deals than originally provided. Please confirm who they are and please insure deal distribution is increased across all SPs
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
Hello, @kevzak As the storage project progresses, more service providers will be added according to community rules, so this is reasonable. Additionally, here is the primary information for these service providers: f02226869new | Nanchang, Jiangxi, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone | LuckyMine f01853077 | Singapore, Singapore, SGZenlayer Inc | Alpha100 f01852363 | Singapore, Singapore, SGZenlayer Inc | HectorLi
@cryptowhizzard I'm sorry, I can't upload this file. It's showing that the file is too large.
@CaptaiNLP
Then use Winzip or something to split it in 2 or more pieces.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
@cryptowhizzard I'm sorry. I'm not a technical person.
Data Owner Name
AOLIGEI
What is your role related to the dataset
Dataset Owner
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
Information, Media & Telecommunications
Website
www.aoligei-Fighting.com
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
4PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
450T
Number of replicas to store
10
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
500TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1ofjicywsxwx6nzuz36upvsziibcsw2c7jsfrola
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Commercial/Enterprise
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
How do you plan to prepare the dataset
IPFS, lotus, singularity
If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Yearly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
1 to 1.5 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, IPFS
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Filmine, Big Data Exchange
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes