Closed xujunhuaweitu closed 1 year ago
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 68.31% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Willing to support the round.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedm32prilbs3e6kq7thwdexwer3ns7fkcaa755ml2exbcm4glnwow
Address
f1elc35nz6bzmtxmchc2uoiajv5mkjuhw2yvorl5i
Datacap Allocated
1.00PiB
Signer Address
f1ui5iy4mmkxjbw7752omiwp2ols2fzv4thrayagi
Id
dce26a85-a082-4b40-a67d-48884589a7eb
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedm32prilbs3e6kq7thwdexwer3ns7fkcaa755ml2exbcm4glnwow
Hello,
I have managed to download a deals from you but there is something strange with your data:
gocar inspect 2151-f02637820-f02329119-53035030-baga6ea4seaqfz6rf2wjzj73oo235opzkfr2lvprv5mzqsfdxjo3g5qphzaahgoy Version: 1 Roots: bafykbzaceaonces5i6g42il5xxnrfgaojlkxupjlxxcyxkns2ck4tm4l7ie2o Root blocks present in data: Yes Block count: 32803 Min / average / max block length (bytes): 60 / 1047510 / 1048576 Min / average / max CID length (bytes): 38 / 38 / 64 Block count per codec: raw: 32769 dag-pb: 34 CID count per multihash: identity: 1 blake2b-256: 32802
The data provided is not the data you show in the samples of your LDN and i cannot unpack the car file to UnixFS. Can you explain?
@Casey-PG @maxvint
Did you download data from this LDN and did you inspect the data? Please provide me with the due diligence done?
@cryptowhizzard @kevzak We have applied for private data files, which are not public files. We have encrypted these files during storage.
This is the Non E-Fil.
f02049625
f1elc35nz6bzmtxmchc2uoiajv5mkjuhw2yvorl5i
2PiB
9436e151-8e3c-4971-9271-b290057c310f
@cryptowhizzard Please review the records.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 72.20% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
"72.20% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers." Please explain why.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedtbi6srbddas4bpkov7yt5dunkt3ptcpunwzeixf32drpaaa7ezy
Address
f1elc35nz6bzmtxmchc2uoiajv5mkjuhw2yvorl5i
Datacap Allocated
2.00PiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
Id
9436e151-8e3c-4971-9271-b290057c310f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedtbi6srbddas4bpkov7yt5dunkt3ptcpunwzeixf32drpaaa7ezy
In fact, it was distributed to 10 SPs, but it appears to be skewed to a small number of SPs.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 72.20% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
@psh0691 Thank you for your support.
@DaYouGroup Yes, because the storage speed of each SP varies, e+fil data needs to be encrypted before storage by SPs. The speed of encrypting data varies depending on the encryption method used.
I apologize for the copying and pasting error. I was just doing a quick check.
Willing to support this round
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacechugmhpus7eer6q2fxld6i6b67etms5h4wyhv7gjtwe7uquxeuuw
Address
f1elc35nz6bzmtxmchc2uoiajv5mkjuhw2yvorl5i
Datacap Allocated
2.00PiB
Signer Address
f1nwjsd2mc6hu4qrwnmd6ukrfkuu4h5fhs7u3exii
Id
9436e151-8e3c-4971-9271-b290057c310f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacechugmhpus7eer6q2fxld6i6b67etms5h4wyhv7gjtwe7uquxeuuw
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
keep open
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 52.84% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 52.84% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceavnjkkw2bbbibhqungrbe7n6aublxxt4fiko766ierzpbcrv6lo6
Address
f1elc35nz6bzmtxmchc2uoiajv5mkjuhw2yvorl5i
Datacap Allocated
2.00PiB
Signer Address
f1pnmzlxj7cfeo2v6oj5nco46hkg2l46wj7o4xxui
Id
9436e151-8e3c-4971-9271-b290057c310f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceavnjkkw2bbbibhqungrbe7n6aublxxt4fiko766ierzpbcrv6lo6
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebfdqomrawygom74e6myhdi57devkk6xbpzsu3lragohe4etvn7hk
Address
f1elc35nz6bzmtxmchc2uoiajv5mkjuhw2yvorl5i
Datacap Allocated
2.00PiB
Signer Address
f1q6bpjlqia6iemqbrdaxr2uehrhpvoju3qh4lpga
Id
9436e151-8e3c-4971-9271-b290057c310f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebfdqomrawygom74e6myhdi57devkk6xbpzsu3lragohe4etvn7hk
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 51.63% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
SPs taking deals f02211572 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. | 92.00 TiB | 2.38% | 92.00 TiB | 0.00% f02368282 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone | 752.34 TiB | 19.47% | 721.72 TiB | 4.07% f02226869 | Nanchang, Jiangxi, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone | 399.91 TiB | 10.35% | 398.19 TiB | 0.43% f02274508 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKChina Unicom Global | 955.22 TiB | 24.72% | 955.22 TiB | 0.00% f02815620 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKChina Unicom Global | 52.22 TiB | 1.35% | 52.22 TiB | 0.00% f02329119 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CNCT-HangZhou-IDC | 144.13 TiB | 3.73% | 144.13 TiB | 0.00% f02133079 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHK Broadband Network Ltd. | 51.72 TiB | 1.34% | 51.72 TiB | 0.00% f02037700 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom | 259.94 TiB | 6.73% | 259.94 TiB | 0.00% f01159754 | Singapore, Singapore, SGTencent Building, Kejizhongyi Avenue | 62.81 TiB | 1.63% | 62.81 TiB | 0.00% f01853077 | Singapore, Singapore, SGZenlayer Inc | 354.34 TiB | 9.17% | 354.34 TiB | 0.00% f01852363 | Singapore, Singapore, SGZenlayer Inc | 235.59 TiB | 6.10% | 235.59 TiB | 0.00% f02322031 | Los Angeles, California, USZenlayer Inc | 99.88 TiB | 2.58% | 99.88 TiB | 0.00% f02320270 | Los Angeles, California, USZenlayer Inc | 99.81 TiB | 2.58% | 99.81 TiB | 0.00% f02327534 | Los Angeles, California, USZenlayer Inc | 99.66 TiB | 2.58% | 99.66 TiB | 0.00% f02321504 | Los Angeles, California, USZenlayer Inc | 99.66 TiB | 2.58% | 99.66 TiB | 0.00% f02320312 | Los Angeles, California, USZenlayer Inc | 99.53 TiB | 2.58% | 99.53 TiB | 0.00% f01834291 | Los Angeles, California, USZenlayer Inc | 4.97 TiB | 0.13% | 4.97 TiB | 0.00%
SPs listed upfront: f01853077 - Verified to support retrieval f01834291 US - Approved by community reviewers f02327534 US - Approved by community reviewers f02226869 - CN - LuckyMine - New updated node f02274508 - HK - H&W - New updated node
Confirm all SP entities @xujunhuaweitu
High amount of these deals go to the same entity under VPN. Selfdealing is what we are looking at.
The issue reached the total datacap requested. This should be closed
Data Owner Name
Hangzhou Weitu technology Co., LTD
What is your role related to the dataset
Dataset Owner
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
IT & Technology Services
Website
N/A
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
5PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
500T
Number of replicas to store
10
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
800TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1elc35nz6bzmtxmchc2uoiajv5mkjuhw2yvorl5i
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Commercial/Enterprise
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
If you are a data preparer. What is your location (City and Country)
If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?
If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)
No response
Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Sporadic
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
2 to 3 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, South America, Europe
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
Cloud storage (i.e. S3), HTTP or FTP server, IPFS, Lotus built-in data transfer
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Filmine, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes