Open arlin321 opened 1 year ago
Could you send an email to filplus-app-review@fil.org with your official domain in order to confirm your identity? Email name should includes the issue id #2263.
New account 10PiB with zero reputation. Uploading "video courses" like all of them are. Why are we still allowing this type of behaviour?
f02129988 | LingFengShengShi | Chengdu, China f02639702 | M&UNI | Frankfurt, DE f090665 | BitEngine | Singapore New MinerID(or f02191111) | Chengxin | Los Angeles, USA New MinerID(or f02309112) | Kudian Tec | Changsha, China (Preliminary plan. Some MinerIDs have not yet been determined. Will update and disclose SP information later.)
@Sunnyiscoming
@arlin321 your miners have poor reputation and your account has zero reputation. You are not going to get any datacap. Why don't you try with 10TiB first to showcase your quality and distribution?
Contact email information has not been all completed in the form. Please resubmit the form with complete information.
@herrehesse I don't think your point of view is well-founded. I am fully prepared for this project and I will not change the parameters in the application.
@Sunnyiscoming Resubmited
Same comment. Your miners have poor reputation and your account has zero reputation. We know you do not care about data storage and merely seek datacap to increase miner (your own) revenue.
Close this LDN.
@herrehesse As an entity of Kobiko Company, I applied for LDN for the first time in order to actively participate in distributed storage technology. It can be seen from my account records that I have been paying attention to filecoin for a long time. The miners I provided have all been operating well for a long time and have good search rates. Why slander them? Where is the evidence for your opinion? You should be responsible for your words!
In addition, I got to know many SPs during the preparation of this project, and I also know some information about Dcent. As a notary, Dcent applies for a large number of LDNs as sales quotas in exchange for benefits. In order to maximize benefits, they will maintain A large number of attacks on other LDNs in the name of the community have created conflicts in the community. Almost every LDN has been subjected to unwarranted accusations. I hope that FIL+ officials can pay attention to this matter. Such a group cannot bring any progress to FIL+. We need to understand rationally. Put on some people's hypocritical masks.
As a client who is applying for LDN for the first time, I have provided sufficient materials and a well-operated SPs list, but I am still questioned by such a notary. Shouldn't we doubt his purpose and ask official personnel to review the LDN? At the same time, we will also review the behavior of each notary public. @Kevin-FF-USA @kevzak @raghavrmadya @dkkapur
@arlin321, it's intriguing how quickly you've shifted to critiquing my transparent business practices, following my comments on the questionable reputation of your miners. It's regrettable to observe that numerous LDNs have been involved in questionable activities by the miners you selected. If you genuinely believe your operations are an exception, and my concerns are misplaced, wouldn't it be more constructive to demonstrate how your selected miners have moved past their previously questionable conduct?
Your detailed insights into my operations are quite remarkable for someone purportedly new to this field. It does raise some eyebrows.
To cut a long story short, claiming moral superiority requires more than just words. Show me storage providers that are widely respected. Present high-quality data and efficient indexing. Prove the reliability of your retrieval processes. Earn trust through tangible actions, not merely through rhetoric.
Have a pleasant weekend.
@arlin321 your miners have poor reputation and your account has zero reputation. You are not going to get any datacap. Why don't you try with 10TiB first to showcase your quality and distribution?
Just general question - how to track miners' reputation?
@cryptoAmandaL Good question. Miners have a reputation based on their previous wrongdoings in the past. We keep a record since the first LDN was approved and we have caught miners/notaries/clients involved in numerous accounts of abuse. Some miners lie about their locations, some hide behind VPN and self-deal, some store duplicates to spoof volume and some are simply non-retrievable. All these things get logged and stored.
@herrehesse I have only disclosed 3 MinerIDs that can be determined, and from this you have come to an astonishing conclusion, even before my project has started. All your conclusions are completely one-sided and can even be characterized as slandering other SPs.
A normal notary’s thinking: The SPs disclosed by the new LDN are suspected of having problems -> provide evidence of the problem -> client explains this -> determine whether the explanation is reasonable -> if the explanation is reasonable -> the project continues -> If the explanation is unreasonable, it is recommended that the client re-select SPs that meet the requirements -> Observe the client's modification results to decide whether to continue the project.
And your behavior is: All new LDN applications -> slander without evidence from all aspects -> ask the official to close LDN with a commanding tone
So, I think the big question here is what exactly is your purpose? Why do you want to prevent all clients from obtaining datacap normally?
It is hoped that the official will punish this group to show justice. @Kevin-FF-USA @kevzak @raghavrmadya @dkkapur
@arlin321 that happens when 90% of the LDN's are actively abusive. Since you are one requesting something valuable (DC), I would suggest you tried your utmost to get a proper reputation in place before suggesting anything to the officials ;)
Don't come to me on your high horse, I have been here since genesis and I have seen it all before.
Goodluck.
email sent to SPs listed
Please provide ID, City, Country, Organization of each SP here.
@Sunnyiscoming Since the current LDN has not been approved for a long time, the SPs information is updated here.
ID | City | Country | Organization |
---|---|---|---|
f02129771 | Changsha, Hunan | CN | Kudian Tec |
f02309112 | Changsha, Hunan | CN | Kudian Tec |
f090665 | Singapore, Singapore | SG | BitEngine |
f02848894 | Makati City, Metro Manila | Philippines | AXE ELEMENT CORP |
f02851383 | Bangkok, Bangkok | Thailand | AXE ELEMENT CORP |
f02852197 | Chatuchak District, Bangkok | Thailand | AXE ELEMENT CORP |
f02220887 | Los Angeles, California | US | ChenXing |
f02191111 | Los Angeles, California | US | ChenXing |
If there are SPs outside this list during the official packaging, I will update the current page in time.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
@Sunnyiscoming Can we continue this ?
@arlin321 you can send an email to filplus.govteam@gmail.com with proof of location of the SPs. The list of names is not enough.
SP List provided: [{"providerID": "f02129771","City": "Hunan", "Country": "CN", "SPOrg","Kudian Tec"}, {"providerID": "f02309112","City": "Hunan", "Country": "CN", "SPOrg","Kudian Tec"}, {"providerID": "f090665","City": "Singapore", "Country": "SG", "SPOrg","BitEngine"}, {"providerID": "f02848894","City": "Metro Manila", "Country": "Philippines", "SPOrg","AXE ELEMENT CORP"}, {"providerID": "f02851383","City": "Bangkok", "Country": "Thailand", "SPOrg","AXE ELEMENT CORP"}, {"providerID": "f02852197","City": "Bangkok", "Country": "Thailand", "SPOrg","AXE ELEMENT CORP"}, {"providerID": "f02220887","City": "California", "Country": "US", "SPOrg","ChenXing"}, {"providerID": "f02191111","City": "California", "Country": "US", "SPOrg","ChenXing"},]
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
@Filplus-govteam SP list confirmed
@arlin321 you sent an email? Not seeing anything yet
@Filplus-govteam Since gmail cannot be delivered, the email has been sent to filplus-app-review@fil.org. Pls check it.
The email have not been received. Please send to filplus.govteam@gmail.com.
@Sunnyiscoming @Filplus-govteam
@Sunnyiscoming @Filplus-govteam Can you help confirm this?
Total DataCap requested
10PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
600TiB
Client address
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
f02049625
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
300TiB
5ae8deff-375a-47bd-98ae-b59651f498fc
Looking at the history, the official team completed the initial KYC and the first round is willing to support it.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecsgxizrgjbm2xzlftvlicqh54oxqs3hrajavddmp5o4zvo3yxla6
Address
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
Datacap Allocated
300.00TiB
Signer Address
f1pnmzlxj7cfeo2v6oj5nco46hkg2l46wj7o4xxui
Id
5ae8deff-375a-47bd-98ae-b59651f498fc
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecsgxizrgjbm2xzlftvlicqh54oxqs3hrajavddmp5o4zvo3yxla6
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceauux7p2m5xnysjf5k3yubbbe3choapqme5wtobnpheyeqnpyvz5i
Address
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
Datacap Allocated
300.00TiB
Signer Address
f1bp3tzp536edm7dodldceekzbsx7zcy7hdfg6uzq
Id
5ae8deff-375a-47bd-98ae-b59651f498fc
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceauux7p2m5xnysjf5k3yubbbe3choapqme5wtobnpheyeqnpyvz5i
First 2 round SP list information update: | providerID | City | Country | SPOrg |
---|---|---|---|---|
f02900008 | Singapore | SG | BitEngine | |
f02222322 | Yichang, Hubei | CN | SXX FUTURE DATA | |
f02216186 | Dallas, Texas | US | SJX | |
f02833882 | Dallas, Texas | US | SJX |
f02049625
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
512TiB
d4487711-a732-46df-b875-7cf0d3137134
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacec5er4je6euvnspmke7jiv246tmdx7qhkv4kmbk4dctbhih7wrm7k
Address
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1xx6555qijma7igpnjspyvdunc4vfxkawnpqy5ii
Id
d4487711-a732-46df-b875-7cf0d3137134
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec5er4je6euvnspmke7jiv246tmdx7qhkv4kmbk4dctbhih7wrm7k
The node ID of the next round has been disclosed, continue to pay attention
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced5htkrmchxosnfjwvlqcmlj74uuildr3lsolivtygjpb723gy2zw
Address
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ui5iy4mmkxjbw7752omiwp2ols2fzv4thrayagi
Id
d4487711-a732-46df-b875-7cf0d3137134
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced5htkrmchxosnfjwvlqcmlj74uuildr3lsolivtygjpb723gy2zw
f02049625
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
512TiB
9aa48621-2a15-4e8e-b997-6f514c41b121
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 50% of total datacap - f02222322: 55.34%
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
Because it is the second round. i Support it. But it should be add more SPs in the next round. At least 4 SPs in different regions.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedl4e6fbmkcv2oqlyqydhkv6o2v5f2nqo7dvjqfeio4rt6pndaoii
Address
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1mdk7s2vntzm6hu35yuo6vjubtrpfnb2awhgvrri
Id
9aa48621-2a15-4e8e-b997-6f514c41b121
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedl4e6fbmkcv2oqlyqydhkv6o2v5f2nqo7dvjqfeio4rt6pndaoii
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaervite74y27qgx4v22pgisxqypraq5mdzs4w3aj3665xu5ll3u6
Address
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1dnb3uz7sylxk6emti3ififcvu3nlufnnsjui6ea
Id
9aa48621-2a15-4e8e-b997-6f514c41b121
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaervite74y27qgx4v22pgisxqypraq5mdzs4w3aj3665xu5ll3u6
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
checker:manualTrigger
Data Owner Name
Beijing kebike Education Consulting
What is your role related to the dataset
Dataset Owner
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
Education & Training
Website
https://www.kobiko.cn/
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
10PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
700TiB
Number of replicas to store
10
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
600TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1x5pwzgywea6vnbq4fkvp2typvg7qnxrg6ni2sjy
Data Type of Application
Private Commercial/Enterprise
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
If you are a data preparer. What is your location (Country/Region)
China
If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?
If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)
No response
Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Monthly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
2 to 3 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, Shipping hard drives
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes