Closed xinaxu closed 9 months ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@xinaxu Hello there! Lovely application, you are an extremely trustworthy member of this community. Question: Could you add multiple EU miners to your selection? This would make the distribution more even.
Goodluck!
SP List provided: [{"providerID": "f01989866", "location": "Xi'an, CN", "SPOrg","Weimin"}, {"providerID": "f09848", "location": "CA, US", "SPOrg","bigbear"}, {"providerID": "f01390323", "location": "Hangzhou, CN", "SPOrg","Lianxing storage"}, {"providerID": "f081990", "location": "HK", "SPOrg","Weimin Pan"}, {"providerID": "f01967501", "location": "PA, US", "SPOrg","Acrontech"}, {"providerID": "f01717477", "location": "PA, US", "SPOrg","Acrontech"}, {"providerID": "f02214491", "location": "PA, US", "SPOrg","Acrontech"}, {"providerID": "f02228866", "location": "Tokyo, JP", "SPOrg","Feige IT"}, {"providerID": "f01315130", "location": "Chengdu, CN", "SPOrg","Ouruan IT"},]
I should say that we will likely add more SPs to the list but the IDs of them are unknown but they will likely come from the same companies in the list above
Total DataCap requested
15PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
1PiB
Client address
f1ec3tximpyywg7l7t7lco2ljaz7uvmsdlfg26gli
f02049625
f1ec3tximpyywg7l7t7lco2ljaz7uvmsdlfg26gli
512TiB
6f32991b-e801-49d7-97b8-e58bd922bff6
I should say that we will likely add more SPs to the list but the IDs of them are unknown but they will likely come from the same companies in the list above
Oh gosh Is it can be allowed in fil+? Most of the applications are closed by @Filplus-govteam due to list of sps. @xinaxu should provide all sps he will work with, right?
{"providerID": "f01967501", "location": "PA, US", "SPOrg","Acrontech"}, {"providerID": "f01717477", "location": "PA, US", "SPOrg","Acrontech"}, {"providerID": "f02214491", "location": "PA, US", "SPOrg","Acrontech"},
@xinaxu 's sp list has the same location and the same company. As @Filplus-govteam 's words in other applications, I think @xinaxu should be treated the same as anyone else. Close the application until updated.
@galen-mcandrew @raghavrmadya @Kevin-FF-USA @kevzak @Sunnyiscoming
Can you guys give a clear rule instead of treating everyone differently?
@lilisy90
Regarding my responsibility to provide all service providers (SPs) he will be working with, I concur with your observation. To add clarity, I would like to mention that should there be any changes to the list, I will promptly update it. This allows the Notary to review any new additions and make informed decisions on whether to continue support or to close the application.
In response to your observation about my SP list featuring similar locations and companies, I believe there might be a slight misunderstanding. For a more accurate perspective, I recommend referring to the original post, which details the distribution of deals. Here’s a quick summary for your convenience:
f01989866 - Weimin, Xi'an, CN f09848 - Bigbear, CA, US f01390323 - Lianxing Storage, Hangzhou, CN f081990 - Weimin Pan, HK f01967501, f01717477, f02214491 - Acrontech, PA, US f02228866 - Feige IT, Tokyo, JP f01315130 - Ouruan IT, Chengdu, CN
The presence of multiple miner IDs for Acrontech is due to their individual sealing capacities. Our approach is to ensure fair and equitable distribution of deals across various companies, not limiting them to Acrontech alone. We are committed to maintaining balance in deal distribution, allowing each company to receive a similar volume of deals. How each company manages its allocation, particularly in terms of data distribution across their service providers, is at their discretion.
Regarding the consistency in the application process, as highlighted by @Filplus-govteam in other discussions, I share your sentiment about the importance of clear guidelines. It's indeed challenging when applications are closed due to uncertainties in company identification. That’s why I strive for transparency in disclosing every company involved in our dealings, ensuring clarity and fairness in the process.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebsupvc7vlhs4ianonup5uqj6qnbivtb5vdrqcb6ztqnankbv2ggu
Address
f1ec3tximpyywg7l7t7lco2ljaz7uvmsdlfg26gli
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1jvvltduw35u6inn5tr4nfualyd42bh3vjtylgci
Id
6f32991b-e801-49d7-97b8-e58bd922bff6
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebsupvc7vlhs4ianonup5uqj6qnbivtb5vdrqcb6ztqnankbv2ggu
@xinaxu Thank you for your reply. What I said is all based on what's actually in your application and what other applications in Fil+ are actually facing.
To add clarity, I would like to mention that should there be any changes to the list, I will promptly update it. This allows the Notary to review any new additions and make informed decisions on whether to continue support or to close the application.
Agree with you about this point. And other applicants should also have this right to update their list instead of having their applications be closed. @Filplus-govteam Look at @xinaxu ’s comments, changes do exist in actual process, so that you should give time to applicants for checking. Closing is not a good idea.
@lilisy90 - four points: 1) This is a known client and Fil+ community member with a good level of trust established. However, I did not realize this applicant has not completed the SP registration form cc @Sunnyiscoming. Will ask and pause notary signing until completed. 2) As non-compliance continues to evolve, due diligence, especially related to SPs being used, has to adapt. If an applicant cannot specify SPs before, or if they are accepted and then do not match after some allocations it too will closed and questioned. 3) Applicants are allowed to use multiple miners per SP entity and each entity is held accountable to store only a % of the total (30%). The point of due diligence here is disallowing applicants using many miner IDs disguised as separate entities. 4) All applicants are allowed to update SP lists and provide more information to prove they meet Fil+ guidelines. When an application is closed, it does not mean they lose their DataCap allocated. It just means they will not receive anymore DataCap until they prove their SP entity and distribution.
if you have questions about a specific application, tag this handle and we will review and respond accordingly.
@xinaxu Per the https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/922 for Open, Public Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.
closing until SP registration form is provided. We missed this step before triggering
The SP registration form has been submitted. @Filplus-govteam
SP list provided: f02822921 | Tech Greedy | USA | f02822921 | Feige IT | Tokyo f02240216 | Lianxing Storage | Tokyo f09848 | SEAMOUNT TECHNOLOGIES LLC | Canada f02815438 | MaiJie | India |
Data Owner Name
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
What is your role related to the dataset
Data Preparer
Data Owner Country/Region
United States
Data Owner Industry
Environment
Website
https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-gefs/
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
15PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
3PiB
Number of replicas to store
10
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
1PiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1ec3tximpyywg7l7t7lco2ljaz7uvmsdlfg26gli
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Dataset (Research/Non-Profit)
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
Yes
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
AWS Cloud
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
If you are a data preparer. What is your location (Country/Region)
United States
If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?
If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)
No response
Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Sporadic
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
More than 3 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Singularity
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes