Open cryptowhizzard opened 11 months ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
This user’s identity has been verified through filplus.storage
Total DataCap requested
15PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
1PiB
Client address
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
f02049625
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
512TiB
e4687e48-5600-40be-b036-9f27b456877f
SP List provided: [{"providerID":"f01944347","City":"Oregon","Country":"USA","SPOrg","Jenny,Dabai"}, {"providerID":"f01952350","City":"Oregon","Country":"USA","SPOrg","Jenny,Dabai"}, {"providerID":"f01972364","City":"Oregon","Country":"USA","SPOrg","Jenny,Dabai"}, {"providerID":"f01972376","City":"Oregon","Country":"USA","SPOrg","Jenny,Dabai"}, {"providerID":"f02000937","City":"Chengdu","Country":"CN","SPOrg","MTY"}, {"providerID":"f01915033","City":"Chengdu","Country":"CN","SPOrg","MTY"}, {"providerID":"f0120","City":"Melbourne","Country":"AU","SPOrg","HOLON"}, {"providerID":"f0115","City":"Melbourne","Country":"AU","SPOrg","HOLON"}, {"providerID":"f01199430","City":"Heerhugowaard","Country":"EU","SPOrg","DCENT"}, {"providerID":"f01786387","City":"Heerhugowaard","Country":"EU","SPOrg","DCENT"}, {"providerID":"f01201327","City":"Heerhugowaard","Country":"EU","SPOrg","DCENT"}, {"providerID":"f01937642","City":"Heerhugowaard","Country":"EU","SPOrg","DCENT"}, {"providerID":"f0198","City":"Dallas","Country":"USA","SPOrg","GREATERHEAT"}, {"providerID":"f0188","City":"Singapore","Country":"AS","SPOrg","GREATERHEAT"}, {"providerID":"f01091851","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01736668","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01820744","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f0855584","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01794610","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01838599","City":"KansasCity","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01845552","City":"KansasCity","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01274011","City":"Sydney","Country":"AU","SPOrg","DSS"}, {"providerID":"f01746964","City":"Sydney","Country":"AU","SPOrg","DSS"},]
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebwoze5uuxnwpcq6a6sakkp3yq4jf6zzuac3oq4fpeilozyvgdir4
Address
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
Id
e4687e48-5600-40be-b036-9f27b456877f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebwoze5uuxnwpcq6a6sakkp3yq4jf6zzuac3oq4fpeilozyvgdir4
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedof5mue44xzh2fgoi7rga7363v424vtlirtchl4v5fz7x5dudjwq
Address
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
Id
e4687e48-5600-40be-b036-9f27b456877f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedof5mue44xzh2fgoi7rga7363v424vtlirtchl4v5fz7x5dudjwq
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ All storage providers are located in the same region.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 2 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 2 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 99.94% of deals are for data replicated across less than 2 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
1: There is no backup of the data, all of which are independent data and do not comply with the rules
2: LDN #2111 with CID shared for the same category
3: The packaging report of #2111 is very non compliant, and there are serious issues with cid sharing and insufficient number of copies
@Sunnyiscoming @galen-mcandrew @Kevin-FF-USA @Filplus-govteam
Please check this LDN according to the standards and close it
SP List provided: [{"providerID":"f01944347","City":"Oregon","Country":"USA","SPOrg","Jenny,Dabai"}, {"providerID":"f01952350","City":"Oregon","Country":"USA","SPOrg","Jenny,Dabai"}, {"providerID":"f01972364","City":"Oregon","Country":"USA","SPOrg","Jenny,Dabai"}, {"providerID":"f01972376","City":"Oregon","Country":"USA","SPOrg","Jenny,Dabai"}, {"providerID":"f02000937","City":"Chengdu","Country":"CN","SPOrg","MTY"}, {"providerID":"f01915033","City":"Chengdu","Country":"CN","SPOrg","MTY"}, {"providerID":"f0120","City":"Melbourne","Country":"AU","SPOrg","HOLON"}, {"providerID":"f0115","City":"Melbourne","Country":"AU","SPOrg","HOLON"}, {"providerID":"f01199430","City":"Heerhugowaard","Country":"EU","SPOrg","DCENT"}, {"providerID":"f01786387","City":"Heerhugowaard","Country":"EU","SPOrg","DCENT"}, {"providerID":"f01201327","City":"Heerhugowaard","Country":"EU","SPOrg","DCENT"}, {"providerID":"f01937642","City":"Heerhugowaard","Country":"EU","SPOrg","DCENT"}, {"providerID":"f0198","City":"Dallas","Country":"USA","SPOrg","GREATERHEAT"}, {"providerID":"f0188","City":"Singapore","Country":"AS","SPOrg","GREATERHEAT"}, {"providerID":"f01091851","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01736668","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01820744","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f0855584","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01794610","City":"Omaha","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01838599","City":"KansasCity","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01845552","City":"KansasCity","Country":"USA","SPOrg","DLTx"}, {"providerID":"f01274011","City":"Sydney","Country":"AU","SPOrg","DSS"}, {"providerID":"f01746964","City":"Sydney","Country":"AU","SPOrg","DSS"},]
@Sunnyiscoming @galen-mcandrew @Kevin-FF-USA @Filplus-govteam
The encapsulated node does not match the node provided in the application. Please close it
Hello,
Please note that we have multiple issues open with the same wallet address for this LDN, mostly caused by technical difficulties with the bot and on request of the governance team we created a new one.
You also need to take the other issues in account for this project with the other wallet to get the whole picture.
Thanks
The LDN shared by cid is #2111 #339 . There is another one that cannot be clicked. These three LDNs are simply different projects and different addresses. Don’t quibble, it is a fact.
The LDN shared by cid is #2111 #339 . There is another one that cannot be clicked. These three LDNs are simply different projects and different addresses. Don’t quibble, it is a fact.
It seems that you have difficulty understanding given that you are biased and probably emotional because things did not work out as expected.
However we have only one NIH project, a 15 PiB public and retrievable dataset and we have an old and a new wallet, the latter on request of the Fil+ gov team. They both belong to one project and there is nothing wrong.
Thanks
f02049625
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
512TiB
ef0efb76-6081-4585-b562-a5f73c4517f9
The LDN shared by cid is #2111 #339 . There is another one that cannot be clicked. These three LDNs are simply different projects and different addresses. Don’t quibble, it is a fact.
It seems that you have difficulty understanding given that you are biased and probably emotional because things did not work out as expected.
However we have only one NIH project, a 15 PiB public and retrievable dataset and we have an old and a new wallet, the latter on request of the Fil+ gov team. They both belong to one project and there is nothing wrong.
Thanks
Hello, I don’t have any bias. The question is very clear. You did not answer the question directly. #339 is not the same address and is not the same project as #339. Don't blame others for being biased because you can't answer your own mistakes. But you don't know that you have always been biased to attack others.
@herrehesse You can check it according to your standards
The encapsulated node does not match the node provided in the application. Please close it
@Tom-OriginStorage this is low, even for you as a known abuser of this program. As @cryptowhizzard stated above, its all known and clear. Nothing to add.
@herrehesse
1: There is only one copy of data for 3P, and only two copies of data for 700T+, which is a large proportion;
2: Why do you maliciously attack others' projects without any evidence just by your so-called speculation when you claim to have minor violations for the projects your company has applied for.
Hello,
These issues all belong to this wallet : f1mgnwoczfj25foxn4555wvwyak6rsynzy7z73azy
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
@Tom-OriginStorage
Like i said, these wallet should be combined. We are storing the biggest dataset in the network at the moment ( 15PiB). It is inevitable that the distribution is not in pair and it will take some time for everyone to catch up. It's not a set of a few TiB's that can be done easily.
No need to argue, the fact is there, and I have already made it very clear that everyone can see it
@Tom-OriginStorage Hello dear friend, trying to counter us in here publicly? Our NIH application is the best and most spread out application globally. The CID bot is simply confused by this being a new wallet ID (asked by @kevzak & @simonkim0515 )
Dont shout so loud here Tom, we all know how things work on your end. We are past that.
With this large dataset. I think it's reasonable to get fewer replication for the first few rounds
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedirktvfqmcklayqk6q6ueg6legohvatw425fexayjabzx6qhquj6
Address
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1k3ysofkrrmqcot6fkx4wnezpczlltpirmrpsgui
Id
ef0efb76-6081-4585-b562-a5f73c4517f9
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedirktvfqmcklayqk6q6ueg6legohvatw425fexayjabzx6qhquj6
@Tom-OriginStorage Hello dear friend, trying to counter us in here publicly? Our NIH application is the best and most spread out application globally. The CID bot is simply confused by this being a new wallet ID (asked by @kevzak & @simonkim0515 )
Dont shout so loud here Tom, we all know how things work on your end. We are past that.
@herrehesse What is shouting? Are you not letting others speak? Facts are facts, why are others normal? You can make a lot of pledges just by guessing, but your own real problems are said to be normal,
Don't shy away from the importance, the issue of replica count is just one of them, and there is also the issue of sharing CID with 339. Isn't it a problem?
Please see the shared data volume between your 339 project and this project's CID. Is 339 the same project as this one? 339 ended long ago, the only explanation being that the data for this project does not match this project
@xinaxu You can also take a look
339 shares more, but that belongs to the previous issue, so I won't talk about it. 2111 and 2259 are the latest projects. This is a complete deception, using 339 data to arbitrarily encapsulate LDN
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebcozr6ykuv7ullvs6ehbvklq7axvirr2j63tyacfduabainqqmqe
Address
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1wxhnytjmklj2czezaqcfl7eb4nkgmaxysnegwii
Id
ef0efb76-6081-4585-b562-a5f73c4517f9
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebcozr6ykuv7ullvs6ehbvklq7axvirr2j63tyacfduabainqqmqe
@s0nik42 Could you please take a look at the questions I raised above
@simonkim0515 @Sunnyiscoming @kevzak @raghavrmadya I hope you can pay attention to the questions I raised
f02049625
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
512TiB
166bce1b-9840-4635-af0b-5b917f854511
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebbzyf24l7mow4trzxqbmsoedmtep4cvwzyelaxtp6fwvpmxlzxqc
Address
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
Datacap Allocated
512.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
Id
166bce1b-9840-4635-af0b-5b917f854511
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebbzyf24l7mow4trzxqbmsoedmtep4cvwzyelaxtp6fwvpmxlzxqc
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 14 days, so for now it is being closed. Please feel free to contact the Fil+ Gov team to re-open the application if it is still being processed. Thank you!
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
f02049625
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
1000TiB
dac4fe66-d84e-454c-9d45-232ae75730f6
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebac3ugpzxwciaahg32ggd5fing7rczhapely4g7buzqu75mmal4y
Address
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
Id
dac4fe66-d84e-454c-9d45-232ae75730f6
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebac3ugpzxwciaahg32ggd5fing7rczhapely4g7buzqu75mmal4y
Client f02897439 does not follow the datacap usage rules. More info here. This application has been failing the requirements for 7 days. Please take appropiate action to fix the following DataCap usage problems. | Criteria | Treshold | Reason |
---|---|---|---|
Shared data percent | < 20% | 24.09% of the clients data is shared with other clients. This should be less than 20% |
@Filplus-govteam The shared data is simply caused by us changing our main wallet. This datapacking is the follow up from #2111 .
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacect6fp37l63ti753cycmuwfdzfpind5crqj7jnqjgpqjjzgh22bli
Address
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1pszcrsciyixyuxxukkvtazcokexbn54amf7gvoq
Id
dac4fe66-d84e-454c-9d45-232ae75730f6
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacect6fp37l63ti753cycmuwfdzfpind5crqj7jnqjgpqjjzgh22bli
Client f02897439 does not follow the datacap usage rules. More info here. This application has been failing the requirements for 14 days. Please take appropiate action to fix the following DataCap usage problems. | Criteria | Treshold | Reason |
---|---|---|---|
Shared data percent | < 20% | 25.1% of the clients data is shared with other clients. This should be less than 20% |
Data Owner Name
NIH - National Institute of Health
What is your role related to the dataset
Data Preparer
Data Owner Country/Region
United States
Data Owner Industry
Life Science / Healthcare
Website
https://www.nih.gov/
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
15PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
13.14 PiB
Number of replicas to store
10
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
1PiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1k22mdjvcqhuvrflxrftp4f5oyvgzvnt6rr3kyyi
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Dataset (Research/Non-Profit)
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
AWS Cloud
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
If you are a data preparer. What is your location (City and Country)
If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?
If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)
No response
Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Monthly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
1.5 to 2 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, Europe, Australia (continent)
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, IPFS, Lotus built-in data transfer
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes