Closed NiwanDao closed 2 years ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@galen-mcandrew Can you please take a look
3PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
300TiB
**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01736650
f01736650
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
150TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaz45pq4wgoviuznpm3e3mwmb3yezgj6b4w5a74qn4a5pknas5ewu
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
150.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaz45pq4wgoviuznpm3e3mwmb3yezgj6b4w5a74qn4a5pknas5ewu
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecvih2bhzf2k5a25qexelkweiltxazkibohwz5mlazgcowynugaqu
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
150.00TiB
Signer Address
f13k5zr6ovc2gjmg3lvd43ladbydhovpylcvbflpa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecvih2bhzf2k5a25qexelkweiltxazkibohwz5mlazgcowynugaqu
@galen-mcandrew Not sure why the bot is not triggered again this time .... I only have 5.3 TiB Datacap left in address. (https://verify.glif.io/), and is far below the 25% threshold. Could you please take a look ?
I did not see this application in https://plus.fil.org/
f01736650
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
300TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacearwwxpgnokypxzfl54kohfwgaham3n2v2why26iaxwpkgmbuugpw
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
300.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacearwwxpgnokypxzfl54kohfwgaham3n2v2why26iaxwpkgmbuugpw
@Reiers @IreneYoung @flyworker @MasaakiNawatani @tinkmk @s0nik42 @aaitor @rayshitou @dannyob @TimWilliams00 @ozhtdong @Fenbushi-Filecoin @steven004 @neogeweb3 @waynewyang @swatchliu @MRJAVAZHAO @KodaRobotDog @andrewxhill @XnMatrixSV
Hi, could someone please help here ?
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaujixosvztnqiewibqftvsrhhh7m2xeosb7eqkmrud7bfretegfc
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
300.00TiB
Signer Address
f1fkxkfxgopjf3ufnfg5i3m6qlwf73kp4w5zz7nnq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaujixosvztnqiewibqftvsrhhh7m2xeosb7eqkmrud7bfretegfc
@Reiers @IreneYoung @flyworker @MasaakiNawatani @tinkmk @s0nik42 @aaitor @rayshitou @dannyob @TimWilliams00 @ozhtdong @Fenbushi-Filecoin @steven004 @neogeweb3 @waynewyang @swatchliu @MRJAVAZHAO @KodaRobotDog @andrewxhill @XnMatrixSV
Hi, could someone please help here ?
Done
f01736650
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
600TiB
f01736650
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
not found & not found
200% of weekly dc amount requested
600TiB
450TiB
2.560546875PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
2331 | 14 | 300TiB | 25.57 | 57.015625TiB |
@Reiers @IreneYoung @flyworker @MasaakiNawatani @tinkmk @s0nik42 @aaitor @rayshitou @dannyob @TimWilliams00 @ozhtdong @Fenbushi-Filecoin @steven004 @neogeweb3 @waynewyang @swatchliu @MRJAVAZHAO @KodaRobotDog @andrewxhill @XnMatrixSV @cryptowhizzard
Can someone please help me to sign again?
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedccgvww62zhh5znuevfgpiotzepozksqos5qdkrujcn4ajzllyjo
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
600.00TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedccgvww62zhh5znuevfgpiotzepozksqos5qdkrujcn4ajzllyjo
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecdin7g22oipfpjglvxkb4oqqja5hykep2smherwcpnlraevbv2wa
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
600.00TiB
Signer Address
f1k6wwevxvp466ybil7y2scqlhtnrz5atjkkyvm4a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecdin7g22oipfpjglvxkb4oqqja5hykep2smherwcpnlraevbv2wa
f01736650
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
1.17PiB
f01736650
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
not found & not found
400% of weekly dc amount requested
1.17PiB
1.02PiB
1.97PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
29352 | 33 | 600TiB | 10.69 | 147.57TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacec7wu4z7m24kbwbzalmhnm57k4ggskkuyyk3yfo4bprreydmvxihy
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
1.17PiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec7wu4z7m24kbwbzalmhnm57k4ggskkuyyk3yfo4bprreydmvxihy
@Reiers @IreneYoung @s0nik42 @rayshitou @dannyob @TimWilliams00 @ozhtdong @Fenbushi-Filecoin @neogeweb3 @swatchliu @andrewxhill @XnMatrixSV @cryptowhizzard Could one of you help me to sign this? Really appreciated!
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacear4h7wyqrowsew7qxrldm5ihwfhmjqdprg4g6e4lcfvetecy3rum
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
1.17PiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacear4h7wyqrowsew7qxrldm5ihwfhmjqdprg4g6e4lcfvetecy3rum
Hi @xingjitansuo, I can support it if you still need DataCap.
f01858410
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
823.92TiB
f01858410
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
@cryptowhizzard & @megtei
800% of weekly dc amount requested
823.92TiB
2.19PiB
823.92TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
68721 | 38 | 1.17PiB | 9.77 | 246.15TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceayevl6hf2lkpu3ooafa363rpnvfu7izu5rw6xrmpmfrh3fsz2lxu
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
823.92TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceayevl6hf2lkpu3ooafa363rpnvfu7izu5rw6xrmpmfrh3fsz2lxu
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedziaeg3rsu3453n5reqt3jb4ynvhb4qhc7ejtffhwwdy2gwsqtsw
Address
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
Datacap Allocated
823.92TiB
Signer Address
f1k3ysofkrrmqcot6fkx4wnezpczlltpirmrpsgui
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedziaeg3rsu3453n5reqt3jb4ynvhb4qhc7ejtffhwwdy2gwsqtsw
Hello @xingjitansuo - I'm Kevin from the Client Success Team. I saw you were recently granted more DataCap but there's been a delay in onboarding data. I wanted to reach out to offer any support as needed. Let me know if you have any questions or issues currently holding you back.
Also, feel free to post a message in #fil-plus or slingshot slack channel.
@kevzak Thanks for reaching out. The main reason for delay in onboarding is the speed of dataset transfer. The internet bandwidth is the blocker.
Closing this one. Appreciate everyone involved in this LDN.
CabrinaHuang-Xingjitansuo
f1zil5gn6fgelxw5lb7sbv22eayfltg7eohcrqpni
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 52.76% of total deal sealed by f01826997 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01924827 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01882035 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.95% of total deal sealed by f01863339 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.44% of total deal sealed by f01840219 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.32% of total deal sealed by f01850141 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 48.77% of total deal sealed by f054464 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 48.59% of total deal sealed by f01823264 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 47.97% of total deal sealed by f01887962 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.87% of total deal sealed by f098743 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 32.09% of total deal sealed by f039940 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 24.60% of total deal sealed by f0142637 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.32% of total deal sealed by f01395673 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01826997new |
Dongguan, Guangdong, CN | 205.89 TiB | 6.70% | 97.26 TiB | 52.76% |
f01924827new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 204.50 TiB | 6.66% | 102.25 TiB | 50.00% |
f01882035 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 204.44 TiB | 6.66% | 102.22 TiB | 50.00% |
f01863339new |
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 204.31 TiB | 6.65% | 102.25 TiB | 49.95% |
f01840219 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 202.31 TiB | 6.59% | 102.28 TiB | 49.44% |
f01850141 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 201.75 TiB | 6.57% | 102.25 TiB | 49.32% |
f054464 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 199.68 TiB | 6.50% | 102.29 TiB | 48.77% |
f01823264 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 198.97 TiB | 6.48% | 102.28 TiB | 48.59% |
f01887962 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 196.53 TiB | 6.40% | 102.25 TiB | 47.97% |
f098743 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 139.87 TiB | 4.55% | 102.29 TiB | 26.87% |
f039940 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 108.28 TiB | 3.53% | 73.53 TiB | 32.09% |
f01344987 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 102.17 TiB | 3.33% | 102.17 TiB | 0.00% |
f01284467new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 99.84 TiB | 3.25% | 99.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f01806248new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 84.82 TiB | 2.76% | 79.82 TiB | 5.89% |
f01392600 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 84.76 TiB | 2.76% | 84.76 TiB | 0.00% |
f0117211new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 69.52 TiB | 2.26% | 69.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01270767new |
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN | 65.38 TiB | 2.13% | 65.38 TiB | 0.00% |
f0136399new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 44.23 TiB | 1.44% | 44.23 TiB | 0.00% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 40.78 TiB | 1.33% | 30.75 TiB | 24.60% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 39.23 TiB | 1.28% | 35.58 TiB | 9.32% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 38.59 TiB | 1.26% | 34.88 TiB | 9.64% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 35.67 TiB | 1.16% | 32.11 TiB | 9.99% |
f01395673 | Fuzhou, Fujian, CN | 34.56 TiB | 1.13% | 17.52 TiB | 49.32% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 31.11 TiB | 1.01% | 29.52 TiB | 5.12% |
f01111112new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 26.31 TiB | 0.86% | 21.36 TiB | 18.82% |
f01732188 | Chicago, Illinois, US | 24.42 TiB | 0.80% | 24.42 TiB | 0.00% |
f01702940 | Dallas, Texas, US | 23.78 TiB | 0.77% | 23.78 TiB | 0.00% |
f01794835 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 22.58 TiB | 0.74% | 22.58 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 19.45 TiB | 0.63% | 18.05 TiB | 7.23% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 19.45 TiB | 0.63% | 18.05 TiB | 7.23% |
f01652333 | Sunnyvale, California, US | 17.77 TiB | 0.58% | 17.77 TiB | 0.00% |
f0133509new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 15.63 TiB | 0.51% | 15.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01611097 | San Clemente, California, US | 12.73 TiB | 0.41% | 12.70 TiB | 0.25% |
f01732189new |
San Diego, California, US | 12.03 TiB | 0.39% | 12.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01672960 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 8.91 TiB | 0.29% | 8.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 8.81 TiB | 0.29% | 8.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f034258 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 6.53 TiB | 0.21% | 6.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01157288 | Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 3.78 TiB | 0.12% | 3.78 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 3.75 TiB | 0.12% | 3.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f01208189 | Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 2.91 TiB | 0.09% | 2.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01509930 | Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN | 1.88 TiB | 0.06% | 1.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f079817 | Tomilino, Moscow Oblast, RU | 1.66 TiB | 0.05% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f08240 | Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, RU | 1.50 TiB | 0.05% | 1.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f0688935 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 128.00 GiB | 0.00% | 128.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
4.00 GiB | 24.00 GiB | 6 | 0.00% |
16.00 GiB | 144.00 GiB | 7 | 0.00% |
8.00 GiB | 88.00 GiB | 9 | 0.00% |
32.00 GiB | 608.00 GiB | 11 | 0.02% |
1.19 TiB | 24.38 TiB | 13 | 0.79% |
5.25 TiB | 114.72 TiB | 14 | 3.74% |
6.53 TiB | 155.06 TiB | 15 | 5.05% |
16.41 TiB | 413.09 TiB | 16 | 13.45% |
19.77 TiB | 527.69 TiB | 17 | 17.18% |
10.38 TiB | 293.72 TiB | 18 | 9.56% |
1.78 TiB | 52.78 TiB | 19 | 1.72% |
992.00 GiB | 30.00 TiB | 20 | 0.98% |
3.50 TiB | 112.59 TiB | 21 | 3.67% |
2.38 TiB | 78.25 TiB | 22 | 2.55% |
2.22 TiB | 74.00 TiB | 23 | 2.41% |
3.81 TiB | 131.66 TiB | 24 | 4.29% |
8.16 TiB | 292.19 TiB | 25 | 9.51% |
5.88 TiB | 218.78 TiB | 26 | 7.12% |
6.25 TiB | 238.81 TiB | 27 | 7.78% |
4.31 TiB | 168.91 TiB | 28 | 5.50% |
2.31 TiB | 93.88 TiB | 29 | 3.06% |
864.00 GiB | 35.25 TiB | 30 | 1.15% |
352.00 GiB | 14.59 TiB | 31 | 0.48% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1c2nxtixkivuzmmezwawg4nwzoknvd7hto37cy4q | CabrinaHuang-Slingshot Restore Program | 24.89 TiB | 797 | LDN # 249 |
f1lnecek42mynnu5ph7ucoikald2gucl6jty2ivty | 21.13 TiB | 676 | LDN # 171 | |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 7.22 TiB | 205 | LDN # 293 |
f12m4wzu4ynkpilkh5bv4zaadigmr6hml4zg46dhq | Chengdu Sinso Technology Co., Ltd. | 32.00 GiB | 1 | Zhehao Chen |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?