Closed fildata closed 6 months ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@fildata The site provided is a business platform website. Is there any website or social media account about the organization?
Any update?
@fildata The site provided is a business platform website. Is there any website or social media account about the organization?
@Sunnyiscoming Hello. We check the question late and answer it now.
Our company website is below. http://fildata.co.kr
If you have any additional questions or requests, please ask us. We appreciate your feedback.
http://fildata.co.kr/ do not work. Please check it.
http://fildata.co.kr/ do not work. Please check it.
@Sunnyiscoming We read and checked what you sent. We have confirmed that there is a problem in accessing our web server. We have fixed the current web server connection problem.
http://fildata.co.kr/ Please check the website again.
@fildata Hey. Could you send an email of your organization existence certificant to filplus@fil.org with your official domain in order to confirm your identity?
@fildata Hey. Could you send an email of your organization existence certificant to filplus@fil.org with your official domain in order to confirm your identity?
@Sunnyiscoming We sent the company registration via email. Please check email(filplus@fil.org).
5PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
Client address
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
f02049625
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
50TiB
I have a few questions for you.
You applied for LDN of 5PiB,
As a 'FILDATA' storage provider,
Are you working with other storage providers? If so, can you disclose your partner?
@psh0691
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb6pkoefzteh7p4omlwlxt5atatwbvs4i663sa5rtpcgnxvya6cew
Address
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb6pkoefzteh7p4omlwlxt5atatwbvs4i663sa5rtpcgnxvya6cew
To @psh0691 @galen-mcandrew @Sunnyiscoming @rayshitou @dannyob @TimWilliams00 @ozhtdong @Fenbushi-Filecoin @swatchliu @MRJAVAZHAO @KodaRobotDog @XnMatrixSV @KodaRobotDog @flyworker @IPFSUnion
Hi, please help me to approve next round of Datacap. Thanks!
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebkluqaar2c6uoiurh2z3ulierbb4bvdbsbvm6ymu5qgxapv5nygo
Address
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebkluqaar2c6uoiurh2z3ulierbb4bvdbsbvm6ymu5qgxapv5nygo
@fildata Hi! Great to see you have gotten approval for DataCap. If you are looking for storage providers to store these data, please visit #bigdata-exchange on Filecoin Slack or reply here.
@fildata Hi! Great to see you have gotten approval for DataCap. If you are looking for storage providers to store these data, please visit #bigdata-exchange on Filecoin Slack or reply here.
Nope. Not a chance cuz they claiemd that they're gonna give it all to themselves.
@psh0691 I happened to get this message from someone I know and I couldn't look the other way because their intension seemd very clear which is a SP getting datacap for self dealing (or to an associated SP). As a Korean speaker, I'm sure you'll understand what their intension has been. I'd recommend you to watch how they spend their datacap.
📌 파이온 소식 전합니다 :)
드디어 회사에서 몇달간 수고한 보람의 결실로 "5페타" 대용량 데이터캡 승인이 완료되어, 그 첫번째로 50테라 실링 배정받았습니다 !
회사가 받은 5페타를 데이터캡으로 실링하면 "50페타" 의 용량으로 인정을 받습니다. 이제부터 5패타 만큼은 계속 실링할수 있게 되었습니다 (담보금은 50패타의 비용이 들어가겠지요)
정말 오랜시간이 걸렸고 어려운 결과를 얻어 냈습니다 모두 축하 하는 마음으로 기대 하셔도 좋을듯 합니다!
f02049625
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
100TiB
f01858410
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
cryptowhizzard & psh0691
100% of weekly dc amount requested
100TiB
50TiB
4.95PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1212 | 3 | 50TiB | 40.92 | 9.43TiB |
The File Plus DataCap is not a self-dealing project. The same client and SP can be disputed, and notaries who approve the DataCap are also liable. Based on the above information, we've done some research Both accounts are self-accounts that have already been disclosed. There seems to be a need for clarification and action.
Ok, if this is a self dealing project it might be better to have the team close it to prevent it pops up in our dashboards to sign. That way mistakes are prevented.
SP doesn't mean you can't be a client. Any data owner can apply for a data cap. However, there is a possibility of dispute if you applied only for your own trading purposes
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecqfjgnt2r3kwq6af3gdlkwvs3pguoh6rhfmjdrthrp65g5ju7vcs
Address
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecqfjgnt2r3kwq6af3gdlkwvs3pguoh6rhfmjdrthrp65g5ju7vcs
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceapgyhoipv6sfir65qjps4xuwvl5ffz6zrt5bgwpu7olxmkrculyg
Address
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceapgyhoipv6sfir65qjps4xuwvl5ffz6zrt5bgwpu7olxmkrculyg
f02049625
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
200TiB
f01858410
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
Reiers & psh0691
200% of weekly dc amount requested
200TiB
150TiB
4.85PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
3817 | 6 | 100TiB | 25.62 | 21.96TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebffuae37n34twk6u43gp44rywqdavw2henixjkvie2qu266uqtd2
Address
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1zffqhxwq2rrg7rtot6lmkl6hb2xyrrseawprzsq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebffuae37n34twk6u43gp44rywqdavw2henixjkvie2qu266uqtd2
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacec4wk7ium32gb5flemt5dzys35kibinsb7t5bgxvvuifjpki77sw4
Address
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1pszcrsciyixyuxxukkvtazcokexbn54amf7gvoq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec4wk7ium32gb5flemt5dzys35kibinsb7t5bgxvvuifjpki77sw4
f02049625
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
400TiB
f01858410
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
liyunzhi-666 & GaryGJG
400% of weekly dc amount requested
400TiB
350TiB
4.65PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
9603 | 6 | 200TiB | 27.71 | 47.31TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebvdv7v7ppahvohr2rqdpsmiawrrtkhkpfjvp2kqimtdm4y4bozxm
Address
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebvdv7v7ppahvohr2rqdpsmiawrrtkhkpfjvp2kqimtdm4y4bozxm
FILDATA Co., Ltd.
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ f01924891 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01927163 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01900525 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01924824 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01770778 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01115949 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 80.00 TiB | 22.87% | 79.97 TiB | 0.04% |
f01924891new |
Unknown | 69.63 TiB | 19.91% | 69.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01927163new |
Unknown | 60.91 TiB | 17.41% | 60.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01900525 | Unknown | 48.69 TiB | 13.92% | 48.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924824new |
Unknown | 47.88 TiB | 13.69% | 47.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01770778 | Unknown | 42.66 TiB | 12.20% | 42.66 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
349.72 TiB | 349.75 TiB | 1 | 100.00% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Hello,
I was looking at this application to approve it but It seems to me that only f01924891 is reachable. The guidelines of Fil+ state that the miners should be reachable.
Can you tell me how this works when you are working cloud storage without a reachable miner? How can anyone retrieve this data?
Can you tell me who are miners ->
f01924891new | Unknown | 69.63 TiB | 19.91% | 69.63 TiB | 0.00% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01927163new | Unknown | 60.91 TiB | 17.41% | 60.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01900525 | Unknown | 48.69 TiB | 13.92% | 48.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924824new | Unknown | 47.88 TiB | 13.69% | 47.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01770778 | Unknown | 42.66 TiB | 12.20% | 42.66 TiB | 0.00% |
FILDATA Co., Ltd.
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
1
cryptowhizzard1
GaryGJG1
liyunzhi-6663
psh06911
Reiers
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01770778 | Toronto, Ontario, CAAmanah Tech Inc. |
42.66 TiB | 12.20% | 42.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01927163new |
Amsterdam, North Holland, NLGlobal Layer B.V. |
60.91 TiB | 17.42% | 60.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924891new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JPM247 Europe SRL |
69.63 TiB | 19.91% | 69.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01900525 | Los Angeles, California, USM247 Europe SRL |
48.69 TiB | 13.92% | 48.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924824new |
Singapore, Singapore, SGM247 Europe SRL |
47.88 TiB | 13.69% | 47.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01115949 | Seoul, Seoul, KRSK Broadband Co Ltd |
79.91 TiB | 22.85% | 79.88 TiB | 0.04% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
349.63 TiB | 349.66 TiB | 1 | 100.00% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
FILDATA Co., Ltd.
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
1
cryptowhizzard1
GaryGJG1
liyunzhi-6663
psh06911
Reiers
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01770778 | Toronto, Ontario, CAAmanah Tech Inc. |
42.66 TiB | 12.20% | 42.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01927163new |
Amsterdam, North Holland, NLGlobal Layer B.V. |
60.91 TiB | 17.42% | 60.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924891new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JPM247 Europe SRL |
69.63 TiB | 19.91% | 69.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01900525 | Los Angeles, California, USM247 Europe SRL |
48.69 TiB | 13.92% | 48.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924824new |
Singapore, Singapore, SGM247 Europe SRL |
47.88 TiB | 13.69% | 47.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01115949 | Seoul, Seoul, KRSK Broadband Co Ltd |
79.91 TiB | 22.85% | 79.88 TiB | 0.04% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
349.63 TiB | 349.66 TiB | 1 | 100.00% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
FILDATA Co., Ltd.
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
1
cryptowhizzard1
GaryGJG1
liyunzhi-6663
psh06911
Reiers
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01770778 | Toronto, Ontario, CAAmanah Tech Inc. |
42.66 TiB | 12.20% | 42.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01927163new |
Amsterdam, North Holland, NLGlobal Layer B.V. |
60.91 TiB | 17.42% | 60.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924891new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JPM247 Europe SRL |
69.63 TiB | 19.91% | 69.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01900525 | Los Angeles, California, USM247 Europe SRL |
48.69 TiB | 13.92% | 48.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924824new |
Singapore, Singapore, SGM247 Europe SRL |
47.88 TiB | 13.69% | 47.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01115949 | Seoul, Seoul, KRSK Broadband Co Ltd |
79.91 TiB | 22.85% | 79.88 TiB | 0.04% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
349.63 TiB | 349.66 TiB | 1 | 100.00% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
FILDATA Co., Ltd.
f3vvab3qun5ye6w7ut2vow7o3r4uap3qmt3xz3eib2cp7j3chfb2v3auu4p3w5h62pjqj7dkta3xs5vaky4goa
1
cryptowhizzard1
GaryGJG1
liyunzhi-6663
psh06911
Reiers
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01770778 | Toronto, Ontario, CAAmanah Tech Inc. |
42.66 TiB | 12.20% | 42.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01927163new |
Amsterdam, North Holland, NLGlobal Layer B.V. |
60.91 TiB | 17.42% | 60.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924891new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JPM247 Europe SRL |
69.63 TiB | 19.91% | 69.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01900525 | Los Angeles, California, USM247 Europe SRL |
48.69 TiB | 13.92% | 48.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924824new |
Singapore, Singapore, SGM247 Europe SRL |
47.88 TiB | 13.69% | 47.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01115949 | Seoul, Seoul, KRSK Broadband Co Ltd |
79.91 TiB | 22.85% | 79.88 TiB | 0.04% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
349.63 TiB | 349.66 TiB | 1 | 100.00% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?