Closed scharfstein closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
2PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01838560
f01838560
f1usscfxtogr5v4jmi32uzkckeql2mgvun72q37ga
50TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacediiie2ljjmt5ippxnt2iht4hjtr2si37yb7mxdl75kak4qauf23y
Address
f1usscfxtogr5v4jmi32uzkckeql2mgvun72q37ga
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1k6wwevxvp466ybil7y2scqlhtnrz5atjkkyvm4a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacediiie2ljjmt5ippxnt2iht4hjtr2si37yb7mxdl75kak4qauf23y
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceahnlilxqzokl2km27u2vxc3kovsqyinjg2ijx7oxmcwo7bs3tceu
Address
f1usscfxtogr5v4jmi32uzkckeql2mgvun72q37ga
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1fkxkfxgopjf3ufnfg5i3m6qlwf73kp4w5zz7nnq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceahnlilxqzokl2km27u2vxc3kovsqyinjg2ijx7oxmcwo7bs3tceu
This went through, clearing the warning.
Thanks for your request!
Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@raghavrmadya waiting for auto bot allocation for next tranche
@salstorage -> as part of routine cleanup we were doing (cc @galen-mcandrew) this notary was actually deprecated and set to 0. see https://filplus.d.interplanetary.one/notaries?showInactive=true&filter=Baikal. this is likely because it got picked up in our filters for "inactive" notaries where we had latent DataCap. can you shed any light on recent progress for this application and we can get you started up again?
@galen-mcandrew @simonkim0515 @raghavrmadya what are your thoughts on getting this stood up via a new app following the latest guidelines (i.e., issue on notary governance + new app in this repo)? @kevzak is this a fit for E-Fil+ given private data?
I think if Seal already had notaries that supported this application, there's no need to change the path to DataCap. If they need to start over, then it might be worth considering E-Fil
Seal Storage Technology
f1usscfxtogr5v4jmi32uzkckeql2mgvun72q37ga
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ f01886710 has sealed 43.94% of total datacap.
⚠️ f01886710 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01873432 has sealed 30.95% of total datacap.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01886710 | Unknown | 14.01 TiB | 43.94% | 14.01 TiB | 0.00% |
f01873432 | Las Vegas, Nevada, US | 9.87 TiB | 30.95% | 9.87 TiB | 0.00% |
f01157018 | Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 2.69 TiB | 8.43% | 2.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01157027 | Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 1.81 TiB | 5.68% | 1.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01156901 | Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 1.67 TiB | 5.23% | 1.67 TiB | 0.00% |
f01156975 | Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 1.65 TiB | 5.18% | 1.65 TiB | 0.00% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 192.00 GiB | 0.59% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 97.65% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
4.86 TiB | 4.86 TiB | 1 | 15.24% |
2.39 TiB | 4.78 TiB | 2 | 15.00% |
7.16 TiB | 21.49 TiB | 3 | 67.41% |
192.00 GiB | 768.00 GiB | 4 | 2.35% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1rovtu5m3gq7q5vu4kfh4oiiif643gqq7voi4ida | Seal Storage Technology | 6.38 TiB | 190 | LDN EFil+ |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
checker:manualTrigger
Seal Storage Technology
f1usscfxtogr5v4jmi32uzkckeql2mgvun72q37ga
1
dannyob1
TimWilliams00
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 2nd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01157018 | Melbourne, Victoria, AUAnycast Global Backbone |
2.69 TiB | 8.43% | 2.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01157027 | Melbourne, Victoria, AUAnycast Global Backbone |
1.81 TiB | 5.68% | 1.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01156901 | Melbourne, Victoria, AUAnycast Global Backbone |
1.67 TiB | 5.23% | 1.67 TiB | 0.00% |
f01156975 | Melbourne, Victoria, AUAnycast Global Backbone |
1.65 TiB | 5.18% | 1.65 TiB | 0.00% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
192.00 GiB | 0.59% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01886710 | Las Vegas, Nevada, USGTT Communications Inc. |
14.01 TiB | 43.94% | 14.01 TiB | 0.00% |
f01873432 | Las Vegas, Nevada, USPiKNiK & Company Inc. |
9.87 TiB | 30.95% | 9.87 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 2nd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
4.86 TiB | 4.86 TiB | 1 | 15.24% |
2.39 TiB | 4.78 TiB | 2 | 15.00% |
7.16 TiB | 21.49 TiB | 3 | 67.41% |
192.00 GiB | 768.00 GiB | 4 | 2.35% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1rovtu5m3gq7q5vu4kfh4oiiif643gqq7voi4ida | Seal Storage Technology | 24.62 TiB | 495 | 1 cryptowhizzard1 Fenbushi-Filecoin1 flyworker1 UnionLabs2020 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
@raghavrmadya @dkkapur @galen-mcandrew this application is in a deprecated state. LDN Application #1212 is active and replaces application #325
Please close this application as inactive/void Thanks Sal - Seal Storage
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?