Closed LMdesignlab closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request!
Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Unable to certain legitimacy using the current website. Please send an email from an official account, not limuarch@163.com, to filplus-app-review@fil.org
How long have you been in operation? Many projects listed on your website show other firms as lead architects with further investigation. Please provide evidence for at least 3 projects listed on your site that you have delivered and associated data samples.
Hello Sir @raghavrmadya Thank you for your reply
On the first question
The foreign business e-mail that our company has been using is:“ limuarch@163.com ”, you can see this through our website and social media account.
I don't quite understand what you mean about this part,Maybe you can get some answers through this link. https://www.gooood.cn/company/limu-design-studio?lang=cn
How long have you been in operation? Many projects listed on your website show other firms as lead architects with further investigation. Please provide evidence for at least 3 projects listed on your site that you have delivered and associated data samples.
1. 2021-Convenience store in Beijing
For some data about this project, you can see the details through this link.There are some planning plans, design drawings, effect rendering drawings and final photos of the project.
2. 2018-Stage over the Landscape, Neobay Administrative Service Center
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19oC9DNsM9PSHfXRN14dJMOFEKgL6XL6l?usp=sharing
https://aiqicha.baidu.com/detail/compinfo?pid=xlTM-TogKuTwMR1ObcPsq*vTgWtCeYAdkQmd&rq=ef&pd=ee&from=ps Is this link related with your organization?
@Sunnyiscoming
The organization shown in this link is our company
Data samples only have press releases. Please share 5 examples each of - Project data design scheme Project design drawing Design rendering Rendering video of renderings Relevant image data after the completion of the project.
Hi Sir @raghavrmadya Thank you for your reply We have prepared information related to 5 project cases, please check
Tip: because what we share is the link to the network disk in China, you may not be able to open it. However, we are talking about uploading the data to Google cloud disk for inspection
链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1D38ysmsvtnv9kAopKN6gUg 提取码: 9vc7 复制这段内容后打开百度网盘手机App,操作更方便哦
It is worth adding that we are also in contact with many SP technology service providers. Because we are engaged in traditional industries, we need more complete technical service solutions to store data in filecoin with their help. Including great heat, new web group, origin storage, etc Some SPS we are docking are: f090387 f01609999 f01658888 f0149768 f019362 f066104 f0469055 f01128206
Your data samples still word files and jpg. 5 PiBs is a LOT of data and I don't have enough confidence that you have that much data. That said, I will let notaries decide.
Total DataCap requested
5PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
200TiB
Client address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
f02049625
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
100TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedvyu6tefzyy26p4ce5arsykbdvz73izy3r36f5lz4vnkgzorxxw2
Address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedvyu6tefzyy26p4ce5arsykbdvz73izy3r36f5lz4vnkgzorxxw2
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecrv5ltuyg36c4kzla7khbmgheimm7c6e5c5lvyxucdtv5v3uwxmm
Address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1q6bpjlqia6iemqbrdaxr2uehrhpvoju3qh4lpga
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecrv5ltuyg36c4kzla7khbmgheimm7c6e5c5lvyxucdtv5v3uwxmm
@LMdesignlab Hi! Great to see you have gotten approval for DataCap. If you are looking for storage providers to store these data or have any questions, please visit #bigdata-exchange on Filecoin Slack or reply here.
We have strong demand from a diverse group of SPs, who are actively looking to onboard more data.
f02049625
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
200TiB
f1519137-196d-4eb3-9f07-3348cf6c07e5
f01858410
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
llifezou & newwebgroup
100% of weekly dc amount requested
200TiB
100TiB
4.90PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
2523 | 4 | 100TiB | 31.67 | 6.09TiB |
L&M design lab (Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd)上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
1
newwebgroup1
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 2nd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01964215 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
30.34 TiB | 33.97% | 30.34 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981603 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED |
24.72 TiB | 27.68% | 24.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01920091 | Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DEThe Constant Company, LLC |
16.56 TiB | 18.54% | 16.56 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777788 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
17.69 TiB | 19.80% | 17.69 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 2nd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
56.19 TiB | 56.19 TiB | 1 | 62.91% |
16.56 TiB | 33.13 TiB | 2 | 37.09% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 64.00 GiB | 2 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup2 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceadjsyfvkl6c7mdns7f5nerd5rdd27n5wenrosjwc6qembdecyyss
Address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
f1519137-196d-4eb3-9f07-3348cf6c07e5
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceadjsyfvkl6c7mdns7f5nerd5rdd27n5wenrosjwc6qembdecyyss
Early stage of allocation. Checker bot looks OK.
There is no problem with the number of SPs and data checks, but your data is too centralized, which is not in line with the filecoin principle. I will support you this time, but you need to adjust the subsequent packaging to ensure that the data is evenly distributed. In addition, there are 64 data sharing, which is very small and seems to be negligible operational errors.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacea4rx5brvlmkikur7r32doelz46s3pvdyasdgb55ptrxheqsqwcmi
Address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1fg6jkxsr3twfnyhdlatmq36xca6sshptscds7xa
Id
f1519137-196d-4eb3-9f07-3348cf6c07e5
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacea4rx5brvlmkikur7r32doelz46s3pvdyasdgb55ptrxheqsqwcmi
f02049625
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
400TiB
0da82a1e-aec7-4ddb-8b07-869ef0981244
f01858410
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
fireflyHZ & kernelogic
200% of weekly dc amount requested
400TiB
100TiB
4.90PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
3200 | 4 | 200TiB | 31.22 | 0B |
L&M design lab (Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd)上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
1
kernelogic1
newwebgroup1
Tom-OriginStorage1
YuanHeHK
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01964215 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
30.47 TiB | 30.79% | 30.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981603 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED |
24.72 TiB | 24.98% | 24.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01920091 | Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DEThe Constant Company, LLC |
21.50 TiB | 21.72% | 21.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777788 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
22.28 TiB | 22.51% | 22.28 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
55.97 TiB | 55.97 TiB | 1 | 56.55% |
21.50 TiB | 43.00 TiB | 2 | 43.45% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 64.00 GiB | 2 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup2 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
checker:manualTrigger
L&M design lab (Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd)上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
1
kernelogic1
newwebgroup1
Tom-OriginStorage1
YuanHeHK
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 44.87% of total deal sealed by f01920091 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01964215 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
30.47 TiB | 21.19% | 30.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01529999 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHK Broadband Network Ltd. |
8.75 TiB | 6.08% | 8.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981603 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED |
24.72 TiB | 17.19% | 24.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01920091 | Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DEThe Constant Company, LLC |
39.56 TiB | 27.51% | 21.81 TiB | 44.87% |
f01777786 | Ōi, Saitama, JPThe Constant Company, LLC |
10.50 TiB | 7.30% | 10.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777785 | Singapore, Singapore, SGUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED |
7.53 TiB | 5.24% | 7.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777788 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
22.28 TiB | 15.49% | 22.28 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:
⚠️ 75.32% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
64.41 TiB | 64.41 TiB | 1 | 44.78% |
10.97 TiB | 29.34 TiB | 2 | 20.40% |
3.66 TiB | 14.56 TiB | 3 | 10.13% |
7.19 TiB | 35.50 TiB | 4 | 24.68% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 64.00 GiB | 2 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup2 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacec3pgww6qmf43dxluxuyll6xmkqcnpexgco7wfesumleu2hyircuc
Address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1q6bpjlqia6iemqbrdaxr2uehrhpvoju3qh4lpga
Id
0da82a1e-aec7-4ddb-8b07-869ef0981244
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec3pgww6qmf43dxluxuyll6xmkqcnpexgco7wfesumleu2hyircuc
Thank you for your signature support, Notary Public
About CID Sharing Sorry, this is due to operational errors. We have made corrections, and the sharing situation has not spread further. About SP dispersion improvement We plan to add 3 - 5 SPs in the next two rounds to make the data more dispersed.
I checked Github's history and CID Checker's conclusions, and it looks ok. The Client has already explained some problems, and the Client said that it will continue to optimize, so it is willing to support this round.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced7hr4trk2vr3fket7col2qk76q6umqex7niwqhhoaivkkh7gmn6e
Address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1mdk7s2vntzm6hu35yuo6vjubtrpfnb2awhgvrri
Id
0da82a1e-aec7-4ddb-8b07-869ef0981244
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced7hr4trk2vr3fket7col2qk76q6umqex7niwqhhoaivkkh7gmn6e
Dear Applicant,
Due to the increased amount of erroneous/wrong Filecoin+ data recently, on behalf of the entire community, we feel compelled to go deeper into datacap requests. Hereby to ensure that the overall value of the Filecoin network and Filecoin+ program increases and is not abused.
Please answer the questions below as comprehensively as possible.
Customer data
We expect that for the onboarding of customers with the scale of an LDN there would have been at least multiple email and perhaps several chat conversations preceding it. A single email with an agreement does not qualify here.
Did the customer specify the amount of data involved in this relevant correspondence?
Why does the customer in question want to use the Filecoin+ program?
Should this only be soley for acquiring datacap this is of course out of the question. The customer must have a legitimate reason for wanting to use the Filecoin+ program which is intended as a program to store useful and public datasets on the network.
(As an intermediate solution Filecoin offers the FIL-E program or the glif.io website for business datasets that do not meet the requirements for a Filecoin+ dataset)
Files and Processing
Hopefully you understand the caution the overall community has for onboarding the wrong data. We understand the increased need for Filecoin+, however, we must not allow the program to be misused. Everything depends on a valuable and useful network, let's do our best to make this happen. Together.
f02049625
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
800TiB
29b4f45e-8e12-4643-8821-0d76b8f2d04f
f01858410
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
1ane-1 & llifezou
400% of weekly dc amount requested
800TiB
300TiB
4.70PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
17149 | 10 | 400TiB | 19.34 | 80.21TiB |
L&M design lab (Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd)上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
1
1ane-11
kernelogic1
newwebgroup2
Tom-OriginStorage1
YuanHeHK
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 26.75% of total deal sealed by f01777788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01771695 | Wuhan, Hubei, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
14.56 TiB | 2.64% | 14.56 TiB | 0.00% |
f01964215 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
30.47 TiB | 5.51% | 30.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924827 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKDiyixian.com Limited |
26.69 TiB | 4.83% | 26.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01529999 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHK Broadband Network Ltd. |
32.03 TiB | 5.80% | 32.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981603 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED |
24.72 TiB | 4.47% | 24.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01920091 | Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DEThe Constant Company, LLC |
110.50 TiB | 20.00% | 91.44 TiB | 17.25% |
f01777786 | Ōi, Saitama, JPThe Constant Company, LLC |
78.03 TiB | 14.12% | 78.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777787 | Paripark, Seoul, KRThe Constant Company, LLC |
62.44 TiB | 11.30% | 62.44 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777785 | Singapore, Singapore, SGUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED |
58.53 TiB | 10.59% | 58.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777788 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
83.28 TiB | 15.07% | 61.00 TiB | 26.75% |
f01681234new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
31.25 TiB | 5.66% | 31.25 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 31.63% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
128.84 TiB | 128.84 TiB | 1 | 23.32% |
22.44 TiB | 44.88 TiB | 2 | 8.12% |
352.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 3 | 0.19% |
1.81 TiB | 7.25 TiB | 4 | 1.31% |
35.34 TiB | 185.34 TiB | 5 | 33.55% |
25.41 TiB | 185.16 TiB | 6 | 33.51% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 64.00 GiB | 2 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup2 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedakcfl3g4hx3xzw37crzomfzswh5ax355chk5jkjiwwbh5nobkao
Address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
29b4f45e-8e12-4643-8821-0d76b8f2d04f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedakcfl3g4hx3xzw37crzomfzswh5ax355chk5jkjiwwbh5nobkao
Thank you for your efforts @herrehesse
2.LM is a customized architectural design company founded in 2015. It has been in normal operation for 8 years. You can get our information through the above PPT materials. We currently have 400T+ business data, and we want to make 10 replicas, including: Project data design scheme Project design drawing Design rendering Rendering video of renderings Relevant image data after the completion of the project.
We apply for DC for the following reasons (1) Our data is valuable to both clients and the construction industry. Future clients are willing to pay to get their data back when they need it. (2) The DC quota allows us to store the data set in Filecoin. When we communicate with SP, they are not willing to provide us with data storage without DC. Because there's a lot of extra cost. These costs are higher than buying our own servers and using a centralized storage service.
We reached out to some Filecoin investors, and we also reached out to some technical services teams. We provide the source data, send the hard disk offline, send to the location of SP, and load the data.
I'm sorry that we have CID sharing, which is caused by the mistake of technical personnel. You can see that the error is not magnified in subsequent rounds.
It seems that the client ask a third party to prepare the file to the format that Filecoin accepts, and that's the reason for the CID sharing. Please be careful next time.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceakzcw4gwthjf7lbugkqk64r35a5ucel5xsougjj5fhowd3vsg7ui
Address
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1a2lia2cwwekeubwo4nppt4v4vebxs2frozarz3q
Id
29b4f45e-8e12-4643-8821-0d76b8f2d04f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceakzcw4gwthjf7lbugkqk64r35a5ucel5xsougjj5fhowd3vsg7ui
@LMdesignlab thank you for your detailed explanation, appreciate it.
The business data you provided is very much welcomed to the Filecoin network, but I believe it does not fit the requirements for the Filecoin+ program. The data is purely for and from your business and does not improve the global network as a whole in my opinion.
"The DC quota allows us to store the data set in Filecoin. When we communicate with SP, they are not willing to provide us with data storage without DC. Because there's a lot of extra cost. These costs are higher than buying our own servers and using a centralized storage service."
This one is really important to me, again your transparency is valued, should we grant datacap to applicants who are requesting to store business data at selected storage providers who declined regular paid deals? This way we will never evolve into a monetised storage platform and the datacap will be abused purely for growth only. Not the vision of storing humanities most important information.
I am happy to discuss with you about the abuse of DC. The following views only represent my own personal views
In my opinion, any data is valuable (except for random computer generated numbers), and each piece of data has a different meaning and function for each person. Whether it's a large public data set or an enterprise data set, if someone is willing to use Fil+ to store it and use it by the rules, I think that's a great thing.
To be honest, Filecoin at this stage is a terrible experience to use, and it will take some time to grow if it is to reach the level of S3.
My personal opinion is: During the Filecoin ➡️ S3 process, Any data loaded into Filecoin is helping Filecoin grow. If there is no DC incentive, SP is hardly motivated to cooperate with Client to store data. This is the fact of the moment. Besides, right now we only have DC.
I think we might as well not put so much value on DC ️ Can we interpret this as a testing phase? Everything is being done to keep Filecoin strong and growing. Whether it's through Fil+, fil-e, or fil-A? Fil-B? OR Fil-?? No matter what data, no matter what form.
Until the use experience of Filecoin can reach S3 or close to S3, we can replace the data. After all, so far, the data storage period is only 540 days.
This is my opinion on DC, which has nothing to do with LM and others.Look forward to your reply😊 @herrehesse
No slur on Filecoin, just look at it from the perspective of how things are going. This is normal, after all, everyone needs time to grow up.
In the early days, many successful Internet giants gave away their resources to users for free in order to have more users. Users also helped the application/network to further grow while using them. (e.g. Google, wechat, etc.)
So I think Filecoin's DC is a similar reward, This reward is given by the community to Client and SP.
We just need to make sure it's not random computer-generated numbers, it's not an adult video, it's not illegal content. Everyone has the right to enjoy the DC and participate in the community.
What do you think? 🤔
@LMdesignlab I agree with you mostly, and I respect the way you are responding to my questions. I wished there where more people like you in this github repo.
"Everyone has the right to enjoy the DC and participate in the community" I 100% agree with you.
It does not automatically mean that "any piece of corporate data may derive the permissions to amass datacap."
Datacap is a gift, not a right.
Aside from my opinion that this data may not be suitable for the Filecoin+ program, I am always in favor of experimenting with customers on the Filecoin network. And I also like the above CID report better than the 9/10 applications I have come across. However, two more questions about the report:
Could you enlighten me if you can still approach storage providers in australia or america for full correct distribution?
Also, data dissemination is still among too few different companies. (And as indicated above regions).
Would love to see improvement in this, in addition to the conversation about the eligibility of the data.
checker:manualTrigger
L&M design lab (Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd)上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla
1
1ane-12
kernelogic1
newwebgroup2
Tom-OriginStorage1
xingjitansuo1
YuanHeHK
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01964215 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
30.47 TiB | 2.11% | 30.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01924827 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKDiyixian.com Limited |
26.69 TiB | 1.85% | 26.69 TiB | 0.00% |
f01529999 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHK Broadband Network Ltd. |
70.53 TiB | 4.90% | 70.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01990005new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHKBN Enterprise Solutions HK Limited |
31.78 TiB | 2.21% | 31.78 TiB | 0.00% |
f01771695 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED |
60.50 TiB | 4.20% | 60.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981603 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED |
24.72 TiB | 1.72% | 24.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01920091 | Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DEThe Constant Company, LLC |
167.53 TiB | 11.63% | 148.47 TiB | 11.38% |
f01777786 | Yokohama, Kanagawa, JPThe Constant Company, LLC |
154.50 TiB | 10.72% | 154.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777787 | Seoul, Seoul, KRThe Constant Company, LLC |
148.63 TiB | 10.32% | 148.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777785 | Singapore, Singapore, SGUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED |
152.81 TiB | 10.61% | 152.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VNUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED |
59.63 TiB | 4.14% | 59.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01953959 | Singapore, Singapore, SGUCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED |
16.41 TiB | 1.14% | 16.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f01777788 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
172.91 TiB | 12.00% | 150.63 TiB | 12.89% |
f01681234new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
126.00 TiB | 8.75% | 126.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01732345 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
100.84 TiB | 7.00% | 100.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f01753456 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKUNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
96.78 TiB | 6.72% | 96.78 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
187.91 TiB | 187.91 TiB | 1 | 13.04% |
41.16 TiB | 82.31 TiB | 2 | 5.71% |
3.69 TiB | 11.06 TiB | 3 | 0.77% |
4.31 TiB | 17.25 TiB | 4 | 1.20% |
4.41 TiB | 22.03 TiB | 5 | 1.53% |
8.06 TiB | 48.38 TiB | 6 | 3.36% |
61.31 TiB | 438.06 TiB | 7 | 30.41% |
75.16 TiB | 633.72 TiB | 8 | 43.99% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Approvers |
---|---|---|---|---|
f12k5kukgldua3ag5kzdhi27bxy52cvwf4kn7phfy | BLOCKCHAIN METAVERSE ACADEMY PTY LTD | 73.66 TiB | 1,890 | 1 kernelogic1 NDLABS-OFFICE2 newwebgroup1 stcouldlisa1 Tom-OriginStorage1 xingjitansuo1 YuanHeHK |
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq | Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 64.00 GiB | 2 | 1 1ane-11 ipfscn2 kernelogic1 liyunzhi-6661 NDLABS-OFFICE3 newwebgroup1 stcouldlisa3 Tom-OriginStorage |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
I was surprised by CID Checker's results. As for the emerging CID sharing situation, we are investigating the cause. Preliminary judgment is due to the operation error of one of the technical service team, the specific situation is still under investigation. If the violation is true, we will try to have the offending SP terminate the corresponding DC sector.
@LMdesignlab Full investigation results are requested by the community as this violation is not acceptable without clear explanation.
I agree with you. We are also checking. @herrehesse
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Organization Name: L&M design lab (Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd)上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
Website / Social Media:https://www.limu.design/
Total amount of DataCap being requested (between 500 TiB and 5 PiB):5PiB
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested (usually between 1-100TiB):200TiB
On-chain address for first allocation:f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?