Closed kernelogic closed 2 years ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@kernelogic is this same or different to #60 ?
@MegTei different dataset / project.
looks good for me
Happy to support
1PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
200TiB
**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01381719
HI @galen-mcandrew this LDN also absent from my list
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
50TiB
The allocation of the requested datacap cannot be performed.The requested amount exceeds 5% of the total datacap requested.
should it be 50T for the first allocation? @galen-mcandrew
@kernelogic is the 200TB correct for weekly onboarding rate?
I agree that it should be 50TB, trying to resolve bot logic that miscalculated.
@dkkapur Yes, 200T weekly. In my previous experience 100T weekly is ... tight.
Pausing and removing label so it is not signed yet, waiting on team to adjust calculation bots. @fabriziogianni7
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebjk5lw5aln7ucew2zvzdice3xpm4ace5jcf5oh54izl3ajv3r5qq
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
50TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebjk5lw5aln7ucew2zvzdice3xpm4ace5jcf5oh54izl3ajv3r5qq
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceazfd4kefosgpob72ko3fvhkarofy4jpb4vik7sfzqg74cm5qsz3g
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
50TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceazfd4kefosgpob72ko3fvhkarofy4jpb4vik7sfzqg74cm5qsz3g
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
102.4TiB
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
MegTei & Reiers
102.4TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1101 | 7 | not found | 30.70 | 10.9TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebbaschaltzc62tiewpiipyyajtnmuajt64y4sezcgcnuznw57b5q
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
102TiB
Signer Address
f1yh6q3nmsg7i2sys7f7dexcuajgoweudcqj2chfi
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebbaschaltzc62tiewpiipyyajtnmuajt64y4sezcgcnuznw57b5q
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedyydgecup6lgkqd6wa4odd6f37womsxciktfeavc75skmg2uufpi
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
102TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedyydgecup6lgkqd6wa4odd6f37womsxciktfeavc75skmg2uufpi
Hi @dkkapur @galen-mcandrew my address suddenly not a verified client anymore. I think it should still have more than 30TiB datacap before renew.
lotus filplus check-client-datacap f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q ERROR: client f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q is not a verified client
When I check https://verify.glif.io/ right now, it says that address has 64 GiB remaining. Very odd. @kernelogic can you double-check?
We are having an issue with the Fil+ registry app, so allocations are not showing up for notaries to sign or approve.
@galen-mcandrew I think it was completely depleted when it says not a verified client, then some of my SPs failed two deals and 64GB datacap was returned.
Now just waiting for everything to get back to normal so this can be renewed for the next 200TB allocation. It's blocking.
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
204.8TiB
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
swatchliu & Reiers
204.8TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
4136 | 13 | not found | 20.43 | 128GiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedhok6zcirtdgrzisi6nkugbhobisr3komu637obphtvxnvpuyndy
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
204TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedhok6zcirtdgrzisi6nkugbhobisr3komu637obphtvxnvpuyndy
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebhffxjgsez7htts5n4rekw2fuc5bo3mloaovtt772gazkukulvns
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
204TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebhffxjgsez7htts5n4rekw2fuc5bo3mloaovtt772gazkukulvns
@galen-mcandrew could you help me to remove the Granted status so it can show up for approval?
I think the second message was actually the approval for txID2, and at this time there is still a pending transaction (txID3) for 200TiB with one proposal.
Adjusting the labels to have it show up in the app again for the second approval for txID3.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedrm6vbu3tn5eviaucwruz4d7adyhixckncqgur4kbgkx4tsjimrm
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
204TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedrm6vbu3tn5eviaucwruz4d7adyhixckncqgur4kbgkx4tsjimrm
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
409.6TiB
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Reiers & MegTei
409.6TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
7621 | 22 | 204.8TiB | 14.33 | 48.1TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaf44k6c2abtxk42zco2bnbmbo465mmw5wsxqzaboammfstybqwvq
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
409TiB
Signer Address
f1yh6q3nmsg7i2sys7f7dexcuajgoweudcqj2chfi
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaf44k6c2abtxk42zco2bnbmbo465mmw5wsxqzaboammfstybqwvq
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacec6emocy66g3bha7uojceidzkf4mhxs7lpcraof5qzqiluqeg4yr6
Address
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
Datacap Allocated
409TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec6emocy66g3bha7uojceidzkf4mhxs7lpcraof5qzqiluqeg4yr6
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
157TiB
f01381719
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
not found & not found
80% of total dc amount requested
157TiB
867TiB
157TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
18595 | 24 | 409.6TiB | 17.17 | 85.1328125TiB |
Consider this as close as this data has been discontinued for further slingshot phases.
Fei Yan - Kernelogic
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 40.21% of total deal sealed by f0240185 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 43.90% of total deal sealed by f02301 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.83% of total deal sealed by f03223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.02% of total deal sealed by f0143858 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 150.57 TiB | 19.90% | 90.03 TiB | 40.21% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 143.10 TiB | 18.91% | 80.28 TiB | 43.90% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 136.52 TiB | 18.04% | 67.13 TiB | 50.83% |
f0143858new |
Clifton, New Jersey, US | 116.30 TiB | 15.37% | 77.89 TiB | 33.02% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 40.59 TiB | 5.37% | 40.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f039940 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 39.25 TiB | 5.19% | 39.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f034258 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 31.75 TiB | 4.20% | 31.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0688935 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 19.94 TiB | 2.64% | 19.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 15.25 TiB | 2.02% | 15.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01672960 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 12.94 TiB | 1.71% | 12.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 11.38 TiB | 1.50% | 11.38 TiB | 0.00% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 6.59 TiB | 0.87% | 6.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838873new |
Dallas, Texas, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838852new |
Newark, New Jersey, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838923new |
Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838893new |
Fremont, California, US | 4.94 TiB | 0.65% | 4.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 3.30 TiB | 0.44% | 3.30 TiB | 0.00% |
f0164291 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 3.22 TiB | 0.43% | 3.22 TiB | 0.00% |
f01609999new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 768.00 GiB | 0.10% | 768.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01278 | Grand Rapids, Michigan, US | 224.00 GiB | 0.03% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.11 TiB | 3.11 TiB | 1 | 0.41% |
5.69 TiB | 11.41 TiB | 2 | 1.51% |
13.09 TiB | 40.19 TiB | 3 | 5.31% |
42.89 TiB | 320.15 TiB | 4 | 42.31% |
15.55 TiB | 109.72 TiB | 5 | 14.50% |
2.88 TiB | 17.59 TiB | 6 | 2.33% |
11.59 TiB | 87.44 TiB | 7 | 11.56% |
14.69 TiB | 157.56 TiB | 8 | 20.83% |
736.00 GiB | 9.44 TiB | 9 | 1.25% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1euejrtpg5vphqzydzleld2vgxfkhbrueiomz54y | Fei Yan - Kernelogic | 215.62 TiB | 2,185 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 143.20 TiB | 2,137 | LDN # 293 |
f15djc5avdxihguvpmtej24rzbvnnqvzurxe55kja | Kernelogic - Fei Yan - Slingshot Restore | 129.55 TiB | 1,386 | LDN # 136 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Fei Yan - Kernelogic
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 40.21% of total deal sealed by f0240185 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 43.90% of total deal sealed by f02301 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.83% of total deal sealed by f03223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.02% of total deal sealed by f0143858 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 150.57 TiB | 19.90% | 90.03 TiB | 40.21% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 143.10 TiB | 18.91% | 80.28 TiB | 43.90% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 136.52 TiB | 18.04% | 67.13 TiB | 50.83% |
f0143858new |
Clifton, New Jersey, US | 116.30 TiB | 15.37% | 77.89 TiB | 33.02% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 40.59 TiB | 5.37% | 40.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f039940 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 39.25 TiB | 5.19% | 39.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f034258 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 31.75 TiB | 4.20% | 31.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0688935 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 19.94 TiB | 2.64% | 19.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 15.25 TiB | 2.02% | 15.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01672960 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 12.94 TiB | 1.71% | 12.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 11.38 TiB | 1.50% | 11.38 TiB | 0.00% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 6.59 TiB | 0.87% | 6.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838873new |
Dallas, Texas, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838852new |
Newark, New Jersey, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838923new |
Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838893new |
Fremont, California, US | 4.94 TiB | 0.65% | 4.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 3.30 TiB | 0.44% | 3.30 TiB | 0.00% |
f0164291 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 3.22 TiB | 0.43% | 3.22 TiB | 0.00% |
f01609999new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 768.00 GiB | 0.10% | 768.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01278 | Grand Rapids, Michigan, US | 224.00 GiB | 0.03% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.11 TiB | 3.11 TiB | 1 | 0.41% |
5.69 TiB | 11.41 TiB | 2 | 1.51% |
13.09 TiB | 40.19 TiB | 3 | 5.31% |
42.89 TiB | 320.15 TiB | 4 | 42.31% |
15.55 TiB | 109.72 TiB | 5 | 14.50% |
2.88 TiB | 17.59 TiB | 6 | 2.33% |
11.59 TiB | 87.44 TiB | 7 | 11.56% |
14.69 TiB | 157.56 TiB | 8 | 20.83% |
736.00 GiB | 9.44 TiB | 9 | 1.25% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1euejrtpg5vphqzydzleld2vgxfkhbrueiomz54y | Fei Yan - Kernelogic | 215.62 TiB | 2,185 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 143.20 TiB | 2,137 | LDN # 293 |
f15djc5avdxihguvpmtej24rzbvnnqvzurxe55kja | Kernelogic - Fei Yan - Slingshot Restore | 129.55 TiB | 1,386 | LDN # 136 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Fei Yan - Kernelogic
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 40.21% of total deal sealed by f0240185 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 43.90% of total deal sealed by f02301 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.83% of total deal sealed by f03223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.02% of total deal sealed by f0143858 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 150.57 TiB | 19.90% | 90.03 TiB | 40.21% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 143.10 TiB | 18.91% | 80.28 TiB | 43.90% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 136.52 TiB | 18.04% | 67.13 TiB | 50.83% |
f0143858new |
Clifton, New Jersey, US | 116.30 TiB | 15.37% | 77.89 TiB | 33.02% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 40.59 TiB | 5.37% | 40.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f039940 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 39.25 TiB | 5.19% | 39.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f034258 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 31.75 TiB | 4.20% | 31.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0688935 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 19.94 TiB | 2.64% | 19.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 15.25 TiB | 2.02% | 15.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01672960 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 12.94 TiB | 1.71% | 12.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 11.38 TiB | 1.50% | 11.38 TiB | 0.00% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 6.59 TiB | 0.87% | 6.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838873new |
Dallas, Texas, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838852new |
Newark, New Jersey, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838923new |
Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838893new |
Fremont, California, US | 4.94 TiB | 0.65% | 4.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 3.30 TiB | 0.44% | 3.30 TiB | 0.00% |
f0164291 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 3.22 TiB | 0.43% | 3.22 TiB | 0.00% |
f01609999new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 768.00 GiB | 0.10% | 768.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01278 | Grand Rapids, Michigan, US | 224.00 GiB | 0.03% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.11 TiB | 3.11 TiB | 1 | 0.41% |
5.69 TiB | 11.41 TiB | 2 | 1.51% |
13.09 TiB | 40.19 TiB | 3 | 5.31% |
42.89 TiB | 320.15 TiB | 4 | 42.31% |
15.55 TiB | 109.72 TiB | 5 | 14.50% |
2.88 TiB | 17.59 TiB | 6 | 2.33% |
11.59 TiB | 87.44 TiB | 7 | 11.56% |
14.69 TiB | 157.56 TiB | 8 | 20.83% |
736.00 GiB | 9.44 TiB | 9 | 1.25% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1euejrtpg5vphqzydzleld2vgxfkhbrueiomz54y | Fei Yan - Kernelogic | 215.62 TiB | 2,185 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 143.20 TiB | 2,137 | LDN # 293 |
f15djc5avdxihguvpmtej24rzbvnnqvzurxe55kja | Kernelogic - Fei Yan - Slingshot Restore | 129.55 TiB | 1,386 | LDN # 136 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Fei Yan - Kernelogic
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 40.21% of total deal sealed by f0240185 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 43.90% of total deal sealed by f02301 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.83% of total deal sealed by f03223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.02% of total deal sealed by f0143858 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 150.57 TiB | 19.90% | 90.03 TiB | 40.21% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 143.10 TiB | 18.91% | 80.28 TiB | 43.90% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 136.52 TiB | 18.04% | 67.13 TiB | 50.83% |
f0143858new |
Clifton, New Jersey, US | 116.30 TiB | 15.37% | 77.89 TiB | 33.02% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 40.59 TiB | 5.37% | 40.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f039940 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 39.25 TiB | 5.19% | 39.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f034258 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 31.75 TiB | 4.20% | 31.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0688935 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 19.94 TiB | 2.64% | 19.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 15.25 TiB | 2.02% | 15.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01672960 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 12.94 TiB | 1.71% | 12.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 11.38 TiB | 1.50% | 11.38 TiB | 0.00% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 6.59 TiB | 0.87% | 6.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838873new |
Dallas, Texas, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838852new |
Newark, New Jersey, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838923new |
Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838893new |
Fremont, California, US | 4.94 TiB | 0.65% | 4.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 3.30 TiB | 0.44% | 3.30 TiB | 0.00% |
f0164291 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 3.22 TiB | 0.43% | 3.22 TiB | 0.00% |
f01609999new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 768.00 GiB | 0.10% | 768.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01278 | Grand Rapids, Michigan, US | 224.00 GiB | 0.03% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.11 TiB | 3.11 TiB | 1 | 0.41% |
5.69 TiB | 11.41 TiB | 2 | 1.51% |
13.09 TiB | 40.19 TiB | 3 | 5.31% |
42.89 TiB | 320.15 TiB | 4 | 42.31% |
15.55 TiB | 109.72 TiB | 5 | 14.50% |
2.88 TiB | 17.59 TiB | 6 | 2.33% |
11.59 TiB | 87.44 TiB | 7 | 11.56% |
14.69 TiB | 157.56 TiB | 8 | 20.83% |
736.00 GiB | 9.44 TiB | 9 | 1.25% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1euejrtpg5vphqzydzleld2vgxfkhbrueiomz54y | Fei Yan - Kernelogic | 215.62 TiB | 2,185 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 143.20 TiB | 2,137 | LDN # 293 |
f15djc5avdxihguvpmtej24rzbvnnqvzurxe55kja | Kernelogic - Fei Yan - Slingshot Restore | 129.55 TiB | 1,386 | LDN # 136 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Fei Yan - Kernelogic
f3xbtxeptbmiuevsbjnnsntx6p37a7q6lbw4x7gdkdkiih2ha4qlymoayd2xwk2mpgbwdvgievlje7eivh3e3q
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 40.21% of total deal sealed by f0240185 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 43.90% of total deal sealed by f02301 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.83% of total deal sealed by f03223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.02% of total deal sealed by f0143858 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 150.57 TiB | 19.90% | 90.03 TiB | 40.21% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 143.10 TiB | 18.91% | 80.28 TiB | 43.90% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 136.52 TiB | 18.04% | 67.13 TiB | 50.83% |
f0143858new |
Clifton, New Jersey, US | 116.30 TiB | 15.37% | 77.89 TiB | 33.02% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 40.59 TiB | 5.37% | 40.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f039940 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 39.25 TiB | 5.19% | 39.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f034258 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 31.75 TiB | 4.20% | 31.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0688935 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 19.94 TiB | 2.64% | 19.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 15.25 TiB | 2.02% | 15.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01672960 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 12.94 TiB | 1.71% | 12.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 11.38 TiB | 1.50% | 11.38 TiB | 0.00% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 6.59 TiB | 0.87% | 6.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838873new |
Dallas, Texas, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838852new |
Newark, New Jersey, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838923new |
Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 5.00 TiB | 0.66% | 5.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838893new |
Fremont, California, US | 4.94 TiB | 0.65% | 4.94 TiB | 0.00% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 3.30 TiB | 0.44% | 3.30 TiB | 0.00% |
f0164291 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 3.22 TiB | 0.43% | 3.22 TiB | 0.00% |
f01609999new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 768.00 GiB | 0.10% | 768.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01278 | Grand Rapids, Michigan, US | 224.00 GiB | 0.03% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.11 TiB | 3.11 TiB | 1 | 0.41% |
5.69 TiB | 11.41 TiB | 2 | 1.51% |
13.09 TiB | 40.19 TiB | 3 | 5.31% |
42.89 TiB | 320.15 TiB | 4 | 42.31% |
15.55 TiB | 109.72 TiB | 5 | 14.50% |
2.88 TiB | 17.59 TiB | 6 | 2.33% |
11.59 TiB | 87.44 TiB | 7 | 11.56% |
14.69 TiB | 157.56 TiB | 8 | 20.83% |
736.00 GiB | 9.44 TiB | 9 | 1.25% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1euejrtpg5vphqzydzleld2vgxfkhbrueiomz54y | Fei Yan - Kernelogic | 215.62 TiB | 2,185 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 143.20 TiB | 2,137 | LDN # 293 |
f15djc5avdxihguvpmtej24rzbvnnqvzurxe55kja | Kernelogic - Fei Yan - Slingshot Restore | 129.55 TiB | 1,386 | LDN # 136 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?