Closed laurarenpanda closed 2 years ago
f01403243
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
4.20TiB
f01403243
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
cryptowhizzard & MegTei
800% of weekly dc amount requested
4.20TiB
4.99PiB
4.20TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
154526 | 38 | 1.70PiB | 12.52 | 401.77TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebcnqj64k7ia35fg7aolccewmiiguxwfwjfunwc6gynaxpdl766pa
Address
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
Datacap Allocated
4.20TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebcnqj64k7ia35fg7aolccewmiiguxwfwjfunwc6gynaxpdl766pa
Hello @laurarenpanda
Thank you for requesting new datacap and joining the Filecoin network with the FIL+ / LDN Program.
It seems you spend your datacap to multiple providers where the majority of the providers do not allow public retrieval of the data. This is against the FIL+ / LDN rules. Therefore I (we) cannot grant you further datacap unfortunately.
Please confirm that you are aware that the data stored should be publicly retrievable and that you are aware that it is your responsibility to check this and make this happen.
Do you intend to make a recovery program to re-upload the data to providers with good reputation and do allow retrieval? If so, can you provide us a list of SP's to check?
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f0118317 f0118317 -> {12D3KooWKdBYgkXGDcAU78435gz435UX7KWKvjziJdazbGoVchiN: [/ip4/62.4.68.25/tcp/26134]} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f0118317": must begin with /
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f0118330 f0118330 -> {12D3KooWFCNwiZovoPkQyc4pvezdZnjrjPaAcwBTuX7n7BRsw33n: [/ip4/80.11.23.28/tcp/32451]} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f0118330": must begin with /
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01228000 ERROR: no PeerID for miner
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01228008 ERROR: no PeerID for miner
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01228009 ERROR: no PeerID for miner
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01228065 ERROR: no PeerID for miner
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01228087 ERROR: no PeerID for miner
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01228100 ERROR: no PeerID for miner
root@proposals:~#
Hi @cryptowhizzard. Thanks for pointing out this problem.
When we found storage providers, we ensured they understood FIL+ rules and what they should do to get verified deals. And many of them have participated in the Slingshot with excellent reputation and data onboarding experience. The thing is, to be honest, as a Filecoin client, there are very few things we could do, particularly demanding storage providers to continue to provide public retrieval service.
We'll try our best to talk to them one by one about this problem and figure out the main reason behind it. As we know, there could be factors that influence data retrieval results, including technical, geographical, etc. We believe we could fix it together with these SPs, but it may take time. And we'll consider suspending cooperation until they allow public retrieval.
About publicly retrievability, in the current stage of the Filecoin network, there are still some challenges we need to overcome to improve the large data onboarding process, which means facing more difficulties on the retrieval part. To ensure data availability and follow FIL+ rules, all data of FileDrive Datasets store on IPFS first, which can be accessible to anyone in the network without requiring any special permissions or access requirements.
I hope you and other Notaries can understand what kind of situation we face right now, and please believe our willingness to contribute to the ecosystem. This application is really important for our two open-source ongoing projects behind FileDrive Datasets. Always appreciate understanding and support from Notaries.
Hi @laurarenpanda
Thank you for your response. I really appreciate that you take time to respond and address the problem at hand, a problem we need to solve and sort out together.
Given the fact that you need some time to talk to the SP's who are not allowing retrieval i am (personally) willing to park that issue for the time being, to give you time and make a plan to propose a restoration / recover program for this data and sort everything out. If you want to continue in the meantime with storing data then i personally think you need to store that data on nodes who allow retrieval with a good reputation. Is this ok and workable for you? If so, i can propose acceptance for the next tranche of allocation of datacap.
If you need help finding SP's to store the data let us know. I know enough SP's with reputation who can help you out here and give them a link to this Git issue to introduce themselves.
Hi @cryptowhizzard. Thank you for being so understanding. Your suggestion is very reasonable. And, yes, it is workable for us. Actually, we are working on a project about SPs' reputation system, which could encourage SPs to pay more attention to their service quality (storage/retrieval) and offer them more chances to reach out to clients. We could work with more SPs with excellent reputations shortly. If we need your support to find more excellent SPs, I'll let you know. Thanks again for your help.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebtqpv2ln5c5gocgluk4j72e2oralafs376znnr6ok3pp6rfxiytg
Address
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
Datacap Allocated
4.20TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebtqpv2ln5c5gocgluk4j72e2oralafs376znnr6ok3pp6rfxiytg
f01858410
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
1B
f01858410
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
@cryptowhizzard & IreneYoung
800% of weekly dc amount requested
1B
4.99PiB
1B
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
168142 | 38 | 4.20TiB | 11.49 | 193.42GiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedw46sv4dsscv7as4eai2sqp5tsvuouchl6re3oerqqhspv76gfpw
Address
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
Datacap Allocated
1.00B
Signer Address
f17xdri3wunqgld7dm23e4f3eqsntjakwc47xjo6i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedw46sv4dsscv7as4eai2sqp5tsvuouchl6re3oerqqhspv76gfpw
https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/453
Closing this issue since it has pretty much hit the ceiling of 5PiB, and there is an issue in the front-end not picking up the transaction.
FileDrive Labs
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 48.34% of total deal sealed by f0522948 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.84% of total deal sealed by f0867300 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.88% of total deal sealed by f01228008 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.91% of total deal sealed by f01228000 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228087 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228089 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.49% of total deal sealed by f01228105 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.57% of total deal sealed by f01228100 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 48.02% of total deal sealed by f01228009 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 47.95% of total deal sealed by f01228065 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 45.30% of total deal sealed by f023651 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f023651 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 45.65% of total deal sealed by f01227975 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.80% of total deal sealed by f01114589 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01114589 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 24.91% of total deal sealed by f01114827 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.92% of total deal sealed by f01114587 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f020378 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0522948new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 1.04 PiB | 9.81% | 551.05 TiB | 48.34% |
f0867300new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 1.01 PiB | 9.52% | 550.44 TiB | 46.84% |
f01228008new |
Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 565.18 TiB | 44.88% |
f01228000new |
Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 564.43 TiB | 44.91% |
f01228087new |
London, England, GB | 837.89 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228089new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 837.81 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228105new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 792.78 TiB | 7.29% | 400.42 TiB | 49.49% |
f01228100new |
San Jose, California, US | 792.65 TiB | 7.29% | 399.73 TiB | 49.57% |
f01228009new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 638.45 TiB | 5.87% | 331.88 TiB | 48.02% |
f01228065new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 637.48 TiB | 5.86% | 331.82 TiB | 47.95% |
f023651new |
Unknown | 473.05 TiB | 4.35% | 258.76 TiB | 45.30% |
f01227975 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 423.91 TiB | 3.90% | 230.39 TiB | 45.65% |
f01114589new |
Unknown | 386.15 TiB | 3.55% | 189.97 TiB | 50.80% |
f01114827new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 200.09 TiB | 1.84% | 150.25 TiB | 24.91% |
f01114587 | Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 199.98 TiB | 1.84% | 106.15 TiB | 46.92% |
f0522364new |
Al Ain City, Abu Dhabi, AE | 98.89 TiB | 0.91% | 98.89 TiB | 0.00% |
f0522949new |
Thessaloníki, Central Macedonia, GR | 96.39 TiB | 0.89% | 96.39 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118330new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 73.28 TiB | 0.67% | 73.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0401135new |
Helsinki, Uusimaa, FI | 68.31 TiB | 0.63% | 68.31 TiB | 0.00% |
f0134516new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 67.68 TiB | 0.62% | 67.68 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118317new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 65.81 TiB | 0.61% | 65.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 10.10 TiB | 0.09% | 8.45 TiB | 16.32% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 3.83 TiB | 0.04% | 3.40 TiB | 11.03% |
f01883179 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US | 2.60 TiB | 0.02% | 2.56 TiB | 1.50% |
f02620 | Warsaw, Mazovia, PL | 1.92 TiB | 0.02% | 1.88 TiB | 2.03% |
f020378 | Unknown | 1.31 TiB | 0.01% | 1.30 TiB | 0.60% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 1.25 TiB | 0.01% | 1.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.11 TiB | 0.01% | 1.08 TiB | 2.46% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 1018.00 GiB | 0.01% | 1018.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019551 | Birmingham, England, GB | 957.00 GiB | 0.01% | 957.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019362 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 920.00 GiB | 0.01% | 864.00 GiB | 6.09% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 688.00 GiB | 0.01% | 688.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02576 | Copenhagen, Capital Region, DK | 656.00 GiB | 0.01% | 656.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f099608 | Riga, Riga, LV | 642.00 GiB | 0.01% | 642.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f066596 | San Diego, California, US | 603.00 GiB | 0.01% | 563.00 GiB | 6.63% |
f0166896new |
Jinrongjie, Beijing, CN | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f097777 | Kivertsi, Volyn, UA | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01193812 | Boardman, Oregon, US | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f014768 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f07998 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
28.65 TiB | 33.50 TiB | 1 | 0.31% |
201.03 TiB | 749.26 TiB | 2 | 6.89% |
326.53 TiB | 1.75 PiB | 3 | 16.45% |
447.63 TiB | 3.42 PiB | 4 | 32.19% |
298.10 TiB | 2.67 PiB | 5 | 25.11% |
213.29 TiB | 2.02 PiB | 6 | 19.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1xd4hex5q44mkddd2n3wr23jmbv7qyzqdcsyetea | Tianjin Zhihui Marine Technology Co., Ltd | 99.61 TiB | 1,259 | LDN # 126 |
f1ju5oabz45ceog6e7k5omdj56uspv2pzgghiyzdy | SYNC LIVE JAPAN INC. | 52.13 TiB | 700 | LDN v3 multisig |
f3qaipvxrz2gxexc7mcvjsxifmscfiw7c7zfhrmq7 6j5ee4hcbvg3gbtpea7wgz72kkjcjmwzhm5uo2onx yocq |
Guazi Dynamic | 26.03 TiB | 368 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 14.63 TiB | 476 | LDN # 293 |
f1ymfz2mqdrkrdpjmrwh4qaqtuknfpsq3lp3r3auq | Venus team | 14.38 TiB | 461 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1aqbilzkvvtggxd4kui5zamwqrdpfzilbtmg5kdi | Nantong Chunna Textile Co., Ltd | 5.57 TiB | 180 | LDN # 165 |
f3s3dwh67ps4kxui4mziwvus5ue7p6p324aiebrrp e24st5t334ib5gwlxql6auo7ibrccmppjxxavah46 wdqa |
FileDrive | 5.00 TiB | 152 | Philipp Banhardt |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
FileDrive Labs
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 48.34% of total deal sealed by f0522948 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.84% of total deal sealed by f0867300 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.88% of total deal sealed by f01228008 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.91% of total deal sealed by f01228000 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228087 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228089 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.49% of total deal sealed by f01228105 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.57% of total deal sealed by f01228100 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 48.02% of total deal sealed by f01228009 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 47.95% of total deal sealed by f01228065 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 45.30% of total deal sealed by f023651 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f023651 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 45.65% of total deal sealed by f01227975 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.80% of total deal sealed by f01114589 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01114589 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 24.91% of total deal sealed by f01114827 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.92% of total deal sealed by f01114587 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f020378 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0522948new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 1.04 PiB | 9.81% | 551.05 TiB | 48.34% |
f0867300new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 1.01 PiB | 9.52% | 550.44 TiB | 46.84% |
f01228008new |
Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 565.18 TiB | 44.88% |
f01228000new |
Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 564.43 TiB | 44.91% |
f01228087new |
London, England, GB | 837.89 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228089new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 837.81 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228105new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 792.78 TiB | 7.29% | 400.42 TiB | 49.49% |
f01228100new |
San Jose, California, US | 792.65 TiB | 7.29% | 399.73 TiB | 49.57% |
f01228009new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 638.45 TiB | 5.87% | 331.88 TiB | 48.02% |
f01228065new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 637.48 TiB | 5.86% | 331.82 TiB | 47.95% |
f023651new |
Unknown | 473.05 TiB | 4.35% | 258.76 TiB | 45.30% |
f01227975 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 423.91 TiB | 3.90% | 230.39 TiB | 45.65% |
f01114589new |
Unknown | 386.15 TiB | 3.55% | 189.97 TiB | 50.80% |
f01114827new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 200.09 TiB | 1.84% | 150.25 TiB | 24.91% |
f01114587 | Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 199.98 TiB | 1.84% | 106.15 TiB | 46.92% |
f0522364new |
Al Ain City, Abu Dhabi, AE | 98.89 TiB | 0.91% | 98.89 TiB | 0.00% |
f0522949new |
Thessaloníki, Central Macedonia, GR | 96.39 TiB | 0.89% | 96.39 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118330new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 73.28 TiB | 0.67% | 73.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0401135new |
Helsinki, Uusimaa, FI | 68.31 TiB | 0.63% | 68.31 TiB | 0.00% |
f0134516new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 67.68 TiB | 0.62% | 67.68 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118317new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 65.81 TiB | 0.61% | 65.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 10.10 TiB | 0.09% | 8.45 TiB | 16.32% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 3.83 TiB | 0.04% | 3.40 TiB | 11.03% |
f01883179 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US | 2.60 TiB | 0.02% | 2.56 TiB | 1.50% |
f02620 | Warsaw, Mazovia, PL | 1.92 TiB | 0.02% | 1.88 TiB | 2.03% |
f020378 | Unknown | 1.31 TiB | 0.01% | 1.30 TiB | 0.60% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 1.25 TiB | 0.01% | 1.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.11 TiB | 0.01% | 1.08 TiB | 2.46% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 1018.00 GiB | 0.01% | 1018.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019551 | Birmingham, England, GB | 957.00 GiB | 0.01% | 957.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019362 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 920.00 GiB | 0.01% | 864.00 GiB | 6.09% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 688.00 GiB | 0.01% | 688.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02576 | Copenhagen, Capital Region, DK | 656.00 GiB | 0.01% | 656.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f099608 | Riga, Riga, LV | 642.00 GiB | 0.01% | 642.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f066596 | San Diego, California, US | 603.00 GiB | 0.01% | 563.00 GiB | 6.63% |
f0166896new |
Jinrongjie, Beijing, CN | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f097777 | Kivertsi, Volyn, UA | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01193812 | Boardman, Oregon, US | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f014768 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f07998 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
28.65 TiB | 33.50 TiB | 1 | 0.31% |
201.03 TiB | 749.26 TiB | 2 | 6.89% |
326.53 TiB | 1.75 PiB | 3 | 16.45% |
447.63 TiB | 3.42 PiB | 4 | 32.19% |
298.10 TiB | 2.67 PiB | 5 | 25.11% |
213.29 TiB | 2.02 PiB | 6 | 19.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1xd4hex5q44mkddd2n3wr23jmbv7qyzqdcsyetea | Tianjin Zhihui Marine Technology Co., Ltd | 99.61 TiB | 1,259 | LDN # 126 |
f1ju5oabz45ceog6e7k5omdj56uspv2pzgghiyzdy | SYNC LIVE JAPAN INC. | 52.13 TiB | 700 | LDN v3 multisig |
f3qaipvxrz2gxexc7mcvjsxifmscfiw7c7zfhrmq7 6j5ee4hcbvg3gbtpea7wgz72kkjcjmwzhm5uo2onx yocq |
Guazi Dynamic | 26.03 TiB | 368 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 14.63 TiB | 476 | LDN # 293 |
f1ymfz2mqdrkrdpjmrwh4qaqtuknfpsq3lp3r3auq | Venus team | 14.38 TiB | 461 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1aqbilzkvvtggxd4kui5zamwqrdpfzilbtmg5kdi | Nantong Chunna Textile Co., Ltd | 5.57 TiB | 180 | LDN # 165 |
f3s3dwh67ps4kxui4mziwvus5ue7p6p324aiebrrp e24st5t334ib5gwlxql6auo7ibrccmppjxxavah46 wdqa |
FileDrive | 5.00 TiB | 152 | Philipp Banhardt |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
FileDrive Labs
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 48.34% of total deal sealed by f0522948 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.84% of total deal sealed by f0867300 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.88% of total deal sealed by f01228008 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.91% of total deal sealed by f01228000 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228087 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228089 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.49% of total deal sealed by f01228105 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.57% of total deal sealed by f01228100 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 48.02% of total deal sealed by f01228009 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 47.95% of total deal sealed by f01228065 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 45.30% of total deal sealed by f023651 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f023651 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 45.65% of total deal sealed by f01227975 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.80% of total deal sealed by f01114589 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01114589 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 24.91% of total deal sealed by f01114827 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.92% of total deal sealed by f01114587 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f020378 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0522948new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 1.04 PiB | 9.81% | 551.05 TiB | 48.34% |
f0867300new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 1.01 PiB | 9.52% | 550.44 TiB | 46.84% |
f01228008new |
Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 565.18 TiB | 44.88% |
f01228000new |
Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 564.43 TiB | 44.91% |
f01228087new |
London, England, GB | 837.89 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228089new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 837.81 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228105new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 792.78 TiB | 7.29% | 400.42 TiB | 49.49% |
f01228100new |
San Jose, California, US | 792.65 TiB | 7.29% | 399.73 TiB | 49.57% |
f01228009new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 638.45 TiB | 5.87% | 331.88 TiB | 48.02% |
f01228065new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 637.48 TiB | 5.86% | 331.82 TiB | 47.95% |
f023651new |
Unknown | 473.05 TiB | 4.35% | 258.76 TiB | 45.30% |
f01227975 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 423.91 TiB | 3.90% | 230.39 TiB | 45.65% |
f01114589new |
Unknown | 386.15 TiB | 3.55% | 189.97 TiB | 50.80% |
f01114827new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 200.09 TiB | 1.84% | 150.25 TiB | 24.91% |
f01114587 | Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 199.98 TiB | 1.84% | 106.15 TiB | 46.92% |
f0522364new |
Al Ain City, Abu Dhabi, AE | 98.89 TiB | 0.91% | 98.89 TiB | 0.00% |
f0522949new |
Thessaloníki, Central Macedonia, GR | 96.39 TiB | 0.89% | 96.39 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118330new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 73.28 TiB | 0.67% | 73.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0401135new |
Helsinki, Uusimaa, FI | 68.31 TiB | 0.63% | 68.31 TiB | 0.00% |
f0134516new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 67.68 TiB | 0.62% | 67.68 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118317new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 65.81 TiB | 0.61% | 65.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 10.10 TiB | 0.09% | 8.45 TiB | 16.32% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 3.83 TiB | 0.04% | 3.40 TiB | 11.03% |
f01883179 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US | 2.60 TiB | 0.02% | 2.56 TiB | 1.50% |
f02620 | Warsaw, Mazovia, PL | 1.92 TiB | 0.02% | 1.88 TiB | 2.03% |
f020378 | Unknown | 1.31 TiB | 0.01% | 1.30 TiB | 0.60% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 1.25 TiB | 0.01% | 1.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.11 TiB | 0.01% | 1.08 TiB | 2.46% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 1018.00 GiB | 0.01% | 1018.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019551 | Birmingham, England, GB | 957.00 GiB | 0.01% | 957.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019362 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 920.00 GiB | 0.01% | 864.00 GiB | 6.09% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 688.00 GiB | 0.01% | 688.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02576 | Copenhagen, Capital Region, DK | 656.00 GiB | 0.01% | 656.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f099608 | Riga, Riga, LV | 642.00 GiB | 0.01% | 642.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f066596 | San Diego, California, US | 603.00 GiB | 0.01% | 563.00 GiB | 6.63% |
f0166896new |
Jinrongjie, Beijing, CN | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f097777 | Kivertsi, Volyn, UA | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01193812 | Boardman, Oregon, US | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f014768 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f07998 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
28.65 TiB | 33.50 TiB | 1 | 0.31% |
201.03 TiB | 749.26 TiB | 2 | 6.89% |
326.53 TiB | 1.75 PiB | 3 | 16.45% |
447.63 TiB | 3.42 PiB | 4 | 32.19% |
298.10 TiB | 2.67 PiB | 5 | 25.11% |
213.29 TiB | 2.02 PiB | 6 | 19.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1xd4hex5q44mkddd2n3wr23jmbv7qyzqdcsyetea | Tianjin Zhihui Marine Technology Co., Ltd | 99.61 TiB | 1,259 | LDN # 126 |
f1ju5oabz45ceog6e7k5omdj56uspv2pzgghiyzdy | SYNC LIVE JAPAN INC. | 52.13 TiB | 700 | LDN v3 multisig |
f3qaipvxrz2gxexc7mcvjsxifmscfiw7c7zfhrmq7 6j5ee4hcbvg3gbtpea7wgz72kkjcjmwzhm5uo2onx yocq |
Guazi Dynamic | 26.03 TiB | 368 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 14.63 TiB | 476 | LDN # 293 |
f1ymfz2mqdrkrdpjmrwh4qaqtuknfpsq3lp3r3auq | Venus team | 14.38 TiB | 461 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1aqbilzkvvtggxd4kui5zamwqrdpfzilbtmg5kdi | Nantong Chunna Textile Co., Ltd | 5.57 TiB | 180 | LDN # 165 |
f3s3dwh67ps4kxui4mziwvus5ue7p6p324aiebrrp e24st5t334ib5gwlxql6auo7ibrccmppjxxavah46 wdqa |
FileDrive | 5.00 TiB | 152 | Philipp Banhardt |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
FileDrive Labs
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 48.34% of total deal sealed by f0522948 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.84% of total deal sealed by f0867300 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.88% of total deal sealed by f01228008 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.91% of total deal sealed by f01228000 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228087 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228089 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.49% of total deal sealed by f01228105 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.57% of total deal sealed by f01228100 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 48.02% of total deal sealed by f01228009 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 47.95% of total deal sealed by f01228065 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 45.30% of total deal sealed by f023651 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f023651 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 45.65% of total deal sealed by f01227975 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.80% of total deal sealed by f01114589 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01114589 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 24.91% of total deal sealed by f01114827 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.92% of total deal sealed by f01114587 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f020378 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0522948new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 1.04 PiB | 9.81% | 551.05 TiB | 48.34% |
f0867300new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 1.01 PiB | 9.52% | 550.44 TiB | 46.84% |
f01228008new |
Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 565.18 TiB | 44.88% |
f01228000new |
Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 564.43 TiB | 44.91% |
f01228087new |
London, England, GB | 837.89 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228089new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 837.81 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228105new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 792.78 TiB | 7.29% | 400.42 TiB | 49.49% |
f01228100new |
San Jose, California, US | 792.65 TiB | 7.29% | 399.73 TiB | 49.57% |
f01228009new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 638.45 TiB | 5.87% | 331.88 TiB | 48.02% |
f01228065new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 637.48 TiB | 5.86% | 331.82 TiB | 47.95% |
f023651new |
Unknown | 473.05 TiB | 4.35% | 258.76 TiB | 45.30% |
f01227975 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 423.91 TiB | 3.90% | 230.39 TiB | 45.65% |
f01114589new |
Unknown | 386.15 TiB | 3.55% | 189.97 TiB | 50.80% |
f01114827new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 200.09 TiB | 1.84% | 150.25 TiB | 24.91% |
f01114587 | Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 199.98 TiB | 1.84% | 106.15 TiB | 46.92% |
f0522364new |
Al Ain City, Abu Dhabi, AE | 98.89 TiB | 0.91% | 98.89 TiB | 0.00% |
f0522949new |
Thessaloníki, Central Macedonia, GR | 96.39 TiB | 0.89% | 96.39 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118330new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 73.28 TiB | 0.67% | 73.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0401135new |
Helsinki, Uusimaa, FI | 68.31 TiB | 0.63% | 68.31 TiB | 0.00% |
f0134516new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 67.68 TiB | 0.62% | 67.68 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118317new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 65.81 TiB | 0.61% | 65.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 10.10 TiB | 0.09% | 8.45 TiB | 16.32% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 3.83 TiB | 0.04% | 3.40 TiB | 11.03% |
f01883179 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US | 2.60 TiB | 0.02% | 2.56 TiB | 1.50% |
f02620 | Warsaw, Mazovia, PL | 1.92 TiB | 0.02% | 1.88 TiB | 2.03% |
f020378 | Unknown | 1.31 TiB | 0.01% | 1.30 TiB | 0.60% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 1.25 TiB | 0.01% | 1.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.11 TiB | 0.01% | 1.08 TiB | 2.46% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 1018.00 GiB | 0.01% | 1018.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019551 | Birmingham, England, GB | 957.00 GiB | 0.01% | 957.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019362 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 920.00 GiB | 0.01% | 864.00 GiB | 6.09% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 688.00 GiB | 0.01% | 688.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02576 | Copenhagen, Capital Region, DK | 656.00 GiB | 0.01% | 656.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f099608 | Riga, Riga, LV | 642.00 GiB | 0.01% | 642.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f066596 | San Diego, California, US | 603.00 GiB | 0.01% | 563.00 GiB | 6.63% |
f0166896new |
Jinrongjie, Beijing, CN | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f097777 | Kivertsi, Volyn, UA | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01193812 | Boardman, Oregon, US | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f014768 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f07998 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
28.65 TiB | 33.50 TiB | 1 | 0.31% |
201.03 TiB | 749.26 TiB | 2 | 6.89% |
326.53 TiB | 1.75 PiB | 3 | 16.45% |
447.63 TiB | 3.42 PiB | 4 | 32.19% |
298.10 TiB | 2.67 PiB | 5 | 25.11% |
213.29 TiB | 2.02 PiB | 6 | 19.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1xd4hex5q44mkddd2n3wr23jmbv7qyzqdcsyetea | Tianjin Zhihui Marine Technology Co., Ltd | 99.61 TiB | 1,259 | LDN # 126 |
f1ju5oabz45ceog6e7k5omdj56uspv2pzgghiyzdy | SYNC LIVE JAPAN INC. | 52.13 TiB | 700 | LDN v3 multisig |
f3qaipvxrz2gxexc7mcvjsxifmscfiw7c7zfhrmq7 6j5ee4hcbvg3gbtpea7wgz72kkjcjmwzhm5uo2onx yocq |
Guazi Dynamic | 26.03 TiB | 368 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 14.63 TiB | 476 | LDN # 293 |
f1ymfz2mqdrkrdpjmrwh4qaqtuknfpsq3lp3r3auq | Venus team | 14.38 TiB | 461 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1aqbilzkvvtggxd4kui5zamwqrdpfzilbtmg5kdi | Nantong Chunna Textile Co., Ltd | 5.57 TiB | 180 | LDN # 165 |
f3s3dwh67ps4kxui4mziwvus5ue7p6p324aiebrrp e24st5t334ib5gwlxql6auo7ibrccmppjxxavah46 wdqa |
FileDrive | 5.00 TiB | 152 | Philipp Banhardt |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
FileDrive Labs
f3wgfwtrs5p6jrkwfl2mksqa2ivgbgdjjrhjbefy3n7qzvotc3y6sazmp5gfyj7um6jlgdvlbiepzawnc6wxtq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 48.34% of total deal sealed by f0522948 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.84% of total deal sealed by f0867300 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.88% of total deal sealed by f01228008 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 44.91% of total deal sealed by f01228000 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228087 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.60% of total deal sealed by f01228089 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.49% of total deal sealed by f01228105 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 49.57% of total deal sealed by f01228100 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 48.02% of total deal sealed by f01228009 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 47.95% of total deal sealed by f01228065 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 45.30% of total deal sealed by f023651 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f023651 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 45.65% of total deal sealed by f01227975 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.80% of total deal sealed by f01114589 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01114589 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 24.91% of total deal sealed by f01114827 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.92% of total deal sealed by f01114587 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f020378 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f0522948new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 1.04 PiB | 9.81% | 551.05 TiB | 48.34% |
f0867300new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 1.01 PiB | 9.52% | 550.44 TiB | 46.84% |
f01228008new |
Sydney, New South Wales, AU | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 565.18 TiB | 44.88% |
f01228000new |
Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.00 PiB | 9.43% | 564.43 TiB | 44.91% |
f01228087new |
London, England, GB | 837.89 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228089new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 837.81 TiB | 7.71% | 422.29 TiB | 49.60% |
f01228105new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 792.78 TiB | 7.29% | 400.42 TiB | 49.49% |
f01228100new |
San Jose, California, US | 792.65 TiB | 7.29% | 399.73 TiB | 49.57% |
f01228009new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 638.45 TiB | 5.87% | 331.88 TiB | 48.02% |
f01228065new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 637.48 TiB | 5.86% | 331.82 TiB | 47.95% |
f023651new |
Unknown | 473.05 TiB | 4.35% | 258.76 TiB | 45.30% |
f01227975 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 423.91 TiB | 3.90% | 230.39 TiB | 45.65% |
f01114589new |
Unknown | 386.15 TiB | 3.55% | 189.97 TiB | 50.80% |
f01114827new |
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 200.09 TiB | 1.84% | 150.25 TiB | 24.91% |
f01114587 | Tokyo, Tokyo, JP | 199.98 TiB | 1.84% | 106.15 TiB | 46.92% |
f0522364new |
Al Ain City, Abu Dhabi, AE | 98.89 TiB | 0.91% | 98.89 TiB | 0.00% |
f0522949new |
Thessaloníki, Central Macedonia, GR | 96.39 TiB | 0.89% | 96.39 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118330new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 73.28 TiB | 0.67% | 73.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0401135new |
Helsinki, Uusimaa, FI | 68.31 TiB | 0.63% | 68.31 TiB | 0.00% |
f0134516new |
Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 67.68 TiB | 0.62% | 67.68 TiB | 0.00% |
f0118317new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 65.81 TiB | 0.61% | 65.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 10.10 TiB | 0.09% | 8.45 TiB | 16.32% |
f09848 | Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US | 3.83 TiB | 0.04% | 3.40 TiB | 11.03% |
f01883179 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US | 2.60 TiB | 0.02% | 2.56 TiB | 1.50% |
f02620 | Warsaw, Mazovia, PL | 1.92 TiB | 0.02% | 1.88 TiB | 2.03% |
f020378 | Unknown | 1.31 TiB | 0.01% | 1.30 TiB | 0.60% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 1.25 TiB | 0.01% | 1.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.11 TiB | 0.01% | 1.08 TiB | 2.46% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 1018.00 GiB | 0.01% | 1018.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019551 | Birmingham, England, GB | 957.00 GiB | 0.01% | 957.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019362 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 920.00 GiB | 0.01% | 864.00 GiB | 6.09% |
f022352 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 688.00 GiB | 0.01% | 688.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02576 | Copenhagen, Capital Region, DK | 656.00 GiB | 0.01% | 656.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f099608 | Riga, Riga, LV | 642.00 GiB | 0.01% | 642.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f066596 | San Diego, California, US | 603.00 GiB | 0.01% | 563.00 GiB | 6.63% |
f0166896new |
Jinrongjie, Beijing, CN | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% | 224.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f097777 | Kivertsi, Volyn, UA | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% | 114.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01193812 | Boardman, Oregon, US | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% | 64.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f014768 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% | 56.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f07998 | Wuhan, Hubei, CN | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
28.65 TiB | 33.50 TiB | 1 | 0.31% |
201.03 TiB | 749.26 TiB | 2 | 6.89% |
326.53 TiB | 1.75 PiB | 3 | 16.45% |
447.63 TiB | 3.42 PiB | 4 | 32.19% |
298.10 TiB | 2.67 PiB | 5 | 25.11% |
213.29 TiB | 2.02 PiB | 6 | 19.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f1xd4hex5q44mkddd2n3wr23jmbv7qyzqdcsyetea | Tianjin Zhihui Marine Technology Co., Ltd | 99.61 TiB | 1,259 | LDN # 126 |
f1ju5oabz45ceog6e7k5omdj56uspv2pzgghiyzdy | SYNC LIVE JAPAN INC. | 52.13 TiB | 700 | LDN v3 multisig |
f3qaipvxrz2gxexc7mcvjsxifmscfiw7c7zfhrmq7 6j5ee4hcbvg3gbtpea7wgz72kkjcjmwzhm5uo2onx yocq |
Guazi Dynamic | 26.03 TiB | 368 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda | Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen ) | 14.63 TiB | 476 | LDN # 293 |
f1ymfz2mqdrkrdpjmrwh4qaqtuknfpsq3lp3r3auq | Venus team | 14.38 TiB | 461 | LDN v3 multisig |
f1aqbilzkvvtggxd4kui5zamwqrdpfzilbtmg5kdi | Nantong Chunna Textile Co., Ltd | 5.57 TiB | 180 | LDN # 165 |
f3s3dwh67ps4kxui4mziwvus5ue7p6p324aiebrrp e24st5t334ib5gwlxql6auo7ibrccmppjxxavah46 wdqa |
FileDrive | 5.00 TiB | 152 | Philipp Banhardt |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
This user’s identity has been verified through filplus.storage
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?