flyworker commented 2 years ago

Large Dataset Notary Application

To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.

Core Information

Organization Name: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Website / Social Media: https://www.filswan.com Slack: http://filswan.slack.com Discord: http://discord.gg/Uw5jCGqc
Total amount of DataCap being requested (between 500 TiB and 5 PiB): 2 PiB
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested (usually between 1-100TiB): 100 TiB
On-chain address for first allocation: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Project details

Share a brief history of your project and organization.

Real-time and archival data from the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) network.
The Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) is a network of 160 high-resolution Doppler radar sites that detects precipitation and atmospheric movement and disseminates data in approximately 5 minute intervals from each site. NEXRAD enables severe storm prediction and is used by researchers and commercial enterprises to study and address the impact of weather across multiple sectors.

Filswan provides a decentralized edge infrastructure marketplace and software that moves data storage and analysis as close as necessary on Web 3.0.

What is the primary source of funding for this project?

FilSwan  Foundation Provide funding for it

What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?

enterprise-sp-wp, Deal Market, Asia working group

Use-case details

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

The Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) is a network of 160 high-resolution Doppler radar sites that detects precipitation and atmospheric movement and disseminates data in approximately 5 minute intervals from each site. NEXRAD enables severe storm prediction and is used by researchers and commercial enterprises to study and address the impact of weather across multiple sectors.

Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?

Images  compressed (compressed with gzip).

Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.

The following animation follows the track of the storm, with the the sky changing color depending on the local time.
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmNUbPstcPCDj5r1QB39PesVNoLhgELSE9DBHZNhk3NSbV?filename=1*ioHzusnUyldf0P8C7XULrA.gif

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).

Yes

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?

Anyone interested in retrieving this datacet for R&D purpose

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?

540 days

DataCap allocation plan

In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?

Asia, North America

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?

Through filswan autobid process and [swan provider](https://docs.filswan.com/run-swan-provider/overview). It is an offline data transfer process.

How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.

FilSwan have a reputation system, any storage provider has score higher than 80 will have the right to get the deal.

How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?

Based on the reputation score we followed an gaussian distribution of the deals to different miners and we will have multiple copies across miners.

Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find your Filecoin address in the information provided We could not find any Web site or social media info in the information provided We could not find any Expected weekly DataCap usage rate in the information provided

Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find your Filecoin address in the information provided We could not find any Web site or social media info in the information provided We could not find any Expected weekly DataCap usage rate in the information provided

Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find any Web site or social media info in the information provided

Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

galen-mcandrew commented 2 years ago

Multisig Notary requested

Total DataCap requested

2PiB

Expected weekly DataCap usage rate

100TiB

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01422994

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Multisig Notary address

f01422994

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

DataCap allocation requested

50TiB

IreneYoung commented 2 years ago

@flyworker Hi Charles, is NEXRAD one of new features on Filswan platform or anything else? And probably you didn't answer properly to the question 5, "Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?". So please leave your answer here, thanks.

flyworker commented 2 years ago

Hi @IreneYoung , the data source comes from Next Generation Weather Radar it can also be found here https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-nexrad

It is not a new feature of filswan, but we will use filswan platform for distributing data as usual.

IreneYoung commented 2 years ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacebkvb3ybfxajz3qpsfzpo2idqsutkv3fpgsvtvojcrgjlg54edwjo

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

50TiB

Signer Address

f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebkvb3ybfxajz3qpsfzpo2idqsutkv3fpgsvtvojcrgjlg54edwjo

Reiers commented 2 years ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceay4qjcktdtekzpbyrqfrtrv6wsvpiymlxws4b65hwxat77mzbc6s

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

50TiB

Signer Address

f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceay4qjcktdtekzpbyrqfrtrv6wsvpiymlxws4b65hwxat77mzbc6s

mr-spaghetti-code commented 2 years ago

Hi,

It looks like you received 50TiBs of DataCap to date but have spent less than 20% of it so far.

We would love to understand if there's anything holding you back. We are working hard to make the data onboarding process easier for clients like you and your feedback is very valuable. If you have a moment, please fill in this survey: https://forms.gle/s6AuTXZPZSMokscLA

If you have any feedback or would like to consult with an expert, please let me know.

Thanks,

João Fiadeiro Product Manager, Large Data Client Onboarding Protocol Labs

flyworker commented 2 years ago

Hi João, Thanks for your concern, we were working on the data download and sorting the data deals. While we have 3 project on going, they are on our pipeline. We will let the team start the distribution process with filswan. thanks

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 2

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

DataCap allocation requested

100TiB

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Last two approvers

Reiers & IreneYoung

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

100% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

100TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

50TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2 PiB)

1.95PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
1260	24	50TiB	10.96	11.25TiB

kernelogic commented 2 years ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacearo26c6oh7xynsgegpkpdf3e2grn5k2jjbuicstirhytvw4ez6vu

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

100.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacearo26c6oh7xynsgegpkpdf3e2grn5k2jjbuicstirhytvw4ez6vu

jamerduhgamer commented 2 years ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacebiwjqchxvyzggk5uper2uu7runfgzcegjaj7yjfmlhlflxq3wnmo

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

100.00TiB

Signer Address

f1ypuqpi4xn5q7zi5at3rmdltosozifhqmrt66vhq

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebiwjqchxvyzggk5uper2uu7runfgzcegjaj7yjfmlhlflxq3wnmo

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 3

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Last two approvers

jamerduhgamer & kernelogic

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

200% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

100TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2 PiB)

1.90PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
2359	21	100TiB	33.53	22.71TiB

kernelogic commented 2 years ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacebhchegjvogsgzcz5qopq6a7kh33e7uzou6arckv73xqn4toujmmg

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

200.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebhchegjvogsgzcz5qopq6a7kh33e7uzou6arckv73xqn4toujmmg

liyunzhi-666 commented 2 years ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaced5gi2srnr46xpsugcogai3xscfw4f54fuispkyweuqtmr7vp5i5y

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

200.00TiB

Signer Address

f1pszcrsciyixyuxxukkvtazcokexbn54amf7gvoq

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced5gi2srnr46xpsugcogai3xscfw4f54fuispkyweuqtmr7vp5i5y

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 4

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

DataCap allocation requested

400TiB

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 2 years ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Last two approvers

liyunzhi-666 & kernelogic

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

400% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

400TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

300TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2 PiB)

1.70PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
7553	27	200TiB	34.13	43.07TiB

kernelogic commented 2 years ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacebrjkucgj7wh24zcsaj6jppc2c7kpeqwatw3s7lg3kmqecy2nknr4

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

400.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebrjkucgj7wh24zcsaj6jppc2c7kpeqwatw3s7lg3kmqecy2nknr4

NiwanDao commented 2 years ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacedexz3dw7557yjo2zjdltqy2vyc5hpojevckhqvlxq5r4j7axedjq

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

400.00TiB

Signer Address

f1a2lia2cwwekeubwo4nppt4v4vebxs2frozarz3q

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedexz3dw7557yjo2zjdltqy2vyc5hpojevckhqvlxq5r4j7axedjq

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 5

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

DataCap allocation requested

800TiB

Id

c88919cb-dd81-4982-a47d-cc8c9b83ecfe

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Last two approvers

xingjitansuo & kernelogic

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

800% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

800TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

700TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2 PiB)

1.31PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
15995	34	400TiB	19.21	95.75TiB

IreneYoung commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacebpd65xtz2oeugnhtsawb4yhv6t53zidlvezc3fp3dvqzz544jh26

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

800.00TiB

Signer Address

f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq

Id

c88919cb-dd81-4982-a47d-cc8c9b83ecfe

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebpd65xtz2oeugnhtsawb4yhv6t53zidlvezc3fp3dvqzz544jh26

kernelogic commented 1 year ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacecusffgr7nafe3e62cqxpns3uvpuvs5ud2ttdjn6e6d7x47lem72q

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

800.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

Id

c88919cb-dd81-4982-a47d-cc8c9b83ecfe

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecusffgr7nafe3e62cqxpns3uvpuvs5ud2ttdjn6e6d7x47lem72q

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 6

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

DataCap allocation requested

498TiB

Id

7678358a-28e1-4434-8ae4-8a8829f7a33a

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Last two approvers

kernelogic & IreneYoung

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

800% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

498TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

1.46PiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2 PiB)

548TiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
27994	36	800TiB	15.95	197.34TiB

kernelogic commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceaimkmu5kay3jef5kq3fw26ywobm2snsdcb7rth5qy3dzdzk4k3n6

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

498.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

Id

7678358a-28e1-4434-8ae4-8a8829f7a33a

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaimkmu5kay3jef5kq3fw26ywobm2snsdcb7rth5qy3dzdzk4k3n6

filplus-checker commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 25% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 25% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

⚠️ 25.33% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Organization: NEXRAD - FilSwan
Client: f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.

⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01955034`new`	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	233.59 TiB	16.39%	73.72 TiB	68.44%
f01938223`new`	Montréal, Quebec, CA	222.91 TiB	15.64%	106.16 TiB	52.38%
f01955030	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	199.88 TiB	14.02%	73.63 TiB	63.16%
f01955028	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	191.63 TiB	13.44%	73.56 TiB	61.61%
f01947280	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	178.16 TiB	12.50%	94.75 TiB	46.82%
f01911369	Unknown	80.94 TiB	5.68%	62.41 TiB	22.90%
f01146045	Singapore, Singapore, SG	64.81 TiB	4.55%	40.53 TiB	37.46%
f01786736	Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA	50.58 TiB	3.55%	31.30 TiB	38.12%
f01940076	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK	24.47 TiB	1.72%	24.47 TiB	0.00%
f01919426	Unknown	21.88 TiB	1.53%	21.88 TiB	0.00%
f01981571	Unknown	21.52 TiB	1.51%	21.52 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN	20.91 TiB	1.47%	20.91 TiB	0.00%
f079426	Singapore, Singapore, SG	16.84 TiB	1.18%	16.84 TiB	0.00%
f02401	Raleigh, North Carolina, US	16.75 TiB	1.18%	16.75 TiB	0.00%
f0447183	Indianapolis, Indiana, US	13.72 TiB	0.96%	13.72 TiB	0.00%
f01072221	Los Angeles, California, US	7.11 TiB	0.50%	6.39 TiB	10.11%
f01402814	Singapore, Singapore, SG	6.38 TiB	0.45%	6.34 TiB	0.49%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	4.75 TiB	0.33%	4.59 TiB	3.29%
f01886797	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	4.56 TiB	0.32%	4.53 TiB	0.68%
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	3.88 TiB	0.27%	3.88 TiB	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	3.66 TiB	0.26%	3.66 TiB	0.00%
f01858429	Boston, Massachusetts, US	3.53 TiB	0.25%	3.53 TiB	0.00%
f01896422	Fremont, California, US	3.00 TiB	0.21%	3.00 TiB	0.00%
f0773157	Fremont, California, US	2.70 TiB	0.19%	1.86 TiB	31.21%
f010088	Everett, Washington, US	2.67 TiB	0.19%	2.52 TiB	5.85%
f01398391	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	2.36 TiB	0.17%	2.20 TiB	6.62%
f01225882	Burnaby, British Columbia, CA	2.06 TiB	0.14%	2.06 TiB	0.00%
f03624	Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE	2.03 TiB	0.14%	2.03 TiB	0.00%
f01390330	Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN	1.75 TiB	0.12%	1.75 TiB	0.00%
f033356	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.70 TiB	0.12%	1.70 TiB	0.00%
f08399	Seattle, Washington, US	1.66 TiB	0.12%	1.66 TiB	0.00%
f047419	North Prairie, Wisconsin, US	1.44 TiB	0.10%	1.34 TiB	6.52%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f0240185	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.41 TiB	0.10%	1.41 TiB	0.00%
f03488	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.38 TiB	0.10%	1.16 TiB	15.91%
f0214334`new`	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	1.28 TiB	0.09%	1.28 TiB	0.00%
f0143858	Clifton, New Jersey, US	1.19 TiB	0.08%	1.19 TiB	0.00%
f03223	San Jose, California, US	1.17 TiB	0.08%	1.14 TiB	2.67%
f030379	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.02 TiB	0.07%	1.02 TiB	0.00%
f01859603	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	1.00 TiB	0.07%	1.00 TiB	0.00%
f01683871	Gwangju, Gwangju, KR	448.00 GiB	0.03%	448.00 GiB	0.00%
f0240456	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	352.00 GiB	0.02%	352.00 GiB	0.00%
f0836160	Seoul, Seoul, KR	320.00 GiB	0.02%	320.00 GiB	0.00%
f0520660	Unknown	288.00 GiB	0.02%	288.00 GiB	0.00%
f02301	San Jose, California, US	192.00 GiB	0.01%	192.00 GiB	0.00%
f032824	Austin, Texas, US	160.00 GiB	0.01%	160.00 GiB	0.00%
f01871352	Seoul, Seoul, KR	96.00 GiB	0.01%	96.00 GiB	0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
177.41 TiB	246.25 TiB	1	17.28%
22.75 TiB	76.97 TiB	2	5.40%
6.44 TiB	37.81 TiB	3	2.65%
7.47 TiB	64.13 TiB	4	4.50%
38.41 TiB	454.06 TiB	5	31.85%
27.19 TiB	346.03 TiB	6	24.28%
7.48 TiB	105.70 TiB	7	7.42%
288.00 GiB	2.75 TiB	8	0.19%
192.00 GiB	1.75 TiB	9	0.12%
384.00 GiB	4.19 TiB	10	0.29%
512.00 GiB	6.84 TiB	11	0.48%
320.00 GiB	4.75 TiB	12	0.33%
1.06 TiB	17.13 TiB	13	1.20%
928.00 GiB	15.59 TiB	14	1.09%
1.22 TiB	22.94 TiB	15	1.61%
384.00 GiB	7.47 TiB	16	0.52%
384.00 GiB	7.75 TiB	17	0.54%
128.00 GiB	2.63 TiB	18	0.18%
32.00 GiB	736.00 GiB	19	0.05%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Verifier
f1o54sve7ede7im4caux3ug7lsyjmbue7ss3zzl6y	FilSwan	1.10 PiB	5,403	LDN v3 multisig
f1bstbq5bi72kyovhh7zoo2f6l6uivsjz4ey5dnqq	FilSwan	587.44 TiB	5,647	LDN v3 multisig
f14r2jybmccwiu6hze4fu55jyhclktvwacec56hea	FilSwan	250.56 TiB	4,703	LDN v3 multisig
f3wn64jznjqmr3s3qt4tfwynxo6k73wdxkhd6wo2l 4rwpjdyyddirah2ugfaibvlzz2asaj3ehsp7bwc2z vnia	Jiaxing Yangtze Delta Region Blockchain Technology Research Institute	132.22 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f13d6zt424jkp55u7kp67azotkzadtlokwnz2ntxa	FilSwan - Slingshot Restore	114.30 TiB	2,000	LDN v3 multisig
f1fkh47gdwclmovclfz2kvorhhdofvgr5y7fjvkmi	BigData Exchange	98.81 TiB	698	LDN v3 multisig
f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y	Haoqian Mx	31.06 TiB	198	LDN v3 multisig
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda	Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )	17.30 TiB	189	LDN # 293
f13csteap4jcgl3a65qtsvmblzvelp4sgivddtpqa	PiKNiK	4.56 TiB	146	LDN v3 multisig
f3v7x4a2aapgx6o2r477tenoin3u5oadaeqyd7kjd sitykvf4ok7vq2utcyh34lmu5u7oybs25ff6s4dbu dpma	LeoCheung - Slingshot Restore	4.38 TiB	28	LDN v3 multisig
f3td7znsz2q6laexewfqogczo74xyiwgbysuf6i75 k2wrdqwzyvln7wvzmxaz3jvqzskwxqerdwaetdvue jama	Unknown	1.84 TiB	39	Unknown
f3rwypb3nhyzkslf6eb2qoiaqdwvaedcawxiav4hm hi4cp4w7ptjua42knqoddbl5uabcrtzgq7jajvjro z54a	dropcool - Slingshot Restore	992.00 GiB	29	LDN v3 multisig
f1toz5izxdse43peqyd7zktmyqilvhf6u72z74gfq	Starboard Networks	96.00 GiB	3	Steven Li
f13zfhkvtf6mewd74jhav6iqcggwsojht73tickga	X-Order Lab	96.00 GiB	3	LDN v3 multisig
f3wzua4wihcouehv5datojpgalyapegvdfkhkqamx dtr4tzcsn7kylkoaapmmxisbp3tzekgijb32lrswf 5t5q	Ninth Heaven Guild	32.00 GiB	1	Neo Ge

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacebl37bma5jh74x2oa5h6rz6kohmsudtah5y2ik7nlyd2hppjwuywm

Address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Datacap Allocated

498.00TiB

Signer Address

f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa

Id

7678358a-28e1-4434-8ae4-8a8829f7a33a

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebl37bma5jh74x2oa5h6rz6kohmsudtah5y2ik7nlyd2hppjwuywm

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

The issue reached the total datacap requested. This should be closed

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq

Last two approvers

cryptowhizzard & kernelogic

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

total dc reached

DataCap allocation requested

0

Total DataCap granted for client so far

1.46PiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2 PiB)

548TiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
45319	37	498TiB	16.61	90.70TiB

filecoin-project / filecoin-plus-large-datasets

[DataCap Application] NEXRAD - Next Generation Weather Radar #80

Large Dataset Notary Application

Core Information

Project details

Use-case details

DataCap allocation plan

Multisig Notary requested

Total DataCap requested

Expected weekly DataCap usage rate

DataCap Allocation requested

Multisig Notary address

Client address

DataCap allocation requested

Request Approved

Message sent to Filecoin Network

Address

Datacap Allocated

Signer Address

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebkvb3ybfxajz3qpsfzpo2idqsutkv3fpgsvtvojcrgjlg54edwjo

Request Approved

Message sent to Filecoin Network

Address

Datacap Allocated

Signer Address

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceay4qjcktdtekzpbyrqfrtrv6wsvpiymlxws4b65hwxat77mzbc6s

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 2

Multisig Notary address

Client address

DataCap allocation requested

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

Client address

Last two approvers

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

DataCap allocation requested

Total DataCap granted for client so far

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2 PiB)

Stats

Request Proposed

Message sent to Filecoin Network

Address

Datacap Allocated

Signer Address

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacearo26c6oh7xynsgegpkpdf3e2grn5k2jjbuicstirhytvw4ez6vu

Request Approved

Message sent to Filecoin Network

Address

Datacap Allocated

Signer Address

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebiwjqchxvyzggk5uper2uu7runfgzcegjaj7yjfmlhlflxq3wnmo

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 3

Multisig Notary address

Client address

DataCap allocation requested

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

Client address

Last two approvers

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

DataCap allocation requested

Total DataCap granted for client so far

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2 PiB)

Stats

Request Proposed

Message sent to Filecoin Network

Address

Datacap Allocated

Signer Address

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebhchegjvogsgzcz5qopq6a7kh33e7uzou6arckv73xqn4toujmmg

Request Approved

Message sent to Filecoin Network

Address

Datacap Allocated

Signer Address

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced5gi2srnr46xpsugcogai3xscfw4f54fuispkyweuqtmr7vp5i5y

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 4