Closed flyworker closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find your Filecoin address in the information provided We could not find any Web site or social media info in the information provided We could not find any Expected weekly DataCap usage rate in the information provided
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find your Filecoin address in the information provided We could not find any Web site or social media info in the information provided We could not find any Expected weekly DataCap usage rate in the information provided
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find any Web site or social media info in the information provided
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
2PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01422994
f01422994
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
50TiB
@flyworker Hi Charles, is NEXRAD one of new features on Filswan platform or anything else? And probably you didn't answer properly to the question 5, "Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?". So please leave your answer here, thanks.
Hi @IreneYoung , the data source comes from Next Generation Weather Radar it can also be found here https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-nexrad
It is not a new feature of filswan, but we will use filswan platform for distributing data as usual.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebkvb3ybfxajz3qpsfzpo2idqsutkv3fpgsvtvojcrgjlg54edwjo
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
50TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebkvb3ybfxajz3qpsfzpo2idqsutkv3fpgsvtvojcrgjlg54edwjo
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceay4qjcktdtekzpbyrqfrtrv6wsvpiymlxws4b65hwxat77mzbc6s
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
50TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceay4qjcktdtekzpbyrqfrtrv6wsvpiymlxws4b65hwxat77mzbc6s
Hi,
It looks like you received 50TiBs of DataCap to date but have spent less than 20% of it so far.
We would love to understand if there's anything holding you back. We are working hard to make the data onboarding process easier for clients like you and your feedback is very valuable. If you have a moment, please fill in this survey: https://forms.gle/s6AuTXZPZSMokscLA
If you have any feedback or would like to consult with an expert, please let me know.
Thanks,
João Fiadeiro Product Manager, Large Data Client Onboarding Protocol Labs
Hi João, Thanks for your concern, we were working on the data download and sorting the data deals. While we have 3 project on going, they are on our pipeline. We will let the team start the distribution process with filswan. thanks
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
100TiB
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Reiers & IreneYoung
100% of weekly dc amount requested
100TiB
50TiB
1.95PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1260 | 24 | 50TiB | 10.96 | 11.25TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacearo26c6oh7xynsgegpkpdf3e2grn5k2jjbuicstirhytvw4ez6vu
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacearo26c6oh7xynsgegpkpdf3e2grn5k2jjbuicstirhytvw4ez6vu
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebiwjqchxvyzggk5uper2uu7runfgzcegjaj7yjfmlhlflxq3wnmo
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ypuqpi4xn5q7zi5at3rmdltosozifhqmrt66vhq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebiwjqchxvyzggk5uper2uu7runfgzcegjaj7yjfmlhlflxq3wnmo
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
200TiB
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
jamerduhgamer & kernelogic
200% of weekly dc amount requested
200TiB
100TiB
1.90PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
2359 | 21 | 100TiB | 33.53 | 22.71TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebhchegjvogsgzcz5qopq6a7kh33e7uzou6arckv73xqn4toujmmg
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebhchegjvogsgzcz5qopq6a7kh33e7uzou6arckv73xqn4toujmmg
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced5gi2srnr46xpsugcogai3xscfw4f54fuispkyweuqtmr7vp5i5y
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1pszcrsciyixyuxxukkvtazcokexbn54amf7gvoq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced5gi2srnr46xpsugcogai3xscfw4f54fuispkyweuqtmr7vp5i5y
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
400TiB
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
liyunzhi-666 & kernelogic
400% of weekly dc amount requested
400TiB
300TiB
1.70PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
7553 | 27 | 200TiB | 34.13 | 43.07TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebrjkucgj7wh24zcsaj6jppc2c7kpeqwatw3s7lg3kmqecy2nknr4
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebrjkucgj7wh24zcsaj6jppc2c7kpeqwatw3s7lg3kmqecy2nknr4
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedexz3dw7557yjo2zjdltqy2vyc5hpojevckhqvlxq5r4j7axedjq
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1a2lia2cwwekeubwo4nppt4v4vebxs2frozarz3q
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedexz3dw7557yjo2zjdltqy2vyc5hpojevckhqvlxq5r4j7axedjq
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
800TiB
c88919cb-dd81-4982-a47d-cc8c9b83ecfe
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
xingjitansuo & kernelogic
800% of weekly dc amount requested
800TiB
700TiB
1.31PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
15995 | 34 | 400TiB | 19.21 | 95.75TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebpd65xtz2oeugnhtsawb4yhv6t53zidlvezc3fp3dvqzz544jh26
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
Id
c88919cb-dd81-4982-a47d-cc8c9b83ecfe
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebpd65xtz2oeugnhtsawb4yhv6t53zidlvezc3fp3dvqzz544jh26
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecusffgr7nafe3e62cqxpns3uvpuvs5ud2ttdjn6e6d7x47lem72q
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
c88919cb-dd81-4982-a47d-cc8c9b83ecfe
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecusffgr7nafe3e62cqxpns3uvpuvs5ud2ttdjn6e6d7x47lem72q
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
498TiB
7678358a-28e1-4434-8ae4-8a8829f7a33a
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
kernelogic & IreneYoung
800% of weekly dc amount requested
498TiB
1.46PiB
548TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
27994 | 36 | 800TiB | 15.95 | 197.34TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaimkmu5kay3jef5kq3fw26ywobm2snsdcb7rth5qy3dzdzk4k3n6
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
498.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
7678358a-28e1-4434-8ae4-8a8829f7a33a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaimkmu5kay3jef5kq3fw26ywobm2snsdcb7rth5qy3dzdzk4k3n6
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 25.33% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
NEXRAD - FilSwan
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 68.44% of total deal sealed by f01955034 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 52.38% of total deal sealed by f01938223 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 63.16% of total deal sealed by f01955030 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 61.61% of total deal sealed by f01955028 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 46.82% of total deal sealed by f01947280 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 22.90% of total deal sealed by f01911369 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01911369 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 37.46% of total deal sealed by f01146045 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 38.12% of total deal sealed by f01786736 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f01919426 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ f01981571 has unknown IP location.
⚠️ 31.21% of total deal sealed by f0773157 are duplicate data.
⚠️ f0520660 has unknown IP location.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01955034new |
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 233.59 TiB | 16.39% | 73.72 TiB | 68.44% |
f01938223new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 222.91 TiB | 15.64% | 106.16 TiB | 52.38% |
f01955030 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 199.88 TiB | 14.02% | 73.63 TiB | 63.16% |
f01955028 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 191.63 TiB | 13.44% | 73.56 TiB | 61.61% |
f01947280 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN | 178.16 TiB | 12.50% | 94.75 TiB | 46.82% |
f01911369 | Unknown | 80.94 TiB | 5.68% | 62.41 TiB | 22.90% |
f01146045 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 64.81 TiB | 4.55% | 40.53 TiB | 37.46% |
f01786736 | Saint-Gabriel, Quebec, CA | 50.58 TiB | 3.55% | 31.30 TiB | 38.12% |
f01940076 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 24.47 TiB | 1.72% | 24.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01919426 | Unknown | 21.88 TiB | 1.53% | 21.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01981571 | Unknown | 21.52 TiB | 1.51% | 21.52 TiB | 0.00% |
f01876488 | Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN | 20.91 TiB | 1.47% | 20.91 TiB | 0.00% |
f079426 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 16.84 TiB | 1.18% | 16.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f02401 | Raleigh, North Carolina, US | 16.75 TiB | 1.18% | 16.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f0447183 | Indianapolis, Indiana, US | 13.72 TiB | 0.96% | 13.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01072221 | Los Angeles, California, US | 7.11 TiB | 0.50% | 6.39 TiB | 10.11% |
f01402814 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 6.38 TiB | 0.45% | 6.34 TiB | 0.49% |
f0187709 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 4.75 TiB | 0.33% | 4.59 TiB | 3.29% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 4.56 TiB | 0.32% | 4.53 TiB | 0.68% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 3.88 TiB | 0.27% | 3.88 TiB | 0.00% |
f01222595 | Moscow, Moscow, RU | 3.66 TiB | 0.26% | 3.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 3.53 TiB | 0.25% | 3.53 TiB | 0.00% |
f01896422 | Fremont, California, US | 3.00 TiB | 0.21% | 3.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 2.70 TiB | 0.19% | 1.86 TiB | 31.21% |
f010088 | Everett, Washington, US | 2.67 TiB | 0.19% | 2.52 TiB | 5.85% |
f01398391 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 2.36 TiB | 0.17% | 2.20 TiB | 6.62% |
f01225882 | Burnaby, British Columbia, CA | 2.06 TiB | 0.14% | 2.06 TiB | 0.00% |
f03624 | Nürnberg, Bavaria, DE | 2.03 TiB | 0.14% | 2.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01390330 | Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN | 1.75 TiB | 0.12% | 1.75 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.70 TiB | 0.12% | 1.70 TiB | 0.00% |
f08399 | Seattle, Washington, US | 1.66 TiB | 0.12% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f047419 | North Prairie, Wisconsin, US | 1.44 TiB | 0.10% | 1.34 TiB | 6.52% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f0240185 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.41 TiB | 0.10% | 1.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.38 TiB | 0.10% | 1.16 TiB | 15.91% |
f0214334new |
Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 1.28 TiB | 0.09% | 1.28 TiB | 0.00% |
f0143858 | Clifton, New Jersey, US | 1.19 TiB | 0.08% | 1.19 TiB | 0.00% |
f03223 | San Jose, California, US | 1.17 TiB | 0.08% | 1.14 TiB | 2.67% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.02 TiB | 0.07% | 1.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01859603 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN | 1.00 TiB | 0.07% | 1.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f01683871 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 448.00 GiB | 0.03% | 448.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0240456 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 352.00 GiB | 0.02% | 352.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0836160 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 320.00 GiB | 0.02% | 320.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0520660 | Unknown | 288.00 GiB | 0.02% | 288.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02301 | San Jose, California, US | 192.00 GiB | 0.01% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f032824 | Austin, Texas, US | 160.00 GiB | 0.01% | 160.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 96.00 GiB | 0.01% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
177.41 TiB | 246.25 TiB | 1 | 17.28% |
22.75 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2 | 5.40% |
6.44 TiB | 37.81 TiB | 3 | 2.65% |
7.47 TiB | 64.13 TiB | 4 | 4.50% |
38.41 TiB | 454.06 TiB | 5 | 31.85% |
27.19 TiB | 346.03 TiB | 6 | 24.28% |
7.48 TiB | 105.70 TiB | 7 | 7.42% |
288.00 GiB | 2.75 TiB | 8 | 0.19% |
192.00 GiB | 1.75 TiB | 9 | 0.12% |
384.00 GiB | 4.19 TiB | 10 | 0.29% |
512.00 GiB | 6.84 TiB | 11 | 0.48% |
320.00 GiB | 4.75 TiB | 12 | 0.33% |
1.06 TiB | 17.13 TiB | 13 | 1.20% |
928.00 GiB | 15.59 TiB | 14 | 1.09% |
1.22 TiB | 22.94 TiB | 15 | 1.61% |
384.00 GiB | 7.47 TiB | 16 | 0.52% |
384.00 GiB | 7.75 TiB | 17 | 0.54% |
128.00 GiB | 2.63 TiB | 18 | 0.18% |
32.00 GiB | 736.00 GiB | 19 | 0.05% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebl37bma5jh74x2oa5h6rz6kohmsudtah5y2ik7nlyd2hppjwuywm
Address
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
Datacap Allocated
498.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
7678358a-28e1-4434-8ae4-8a8829f7a33a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebl37bma5jh74x2oa5h6rz6kohmsudtah5y2ik7nlyd2hppjwuywm
The issue reached the total datacap requested. This should be closed
f01858410
f1r3d25hl2y7rqlsu2mgczdethy4qqjmkfdlmibfq
cryptowhizzard & kernelogic
total dc reached
0
1.46PiB
548TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
45319 | 37 | 498TiB | 16.61 | 90.70TiB |
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?