Closed thrbowl closed 1 year ago
The quota allocation of each SP is reasonable, and the maximum does not exceed 21% I randomly checked the data to check, indeed, it is the data related to the company that applied. So far, this is an honest customer.
f02049625
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
800TiB
d0a40676-c153-4751-a3f5-e25682a12e0f
f01858410
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
llifezou & 1LISA2
800% of weekly dc amount requested
800TiB
3.85PiB
1.14PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
75764 | 11 | 800TiB | 19.72 | 181.43TiB |
Top Allocation :16% I am willing to support and continue to follow.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebdmt5fivpvcxrrjcr63zetj4l3agdt4cljdlxyjuqoramjfd6eee
Address
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yayfsv6whu3rheviucvventj3y6t542xfpb47ei
Id
d0a40676-c153-4751-a3f5-e25682a12e0f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebdmt5fivpvcxrrjcr63zetj4l3agdt4cljdlxyjuqoramjfd6eee
Check items
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacec7htpaama6ktq5vls2mhyxctf4yhbrse7hm4fjftjlolm44d3txe
Address
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq
Id
d0a40676-c153-4751-a3f5-e25682a12e0f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec7htpaama6ktq5vls2mhyxctf4yhbrse7hm4fjftjlolm44d3txe
Boom Adverisng Media Co. Ltd.
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01938721 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 476.94 TiB | 12.35% | 476.88 TiB | 0.01% |
f01938718 | Morrisville, North Carolina, US | 472.25 TiB | 12.23% | 472.22 TiB | 0.01% |
f01938717 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 470.78 TiB | 12.19% | 470.78 TiB | 0.00% |
f01938665 | Sham Shui Po, Sham Shui Po, HK | 469.03 TiB | 12.15% | 469.00 TiB | 0.01% |
f01938714 | Sham Shui Po, Sham Shui Po, HK | 466.31 TiB | 12.08% | 466.31 TiB | 0.00% |
f01852023 | Busan, Busan, KR | 334.50 TiB | 8.66% | 334.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01852325 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 329.41 TiB | 8.53% | 329.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f01852677 | Morrisville, North Carolina, US | 322.81 TiB | 8.36% | 322.81 TiB | 0.00% |
f01852664 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 304.59 TiB | 7.89% | 304.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f01851482 | Busan, Busan, KR | 213.78 TiB | 5.54% | 213.78 TiB | 0.00% |
f01969202new |
Sham Shui Po, Sham Shui Po, HK | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
384.00 GiB | 384.00 GiB | 1 | 0.01% |
4.59 TiB | 9.19 TiB | 2 | 0.24% |
52.72 TiB | 158.16 TiB | 3 | 4.10% |
269.53 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 4 | 27.93% |
522.72 TiB | 2.55 PiB | 5 | 67.70% |
96.00 GiB | 864.00 GiB | 8 | 0.02% |
32.00 GiB | 320.00 GiB | 9 | 0.01% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
f02049625
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
370TiB
9e0784c7-27b5-436b-a7e4-240dce721cf7
f01858410
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
newwebgroup & not found
800% of weekly dc amount requested
370TiB
4.63PiB
370TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
143619 | 15 | 800TiB | 10.4 | 196.84TiB |
Boom Adverisng Media Co. Ltd.
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
2
fireflyHZ1
ipfscn1
Joss-Hua2
kernelogic2
liyunzhi-6662
NDLABS-OFFICE2
newwebgroup1
stcouldlisa5
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01938721 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKBIH-Global Internet Harbor |
476.94 TiB | 10.71% | 476.88 TiB | 0.01% |
f01852325 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKBIH-Global Internet Harbor |
385.16 TiB | 8.65% | 385.13 TiB | 0.01% |
f01938665 | Sham Shui Po, Sham Shui Po, HKChina Unicom Global |
469.03 TiB | 10.53% | 469.00 TiB | 0.01% |
f01938714 | Sham Shui Po, Sham Shui Po, HKChina Unicom Global |
466.31 TiB | 10.47% | 466.31 TiB | 0.00% |
f01852023 | Busan, Busan, KRKorea Telecom |
391.44 TiB | 8.79% | 391.44 TiB | 0.00% |
f01851482 | Busan, Busan, KRKorea Telecom |
271.59 TiB | 6.10% | 271.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f01938717 | Singapore, Singapore, SGStarHub Ltd |
470.78 TiB | 10.57% | 470.78 TiB | 0.00% |
f01852664 | Singapore, Singapore, SGStarHub Ltd |
363.41 TiB | 8.16% | 363.41 TiB | 0.00% |
f01938718 | Morrisville, North Carolina, USTierPoint, LLC |
472.25 TiB | 10.61% | 472.22 TiB | 0.01% |
f01852677 | Morrisville, North Carolina, USTierPoint, LLC |
379.25 TiB | 8.52% | 379.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01969202new |
London, England, GBZenlayer Inc |
63.72 TiB | 1.43% | 63.72 TiB | 0.00% |
f01964073 | Jakarta, Jakarta, IDZenlayer Inc |
62.50 TiB | 1.40% | 62.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01966534 | Bangkok, Bangkok, THZenlayer Inc |
61.47 TiB | 1.38% | 61.47 TiB | 0.00% |
f01964002 | Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MYZenlayer Inc |
60.38 TiB | 1.36% | 60.38 TiB | 0.00% |
f01965334 | Mumbai, Maharashtra, INZenlayer Inc |
58.47 TiB | 1.31% | 58.47 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
6.56 TiB | 6.56 TiB | 1 | 0.15% |
9.41 TiB | 18.81 TiB | 2 | 0.42% |
31.06 TiB | 93.19 TiB | 3 | 2.09% |
127.66 TiB | 510.63 TiB | 4 | 11.47% |
764.41 TiB | 3.73 PiB | 5 | 85.84% |
32.00 GiB | 224.00 GiB | 7 | 0.00% |
32.00 GiB | 320.00 GiB | 8 | 0.01% |
96.00 GiB | 960.00 GiB | 9 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Greetings,
I have been doing retrievals on this application but i could not do any except for the demo data. The rest of the deals are inaccessible due the SP's timing out or not open.
Can you also tell me why f0155049-14 is involved? I don't understand the relationship.
I am also interested in the relationship between what you store above and say to be storing here:
Our data includes 1 User clicks log 2 Advertising analysis logs 3 Advertising big data recommendation of each country Because some of the materials involve customer privacy, it is inconvenient to show them in detail here. This is a screenshot of the amount of material displayed at part of the time. We confirm that a lot of storage space is required.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/109211726/183399725-a74b50ff-59e0-4ec6-a637-be4a791aee0d.png http://www.boom-ad.cn/private/datareport2022.png https://www.boom-ad.cn/dataview/data.zip But we will not store private data. For contractual and security reasons, customer-related data will only be stored in our own data center.
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find Organization Name field in the information provided We could not find Website \/ Social Media field in the information provided We could not find Total amount of DataCap being requested (between 500 TiB and 5 PiB) field in the information provided We could not find Weekly allocation of DataCap requested (usually between 1-100TiB) field in the information provided We could not find On-chain address for first allocation field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find Organization Name field in the information provided We could not find Website \/ Social Media field in the information provided We could not find Total amount of DataCap being requested (between 500 TiB and 5 PiB) field in the information provided We could not find Weekly allocation of DataCap requested (usually between 1-100TiB) field in the information provided We could not find On-chain address for first allocation field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
f02049625
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
370TiB
fed5cfbd-8ca0-4e26-8afd-5cdaa991aaad
f01858410
f1ucw52kv3o7ztmikgmc5cdeq6msr5vdmnmeb3c5a
800% of weekly dc amount requested
370TiB
7.275957614183433e+109YiB
-8.79B
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
150842 | 15 | 800TiB | 9.91 | 0B |
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 14 days, so for now it is being closed. Please feel free to contact the Fil+ Gov team to re-open the application if it is still being processed. Thank you!
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?