Closed Epengtimes closed 2 years ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Hi Epengtimes, will you please provide us a Website / Social Media link regarding to your company instead of a email address( epengtimes@163.com) Thanks
Hi Epengtimes, will you please provide us a Website / Social Media link regarding to your company instead of a email address( epengtimes@163.com) Thanks
Hi there! The data is for our internal use, we don't have a social media now.
Hi Epengtimes, will you please provide us a Website / Social Media link regarding to your company instead of a email address( epengtimes@163.com) Thanks
Hi there! The data is for our internal use, we don't have a social media now.
Thanks for your reply. All data and company will be public when you join the LDN.
Hi @Epengtimes, is there an offline data transfer process?
Hi @Epengtimes, is there an offline data transfer process?
From the very beginning, we prefer to transfer data online. When we make some tests afterwards and find several miners with good reputation and technical strength, we may store some large dataset on HDDs first and then send the HDDs to miners offline to make the storage deals.
5PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
200TiB
**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01576871
At this time, the large dataset process is intended for public client data. It sounds like you are hoping to upload private or encrypted data, which we are not able to validate and verify at this time. In addition, no one can get the download channel through your private email address or your dropbox.
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
100TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceahpildxn4q4sds7ly55qubfafy2n2fugv3eq77cf35yo7yq26gcy
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
100TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceahpildxn4q4sds7ly55qubfafy2n2fugv3eq77cf35yo7yq26gcy
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced4bmyhmkwiderv57akuvklkhb6t6o5jlfbwc6eyrmsoxjjhi32ae
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
100TiB
Signer Address
f1lwpw2bcv66pla3lpkcuzquw37pbx7ur4m6zvq2a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced4bmyhmkwiderv57akuvklkhb6t6o5jlfbwc6eyrmsoxjjhi32ae
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
200TiB
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
ozhtdong & IreneYoung
200TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1492 | 7 | 100TiB | 34.45 | 13.8TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced3kstbccjdoc2k7ufary5u5sotwsgidmqtqmvwjvoqozm5bxiyxm
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
200TiB
Signer Address
f136bz32l2hlyad4npmfg5dngcdw3jk3tpcpoz2ja
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced3kstbccjdoc2k7ufary5u5sotwsgidmqtqmvwjvoqozm5bxiyxm
@ozhtdong @IreneYoung Hi, could you help to approve the subsequent datacap allocation pls? Thanks!
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceawzpc2xiwro6ksmapu5ew7nk3giaeez2yvnmormepick2s2vwaf6
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
200TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceawzpc2xiwro6ksmapu5ew7nk3giaeez2yvnmormepick2s2vwaf6
@ozhtdong @IreneYoung Hi, could you help to approve the subsequent datacap allocation pls? Thanks!
Done👌
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
400TiB
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
IreneYoung & rayshitou
400TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
3650 | 11 | 200TiB | 22.54 | 20.8TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceawl6tibkcffwk7akcntn322ubqdxbq557cy4qcdbmel3kcdhtjv4
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
400TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceawl6tibkcffwk7akcntn322ubqdxbq557cy4qcdbmel3kcdhtjv4
@rayshitou @flyworker @Fenbushi-Filecoin @ozhtdong @IreneYoung @cryptowhizzard @Reiers Any notary can help with the allocation please? Thanks in advance!
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecggqfqsqeqqllyhm3z72grgb6ed2vutkmd4fj4kewxh536q7iqg6
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
400TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecggqfqsqeqqllyhm3z72grgb6ed2vutkmd4fj4kewxh536q7iqg6
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
800TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedtehrzmrd6hydhhsf25ppnulcanbgvvsb575i6i7o5tpfyfeb6nc
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedtehrzmrd6hydhhsf25ppnulcanbgvvsb575i6i7o5tpfyfeb6nc
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecqrzmmwqgpzhkykupibghvj2332a2v3tn4wyctb3oonksaisziqm
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
800.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecqrzmmwqgpzhkykupibghvj2332a2v3tn4wyctb3oonksaisziqm
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
1.56PiB
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
not found & not found
800% of weekly dc amount requested
1.56PiB
1.46PiB
3.53PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
22044 | 11 | 800TiB | 23.49 | 172.46TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebh45jga3gnzhq5sxbwtfmdbewlgldiv5bx3iuewtwqbqjcigq5je
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
1.56PiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebh45jga3gnzhq5sxbwtfmdbewlgldiv5bx3iuewtwqbqjcigq5je
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceayvb4k6sug44u2xl32hav65ll7u4kb64b3krfqvscah5nz7gra2s
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
1.56PiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceayvb4k6sug44u2xl32hav65ll7u4kb64b3krfqvscah5nz7gra2s
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
1.56PiB
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
not found & not found
800% of weekly dc amount requested
1.56PiB
3.02PiB
1.97PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
87453 | 15 | 1.56PiB | 20.37 | 316.37TiB |
Hi, any notaries can help to approve the subsequent datacap allocation pls? Thanks! @ozhtdong @IreneYoung
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebxip3snbwfibgxykmwrumvoxikwatuzyxk6puzfpk6af7cgadtc6
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
1.56PiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebxip3snbwfibgxykmwrumvoxikwatuzyxk6puzfpk6af7cgadtc6
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecq63ag4qehzqslu4assm2tyd6gklcoz3an7n65chmpc2kmhtkwws
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
1.56PiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecq63ag4qehzqslu4assm2tyd6gklcoz3an7n65chmpc2kmhtkwws
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
425.12TiB
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
not found & not found
800% of weekly dc amount requested
425.12TiB
4.58PiB
425.12TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
142165 | 15 | 1.56PiB | 17.88 | 362.14TiB |
Hello everybody, could you help to approve next batch Datacap ? Thank you very much! @IreneYoung @ozhtdong @rayshitou @MegTei @Reiers @cryptowhizzard
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedrkjy2xz3v2hm4kfvlmalzmzvyloupz2cblj76kzyjqfrxoq6ila
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
425.12TiB
Signer Address
f1yqydpmqb5en262jpottko2kd65msajax7fi4rmq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedrkjy2xz3v2hm4kfvlmalzmzvyloupz2cblj76kzyjqfrxoq6ila
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecg2inb7ctxhevazarsqbhrmptsfnsthhqcz4tgmbfdijvfi6zzzs
Address
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
Datacap Allocated
425.12TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecg2inb7ctxhevazarsqbhrmptsfnsthhqcz4tgmbfdijvfi6zzzs
f01576871
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
1B
The allocation of the requested datacap cannot be performed, because it would result in the exceeding of the total granted data cap.
Epeng Times Technology Ltd
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 83.28% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 79.90% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.33% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 77.93% of total deal sealed by f01606675 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.91% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 86.75% of total deal sealed by f01781851 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.83% of total deal sealed by f01666984 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.09% of total deal sealed by f01264125 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 66.09% of total deal sealed by f01662887 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 83.33% of total deal sealed by f01380788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 1.01 PiB | 20.27% | 173.56 TiB | 83.28% |
f01606849new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 978.47 TiB | 19.11% | 196.69 TiB | 79.90% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 973.72 TiB | 19.02% | 191.53 TiB | 80.33% |
f01606675new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 867.66 TiB | 16.95% | 191.52 TiB | 77.93% |
f01716466new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 552.53 TiB | 10.79% | 105.50 TiB | 80.91% |
f01781851 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 500.19 TiB | 9.77% | 66.28 TiB | 86.75% |
f01666984 | Dorval, Quebec, CA | 140.70 TiB | 2.75% | 93.11 TiB | 33.83% |
f01264125 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 36.41 TiB | 0.71% | 26.91 TiB | 26.09% |
f01662887new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 32.34 TiB | 0.63% | 10.97 TiB | 66.09% |
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 83.33% |
f01776738new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01201327 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01199442 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 28.50% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
41.28 TiB | 53.16 TiB | 1 | 1.04% |
86.41 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 2 | 20.91% |
34.55 TiB | 335.23 TiB | 3 | 6.55% |
40.63 TiB | 801.44 TiB | 4 | 15.65% |
108.05 TiB | 2.61 PiB | 5 | 52.21% |
5.91 TiB | 185.28 TiB | 6 | 3.62% |
32.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 7 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.10 PiB | 1,934 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Epeng Times Technology Ltd
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 83.28% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 79.90% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.33% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 77.93% of total deal sealed by f01606675 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.91% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 86.75% of total deal sealed by f01781851 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.83% of total deal sealed by f01666984 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.09% of total deal sealed by f01264125 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 66.09% of total deal sealed by f01662887 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 83.33% of total deal sealed by f01380788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 1.01 PiB | 20.27% | 173.56 TiB | 83.28% |
f01606849new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 978.47 TiB | 19.11% | 196.69 TiB | 79.90% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 973.72 TiB | 19.02% | 191.53 TiB | 80.33% |
f01606675new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 867.66 TiB | 16.95% | 191.52 TiB | 77.93% |
f01716466new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 552.53 TiB | 10.79% | 105.50 TiB | 80.91% |
f01781851 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 500.19 TiB | 9.77% | 66.28 TiB | 86.75% |
f01666984 | Dorval, Quebec, CA | 140.70 TiB | 2.75% | 93.11 TiB | 33.83% |
f01264125 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 36.41 TiB | 0.71% | 26.91 TiB | 26.09% |
f01662887new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 32.34 TiB | 0.63% | 10.97 TiB | 66.09% |
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 83.33% |
f01776738new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01201327 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01199442 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
41.28 TiB | 53.16 TiB | 1 | 1.04% |
86.41 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 2 | 20.91% |
34.55 TiB | 335.23 TiB | 3 | 6.55% |
40.63 TiB | 801.44 TiB | 4 | 15.65% |
108.05 TiB | 2.61 PiB | 5 | 52.21% |
5.91 TiB | 185.28 TiB | 6 | 3.62% |
32.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 7 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.10 PiB | 1,934 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Epeng Times Technology Ltd
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 83.28% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 79.90% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.33% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 77.93% of total deal sealed by f01606675 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.91% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 86.75% of total deal sealed by f01781851 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.83% of total deal sealed by f01666984 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.09% of total deal sealed by f01264125 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 66.09% of total deal sealed by f01662887 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 83.33% of total deal sealed by f01380788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 1.01 PiB | 20.27% | 173.56 TiB | 83.28% |
f01606849new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 978.47 TiB | 19.11% | 196.69 TiB | 79.90% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 973.72 TiB | 19.02% | 191.53 TiB | 80.33% |
f01606675new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 867.66 TiB | 16.95% | 191.52 TiB | 77.93% |
f01716466new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 552.53 TiB | 10.79% | 105.50 TiB | 80.91% |
f01781851 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 500.19 TiB | 9.77% | 66.28 TiB | 86.75% |
f01666984 | Dorval, Quebec, CA | 140.70 TiB | 2.75% | 93.11 TiB | 33.83% |
f01264125 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 36.41 TiB | 0.71% | 26.91 TiB | 26.09% |
f01662887new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 32.34 TiB | 0.63% | 10.97 TiB | 66.09% |
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 83.33% |
f01776738new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01201327 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01199442 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
41.28 TiB | 53.16 TiB | 1 | 1.04% |
86.41 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 2 | 20.91% |
34.55 TiB | 335.23 TiB | 3 | 6.55% |
40.63 TiB | 801.44 TiB | 4 | 15.65% |
108.05 TiB | 2.61 PiB | 5 | 52.21% |
5.91 TiB | 185.28 TiB | 6 | 3.62% |
32.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 7 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.10 PiB | 1,934 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Epeng Times Technology Ltd
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 83.28% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 79.90% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.33% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 77.93% of total deal sealed by f01606675 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.91% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 86.75% of total deal sealed by f01781851 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.83% of total deal sealed by f01666984 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.09% of total deal sealed by f01264125 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 66.09% of total deal sealed by f01662887 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 83.33% of total deal sealed by f01380788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 1.01 PiB | 20.27% | 173.56 TiB | 83.28% |
f01606849new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 978.47 TiB | 19.11% | 196.69 TiB | 79.90% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 973.72 TiB | 19.02% | 191.53 TiB | 80.33% |
f01606675new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 867.66 TiB | 16.95% | 191.52 TiB | 77.93% |
f01716466new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 552.53 TiB | 10.79% | 105.50 TiB | 80.91% |
f01781851 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 500.19 TiB | 9.77% | 66.28 TiB | 86.75% |
f01666984 | Dorval, Quebec, CA | 140.70 TiB | 2.75% | 93.11 TiB | 33.83% |
f01264125 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 36.41 TiB | 0.71% | 26.91 TiB | 26.09% |
f01662887new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 32.34 TiB | 0.63% | 10.97 TiB | 66.09% |
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 83.33% |
f01776738new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01201327 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01199442 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
41.28 TiB | 53.16 TiB | 1 | 1.04% |
86.41 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 2 | 20.91% |
34.55 TiB | 335.23 TiB | 3 | 6.55% |
40.63 TiB | 801.44 TiB | 4 | 15.65% |
108.05 TiB | 2.61 PiB | 5 | 52.21% |
5.91 TiB | 185.28 TiB | 6 | 3.62% |
32.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 7 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.10 PiB | 1,934 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Epeng Times Technology Ltd
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 83.28% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 79.90% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.33% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 77.93% of total deal sealed by f01606675 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.91% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 86.75% of total deal sealed by f01781851 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.83% of total deal sealed by f01666984 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.09% of total deal sealed by f01264125 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 66.09% of total deal sealed by f01662887 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 83.33% of total deal sealed by f01380788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 1.01 PiB | 20.27% | 173.56 TiB | 83.28% |
f01606849new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 978.47 TiB | 19.11% | 196.69 TiB | 79.90% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 973.72 TiB | 19.02% | 191.53 TiB | 80.33% |
f01606675new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 867.66 TiB | 16.95% | 191.52 TiB | 77.93% |
f01716466new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 552.53 TiB | 10.79% | 105.50 TiB | 80.91% |
f01781851 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 500.19 TiB | 9.77% | 66.28 TiB | 86.75% |
f01666984 | Dorval, Quebec, CA | 140.70 TiB | 2.75% | 93.11 TiB | 33.83% |
f01264125 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 36.41 TiB | 0.71% | 26.91 TiB | 26.09% |
f01662887new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 32.34 TiB | 0.63% | 10.97 TiB | 66.09% |
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 83.33% |
f01776738new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01201327 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01199442 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
41.28 TiB | 53.16 TiB | 1 | 1.04% |
86.41 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 2 | 20.91% |
34.55 TiB | 335.23 TiB | 3 | 6.55% |
40.63 TiB | 801.44 TiB | 4 | 15.65% |
108.05 TiB | 2.61 PiB | 5 | 52.21% |
5.91 TiB | 185.28 TiB | 6 | 3.62% |
32.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 7 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.10 PiB | 1,934 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Epeng Times Technology Ltd
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 83.28% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 79.90% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.33% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 77.93% of total deal sealed by f01606675 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.91% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 86.75% of total deal sealed by f01781851 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.83% of total deal sealed by f01666984 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.09% of total deal sealed by f01264125 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 66.09% of total deal sealed by f01662887 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 83.33% of total deal sealed by f01380788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 1.01 PiB | 20.27% | 173.56 TiB | 83.28% |
f01606849new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 978.47 TiB | 19.11% | 196.69 TiB | 79.90% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 973.72 TiB | 19.02% | 191.53 TiB | 80.33% |
f01606675new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 867.66 TiB | 16.95% | 191.52 TiB | 77.93% |
f01716466new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 552.53 TiB | 10.79% | 105.50 TiB | 80.91% |
f01781851 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 500.19 TiB | 9.77% | 66.28 TiB | 86.75% |
f01666984 | Dorval, Quebec, CA | 140.70 TiB | 2.75% | 93.11 TiB | 33.83% |
f01264125 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 36.41 TiB | 0.71% | 26.91 TiB | 26.09% |
f01662887new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 32.34 TiB | 0.63% | 10.97 TiB | 66.09% |
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 83.33% |
f01776738new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01201327 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01199442 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
41.28 TiB | 53.16 TiB | 1 | 1.04% |
86.41 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 2 | 20.91% |
34.55 TiB | 335.23 TiB | 3 | 6.55% |
40.63 TiB | 801.44 TiB | 4 | 15.65% |
108.05 TiB | 2.61 PiB | 5 | 52.21% |
5.91 TiB | 185.28 TiB | 6 | 3.62% |
32.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 7 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.10 PiB | 1,934 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Epeng Times Technology Ltd
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 83.28% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 79.90% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.33% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 77.93% of total deal sealed by f01606675 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.91% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 86.75% of total deal sealed by f01781851 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.83% of total deal sealed by f01666984 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.09% of total deal sealed by f01264125 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 66.09% of total deal sealed by f01662887 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 83.33% of total deal sealed by f01380788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 1.01 PiB | 20.27% | 173.56 TiB | 83.28% |
f01606849new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 978.47 TiB | 19.11% | 196.69 TiB | 79.90% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 973.72 TiB | 19.02% | 191.53 TiB | 80.33% |
f01606675new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 867.66 TiB | 16.95% | 191.52 TiB | 77.93% |
f01716466new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 552.53 TiB | 10.79% | 105.50 TiB | 80.91% |
f01781851 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 500.19 TiB | 9.77% | 66.28 TiB | 86.75% |
f01666984 | Dorval, Quebec, CA | 140.70 TiB | 2.75% | 93.11 TiB | 33.83% |
f01264125 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 36.41 TiB | 0.71% | 26.91 TiB | 26.09% |
f01662887new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 32.34 TiB | 0.63% | 10.97 TiB | 66.09% |
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 83.33% |
f01776738new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01201327 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01199442 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
41.28 TiB | 53.16 TiB | 1 | 1.04% |
86.41 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 2 | 20.91% |
34.55 TiB | 335.23 TiB | 3 | 6.55% |
40.63 TiB | 801.44 TiB | 4 | 15.65% |
108.05 TiB | 2.61 PiB | 5 | 52.21% |
5.91 TiB | 185.28 TiB | 6 | 3.62% |
32.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 7 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.10 PiB | 1,934 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Epeng Times Technology Ltd
f3vyn26odhgiu746qv4n4h3xv7u3bzntwwnnhzrcppnhv52htgzkdg2war2pgi4kdoucneqzkl7wenj3mnjpea
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 83.28% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 79.90% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.33% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 77.93% of total deal sealed by f01606675 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 80.91% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 86.75% of total deal sealed by f01781851 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 33.83% of total deal sealed by f01666984 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 26.09% of total deal sealed by f01264125 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 66.09% of total deal sealed by f01662887 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 83.33% of total deal sealed by f01380788 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 1.01 PiB | 20.27% | 173.56 TiB | 83.28% |
f01606849new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 978.47 TiB | 19.11% | 196.69 TiB | 79.90% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 973.72 TiB | 19.02% | 191.53 TiB | 80.33% |
f01606675new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 867.66 TiB | 16.95% | 191.52 TiB | 77.93% |
f01716466new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 552.53 TiB | 10.79% | 105.50 TiB | 80.91% |
f01781851 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 500.19 TiB | 9.77% | 66.28 TiB | 86.75% |
f01666984 | Dorval, Quebec, CA | 140.70 TiB | 2.75% | 93.11 TiB | 33.83% |
f01264125 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 36.41 TiB | 0.71% | 26.91 TiB | 26.09% |
f01662887new |
Singapore, Singapore, SG | 32.34 TiB | 0.63% | 10.97 TiB | 66.09% |
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 192.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 83.33% |
f01776738new |
Montréal, Quebec, CA | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01201327 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% | 1.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01199442 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% | 512.00 MiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
41.28 TiB | 53.16 TiB | 1 | 1.04% |
86.41 TiB | 1.05 PiB | 2 | 20.91% |
34.55 TiB | 335.23 TiB | 3 | 6.55% |
40.63 TiB | 801.44 TiB | 4 | 15.65% |
108.05 TiB | 2.61 PiB | 5 | 52.21% |
5.91 TiB | 185.28 TiB | 6 | 3.62% |
32.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 7 | 0.02% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.10 PiB | 1,934 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?