Closed Alex11801 closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. The formatting for the Total amount of DataCap being requested is wrong. please input again with this formatting : nnnTiB/PiB or nnnTiB/PiB
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. The formatting for the Total amount of DataCap being requested is wrong. please input again with this formatting : nnnTiB/PiB or nnnTiB/PiB
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@Alex11801 We will need an active client address in order to move forward with next steps for the large dataset application process. Please provide the active client address for receiving the DataCap; this will be the address that you use to make deals with storage providers, as DataCap cannot be transferred between client addresses.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@Alex11801 We will need an active client address in order to move forward with next steps for the large dataset application process. Please provide the active client address for receiving the DataCap; this will be the address that you use to make deals with storage providers, as DataCap cannot be transferred between client addresses.
@galen-mcandrew thanks Galen for your kind reminder. I have updated the application and provided an available active address above, which is f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi. Please check it again. If any problem, let me know.
Our team has prepared ourselves to onboard our dataset to Filecoin. So, could we move forward with next steps for the large dataset application process?
@Alex11801 Are you able to use https://verify.glif.io/ to request an automated first allocation of DataCap? This will also help initialize that client address.
5PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01576886
It sounds like you want to upload private or NFT data. These data belong to each data owner rather than your platform. We can't verify them at present.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
@Alex11801 Are you able to use https://verify.glif.io/ to request an automated first allocation of DataCap? This will also help initialize that client address.
Thanks @galen-mcandrew and we have requested the automated allocation of 32 GiB DataCap successfully. Am I right in thinking we need to wait for the multisign by RKH and Notaries?
It sounds like you want to upload private or NFT data. These data belong to each data owner rather than your platform. We can't verify them at present.
Hi @AnthnoySmith , I appreciate your attention and understand your concerns. However, please allow me to interpret the fact that NFT data on Define platform are a set of metadata describing the information of artwork, paintings, music, videos, and stuff like that which are all publicly visible data, rather than private data. Moreover, while users upload their stuff on Define platform to mint exclusive NFTs, they give consent to display the NFT data to public and proof of ownership on-chain.
Please be assured that the data we plan to store on Filecoin network is absolutely public and can be retrieved by anyone on the network as we have confirmed in the application above.
@Alex11801
Am I right in thinking we need to wait for the multisign by RKH and Notaries?
Yes, the root key holders will approve the creation of the multisig notary, and then the first allocation request will be made for the notaries. At that time, 2 of the active notaries will need to review and sign the first allocation request.
f01576886
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
50TiB
If the data is publicly available, then I'll support the request. If you guys get any problem making the storge deals with miners, you could come back here for help and suggestions from us or @galen-mcandrew.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceczyovdkszbsyzpeo6y7sro7p537vvxjmib4hdmxeykwulluhjqtg
Address
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Datacap Allocated
50TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceczyovdkszbsyzpeo6y7sro7p537vvxjmib4hdmxeykwulluhjqtg
@IreneYoung Hi and thank you a lot for your support! Yes, the data is publicly available, I promise.
hey do you have tools doing migration to the filecoin network? we are interested and want to support
hey do you have tools doing migration to the filecoin network? we are interested and want to support
Hi @flyworker, thanks for your support. My team is outsourcing the tools. my contact email, alex@de-fine.art
great to hear you have prepared for the migrating. We are ok to sign
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebdaxjmyspvbjocgmubnxmobbkkua2jhyp5uipzn3o45flvon5iny
Address
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Datacap Allocated
50TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebdaxjmyspvbjocgmubnxmobbkkua2jhyp5uipzn3o45flvon5iny
Thanks for supports!
f01576886
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
100TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecmbp5xnp3eddzey2jmkjggefj4flti734mbbzarlbe6cuyxnsneo
Address
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecmbp5xnp3eddzey2jmkjggefj4flti734mbbzarlbe6cuyxnsneo
@Reiers @IreneYoung @flyworker @MasaakiNawatani @tinkmk @s0nik42 @aaitor @rayshitou @cryptowhizzard @dannyob @TimWilliams00 @ozhtdong @Fenbushi-Filecoin @steven004 @neogeweb3 @waynewyang @swatchliu @MRJAVAZHAO @KodaRobotDog @andrewxhill @XnMatrixSV Hi notaries, please help us to approve the next round of Datacap allocation. Thank you so much!
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecs2b5z7gk6yu73c4mkn6yd6dr67hf4u3fcdauazd2l24z6mgm7ls
Address
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Datacap Allocated
100.00TiB
Signer Address
f1oz43ckvmtxmmsfzqm6bpnemqlavz4ifyl524chq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecs2b5z7gk6yu73c4mkn6yd6dr67hf4u3fcdauazd2l24z6mgm7ls
f01576886
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
200TiB
f01576886
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Reiers & MegTei
200% of weekly dc amount requested
200TiB
150TiB
4.85PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
6089 | 6 | 100TiB | 79.02 | 12GiB |
@Reiers @IreneYoung @flyworker @MasaakiNawatani @tinkmk @s0nik42 @aaitor @rayshitou @cryptowhizzard @dannyob @TimWilliams00 @ozhtdong @Fenbushi-Filecoin @steven004 @neogeweb3 @waynewyang @swatchliu @MRJAVAZHAO @KodaRobotDog @andrewxhill @XnMatrixSV
Hi notaries, please help us to approve this allocation. Thank you so much!
Seems that from the 100TB datacap you sent 80% to one SP. Is there a specific reason for not spreading the data across 4+ clients?
can you give us a list of SP’s where you store(d) data and some example deals to test retrieval?
@cryptowhizzard thanks for your questions.
We contacted about 10 SPs and started dealing with 6 of them. We thought these SPs would have similar speed. But due to various reasons, one of those SPs is very faster than others. We stopped dealing the fastest SP when we found the distribution issue. At the same time, we took lots of efforts to improve the speed with other SPs. The distribution issue has been fixed already and the allocation will be normal for the next round dealing.
Here is the SP list: f01380788 , f01602479, f01606849, f01641612, f01666984, f01716466 There are some real deals that should be retrieved successfully, please feel free to check it bafykbzacedsj4opdjnrb7q5q6qzy7jihv5tt4juh5uoysviwzcojsvjw7tspm f01602479 bafykbzaced2zvrj5dlo6s5bzjk5obxbze7wes4lyxdjuhjkxb6t6himk3dtji f01641612 bafykbzacedsj4opdjnrb7q5q6qzy7jihv5tt4juh5uoysviwzcojsvjw7tspm f01606849 bafykbzacedpbq4o6bhs7gyxdnhz2pfatx7m6osw4t5nv6gdiy2qqlayczhseq f01380788
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedjzvprfzqpv6rbidngfpwkuvmawybjieaqtyks53kxsowogb22vo
Address
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedjzvprfzqpv6rbidngfpwkuvmawybjieaqtyks53kxsowogb22vo
Hello @Alex11801
That is good to hear!
Please take some time and read this page about Fil+ / LDN. -> https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets
And please check regularly that the data you are storing will be open for retrieval during the time of the deal like described on this page.
Have a nice day!
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb6kdllglbsofy7usbtn3mewntq4sk2tvn276edztc5kn5mzb37zu
Address
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Datacap Allocated
200.00TiB
Signer Address
f1d4gmpqz3execjj2wvrxuuhvbms5mzh7t7yqrviq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb6kdllglbsofy7usbtn3mewntq4sk2tvn276edztc5kn5mzb37zu
Thank you! @cryptowhizzard and @IreneYoung
f01858410
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
400TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebyidvbr2n7nmjhlrps6cywjcb6tpbatxu45lvzor3cghpqudjjo2
Address
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebyidvbr2n7nmjhlrps6cywjcb6tpbatxu45lvzor3cghpqudjjo2
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced6agtknqvhrpr5oaok7rvks7chvgt77fkewz3jlprkesjjwblts2
Address
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced6agtknqvhrpr5oaok7rvks7chvgt77fkewz3jlprkesjjwblts2
@Alex11801 Hi! Great to see you have gotten approval for DataCap. If you are looking for storage providers to store these data or have any questions, please visit #bigdata-exchange on Filecoin Slack or reply here.
We have strong demand from a diverse group of SPs, who are actively looking to onboard more data.
Define Platform
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ f01380788 has sealed 29.30% of total datacap.
⚠️ 50.31% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.25% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.13% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 110.17 TiB | 29.30% | 97.76 TiB | 11.26% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 74.63 TiB | 19.85% | 37.08 TiB | 50.31% |
f01606849 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.53 TiB | 19.82% | 37.08 TiB | 50.25% |
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.34 TiB | 19.77% | 37.08 TiB | 50.13% |
f01666984new |
Dorval, Quebec, CA | 42.33 TiB | 11.26% | 37.08 TiB | 12.40% |
f01716466 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 4.00 GiB | 50.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 29.30% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
97.77 TiB | 110.18 TiB | 1 | 29.30% |
37.08 TiB | 265.83 TiB | 4 | 70.70% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.72 TiB | 1 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Define Platform
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 50.31% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.25% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.13% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 110.17 TiB | 29.30% | 97.76 TiB | 11.26% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 74.63 TiB | 19.85% | 37.08 TiB | 50.31% |
f01606849 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.53 TiB | 19.82% | 37.08 TiB | 50.25% |
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.34 TiB | 19.77% | 37.08 TiB | 50.13% |
f01666984new |
Dorval, Quebec, CA | 42.33 TiB | 11.26% | 37.08 TiB | 12.40% |
f01716466 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 4.00 GiB | 50.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
97.77 TiB | 110.18 TiB | 1 | 29.30% |
37.08 TiB | 265.83 TiB | 4 | 70.70% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.72 TiB | 1 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Define Platform
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 50.31% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.25% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.13% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 110.17 TiB | 29.30% | 97.76 TiB | 11.26% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 74.63 TiB | 19.85% | 37.08 TiB | 50.31% |
f01606849 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.53 TiB | 19.82% | 37.08 TiB | 50.25% |
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.34 TiB | 19.77% | 37.08 TiB | 50.13% |
f01666984new |
Dorval, Quebec, CA | 42.33 TiB | 11.26% | 37.08 TiB | 12.40% |
f01716466 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 4.00 GiB | 50.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
97.77 TiB | 110.18 TiB | 1 | 29.30% |
37.08 TiB | 265.83 TiB | 4 | 70.70% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.72 TiB | 1 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Define Platform
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 50.31% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.25% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.13% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 110.17 TiB | 29.30% | 97.76 TiB | 11.26% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 74.63 TiB | 19.85% | 37.08 TiB | 50.31% |
f01606849 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.53 TiB | 19.82% | 37.08 TiB | 50.25% |
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.34 TiB | 19.77% | 37.08 TiB | 50.13% |
f01666984new |
Dorval, Quebec, CA | 42.33 TiB | 11.26% | 37.08 TiB | 12.40% |
f01716466 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 4.00 GiB | 50.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
97.77 TiB | 110.18 TiB | 1 | 29.30% |
37.08 TiB | 265.83 TiB | 4 | 70.70% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.72 TiB | 1 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Define Platform
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 50.31% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.25% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.13% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 110.17 TiB | 29.30% | 97.76 TiB | 11.26% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 74.63 TiB | 19.85% | 37.08 TiB | 50.31% |
f01606849 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.53 TiB | 19.82% | 37.08 TiB | 50.25% |
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.34 TiB | 19.77% | 37.08 TiB | 50.13% |
f01666984new |
Dorval, Quebec, CA | 42.33 TiB | 11.26% | 37.08 TiB | 12.40% |
f01716466 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 4.00 GiB | 50.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
97.77 TiB | 110.18 TiB | 1 | 29.30% |
37.08 TiB | 265.83 TiB | 4 | 70.70% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.72 TiB | 1 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Define Platform
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 50.31% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.25% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.13% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 110.17 TiB | 29.30% | 97.76 TiB | 11.26% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 74.63 TiB | 19.85% | 37.08 TiB | 50.31% |
f01606849 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.53 TiB | 19.82% | 37.08 TiB | 50.25% |
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.34 TiB | 19.77% | 37.08 TiB | 50.13% |
f01666984new |
Dorval, Quebec, CA | 42.33 TiB | 11.26% | 37.08 TiB | 12.40% |
f01716466 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 4.00 GiB | 50.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
97.77 TiB | 110.18 TiB | 1 | 29.30% |
37.08 TiB | 265.83 TiB | 4 | 70.70% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.72 TiB | 1 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Define Platform
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 50.31% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.25% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.13% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 110.17 TiB | 29.30% | 97.76 TiB | 11.26% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 74.63 TiB | 19.85% | 37.08 TiB | 50.31% |
f01606849 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.53 TiB | 19.82% | 37.08 TiB | 50.25% |
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.34 TiB | 19.77% | 37.08 TiB | 50.13% |
f01666984new |
Dorval, Quebec, CA | 42.33 TiB | 11.26% | 37.08 TiB | 12.40% |
f01716466 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 4.00 GiB | 50.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
97.77 TiB | 110.18 TiB | 1 | 29.30% |
37.08 TiB | 265.83 TiB | 4 | 70.70% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.72 TiB | 1 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Define Platform
f1rb4fa2yoozp7ju6xlnau57uxbmhaf3blwz2njdi
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 50.31% of total deal sealed by f01602479 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.25% of total deal sealed by f01606849 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.13% of total deal sealed by f01641612 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 50.00% of total deal sealed by f01716466 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01380788 | Shanghai, Shanghai, CN | 110.17 TiB | 29.30% | 97.76 TiB | 11.26% |
f01602479 | Longueuil, Quebec, CA | 74.63 TiB | 19.85% | 37.08 TiB | 50.31% |
f01606849 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.53 TiB | 19.82% | 37.08 TiB | 50.25% |
f01641612 | Montréal, Quebec, CA | 74.34 TiB | 19.77% | 37.08 TiB | 50.13% |
f01666984new |
Dorval, Quebec, CA | 42.33 TiB | 11.26% | 37.08 TiB | 12.40% |
f01716466 | Singapore, Singapore, SG | 8.00 GiB | 0.00% | 4.00 GiB | 50.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
97.77 TiB | 110.18 TiB | 1 | 29.30% |
37.08 TiB | 265.83 TiB | 4 | 70.70% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
Other Client | Application | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs | Verifier |
---|---|---|---|---|
f3vygs6wslfvenruzrrbez5yelczv2jjoii4wlvd6 yuyb3snm7sajh2ngjflhdntzxewuzmeczy4j6q56f qdsq |
Ecology Limited | 1.72 TiB | 1 | LDN # 36 |
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Large Dataset Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?