Closed xxcisco closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Total DataCap requested
2PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
60TiB
Client address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
30TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceakskcsitwkapow6zryjksyiypqeueqzmrtcvwwgwakwhbqtz5mca
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
30.00TiB
Signer Address
f1jvvltduw35u6inn5tr4nfualyd42bh3vjtylgci
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceakskcsitwkapow6zryjksyiypqeueqzmrtcvwwgwakwhbqtz5mca
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedxqli374uictibbn2ml4loqbj4qo4t36dgise3zjmhztt4wj26xa
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
30.00TiB
Signer Address
f1tfg54zzscugttejv336vivknmsnzzmyudp3t7wi
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedxqli374uictibbn2ml4loqbj4qo4t36dgise3zjmhztt4wj26xa
@xxcisco Hi! Great to see you have gotten approval for DataCap. If you are looking for more storage providers to store these data or have any questions, please visit #bigdata-exchange on Filecoin Slack or reply here.
We have strong demand from a diverse group of SPs, who are actively looking to onboard more data.
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
60TiB
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Joss-Hua & 1LISA2
100% of weekly dc amount requested
60TiB
30TiB
1.97PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
607 | 5 | 30TiB | 21.25 | 0B |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedszi4jf7kz4s34ol7pg67chqxwu65ht7k7qhbrpkhsba7bqb7hoc
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
60.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedszi4jf7kz4s34ol7pg67chqxwu65ht7k7qhbrpkhsba7bqb7hoc
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceafwbdtdcb3pblehxszdq366cqfkkymn5lfewhzl7coomkzttk33s
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
60.00TiB
Signer Address
f1pszcrsciyixyuxxukkvtazcokexbn54amf7gvoq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceafwbdtdcb3pblehxszdq366cqfkkymn5lfewhzl7coomkzttk33s
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
120TiB
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
liyunzhi-666 & psh0691
200% of weekly dc amount requested
120TiB
90TiB
1.91PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1792 | 5 | 60TiB | 20.81 | 2.46TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacea5fhz66i34hqw3ogqrumrfygu7paxrbe4didzggojtocxxth3see
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
120.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacea5fhz66i34hqw3ogqrumrfygu7paxrbe4didzggojtocxxth3see
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaioux4voa2nu7n2t2lbv5scivy3i4rv4iz3pr2gsdjmfwduqdizc
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
120.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaioux4voa2nu7n2t2lbv5scivy3i4rv4iz3pr2gsdjmfwduqdizc
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
240TiB
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
cryptowhizzard & kernelogic
400% of weekly dc amount requested
240TiB
210TiB
1.79PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
4541 | 5 | 120TiB | 20.88 | 22.71TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceafjrwiil63lmvvwv5sjsxtjxvoor4tbn3z3k3ktva5k2n5a5klbi
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
240.00TiB
Signer Address
f1tfg54zzscugttejv336vivknmsnzzmyudp3t7wi
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceafjrwiil63lmvvwv5sjsxtjxvoor4tbn3z3k3ktva5k2n5a5klbi
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceamaxyooxbb5cx5hia5h37i2vcgsplf7k76a7p6ahpwj44htebh66
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
240.00TiB
Signer Address
f1mdk7s2vntzm6hu35yuo6vjubtrpfnb2awhgvrri
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceamaxyooxbb5cx5hia5h37i2vcgsplf7k76a7p6ahpwj44htebh66
The data samples have disappeared. Please pause future allocations until the client provides a justification and uploads samples
I accidentally deleted some folders when I was cleaning up my google drive space, and I have now restored them.
@raghavrmadya @Kevin-FF-USA can we have some updates here since we already restored?
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
480TiB
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
1ane-1 & Joss-Hua
800% of weekly dc amount requested
480TiB
450TiB
1.56PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
14325 | 5 | 240TiB | 20.03 | 2.34TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedvicfcoy7zgsfodzxwp7v25pju3x5rp4oa4rzh27owuhbqr5bg2o
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
480.00TiB
Signer Address
f1q6bpjlqia6iemqbrdaxr2uehrhpvoju3qh4lpga
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedvicfcoy7zgsfodzxwp7v25pju3x5rp4oa4rzh27owuhbqr5bg2o
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebytbu4wxrgholqfey6oceadmp3u5j2r2x3us5ytcnm6g3defspzy
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
480.00TiB
Signer Address
f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebytbu4wxrgholqfey6oceadmp3u5j2r2x3us5ytcnm6g3defspzy
F3
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
⚠️ 20.24% of total deal sealed by f01914123 are duplicate data.
⚠️ 20.19% of total deal sealed by f01915546 are duplicate data.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01914123new |
Paripark, Seoul, KR | 89.69 TiB | 20.03% | 71.53 TiB | 20.24% |
f01915546new |
El Colorado, Querétaro, MX | 89.63 TiB | 20.02% | 71.53 TiB | 20.19% |
f01927252new |
Dādri, Uttar Pradesh, IN | 89.53 TiB | 20.00% | 75.50 TiB | 15.67% |
f01928022new |
Melbourne, Victoria, AU | 89.47 TiB | 19.99% | 75.50 TiB | 15.61% |
f01926792new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE | 89.34 TiB | 19.96% | 71.50 TiB | 19.97% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
3.97 TiB | 7.94 TiB | 2 | 1.77% |
32.00 GiB | 224.00 GiB | 4 | 0.05% |
71.50 TiB | 439.50 TiB | 5 | 98.18% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
480TiB
97e566a2-230f-4b93-9670-5af436be30cd
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
newwebgroup & llifezou
800% of weekly dc amount requested
480TiB
930TiB
1.09PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
25836 | 11 | 480TiB | 16.94 | 113.05TiB |
F3
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
1
1ane-11
cryptowhizzard2
Joss-Hua1
kernelogic1
liyunzhi-6661
newwebgroup1
psh06911
stcouldlisa1
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01807707 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
121.12 TiB | 15.16% | 121.12 TiB | 0.00% |
f01914123new |
Seoul, Seoul, KRThe Constant Company, LLC |
136.50 TiB | 17.09% | 118.19 TiB | 13.42% |
f01926792new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DEThe Constant Company, LLC |
136.00 TiB | 17.03% | 118.00 TiB | 13.24% |
f01927252new |
Delhi, Delhi, INThe Constant Company, LLC |
135.47 TiB | 16.96% | 121.28 TiB | 10.47% |
f01915546new |
El Colorado, Querétaro, MXThe Constant Company, LLC |
135.41 TiB | 16.95% | 117.19 TiB | 13.45% |
f01928022new |
Melbourne, Victoria, AUThe Constant Company, LLC |
134.31 TiB | 16.81% | 120.19 TiB | 10.52% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
121.12 TiB | 121.12 TiB | 1 | 15.16% |
4.63 TiB | 9.25 TiB | 2 | 1.16% |
32.00 GiB | 96.00 GiB | 3 | 0.01% |
2.00 TiB | 8.09 TiB | 4 | 1.01% |
115.50 TiB | 660.25 TiB | 5 | 82.65% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb5g5pj6u5n4vu4rxrthgp5p3gl7czy66lccq6hzyjyep5p5hp5uw
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
480.00TiB
Signer Address
f1qdko4jg25vo35qmyvcrw4ak4fmuu3f5rif2kc7i
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb5g5pj6u5n4vu4rxrthgp5p3gl7czy66lccq6hzyjyep5p5hp5uw
You have verified that no CID shares have been observed and are being distributed to more than five nodes.
I was able to perform retrieval on the SP of this LDN.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecw7vx75qteykahuggh7cs5huibfycoqugotopy5mpyjwbbtjvvdo
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
480.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecw7vx75qteykahuggh7cs5huibfycoqugotopy5mpyjwbbtjvvdo
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
480TiB
1333d66f-58ff-4788-99b7-1416766519bb
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
kernelogic & psh0691
800% of weekly dc amount requested
480TiB
1.37PiB
638TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
38770 | 11 | 480TiB | 17.92 | 58.28TiB |
F3
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
1
1ane-11
cryptowhizzard2
Joss-Hua2
kernelogic1
liyunzhi-6661
newwebgroup2
psh06911
stcouldlisa1
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01807707 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
126.54 TiB | 9.93% | 126.54 TiB | 0.00% |
f01914123new |
Paripark, Seoul, KRThe Constant Company, LLC |
230.42 TiB | 18.09% | 207.02 TiB | 10.16% |
f01926792new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DEThe Constant Company, LLC |
230.08 TiB | 18.06% | 206.98 TiB | 10.04% |
f01927252new |
Dādri, Uttar Pradesh, INThe Constant Company, LLC |
229.48 TiB | 18.01% | 210.20 TiB | 8.40% |
f01915546new |
El Colorado, Querétaro, MXThe Constant Company, LLC |
229.33 TiB | 18.00% | 206.02 TiB | 10.17% |
f01928022new |
Melbourne, Victoria, AUThe Constant Company, LLC |
228.23 TiB | 17.91% | 209.02 TiB | 8.42% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
126.54 TiB | 126.54 TiB | 1 | 9.93% |
4.63 TiB | 9.25 TiB | 2 | 0.73% |
1.81 TiB | 7.34 TiB | 4 | 0.58% |
204.55 TiB | 1.10 PiB | 5 | 88.77% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb53isuqrohog7sh7mzjzf66s22apu774ifqsstmcpkewdulvwm4g
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
480.00TiB
Signer Address
f1jvvltduw35u6inn5tr4nfualyd42bh3vjtylgci
Id
1333d66f-58ff-4788-99b7-1416766519bb
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb53isuqrohog7sh7mzjzf66s22apu774ifqsstmcpkewdulvwm4g
Reason for signing:
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaced7cyxpqjdm2slw3cwzq7x6wxkntsegsh6u6ocp4rsllylq5zh5rq
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
480.00TiB
Signer Address
f1mdk7s2vntzm6hu35yuo6vjubtrpfnb2awhgvrri
Id
1333d66f-58ff-4788-99b7-1416766519bb
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced7cyxpqjdm2slw3cwzq7x6wxkntsegsh6u6ocp4rsllylq5zh5rq
CID report looks ok,and i will follow this issue, hope you can have a good performance.
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
158TiB
295586e8-b455-464a-bd80-65798e81d2ad
f01858410
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
1ane-1 & 1LISA2
800% of weekly dc amount requested
158TiB
1.37PiB
638TiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
42875 | 11 | 480TiB | 18.12 | 15.16TiB |
F3
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
2
1ane-11
cryptowhizzard2
Joss-Hua2
kernelogic1
liyunzhi-6661
newwebgroup2
psh06912
stcouldlisa1
Tom-OriginStorage
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01807707 | Shenzhen, Guangdong, CNChina Telecom (Group) |
126.54 TiB | 9.17% | 126.54 TiB | 0.00% |
f01926792new |
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DEThe Constant Company, LLC |
253.45 TiB | 18.37% | 230.36 TiB | 9.11% |
f01915546new |
El Colorado, Querétaro, MXThe Constant Company, LLC |
251.61 TiB | 18.23% | 228.30 TiB | 9.27% |
f01914123new |
Paripark, Seoul, KRThe Constant Company, LLC |
250.95 TiB | 18.19% | 227.55 TiB | 9.33% |
f01927252new |
Dādri, Uttar Pradesh, INThe Constant Company, LLC |
249.30 TiB | 18.07% | 230.02 TiB | 7.73% |
f01928022new |
Melbourne, Victoria, AUThe Constant Company, LLC |
248.11 TiB | 17.98% | 228.89 TiB | 7.75% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
126.57 TiB | 126.57 TiB | 1 | 9.17% |
5.00 TiB | 10.00 TiB | 2 | 0.72% |
1.84 TiB | 5.53 TiB | 3 | 0.40% |
7.88 TiB | 31.59 TiB | 4 | 2.29% |
219.61 TiB | 1.18 PiB | 5 | 87.41% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecdaw345puat7vimy3t7a7e4qndujkjlpfn7f73vvohkdzmfwuoik
Address
f1jvsdgfwf3mo2knxwl6jlqm5oupufykd2ati6liq
Datacap Allocated
158.00TiB
Signer Address
f1o3twrcpwjtpcd4q36lpq4qmy2qfbgtyy5h6tsty
Id
295586e8-b455-464a-bd80-65798e81d2ad
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecdaw345puat7vimy3t7a7e4qndujkjlpfn7f73vvohkdzmfwuoik
@xxcisco Could you please work with the following of your SPs to make retrieval possible?
MinerID f01915546 - Cancelling retrieval requests;
# lotus state get-deal 11956452
{
"Proposal": {
"PieceCID": {
"/": "baga6ea4seaqgp37ewn3suzxxfowsk2hkzkzfdj3hcvxk7xknxvtmjhr5fgkv4pq"
},
"PieceSize": 34359738368,
"VerifiedDeal": true,
"Client": "f01917191",
"Provider": "f01915546",
"Label": "bafykbzacebzty4fuxftgc5cj3ot7nwpblwkuovlktfg4mc64kr7i5vc5addf4",
"StartEpoch": 2229432,
"EndEpoch": 3755832,
"StoragePricePerEpoch": "0",
"ProviderCollateral": "8614570313697177",
"ClientCollateral": "0"
},
"State": {
"SectorStartEpoch": 2216176,
"LastUpdatedEpoch": 2579172,
"SlashEpoch": -1,
"VerifiedClaim": 0
}
}
# lotus client retrieve --provider f01915546 bafykbzacebzty4fuxftgc5cj3ot7nwpblwkuovlktfg4mc64kr7i5vc5addf4 baga6ea4seaqgp37ewn3suzxxfowsk2hkzkzfdj3hcvxk7xknxvtmjhr5fgkv4pq.car
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, Open (New), 0s [1674922066658078709|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptance), 2ms [1674922066658078709|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealAccepted (Accepted), 425ms [1674922066658078709|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, PaymentChannelSkip (Ongoing), 425ms [1674922066658078709|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, ProviderCancelled (Cancelling), 10.138s [1674922066658078709|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, CancelComplete (Cancelled), 10.139s [1674922066658078709|0]
ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Cancelled: Provider cancelled retrieval
# lotus state get-deal 11941360
{
"Proposal": {
"PieceCID": {
"/": "baga6ea4seaqeb6dugpbxowmoqh7krprbflzsqjacp3dyunhhotj6cyzze7e36ni"
},
"PieceSize": 34359738368,
"VerifiedDeal": true,
"Client": "f01917191",
"Provider": "f01915546",
"Label": "bafykbzacedis2rm7yzs5lrxupe2cecjf466ttvnvvcthttsybzmnfehyvhgaq",
"StartEpoch": 2229109,
"EndEpoch": 3755509,
"StoragePricePerEpoch": "0",
"ProviderCollateral": "8612229583733234",
"ClientCollateral": "0"
},
"State": {
"SectorStartEpoch": 2215470,
"LastUpdatedEpoch": 2578480,
"SlashEpoch": -1,
"VerifiedClaim": 0
}
}
# lotus client retrieve --provider f01915546 bafykbzacedis2rm7yzs5lrxupe2cecjf466ttvnvvcthttsybzmnfehyvhgaq baga6ea4seaqeb6dugpbxowmoqh7krprbflzsqjacp3dyunhhotj6cyzze7e36ni.car
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, Open (New), 0s [1674922066658078710|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptance), 2ms [1674922066658078710|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealAccepted (Accepted), 421ms [1674922066658078710|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, PaymentChannelSkip (Ongoing), 421ms [1674922066658078710|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, ProviderCancelled (Cancelling), 14.599s [1674922066658078710|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, CancelComplete (Cancelled), 14.6s [1674922066658078710|0]
ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Cancelled: Provider cancelled retrieval
MinerID f01927252 - Unreachable
{
"Proposal": {
"PieceCID": {
"/": "baga6ea4seaqlnlrfuy6ve6auexhlwvgge3m7cfti4mgbfqn37zhxco4qtvewmey"
},
"PieceSize": 34359738368,
"VerifiedDeal": true,
"Client": "f01917191",
"Provider": "f01927252",
"Label": "bafykbzacebz6w53ssf3twnspp6f5ss2h7dljhau6pk2xuqhkbpuctmp5xnzwq",
"StartEpoch": 2295431,
"EndEpoch": 3821831,
"StoragePricePerEpoch": "0",
"ProviderCollateral": "9030366397000123",
"ClientCollateral": "0"
},
"State": {
"SectorStartEpoch": 2281761,
"LastUpdatedEpoch": 2578308,
"SlashEpoch": -1,
"VerifiedClaim": 0
}
}
# lotus client retrieve --provider f01926792 bafykbzaceahgae55a6lxf22ioj7pja43ubmz3wj7ommwckjprwhycigv4ezq6 baga6ea4seaqfg343rrvgw6yarfkdrf4z326j6jumil7shivy637ryxxymz7egjq.car
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, Open (New), 0s [1674922066658078708 ^C
root@R31-Core01:~# lotus client retrieve --provider f01927252 bafykbzacebz6w53ssf3twnspp6f5ss2h7dljhau6pk2xuqhkbpuctmp5xnzwq baga6ea4seaqlnlrfuy6ve6auexhlwvgge3m7cfti4mgbfqn37zhxco4qtvewmey.car
2023-02-06T15:46:48.604+0100 WARN rpc go-jsonrpc@v0.1.8/client.go:548 unmarshaling failed {"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf:\\n * [/ip4/139.84.166.87/tcp/24001] dial tcp4 139.84.166.87:24001: i/o timeout\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\\u003cnil\\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\\u003cnil\\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\\u003cnil\\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01927252\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01927252\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"}
2023-02-06T15:46:48.604+0100 INFO retry retry/retry.go:17 Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"'
2023-02-06T15:48:19.188+0100 WARN rpc go-jsonrpc@v0.1.8/client.go:548 unmarshaling failed {"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf:\\n * [/ip4/139.84.166.87/tcp/24001] dial tcp4 139.84.166.87:24001: i/o timeout\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\\u003cnil\\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\\u003cnil\\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\\u003cnil\\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01927252\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01927252\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"}
2023-02-06T15:48:19.188+0100 INFO retry retry/retry.go:17 Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"'
MinerID f01928022 - Cancelling retrieval requests;
# lotus state get-deal 11912549
{
"Proposal": {
"PieceCID": {
"/": "baga6ea4seaqj3za5sixhu5rbltjh54b2a26vemiyvmpqdmgvbcpj4yxggcsq2oa"
},
"PieceSize": 34359738368,
"VerifiedDeal": true,
"Client": "f01917191",
"Provider": "f01928022",
"Label": "bafykbzaceaaju2rtgvkut3ozrd74kabmwqukwa4mgf4wywl77iptwenihojdm",
"StartEpoch": 2228377,
"EndEpoch": 3754777,
"StoragePricePerEpoch": "0",
"ProviderCollateral": "8609842554379632",
"ClientCollateral": "0"
},
"State": {
"SectorStartEpoch": 2214858,
"LastUpdatedEpoch": 2578469,
"SlashEpoch": -1,
"VerifiedClaim": 0
}
}
# lotus client retrieve --provider f01928022 bafykbzaceaaju2rtgvkut3ozrd74kabmwqukwa4mgf4wywl77iptwenihojdm baga6ea4seaqj3za5sixhu5rbltjh54b2a26vemiyvmpqdmgvbcpj4yxggcsq2oa.car
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, Open (New), 0s [1674922066658078711|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptance), 2ms [1674922066658078711|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealAccepted (Accepted), 811ms [1674922066658078711|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, PaymentChannelSkip (Ongoing), 812ms [1674922066658078711|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, ProviderCancelled (Cancelling), 7.361s [1674922066658078711|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, CancelComplete (Cancelled), 7.361s [1674922066658078711|0]
ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Cancelled: Provider cancelled retrieval
MinerID f01914123 - Cancelling retrieval request;
# lotus state get-deal 11911722
{
"Proposal": {
"PieceCID": {
"/": "baga6ea4seaqjumdku2dza7rhz3expwxoljwmmlwnl6g3pbfwuhklfbosklbosfy"
},
"PieceSize": 34359738368,
"VerifiedDeal": true,
"Client": "f01917191",
"Provider": "f01914123",
"Label": "bafykbzacebtg2lmgqap5bsog4jgdbz4i4g3j2l32j4gcqix2ewkpwqtzjzdfu",
"StartEpoch": 2228314,
"EndEpoch": 3754714,
"StoragePricePerEpoch": "0",
"ProviderCollateral": "8609275213761451",
"ClientCollateral": "0"
},
"State": {
"SectorStartEpoch": 2214772,
"LastUpdatedEpoch": 2577642,
"SlashEpoch": -1,
"VerifiedClaim": 0
}
}
# lotus client retrieve --provider f01914123 bafykbzacebtg2lmgqap5bsog4jgdbz4i4g3j2l32j4gcqix2ewkpwqtzjzdfu baga6ea4seaqjumdku2dza7rhz3expwxoljwmmlwnl6g3pbfwuhklfbosklbosfy.car
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, Open (New), 0s [1674922066658078712|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealProposed (WaitForAcceptance), 2ms [1674922066658078712|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, DealAccepted (Accepted), 367ms [1674922066658078712|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, PaymentChannelSkip (Ongoing), 367ms [1674922066658078712|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, ProviderCancelled (Cancelling), 24.013s [1674922066658078712|0]
Recv 0 B, Paid 0 FIL, CancelComplete (Cancelled), 24.013s [1674922066658078712|0]
ERROR: Retrieval Proposal Cancelled: Provider cancelled retrieval
I am able to download from MinerID f01926792 but is goes terrible slow, slower then expected from a miner located in Frankfurt ... but its slowly coming in 😄
SP stored unsealed files in cold storage, but some failures occurred, causing some unsealed files to be lost. SP tried to repair the problem through sealed files but was not successful. I hope the official can provide a repair tool or there is another way to recover.
Hi @xxcisco
Can you confirm that all above SP's do not support fast retrieval of your sectors?
If so i can put them in my block list to prevent other data preparers getting stuck with the same issues until resolved.
Thank you for your kindness. We have already made contact with SP and our current packaging can now be retrieved. SP promises that all future packaging will be retrievable as well. Thank you again.
Hi
It seems that the retrieval is still not working.
Feb 15 02:26:41 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:26:41.660+0100#011WARN#011rpc#011go-jsonrpc@v0.1.9/client.go:560#011unmarshaling failed#011{"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf:\n [/ip4/139.84.166.87/tcp/24001] dial tcp4 139.84.166.87:24001: i/o timeout\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01927252\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01927252\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} Feb 15 02:26:41 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:26:41.660+0100#011INFO#011retry#011retry/retry.go:17#011Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' Feb 15 02:27:19 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:27:19.997+0100#011WARN#011rpc#011go-jsonrpc@v0.1.9/client.go:560#011unmarshaling failed#011{"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf:\n [/ip4/139.84.166.87/tcp/24001] dial backoff\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01927252\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01927252\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} Feb 15 02:27:19 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:27:19.997+0100#011INFO#011retry#011retry/retry.go:17#011Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' Feb 15 02:29:42 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:29:42.720+0100#011WARN#011rpc#011go-jsonrpc@v0.1.9/client.go:560#011unmarshaling failed#011{"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf:\n [/ip4/139.84.166.87/tcp/24001] dial tcp4 139.84.166.87:24001: i/o timeout\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01927252\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01927252\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} Feb 15 02:29:42 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:29:42.720+0100#011INFO#011retry#011retry/retry.go:17#011Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' Feb 15 02:32:02 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:32:02.435+0100#011WARN#011rpc#011go-jsonrpc@v0.1.9/client.go:560#011unmarshaling failed#011{"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf:\n [/ip4/139.84.166.87/tcp/24001] dial tcp4 139.84.166.87:24001: connect: no route to host\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01927252\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01927252\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} Feb 15 02:32:02 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:32:02.435+0100#011INFO#011retry#011retry/retry.go:17#011Retrying after error:RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' Feb 15 02:34:33 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:34:33.666+0100#011WARN#011rpc#011go-jsonrpc@v0.1.9/client.go:560#011unmarshaling failed#011{"message": "{\"Err\":\"exhausted 5 attempts but failed to open stream, err: failed to dial 12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf:\n * [/ip4/139.84.166.87/tcp/24001] dial tcp4 139.84.166.87:24001: connect: no route to host\",\"Root\":null,\"Piece\":null,\"Size\":0,\"MinPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"UnsealPrice\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PricePerByte\":\"\u003cnil\u003e\",\"PaymentInterval\":0,\"PaymentIntervalIncrease\":0,\"Miner\":\"f01927252\",\"MinerPeer\":{\"Address\":\"f01927252\",\"ID\":\"12D3KooWBsxoo9dZoBoe6SLmV3HYFKebMucBLJ4TJjRxsoqE9dJf\",\"PieceCID\":null}}"} Feb 15 02:34:33 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: 2023-02-15T02:34:33.666+0100#011ERROR#011retry#011retry/retry.go:29#011Failed after 5 attempts, last error: RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' Feb 15 02:34:33 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962: ERROR: RPC client error: unmarshaling result: failed to parse big string: '"\u003cnil\u003e"' Feb 15 02:34:33 proposals dealscanner-f01917191-f01927252-24237962:
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?