Closed Sinsoteam closed 1 year ago
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecu4nmirigyc7b4rtre36pzb6hugze6easogdmliqed2kenjv7xmw
Address
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f174fg3bqbln3zjnkxtyf6s54txqkr7yqkj6cig7y
Id
3dee588e-8f86-4a8b-9905-0dde2c5eeccb
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecu4nmirigyc7b4rtre36pzb6hugze6easogdmliqed2kenjv7xmw
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceasc4xmkqargodt6grjp2f44h2zcg5mspatwjb4arckayiubikzjo
Address
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1vxbqrf7rfum3n6m5u6eb4re6xj7amvsaqnzu64y
Id
3dee588e-8f86-4a8b-9905-0dde2c5eeccb
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceasc4xmkqargodt6grjp2f44h2zcg5mspatwjb4arckayiubikzjo
Necessary to pay attention to the success rate of the retrieval, although the data reported so far is not very accurate. Expect to see changes soon.
f02049625
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
400TiB
335c49a9-d730-4ad0-b9b3-a5a8cb0e9759
f02049625
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
400% of weekly dc amount requested
400TiB
3.63797880709172e+64YiB
3.63797880709172e+64YiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
38819 | 8 | 400TiB | 31.15 | 88.06TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacearjyn4fmks6zr2uryagquo6smxj3ue2mx3c3qtl6pdtg7smurpmo
Address
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1irqs2gmctiv3jcdfwuch7oxvf4ixh3k4b2wc24i
Id
335c49a9-d730-4ad0-b9b3-a5a8cb0e9759
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacearjyn4fmks6zr2uryagquo6smxj3ue2mx3c3qtl6pdtg7smurpmo
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacectornbg436p4nmc42h7m6imh56u433xhey2thkh3cbodnql2fnsc
Address
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1d4yb3wags3mtddzesxoo63jv7dmlec3bq4yteni
Id
335c49a9-d730-4ad0-b9b3-a5a8cb0e9759
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacectornbg436p4nmc42h7m6imh56u433xhey2thkh3cbodnql2fnsc
f02049625
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
400TiB
818faae9-8fc2-4c9f-a626-a7096df46c9f
f02049625
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
400% of weekly dc amount requested
400TiB
3.6379788070917165e+79YiB
3.6379788070917165e+79YiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
46780 | 9 | 400TiB | 26.94 | 31.96TiB |
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 55.24% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
The report shows the retrieval rate is very low.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 55.24% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Report is OK, please try to improve the Deal Data Replication in the next round.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacea6laqtgrsdazk6jsy52lm4b2xrv6xi3xmc2jkzjbbklblh4u6dya
Address
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f1txfsjmix4vlzido4dkildrnbw26owtlbslexmpa
Id
818faae9-8fc2-4c9f-a626-a7096df46c9f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacea6laqtgrsdazk6jsy52lm4b2xrv6xi3xmc2jkzjbbklblh4u6dya
We have found some problems in the information provided in the Approved Comment. We could not find Address** field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the comment and edit the body of the comment providing all the required information.
@Wengeding
Exactly after i posted in Slack a message that HTTP retrievals are not reliable and that the retrieval bot is tricked you are approving this client.
This client is not supporting HTTP retrieval and your signature should be revoked until proper retrieval is fixed.
@Sinsoteam
Please enable retrieval on your data according to the rules of FIL+.
As can be seen SP's f0126478, f02025503, f02114868, f02114994 and f02128256 all were heavily involved in CID sharing The others have Retrieval off.
This LDN should have never received a signature.
Legenda: Client = The LDN data preparer SP = SP TotalDeals = Total volume of data in bytes Ipadress = Ipadress Port = Port Sp is listening on Name = Name as known by DCENT Online = The miner is online Subnet = The class C subnet derived from IP adres Matches in Subnet = The number of machines present in this subnet. Location = Location on the globe VpnResult = VPN score for IP adres given according to ipqualityscore.com % = The percentage of deals this SP received in this LDN. AT = Abuse Type. 1 means CID sharing abuse / 3 means Not retrievable. Asouce = Abuse Source client address. MasterAddress = The address this SP is funded from.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 57.37% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Signed without retrieval. Dispute made.
Since the report shows that the "Retrieval Statistics" are normal(>1%), I checked the "Retrieval Dashboard" and tried to download the data, which was successful. I don't think your comment is correct. @cryptowhizzard
There is no CID sharing found in this application, if the collaborating SPs have some CID sharing with other applications, you should flag them, not this one.
I have the logs here with download attempts. They all fail, no matter where i download on this globe. The fact that someone enables download for the first 100 MB of a deal to trick the deal bot does not mean that his dataset is readily retrievable on the network.
Also notified governance about your last signature.
*Edited the typo You / His.
It's not my dataset. You might be mistaken.
See the screenshot.
Everything with AT 1 = Abuse / CID sharing. The LDN is in the AuditTrail column. Everything with AT 3 does not have retrieval enabled / tricked for only a few MB.
This tool looks good, did you develop it yourself? Might need to get validation from the community before using this result as a benchmark for judging though.
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 61.76% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
See the screenshot.
Everything with AT 1 = Abuse / CID sharing. The LDN is in the AuditTrail column. Everything with AT 3 does not have retrieval enabled / tricked for only a few MB.
You need to check your answer.
This client is actively stalling http retrievals and blocked http ranged requests with a reverse proxy to prevent it's data being investigated.
It works as follows:
One set's a bandwidth limit with NGINX on the HTTP retrieval. After a random certain amount the limit is set to zero. This makes the transfer timeout. Because range retrieval is disabled in NGINX one cannot pick up where he left and needs to start all over again.
Log can be found at http://datasetcreators.com/downloadedcarfiles/logs/961.log
Hello @Sinsoteam per the new guidelines https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/922 for Open Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.
This information will be reviewed by Fil+ Governance team to confirm validity toward the Fil+ guideline of a distributed storage plan and SPs posted in the comments here. Let us know if you have any questions.
This client is actively stalling http retrievals and blocked http ranged requests with a reverse proxy to prevent it's data being investigated.
It works as follows:
One set's a bandwidth limit with NGINX on the HTTP retrieval. After a random certain amount the limit is set to zero. This makes the transfer timeout. Because range retrieval is disabled in NGINX one cannot pick up where he left and needs to start all over again.
Log can be found at http://datasetcreators.com/downloadedcarfiles/logs/961.log
No. We have communicated with SPs and have made sure they are not using NGINX. I am not sure if some of your behavior triggered the network's security defenses.
This client is actively stalling http retrievals and blocked http ranged requests with a reverse proxy to prevent it's data being investigated. It works as follows: One set's a bandwidth limit with NGINX on the HTTP retrieval. After a random certain amount the limit is set to zero. This makes the transfer timeout. Because range retrieval is disabled in NGINX one cannot pick up where he left and needs to start all over again. Log can be found at http://datasetcreators.com/downloadedcarfiles/logs/961.log
No. We have communicated with SPs and have made sure they are not using NGINX. I am not sure if some of your behavior triggered the network's security defenses.
Again:
Boost supports range retrievals. Simple explanation , if a download breaks due timeout , it should pick up again where it left. This function is disabled on your side making retrieval impossible.
Fix it.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 61.76% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Retrieval report seems normal. Please keep your request in accordance with the principles of the program and in line with their allocation strategy. @Sinsoteam
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecclvi2iekxqbcnnhiy6utc4ulrjrvqjeva22c2ahrt2s4n6a6wsk
Address
f1lozjhyay3heeav3wm4ttycoaumjgtgrp452woki
Datacap Allocated
400.00TiB
Signer Address
f15impf3j2zcaex4lhyxndxswuuhv24vzstuqtxsi
Id
818faae9-8fc2-4c9f-a626-a7096df46c9f
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecclvi2iekxqbcnnhiy6utc4ulrjrvqjeva22c2ahrt2s4n6a6wsk
@TakiChain , I see that another notary is actively conducting due diligence on this application. Can you share evidence of what kind of due diligence you performed? Looking at the bot report is not enough. Did you attempt retrieval sampling?
This application has been under dispute - https://www.notion.so/filecoin/LDN-signed-without-retrieval-aebb6f0a736549ae85e03d7b2d411f0a?pvs=4
Client must show evidence of retrievability to continue
@raghavrmadya Isn't the retrieval report valid evidence? Why not consider upgrading your report?
Dear Sinsoteam,
As notary I am doing due diligence on your LDN. I could not get retrieval to work. Can you please upload the car file of CID baga6ea4seaqjhbh6emggbx2zlxaaiqjcrci5ujmjnq6n6lh6kk3vwmn5de56gjq ?
You can use our upload system at http://send.datasetcreators.com. Please select 7 days for the system to keep the file and post the link you received here so I (and other notaries) can download your content.
@raghavrmadya This can show that we support retrieval.
Thanks @Sinsoteam
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.
-- Commented by Stale Bot.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 61.76% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?