Closed didiche88 closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
What is the name of the organization? Please provide the corresponding Tianyancha, Qichacha or other proof links. What's the relationship between you and the organization? The website cannot be opened. It seems that there are many sources of data samples. Could you explain the sources of your data? Do you have permission to store it on the Filecoin network as public data and provide proof of that? Can you provide more detailed information about other storage providers participated in this program, such as you can list SPs you have contacted with at present?
Hi,@Sunnyiscoming China Auto Parts Network belongs to Quanzhou Meirui Network Technology Co., Ltd. I'm the director of the office and I'm in charge of this storage project The website upgrade has been completed, please check When applying, the case preparation is not very sufficient, please check the supplementary materials through the following URL. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jrQMU0ve4Y6EJTQV-i0VlYNey1Ds2HkN?usp=sharing We are very clear that all the data stored this time are public data, and we strictly abide by your retrieval requirements. We have contacted the following SPs: f01681808,f01546926,f01606675 But we have not finalized cooperation. Of course, we are still in contact with more node. Thanks.
Total DataCap requested
1.8PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
100TiB
Client address
f1wbwggh7id4lm3loajxf5lcnk7o2vacvpk64wvna
f02049625
f1wbwggh7id4lm3loajxf5lcnk7o2vacvpk64wvna
50TiB
b30eb6cd-4928-47b9-9fd4-8124b195246b
Dear applicant,
Thank you for applying for datacap. As Filecoin FIL+ notary i am screening your application and conducting due diligence.
Looking at your application i have some questions: As you are brand new on Github and have no history of past applications it seems to me that applying for 1.8PB of datacap is a lot. One needs comprehensive knowledge of Filecoin, packing of data, distribution of data and all it's requirements coming with it. Are you brand new in the Filecoin space or have you applied for datacap in the past on different Github account names?
Can you show us visible proof of the size of your data and the storage systems you have there?
As last question i would like you to fill out this form to provide us with the necessary information to make a educated decision on your LDN request if we would like to support it.
Thanks!
Hey @didiche88 , if you still want to apply for datacap, you can ask notaries to do client due diligence in slack channel. https://app.slack.com/client/TEHTVS1L6/C036JKD8NVA/thread/C03BG1MNQ4T-1673888660.823499
You seem to have applied for a long time, do you have any plans?
You seem to have applied for a long time, do you have any plans?
We need to start, we have been waiting for the support of the notary, we have contacted many people, but no one supports us.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecyxwvisxj5yd7opmd3p6wsihyvmgmw7qkq7uhoafifqlh4qeklca
Address
f1wbwggh7id4lm3loajxf5lcnk7o2vacvpk64wvna
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f1jvvltduw35u6inn5tr4nfualyd42bh3vjtylgci
Id
b30eb6cd-4928-47b9-9fd4-8124b195246b
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecyxwvisxj5yd7opmd3p6wsihyvmgmw7qkq7uhoafifqlh4qeklca
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacea2c7i4ivg3zveej6mlqi4yqdmzfr3wiwzcv43rkrbanjn66ucjxo
Address
f1wbwggh7id4lm3loajxf5lcnk7o2vacvpk64wvna
Datacap Allocated
50.00TiB
Signer Address
f12mckci3omexgzoeosjvstcfxfe4vqw7owdia3da
Id
b30eb6cd-4928-47b9-9fd4-8124b195246b
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacea2c7i4ivg3zveej6mlqi4yqdmzfr3wiwzcv43rkrbanjn66ucjxo
Willing to support the addition of new projects, and the sealing process needs to comply with fil+ community rules
f02049625
f1wbwggh7id4lm3loajxf5lcnk7o2vacvpk64wvna
100TiB
6f453c1a-c901-41f5-bc96-5dd651067ac5
f02049625
f1wbwggh7id4lm3loajxf5lcnk7o2vacvpk64wvna
100% of weekly dc amount requested
100TiB
50TiB
1.75PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | 50TiB | null | 1.87TiB |
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ All retrieval success ratios are below 1%.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
@SuperChaiChai @stcouldlisa
What due diligence have you guys performed with the start of this application? Where is the distribution plan and why is there no retrieval supported against rules and guidlines?
When the customer contacted me, he promised to support retrieval. I will urge customers to increase the retrieval rate, and I will check their retrieval rate again tomorrow, thank you for your kind reminder
The first round of 50T for 964 is too small, the robot may only send one retrieval request a day, so the update is very slow
@stcouldlisa
Please do not answer selectively.
What due diligence have you guys performed with the start of this application? Where is the distribution plan and why is there no retrieval supported against rules and guidlines?
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Looks like retrieval is fixing
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.
Please continue to improve your accessibility, and you also want to deploy the http download tool.
@SuperChaiChai @stcouldlisa
你们在开始此申请时进行了哪些尽职调查? 分配计划在哪里?为什么不支持根据规则和指南进行检索?
Thank you for your attention. We have been advancing according to the requirements of the community. We have contacted many storage service providers, but although the responses are limited, we will still support retrieval in accordance with the requirements of the community and obey the rules of the community unconditionally. Please pay attention at all times our progress thank you
Thanks for your request! :exclamation: We have found some problems in the information provided. We could not find Organization Name field in the information provided We could not find Website \/ Social Media field in the information provided We could not find Total amount of DataCap being requested (between 500 TiB and 5 PiB) field in the information provided We could not find Weekly allocation of DataCap requested (usually between 1-100TiB) field in the information provided We could not find On-chain address for first allocation field in the information provided We could not find Data Type of Application field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the request and edit the body of the issue providing all the required information.
Client f02257620 does not follow the datacap usage rules. More info here. This application has been failing the requirements for 7 days. Please take appropiate action to fix the following DataCap usage problems. | Criteria | Treshold | Reason |
---|---|---|---|
Percent of used DataCap stored with top provider | < 75 | The percent of Data from the client that is stored with their top provider is 85.19%. This should be less than 75% |
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?