search

filecoin-project / filecoin-plus-large-datasets

Hub for client applications for DataCap at a large scale
110 stars 62 forks source link

[DataCap Application] Qiaonao Enterprise Management - Course Data #975

Closed zhongdonglin closed 1 year ago

zhongdonglin commented 2 years ago

Large Dataset Notary Application

To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.

Core Information

Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.

Project details

Share a brief history of your project and organization.

Qiaonao Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd. was established in 2016. And it aims to provide one-stop business services for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, helping them develop better and faster. In the process of enterprises development, Qiaonao is the best partner to accompany the growth of them with professional solutions to fiscal and tax problems. Meanwhile it saves the operating costs in the process of their own development. Now Qiaonao has begun to take shape in accounting services in Shaoxing area.

What is the primary source of funding for this project?

Investment fund capital and operating income.

What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?

This project is an independent project without other related sub-projects and systems.

Use-case details

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

It belongs to the video class tutorial data. As an important material for the company's employee training, these data can improve the basic skills and abilities of employees to meet the company's business requirements in relevant directions.The content includes corporate management, financial management, tax and economic law, etc., which is closely related to the company's main business. There is no doubt that the content of these courses is rich and professional.

Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?

The data is produced by various universities and professionals, shared with everyone through the Internet, and then sorted by the company's resource managers.

Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this. 

https://ke.qq.com/course/3548035#term_id=103688824
https://ke.qq.com/course/291162#term_id=100344898
https://ke.qq.com/course/3418024#term_id=103552664
https://ke.qq.com/course/458253#term_id=100548363
https://ke.qq.com/course/1581703#term_id=101680134
https://ke.qq.com/course/1797131#term_id=101897891
https://ke.qq.com/course/4033665#term_id=104186672
https://ke.qq.com/course/3580953#term_id=103723115
https://ke.qq.com/course/3580942/#term_id=103723103
https://ke.qq.com/course/321730#term_id=100381938
...

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).

The data is publicly accessible without specific identity checks and fees.

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?

5 times a year

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?

540 days, the data content will be stored continuously without obsolescence and iteration.

DataCap allocation plan

In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?

East Asian countries and regions.

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?

The data is public dataset so SPs can download the data directly according to the links. Since data downloads are limited by the network bandwidth, we offer to transfer data by sending the storage hardware directly, depending on the location distance of SPs and the download rate.

How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.

We will first look for some capable SPs in the domestic community. In addition, we will obtain SPs through other retrieval channels, such as Filswan.
Once we have successfully stored the data, we will publish the CID of the resource on our WEB home page and provide an access tutorial so that anyone who wants to retrieve the tutorial content stored on Filecoin.

How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?

In the first allocation, we will give a certain amount of DC to each SP in turn, and then determine the subsequent allocation ratio according to the completion efficiency of SPs. SPs with higher storage encapsulation efficiency will get more transaction quota.

Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?

Yes, we have prepared enough funds.
If there are any further questions, we will directly communicate with the official personnel through Slack.
zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

About customer data: First, we got in touch with the official members of the fil+ team and a large number of notaries, who have done detailed due diligence on our application. Secondly, our sample data and the specific amount of data have been publicly disclosed in the due diligence of the notary public in the early stage, and can be viewed in this application. Finally, using Filecoin for storage is mainly because I see the future of distributed storage and hope to participate in the Web3 world. About files and processing: We mainly use the offline mail storage server for data distribution, and the server configuration as the transmission carrier is: X10DRL-I motherboard, E5-2680v42, 480G SSD1, DDR4 32G2, dual-port 10GbE network card + optical module 10G, LSI 9311-8I 2, CRPS1600W*1 In order to ensure the security of data during transmission, the storage system adopts ZFS-RaidZ2 storage pool, which allows data not to be lost if less than two disks are damaged. We use the Singularity program for data cutting and packaging, and at the same time, we have customized and optimized it to improve efficiency. In order to ensure the compliance of data encapsulation, we have established a corresponding management program that will monitor the entire life cycle of each car file.

herrehesse commented 1 year ago

@zhongdonglin thank you for your detailled response, highly appreciated.

Can you clarify the following tho things to me?

  1. 100% of your data storage happend in the same region, which is against the Filecoin+ guidelines. How are you going to disperse the data to multiple regions?

  2. Your data is described as "It belongs to the video class tutorial data. As an important material for the company's employee training, these data can improve the basic skills and abilities of employees to meet the company's business requirements in relevant directions.The content includes corporate management, financial management, tax and economic law, etc., which is closely related to the company's main business. There is no doubt that the content of these courses is rich and professional."

This is business data and does not belong on the Filecoin+ program. Please use regular deals or contact the FIL-E program.

If you need any assistance let me know, happy to help you.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago
cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

@zhongdonglin with regio we mean the Asian region. You should also store some of the data on other continents world wide.

My collegue is right. Business data belongs in Fil-E , not in Fil+.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

f01993555.log

On a second note: All the data stored has been made non retrievable.

No notary should sign this application untill this is fixed. @psh0691 can you please cancel your propose message?

psh0691 commented 1 year ago

First, let's hear the applicant's explanation.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

@psh0691

No , first you do due diligence, then hear the explanation... THEN you sign if there is still a need to.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago
cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

@zhongdonglin

Beautifull story. Now for the real world:

Why should you store your data so urgently when it is not retrievable at all? All SP's chosen do not support retrieval, the data is inaccessible.

About the regions, the world is bigger then your spot in China. Asia to my knowledge includes:

Scherm­afbeelding 2023-01-10 om 09 16 08

It belongs to the video class tutorial data. As an important material for the company's employee training, these data can improve the basic skills and abilities of employees to meet the company's business requirements in relevant directions.The content includes corporate management, financial management, tax and economic law, etc., which is closely related to the company's main business. There is no doubt that the content of these courses is rich and professional.

And is business data and belongs in Fil-E.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

All the data stored has been made non retrievable# This is really incomprehensible to us. If you don’t have a precise understanding, don’t draw such a direct conclusion. The SP of f01993555 has nothing to do with this project. Why are you here retrieve data form this SP?

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

Beautifull story. # This is not a story, this is our actual project using Fil+ for real data storage on the chain, and we are working hard for it!

@cryptowhizzard @herrehesse I have answered the storage area question many times, even on filplush-checker it is compliant, am I wrong to follow my promise? From the comments of multiple DCs, it can be seen that your questions have a strong subjective consciousness, and the motivation is incredible, which is very different from most notaries. Many statements have not been investigated and verified in detail, which is very important to the general public. It's not fair to support Fil+'s client. I don't think your approach is of any help to the ecological development of Filecoin, I hope the official team could notice the relevant personnel and related situations @raghavrmadya @Kevin-FF-USA

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

@zhongdonglin

I understand that it might be difficult to understand for you. I will explain:

Your wallet is : f1b5qxhzpyg3djvqwilnksd3o3qng2xpzstn3yx2a

On the Fil+ website you can check all the storage deals made from this wallet : https://filplus.d.interplanetary.one/clients/f01920758

For example:

Scherm­afbeelding 2023-01-10 om 09 42 40

Looking at the top one for example gives :

lotus state get-deal 19367369 { "Proposal": { "PieceCID": { "/": "baga6ea4seaqfw77d46yu2fhkrio2ekwxecss7th6eyfxkg2k7xhs6qeftdscikq" }, "PieceSize": 34359738368, "VerifiedDeal": true, "Client": "f01920758", "Provider": "f01981603", "Label": "uAXASIJhx2uuqjTbc2vcTxGG8ee2oDQ2yxv9k0VEKSPEAWLIg", "StartEpoch": 2447959, "EndEpoch": 3989581, "StoragePricePerEpoch": "0", "ProviderCollateral": "8715519941773544", "ClientCollateral": "0" }, "State": { "SectorStartEpoch": 2439133, "LastUpdatedEpoch": 2499209, "SlashEpoch": -1, "VerifiedClaim": 1883427 } }

So it is all one chain. Now doing the retrieval :

lotus client retrieve --provider f01981603 uAXASIJhx2uuqjTbc2vcTxGG8ee2oDQ2yxv9k0VEKSPEAWLIg test.car ERROR: offer error: retrieval query offer errored: failed to fetch piece to retrieve from: getting pieces for cid bafybeieyohnoxkung3onv5ytyrq3y6pnvagq3mwg75sncuikjdyqawfsea: getting pieces containing block bafybeieyohnoxkung3onv5ytyrq3y6pnvagq3mwg75sncuikjdyqawfsea: failed to lookup index for mh 12209871daebaa8d36dcdaf713c461bc79eda80d0db2c6ff64d1510a48f10058b220, err: datastore: key not found

As in simple English ... this data cannot be retrieved

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Btw..... i appreciate you say that you work hard for it but 2 miners share the same IP address.

f01964253 -> {12D3KooWRkHMyCsagMwmJTsBh2YDndPkYbN3jC7S1ksqMg4pGxib: [/ip4/120.133.132.150/tcp/12910]} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f01964253": must begin with /

root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01964215 f01964215 -> {12D3KooWMm54HHNegB6gb7Eqxbc1sA3HSRSraxLQ8SD1J66Q2aMy: [/ip4/14.17.106.229/tcp/12891]} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f01964215": must begin with /

root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01981603 f01981603 -> {12D3KooWMtFop2smonDVRnHtx7nf6oQFiRm7uynS546P3E7xFG2m: [/ip4/39.109.125.191/tcp/10245]} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f01981603": must begin with /

root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01919535 f01919535 -> {12D3KooWCkn1gnXsGDYC2kyBCmWwyRSFsK2LgivdUqcfGwuYr6Rj: [/ip4/39.109.125.191/tcp/13904]} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f01919535": must begin with /

Can you tell us who they belong to? ( f01981603 / f01919535 ) because again, this is against the rules

NDLABS-Leo commented 1 year ago

This client contacted me on slack to review the LDN, but I noticed that there are still some disputes that have not been resolved, and I will continue to pay attention to the LDN situation of this client.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

After communicating with SP companies about data retrieval issues. Since the SP encapsulation process uses a distributed miner, the seal miner and wdpost miner exist on different servers. And dagstorge exists on the seal miner. The explanation they gave me was that all dagstorge will be imported to wdpost miner after all packaging tasks are completed. The data will then be retrievable.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

The IPs of f01981603 / f01919535 are the same. Our agreement is that the SP storage company will help us store data, but there is no agreement that he can only provide a unique Node, so we will not explain this further. If you have an idea, please provide suggestions in the community, and write the rules you want into the node consensus through legal channels, so that everyone can avoid disputes.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

I have posted this issue in the T&T WG for guidance.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

⚠️ f01964215 has sealed 31.63% of total datacap.

⚠️ 83.53% of total deal sealed by f01964215 are duplicate data.

⚠️ f01981603 has sealed 42.24% of total datacap.

⚠️ 87.67% of total deal sealed by f01981603 are duplicate data.

Provider Location Total Deals Sealed Percentage Unique Data Duplicate Deals
f01964253new Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
China Unicom Guangdong IP network		 14.59 TiB 2.43% 14.59 TiB 0.00%
f01964215 Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
CHINANET-BACKBONE		 189.78 TiB 31.63% 31.25 TiB 83.53%
f01981603 Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK
HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED		 253.44 TiB 42.24% 31.25 TiB 87.67%
f01919535 Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK
HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED		 120.00 TiB 20.00% 107.63 TiB 10.31%
f01986236 Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK
HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED		 22.19 TiB 3.70% 22.19 TiB 0.00%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Unique Data Size Total Deals Made Number of Providers Deal Percentage
133.34 TiB 284.47 TiB 1 47.41%
36.78 TiB 315.53 TiB 2 52.59%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client Application Total Deals Affected Unique CIDs Approvers
f3soxnqjhnqmerbnpzanizjlqfkjuxsshvhvwntgh
cfwtoui3j7vmfah6zgv6fmh3ce2yo2bfacgt7sfud
liya		 Unknown 64.00 GiB 1 Unknown

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

NDLABS-Leo commented 1 year ago

image image image image image From the node connectivity check displayed by the check bot, except for the newly added node, other nodes are connected normally. But the regions are all together.

f3soxnqjhnqmerbnpzanizjlqfkjuxsshvhvwntgh cfwtoui3j7vmfah6zgv6fmh3ce2yo2bfacgt7sfud liya -- I have not checked the client at this address, please check with other notaries

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

@NDLABS-OFFICE

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

@cryptowhizzard About the IPs of f01981603 / f01919535 are the same. In order to resume this project as soon as possible, I decided to solve this problem, I proposed a plan to contact SP to carry out the whole migration of f01981603, this will take some time because of the need to move multiple rack mounted servers and the need to avoid the Proof-Of-Space-Time period, but I promise to carry out.

herrehesse commented 1 year ago

Until there is a clear list with SP's their business names and region I am not supportive of this LDN. Distributing only to Asian SP's is not the right way to make use of datacap in my opinion.

If you have the bandwidth to go to SG, HK or JP, you can also send those deals to USA and EU.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

SG, HK or JP， USA or EU

@herrehesse Ok, it is exactly my plan for the next round

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

@zhongdonglin will you let us know when you are ready?

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

Next round plan:

@cryptowhizzard We are ready for this , and now we looking for signatures for the next round.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Hi @zhongdonglin

The SP's above have been involved in CID sharing. I can't sign on those unfortunately.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

@cryptowhizzard From the information I already have, none of the MinerIDs I mentioned above has the problem of CID sharing. If you insist on your claim, you should provide corresponding evidence. Is this reasonable?

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

@zhongdonglin

https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/356

cntrl -:> F + f01876488

Have a nice day.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

@cryptowhizzard If so, shouldn't you persuade me to revise my plans? This SP has not yet participated in my project, and it is completely avoidable, so all this can be adjusted.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

@cryptowhizzard If so, shouldn't you persuade me to revise my plans? This SP has not yet participated in my project, and it is completely avoidable, so all this can be adjusted.

Hi,

Sure, let me know if you have another SP and i will check for you. Np.

From your answer i understood that you were a bot aggravated b/c you asked for proof etc. Reason i went to close the convo to avoid further struggles. Sorry if I misunderstood.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

@cryptowhizzard how about the SP-f01777785 in SG?

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Hi @zhongdonglin

SP's f01777785 flag came from this LDN. , however that is cleared now since 48 hours. I will unflag it , the SP is ok!

Moving forward with this and making the plan : You will store with f01777785 and -> Resolve duplicate data problem of f01964215 Reduce the overall proportion of f01964215 and f01981603

If so, it looks ok to me and I can propose if you please can fill out https://form.jotform.com/230337462961356 with your name etc.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

img_v2_2895dced-f9cf-49bd-ae7e-091b39b282fg @cryptowhizzard Already submited the form, pls check it.

cryptowhizzard commented 1 year ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacednvmkly3w234dfbuura5oknciuwbahdkfadej6dp6dtbfgppvhp4

Address

f1b5qxhzpyg3djvqwilnksd3o3qng2xpzstn3yx2a

Datacap Allocated

640.00TiB

Signer Address

f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa

Id

9a357e58-feb4-43f2-8b71-269dc128ad40

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacednvmkly3w234dfbuura5oknciuwbahdkfadej6dp6dtbfgppvhp4

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 6

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1b5qxhzpyg3djvqwilnksd3o3qng2xpzstn3yx2a

DataCap allocation requested

640TiB

Id

cb6a70e0-414a-4fa1-92a1-d8f81a8c577a

large-datacap-requests[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f1b5qxhzpyg3djvqwilnksd3o3qng2xpzstn3yx2a

Last two approvers

cryptowhizzard & not found

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

800% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

640TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

600TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (2PiB)

1.41PiB

Stats

Number of deals Number of storage providers Previous DC Allocated Top provider Remaining DC
19943 5 640TiB 42 0B
filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 2 storage providers sealed more than 30% of total datacap - f01964215: 31.63%, f01981603: 42.24%

⚠️ 2 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f01964215: 83.53%, f01981603: 87.67%

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the full report.

Joss-Hua commented 1 year ago

image Maybe you need to confirm whether the data download is abnormal. In addition, the dispersion. Become better and better.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

@Joss-Hua It's Ok now i test. img_v2_73cb99f0-5c50-45c9-b51a-1103f39063eg

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

Hi @jamerduhgamer, we have answered your questions in detail. Is it convenient for you to sign now?

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 30% of total datacap - f01981603: 38.24%

⚠️ 2 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f01964215: 83.53%, f01981603: 87.67%

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the full report.

Joss-Hua commented 1 year ago
image

hope the dispersion can be better

Joss-Hua commented 1 year ago

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacecqkal3euxdxuir42lkebswmqvbldpm3454lvhka6lkfvdl2dxed2

Address

f1b5qxhzpyg3djvqwilnksd3o3qng2xpzstn3yx2a

Datacap Allocated

640.00TiB

Signer Address

f1tfg54zzscugttejv336vivknmsnzzmyudp3t7wi

Id

cb6a70e0-414a-4fa1-92a1-d8f81a8c577a

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecqkal3euxdxuir42lkebswmqvbldpm3454lvhka6lkfvdl2dxed2

newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

Checked the CID Checker report, there is no CID sharing, and the alert item Client has a response, which is within the acceptable range. Hopefully, in the next round, the SP positions will be more spread out and the data distribution will be more reasonable. Willing to support this round, will keep watching and monitoring.

SP Support Retrieval lotus client retrieve --provider f01919535 bafybeidjflun45gcktwyxavzocrgvvajedt76m4eazxamgav4qm7v6wjrq LDN-975-2

image
newwebgroup commented 1 year ago

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaced77hbpifooyaixhr7c7ygbnz5xuuglmlbgjj56gw7cmymbzp3plm

Address

f1b5qxhzpyg3djvqwilnksd3o3qng2xpzstn3yx2a

Datacap Allocated

640.00TiB

Signer Address

f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq

Id

cb6a70e0-414a-4fa1-92a1-d8f81a8c577a

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced77hbpifooyaixhr7c7ygbnz5xuuglmlbgjj56gw7cmymbzp3plm

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

zhongdonglin commented 1 year ago

checker:manualTrigger

filplus-checker-app[bot] commented 1 year ago

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Retrieval Statistics

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 2 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f01964215: 53.71%, f01981603: 87.67%

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 71.67% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report. Click here to view the Retrieval Dashboard. Click here to view the Retrieval report.