Closed yvetteoor closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Is there any update here? I've been waiting for over two weeks.
What else can we do to advance the application? Anyone who can assist? @raghavrmadya @galen-mcandrew @Kevin-FF-USA @Sunnyiscoming
Data samples are .jpg files and we cannot determine the need for 3.5 PiBs. Please provide as much justification as possible to support your case as well as SP IDs
Hi, @raghavrmadya ,Thanks for your reply.
Hi, Raghav, I have submitted the sample. If there is anything else to add, please let me know. @raghavrmadya
What else we can do to speed up the review process?
What's the relationship between you and the organization? Can you provide more detailed information about other storage providers participated in this program, such as you can list SPs you have contacted with at present? Could you send an email to filplus-app-review@fil.org with your official domain in order to confirm your identity? Email name should includes the issue id #999.
What's the relationship between you and the organization? Can you provide more detailed information about other storage providers participated in this program, such as you can list SPs you have contacted with at present? Could you send an email to filplus-app-review@fil.org with your official domain in order to confirm your identity? Email name should includes the issue id https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/999.
@Sunnyiscoming Thank you for your reply,The email has been sent, please check.
Here is SPs that we have contacted with at present ,and some more are under negotiation. We'll update here in time. Japan: f01451690 China: f0443184 f0442671 f01832877 f01880558
Total DataCap requested
3.5PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
80TiB
Client address
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
f02049625
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
40TiB
684cc63a-4ef1-4d83-aae0-4dcf7d54b03c
Hey @yvetteoor , if you still want to apply for datacap, you can ask notaries to do client due diligence in slack channel. https://app.slack.com/client/TEHTVS1L6/C036JKD8NVA/thread/C03BG1MNQ4T-1673888660.823499
@Sunnyiscoming Thank you for the tip. I'll ask.
Hi @yvetteoor
It seems you are not fully aware of the rules of fil+. I screened the miners above and none qualify.
lotus net connect f01451690 f01451690 -> {12D3KooWQKo3kw7dqNuAw8brSWiheGvcQ6LpUxGcbbo4w52e7okg: []} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f01451690": must begin with /
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f0443184 f0443184 -> {12D3KooWHSazuftYZhZcy7rBGGSbvtGA7gv1pf3TUsB4waW6iQPo: []} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f0443184": must begin with /
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f0442671 f0442671 -> {12D3KooWRLta9x6sKXHrLri54SzENYKhyEZRzSttNAwBn7uAt8rS: []} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f0442671": must begin with /
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01832877 f01832877 -> {12D3KooWN91RquGvfHF7X16KW9svmSwp6DdP3fPQPDbJQULheqRL: []} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f01832877": must begin with /
root@proposals:~# lotus net connect f01880558 f01880558 -> {12D3KooWG1nJRPMsqsLHSTZmxZiJtTuWJd4iX4vp5USiyzj4i2VB: []} ERROR: failed to parse multiaddr "f01880558": must begin with /
Can you please fill out this form to provide us with the necessary information to make a educated decision on your LDN request if we would like to support it.
I don't see how this dataset is aligned to filecoin
"The dataset should be public, open, and mission aligned with Filecoin and Filecoin Plus. This also means that the data should be accessible to anyone in the network, without requiring any special permissions or access requirement.
Can you please fill out this form to provide us with the necessary information to make a educated decision on your LDN request if we would like to support it.
Hello, @cryptowhizzard About SPs . During the application submission, some of the SPs we contacted have withdrawn from Filecoin project, we are still looking for partners, we will comply with fil+ requirements to select SPs. Regarding the organization information, we have sent a kyc email (https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/999#issuecomment-1330309325) to fil+ team via our corporate domain email. You can check it. Here I post the kyc result of qcc for your confirmation.
Are there any confirmed storage providers that you have contacted now?
Hello @NewHuoPool ,Thanks for asking. We have reached out to some SPs and currently, we can confirm the following: f0443184 HK f02031264 SGP f01943910 US f01945296 JP
OK, I'm willing to support you temporarily this time, and I will pay attention to the next cid report.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacebl53dspefhbhed62tgsnqzqccvbudxjhyekqaqges6csfoyrwaqs
Address
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
Datacap Allocated
40.00TiB
Signer Address
f16karfxq7lxdy7izqrzrk75jf3not34k6sg6zvcy
Id
684cc63a-4ef1-4d83-aae0-4dcf7d54b03c
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebl53dspefhbhed62tgsnqzqccvbudxjhyekqaqges6csfoyrwaqs
Except for the first f0443184 which did not respond (and did not report any error), all the other nodes were reachable after Ask. Willing to support Client going forward in the first round and would like to see more compliance
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacecag7axymt5fk5njlqwerbd5cmptvbejamzkmh7kouz6xcu5liuis
Address
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
Datacap Allocated
40.00TiB
Signer Address
f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq
Id
684cc63a-4ef1-4d83-aae0-4dcf7d54b03c
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecag7axymt5fk5njlqwerbd5cmptvbejamzkmh7kouz6xcu5liuis
f02049625
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
80TiB
b4e1656f-9958-498c-b589-e730b81a4250
f02049625
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
newwebgroup & not found
100% of weekly dc amount requested
80TiB
40TiB
3.46PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | 40TiB | null | 8.62TiB |
⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 70% of total datacap - f0442671: 100.00%
⚠️ All storage providers are located in the same region.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 70% of total datacap - f0442671: 100.00%
⚠️ All storage providers are located in the same region.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Please explain the abnormal information.
f0442671 has sealed 100.00% of total datacap. All storage providers are located in the same region. 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
@METAVERSEDATAMINING thanks for asking. The initial allocation was small, according to the distribution plan disclosed in the application, the allocation of a single sp exceeded 500T, and the current allocation is within the reasonable range,Then other SPs began to be encapsulated and got the right allocation, next cid reports will gradually prove this.
Well, I'll keep an eye on the distribution and encapsulation of this application.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedfwnh53i5nt7rbwfvmspqxbkvirhjyzecjul66cfwqyebnkrtjgk
Address
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
Datacap Allocated
80.00TiB
Signer Address
f17idrnfnxl2mbgcgr57a6z2c6lj2qx56gvm3336i
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedfwnh53i5nt7rbwfvmspqxbkvirhjyzecjul66cfwqyebnkrtjgk
We have found some problems in the information provided in the Approved Comment. We could not find Id** field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the comment and edit the body of the comment providing all the required information.
We have found some problems in the information provided in the Approved Comment. We could not find Id** field in the information provided
Please, take a look at the comment and edit the body of the comment providing all the required information.
Node retrieval is normal. The first round allocation is small, and it's in a node is acceptable. This round I'll support, but I hope you strictly follow the rules in the future.
@yvetteoor I cannot sign this application as the backend search cannot find it. I need confirmation if it's a problem with my system or for other reasons.Please help check @galen-mcandrew @fabriziogianni7
⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 70% of total datacap - f0442671: 100.00%
⚠️ All storage providers are located in the same region.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 3 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
@yvetteoor @OpenGate01 it should be there now
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaoubu7ofa5ycwqq3uvnv3qrmxljdkb5fptsaikdjryocxnamv2pw
Address
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
Datacap Allocated
80.00TiB
Signer Address
f1im4hmtbfzqnx7ir74kdaiu4ynjhgqh3sdi2snla
Id
b4e1656f-9958-498c-b589-e730b81a4250
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaoubu7ofa5ycwqq3uvnv3qrmxljdkb5fptsaikdjryocxnamv2pw
Hi @simonkim0515 @panges2 Datacap allocation is used up. request trigger.mang thanks.
f02049625
f1it5bu33xdc2wjt3xhygckvcy3v6iz5f4ojgodii
160TiB
b4a724a6-56a2-41b2-a972-6afcff9cf237
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the full report.
Comparing to the previous CID report, there is a noticeable improvement. At the same time, we are constantly monitoring the storage progress of SPs, adjusting allocation strategies as needed. In the new round of storage, there will be new SPs joining.
A total of 120T is packaged, but the number of nodes is only 3, which does not comply with the rules and there is no CID sharing. Please explain the plan for the next round of packaging @yvetteoor
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?