Closed XnMatrixSV closed 3 years ago
Hi - we've taken a first pass at scoring your application here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1t4EHgP2PsjPJijuMzHd9a7LKZtwFSmP23SiN25ybMLs/edit?usp=sharing
Please take a look at the comments in column H - if you have questions please ask! If you make changes, please edit your original issue to reflect the updates!
Lastly, please be aware that some changes in the rubric may be approved which might affect your scoring https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/pull/36
Hi @dkkapur Thanks for your scoring.
Firstly, let me reply your questions: Row 13: Xnmatrix group is a global company, our business is located in North America, China, Australia. Our North American subsidiary will focus our business on the North American market. Xnmatrix group will also give priority service to our North American partners. Therefore, we applied for North America first. So that,we changed our allocation strategy which will give priority to applications from North America. Other regions Applications will enter the waiting queue.
Row 21: Yes, we will make a training plan (some paper materials, online course) and we will release an online test for DataCap and Filecoin. Yes, the customer classification will be a public process, and the rules are as follows https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O3daNeNiUcc1nLuqFPgLLs1MEVzLjB-lr4BKj0Es9rI/edit?usp=sharing. We will help customers match and recommend more suitable miners. We will provide customers with more useful information about miners, such as failure rate, storage cost, safety, reliability, miner size, etc. We believe that customers will be more inclined to local miners.
Row 22: Yes, incentive mechanism, punishment mechanism and supervision mechanism will be some good ideas. You can view some details of the Client Due Diligence section.The mechanism will be improved and refined.
Row 23: Yes, the plan is use the same tooling as the Filecoin foundation.
I also updated the application to include more information, including time commitment, in-protocol reputation , in-protocol security, the detailed scoring system, mainly focus on the Allocation Strategy and the Client Due Diligence.
Please check these parts again.
Thanks!
Hi @ann-shin - we've taken a pass at scoring your application based on your updates: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IAiH1mgplrAdvwGac4IaAq6yuiKjJNmp6q3fRC1cK4k/edit?usp=sharing
Eligibility score: 2 Unrounded score: 1.7
Hi @ann-shin - as mentioned on the governance call yesterday, your team was in the top of your region for being a prospective Notary! Prior to confirming your role as a Notary, there are a few items that need to be affirmed:
Please acknowledge the region of operation in which you tend to primarily focus: [NA]
Please confirm each of the following items below (you can do this by adding a line under each section agreeing that you'll abide by these operational principles.
Upfront Disclosures: Prior to being confirmed as a Notary, Notaries are expected to disclose all relevant addresses which they control, have a financial stake in, or are strongly connected to by other means. For the disclosure, the Notary should state the relevant addresses and the nature of the relationship.
Promoting Client Best Practices: Notaries agree to educate approved clients about the best practices for using their DataCap (e.g. how to request additional services from miners, storing data redundantly across many miners, etc). Some reference information can be found here.
No Self Dealing: To prevent conflicts of interest, Notaries should not allocate DataCap to Clients over which they control the private keys, or to a Client who intends to specifically spend the allocated DataCap with an address affiliated with the Notary. When in doubt, Notaries should bias towards transparency (i.e. public disclosure) or to getting a different Notary to handle the individual request.
Operating in good faith: Notaries hold a position of trust in the network, and as such it is expected that they operate keeping the Principles of this mechanism in mind. While each form of abuse cannot be exhaustively defined, Notaries are expected to bias towards caution and act in a way that promotes transparency. Notaries should expect to potentially receive requests or questions for allocation decisions (within reason) - and should make decisions with this in mind.
Please list any addresses you are affiliated with below - stating the nature of the relationship. Please refer to the first bullet point in (2) for the definition of "affiliated", and bias towards transparency when in doubt.
Please affirm that you will abide by the allocation / client due diligence plan you laid out above.
(If ready) - Please confirm the address that should receive DataCap.
Additionally, if you plan on being listed in the Filecoin Plus Registry - please confirm what information you'd like to have displayed below. Please note that public requests currently write to a public repository (and we can work with you to configure the requests as needed).
"name": "Your Name", "use_case": [ "List", "of", "Use Cases" ], "location": "EUR", "github_user": "notaryc", (optional) "website": "google.com", (optional) "max_datacap_allocation": "100 GB", // To indicate to clients what size allocations you might support. (optional) "private_request": "false", // set as true if you plan on supporting private requests. (optional) "email": "youremail@a.com", // only needed if you are supporting private requests "info": "" // You can use this to share information with Clients about your allocation strategy / reqs
Hi @jnthnvctr
1.Please acknowledge the region of operation in which you tend to primarily focus: [NA]
Yes, we are in NA zone.
2.Please confirm each of the following items below (you can do this by adding a line under each section agreeing that you'll abide by these operational principles.
Upfront Disclosures: Confirmed Promoting Client Best Practices: Confirmed No Self Dealing: Confirmed Operating in good faith: Confirmed
3.Please affirm that you will abide by the allocation / client due diligence plan you laid out above.
Atpool miner list: f02614,f03362,f09652,f010424,f020928,f039992,f0104654 The Atpool owner/miners and worker/controller addresses might change for security or other reasons, but the miner ID will keep the same. All the miners are managed by XnMatrix and owned by investors. If in the future we have relevant IDs to disclose, we will add them to this issue.
4.Please affirm that you will abide by the allocation / client due diligence plan you laid out above.
Yes, we will.
5.Please confirm the address that should receive DataCap.
f1yuz2twsllparyfqwslfiuxrc5wj4mfiflvnsw6a I will start with the same repo as the Filecoin Foundation.
6.Additionally, if you plan on being listed in the Filecoin Plus Registry - please confirm what information you'd like to have displayed below.
"name": "Ann Shin/XnMatrix", "use_case": [ "User Content", "Scientific Dataset", "Media" ], "location": "NA", "github_user": "ann-shin", "max_datacap_allocation": "10 TiB", "private_request": "false"
@ann-shin - if you plan on using the same repo as the Filecoin Foundation + want to use the same web app to manage Client applications, your address needs to be backed by a Ledger. Can you confirm that (1) you plan on doing this and your address is backed by a Ledger, (2) update your address with a Ledger-backed address, or (3) confirm that you don't plan on using the same web app tooling? I can then proceed with the final step of confirming you as a Notary. Thanks!
hi @ann-shin - are you on the Filecoin slack by any chance? I see two ann-shins, would you be able to message me (@jnthnvctr ) there?
hi @dkkapur @jnthnvctr, confirmed that (1) the address f1yuz2twsllparyfqwslfiuxrc5wj4mfiflvnsw6a is backed by a Ledger.
Thank you.
f1yuz2twsllparyfqwslfiuxrc5wj4mfiflvnsw6a
Datacap Allocated
100TiB
hi @ann-shin per my message in slack can you confirm this address is correct?
message CID: bafy2bzaceasldfbhnuquh23pj3vpftvbcd2bxp5oene3jgw2iv6ihexpvo5d2
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceasldfbhnuquh23pj3vpftvbcd2bxp5oene3jgw2iv6ihexpvo5d2
Notary Application
PLEASE NOTE ANY APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FINALIZATION OF THE GOVERNING FIP OR THIS REPO WILL BE DISCARDED
To apply as a notary, please fill out the following form.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below in pargraph form, replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer!
Long Term Network Alignment
Time Commitment
Describe the nature and duration of your affiliation with the Filecoin project. Please include relevant Github handles, miner ids, significant projects or contributions (with links).
Stake Exposure
Please cite total token at stake (currently available, locked as collateral, vesting over time) and any substantiating evidence.
Industry Reputation
In-protocol Reputation
Please describe (in detail) your activity and tenure as a member of the Filecoin community. Please note (with links where possible) any contributions made to implementations of Filecoin, the spec, documentation, or to substantially help the Filecoin ecosystem grow.
In-protocol Security
Please describe your contributions to the security of Filecoin and the duration over which you've made contributions. Please also include any links or references who might be able to substantiate your contributions (e.g. if you've filed several bugs, please cite who you've communicated with on the Filecoin side).
External Reputation
Please describe the nature of your organization, including the country of registration, size of the organization, and time since inception.
Please share any relevant details to help substantiate information about your organization (website, named officers, links to social media profiles).
Please share any relevant external information regarding your organization (e.g. news articles, social media profiles, etc.)
Diversity and Decentralization
Use Case Diversity
(Optional) Any additional information you'd like to share about the use case(s) you plan to support?
Allocation Plan
Concreteness of Allocation Plan
Allocation Strategy
How do you plan on allocating the DataCap requested above? Please describe your allocation strategy with as much specificity as you can.
We will classify customers based on their industry reputation and scale. All customers will be divided into four categories: top team customers, medium team customers, small team customers, and individual. The four categories of customers are allocated 40%, 30%, 20%, and 10% respectively.
The client classification rules are as follows: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LjVLLmV0GxEDZf4eH5hv3m2v00qDzbKlez9g0-t95RY/edit?usp=sharing
In the initial stage of specific allocation, we will take out a small part (<10%) of each category for testing, and gradually establish a reputation mechanism (including incentive, punishment, supervision)
Each assignment will be used to evaluate the customer's reputation. For example, if a customer applies the DataCap which is valid and efficient, its reputation credit will increase. With higher credit, the customer can apply more DataCap (maximum increase 200%).
Throughout the allocation and use the DataCap, we will establish a corresponding review mechanism.
Good customer will benefit, bad customer will be punished. The quality of the customer will be optimized gradually.
Are there any internal processes you plan on implementing regarding the target, amount, or rate at which you'll allocate DataCap?
How do you plan on securing the DataCap to ensure your organization (and its delegated members) are the ones allocating the DataCap?
Client Due Diligence
How will you vet your Client to ensure they are spending that DataCap responsibly?
What questions will you ask to ensure the Client can properly handle the DataCap you intend to allocate to them?
What processes will you employ to confirm that a Client is not improperly over-allocating DataCap to a single entity?
Bookkeeping Plan
Do you plan on keeping records of your allocation decisions? If so, with what level of specificity do you intend to respond to any audit requests?
Do you plan on conduct your allocation decisions in public (e.g. Github repo), private (e.g. over email, Telegram, etc), or both?
Track Record
Past allocation
Have you previously received DataCap to allocate before? If so, please link to any previous applications.
Cumulatively, how much DataCap have you previously successfully allocated?
Have there been (or are there still) any disputes raised against you from your previous DataCap allocations?