Closed herrehesse closed 1 year ago
kernelogic
commented
1 year ago The reasons for my signatures are the following:
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago @kernelogic I appreciate your prompt response. I have a few questions for you regarding the issues at hand:
While we acknowledge the high rates of retrievability, the fact remains that this entity is almost fully self-dealing, which is a violation of FIL+ rules.
kernelogic
commented
1 year ago From my own criteria:
I have examined my signatures in 2054 and 1974, both are in early stages. I hope the clients can give a convincing explanation.
guanxinlian
commented
1 year ago Let me make it clear that #2021 is the first DC list I applied for, and I am not an organization that accumulates data for its own miners. For the time being, I am focusing on the encapsulation of a miner(f02032191), and I am also trying to exchange other data with other LDN in different regions. I don't know whether it is my partner's problem or mine. Now my demand is to carry out encapsulation, and we are just a small filecoin team. And I didn't apply for #2067
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago @guanxinlian Thank you for taking the time to respond. However, our question remains unanswered. We would like to know the reason behind storing nearly 70% of your data with a single entity or company. This action contradicts the rules set forth by Filecoin+.
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago guanxinlian
commented
1 year ago @guanxinlian Thank you for taking the time to respond. However, our question remains unanswered. We would like to know the reason behind storing nearly 70% of your data with a single entity or company. This action contradicts the rules set forth by Filecoin+.
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago @guanxinlian Let me make this simpler by adding your client data below:
| sp | client | ipadres | name | location | vpnresults | percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f02032191 | f02204248 | 123.157.235.35 | CN , Zhejiang , Jiaxing | FALSE with fraudscore 0 | 22 | |
| f01843178 | f02204248 | 220.168.154.104 | CN , Hunan , Yiyang | FALSE with fraudscore 0 | 9 | |
| f01969779 | f02204248 | 159.89.177.42 | topblocks | US , New Jersey , Clifton | TRUE with fraudscore 87 | 15 |
| f0143858 | f02204248 | 159.203.96.29 | topblocks | US , New Jersey , Clifton | TRUE with fraudscore 75 | 15 |
| f0240185 | f02204248 | 159.203.96.29 | topblocks | US , New Jersey , Clifton | TRUE with fraudscore 75 | 13 |
| f02301 | f02204248 | 159.65.189.52 | topblocks | US , New Jersey , Clifton | TRUE with fraudscore 75 | 13 |
| f03223 | f02204248 | 159.65.189.52 | topblocks | US , New Jersey , Clifton | TRUE with fraudscore 75 | 13 |
69% is stored at the same company.
jevticgallonsd1466
commented
1 year ago guanxinlian
commented
1 year ago
- 我们在这里披露了F023012f0223,F014385f0240185是我们的。
- Vpn的使用是为了保护我们的卫生和植物免受网络攻击。这不是对地理位置的欺骗。我们的数据中心确实位于美国..
- 赫赫塔普联系我们来存储他的数据集,我们做到了。我们是不同的实体。#2054客户之间的平衡不是来自F1Eto4Dfafkoeuk31-oc7Vzexrvf6I4yqvhszrq2y。
I didn't know it, I was only in accordance with the requirements in the exchange data with other people, I also don't know F023012, f0223, F014385, f0240185 is the same company, and I took a look at this a few node has not reached 75%, the total storage I will ensure that each sp node encapsulation is more than 30%. Now I have only one node, f02032191, located in Jiaxing, Zhejiang. I have been actively looking for other sp partners
- We here disclose f02301,f03223, f0143858,f0240185 are ours.
- The utilization of VPN is to protect our SPs from cyber attacks. It is NOT to spoof geographical location. Our data center is indeed located in the U.S..
- Huge-Top contacted us to store his dataset and we did. We are not the same entity. #2054 client balance is not from f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y.
I didn't know it, I was only in accordance with the requirements in the exchange data with other people, I also don't know F023012, f0223, F014385, f0240185 is the same company, and I took a look at this a few node has not reached 75%, the total storage I will ensure that each sp node encapsulation is more than 30%. Now I have only one node, f02032191, located in Jiaxing, Zhejiang. I have been actively looking for other sp partners
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago
- We here disclose f02301,f03223, f0143858,f0240185 are ours.
- The utilization of VPN is to protect our SPs from cyber attacks. It is NOT to spoof geographical location. Our data center is indeed located in the U.S..
- Huge-Top contacted us to store his dataset and we did. We are not the same entity. #2054 client balance is not from f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y.
I am sorry, but now i lost you. Are we now going into discussion that the data on the blockchain is wrong?
https://filfox.info/en/address/f1hhv5js4gxnw5z4vs7jvgr2cwygtp6gcecog4mui
f1hhv5js4gxnw5z4vs7jvgr2cwygtp6gcecog4mui is the wallet from this LDN . It has been funded by f1gwg6hajm752whcloffiirsvb4ujkhax34rfw3ty proving that the ownership is there.
LDN 1974 ( f1tzbllzb7nbmswrw4zgn2nnewqd45nj7qp7vajoy) is funded by f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y
As you can see in this message:
https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec765a5l3cw32fr2r3jlpb6kmcckq5oo3kydvxowkpxpsbjg2nq62
They were transactions for funding.
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago
- 我们在这里披露了F023012f0223,F014385f0240185是我们的。
- Vpn的使用是为了保护我们的卫生和植物免受网络攻击。这不是对地理位置的欺骗。我们的数据中心确实位于美国..
- 赫赫塔普联系我们来存储他的数据集,我们做到了。我们是不同的实体。#2054客户之间的平衡不是来自F1Eto4Dfafkoeuk31-oc7Vzexrvf6I4yqvhszrq2y。
I didn't know it, I was only in accordance with the requirements in the exchange data with other people, I also don't know F023012, f0223, F014385, f0240185 is the same company, and I took a look at this a few node has not reached 75%, the total storage I will ensure that each sp node encapsulation is more than 30%. Now I have only one node, f02032191, located in Jiaxing, Zhejiang. I have been actively looking for other sp partners
- We here disclose f02301,f03223, f0143858,f0240185 are ours.
- The utilization of VPN is to protect our SPs from cyber attacks. It is NOT to spoof geographical location. Our data center is indeed located in the U.S..
- Huge-Top contacted us to store his dataset and we did. We are not the same entity. #2054 client balance is not from f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y.
I didn't know it, I was only in accordance with the requirements in the exchange data with other people, I also don't know F023012, f0223, F014385, f0240185 is the same company, and I took a look at this a few node has not reached 75%, the total storage I will ensure that each sp node encapsulation is more than 30%. Now I have only one node, f02032191, located in Jiaxing, Zhejiang. I have been actively looking for other sp partners
We by now know the excuse "I did not know." Blockchain knows.
guanxinlian
commented
1 year ago
- 我们在这里披露了F023012f0223,F014385f0240185是我们的。
- Vpn的使用是为了保护我们的卫生和植物免受网络攻击。这不是对地理位置的欺骗。我们的数据中心确实位于美国..
- 赫赫塔普联系我们来存储他的数据集,我们做到了。我们是不同的实体。#2054客户之间的平衡不是来自F1Eto4Dfafkoeuk31-oc7Vzexrvf6I4yqvhszrq2y。
I didn't know it, I was only in accordance with the requirements in the exchange data with other people, I also don't know F023012, f0223, F014385, f0240185 is the same company, and I took a look at this a few node has not reached 75%, the total storage I will ensure that each sp node encapsulation is more than 30%. Now I have only one node, f02032191, located in Jiaxing, Zhejiang. I have been actively looking for other sp partners
- We here disclose f02301,f03223, f0143858,f0240185 are ours.
- The utilization of VPN is to protect our SPs from cyber attacks. It is NOT to spoof geographical location. Our data center is indeed located in the U.S..
- Huge-Top contacted us to store his dataset and we did. We are not the same entity. #2054 client balance is not from f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y.
I didn't know it, I was only in accordance with the requirements in the exchange data with other people, I also don't know F023012, f0223, F014385, f0240185 is the same company, and I took a look at this a few node has not reached 75%, the total storage I will ensure that each sp node encapsulation is more than 30%. Now I have only one node, f02032191, located in Jiaxing, Zhejiang. I have been actively looking for other sp partners
We by now know the excuse "I did not know." Blockchain knows.
I don't know the reason why you're so unfriendly to everyone. I can only tell you that #2021 is the dc I applied for for the first time, and then I found different ldn to exchange data. I don't know whose wallet you mentioned. If the packaging ratio is not appropriate, I also have a limit to find other sp to cooperate with.
guanxinlian
commented
1 year ago
- 我们在这里披露了F023012f0223,F014385f0240185是我们的。
- Vpn的使用是为了保护我们的卫生和植物免受网络攻击。这不是对地理位置的欺骗。我们的数据中心确实位于美国..
- 赫赫塔普联系我们来存储他的数据集,我们做到了。我们是不同的实体。#2054客户之间的平衡不是来自F1Eto4Dfafkoeuk31-oc7Vzexrvf6I4yqvhszrq2y。
I didn't know it, I was only in accordance with the requirements in the exchange data with other people, I also don't know F023012, f0223, F014385, f0240185 is the same company, and I took a look at this a few node has not reached 75%, the total storage I will ensure that each sp node encapsulation is more than 30%. Now I have only one node, f02032191, located in Jiaxing, Zhejiang. I have been actively looking for other sp partners
- We here disclose f02301,f03223, f0143858,f0240185 are ours.
- The utilization of VPN is to protect our SPs from cyber attacks. It is NOT to spoof geographical location. Our data center is indeed located in the U.S..
- Huge-Top contacted us to store his dataset and we did. We are not the same entity. #2054 client balance is not from f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y.
I didn't know it, I was only in accordance with the requirements in the exchange data with other people, I also don't know F023012, f0223, F014385, f0240185 is the same company, and I took a look at this a few node has not reached 75%, the total storage I will ensure that each sp node encapsulation is more than 30%. Now I have only one node, f02032191, located in Jiaxing, Zhejiang. I have been actively looking for other sp partners
We by now know the excuse "I did not know." Blockchain knows.
I don't know the reason why you're so unfriendly to everyone. I can only tell you that #2021 is the dc I applied for for the first time, and then I found different ldn to exchange data. I don't know whose wallet you mentioned. If the packaging ratio is not appropriate, I also have a limit to find other sp to cooperate with.
Others are not willing to reply to your basically do not reply, I applied for the first dc you so targeted, really feel disappointed. Our original intention is not to make filecoin better and better on the way to storage, but you have been making it difficult for some customers to apply for dc
jevticgallonsd1466
commented
1 year ago
- We here disclose f02301,f03223, f0143858,f0240185 are ours.
- The utilization of VPN is to protect our SPs from cyber attacks. It is NOT to spoof geographical location. Our data center is indeed located in the U.S..
- Huge-Top contacted us to store his dataset and we did. We are not the same entity. #2054 client balance is not from f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y.
I am sorry, but now i lost you. Are we now going into discussion that the data on the blockchain is wrong?
https://filfox.info/en/address/f1hhv5js4gxnw5z4vs7jvgr2cwygtp6gcecog4mui
f1hhv5js4gxnw5z4vs7jvgr2cwygtp6gcecog4mui is the wallet from this LDN . It has been funded by f1gwg6hajm752whcloffiirsvb4ujkhax34rfw3ty proving that the ownership is there.
LDN 1974 ( f1tzbllzb7nbmswrw4zgn2nnewqd45nj7qp7vajoy) is funded by f1eto4dfafkoeukxenoc7vzexrvf6i4yqvhszrq2y
As you can see in this message:
https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec765a5l3cw32fr2r3jlpb6kmcckq5oo3kydvxowkpxpsbjg2nq62
They were transactions for funding.
Yes, I told you that he is our partner. When we first started working together, we may have transferred fils to him, but this does not prove that we are the same entity. I remember this transfer in April is what he needed some fils.
jevticgallonsd1466
commented
1 year ago If we send some fils to you, are you also topblocks?
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago These transactions were made for the purpose of funding, and if you wish to challenge the evidence supporting these claims, you are welcome to do so. However, it is evident that the funding wallets are under the control of an entity that provided funds to both client wallets, and this raises significant suspicions.
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago "Yes, I told you that he is our partner. When we first started working together, we may have transferred fils to him, but this does not prove that we are the same entity. I remember this transfer in April is what he needed some fils."
Sorry but this does not make any sense at all. The main wallet clearly funded both of your client wallets, providing solid evidence of ownership and potential collusion. Any claims or denials cannot change the factual information recorded on the blockchain.
jevticgallonsd1466
commented
1 year ago This is not meaningless. Hugh-Top is a customer of our computing power business, this is normal business behavior, and we are still maintaining close contact.
These were originally trade secrets, but because this matter has affected the interests of both parties, it has been revealed reluctantly (it took a long time to communicate with the customer before they agreed to reveal it). This has seriously affected the business reputation of my company
This is our business introduction:
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago It still seems that whatever you post here , that the transactions originate to one owner wallet and one organization. That's blockchain my friend.
I am sorry if i am interrupting your business plan running hundreds of machines where you control them for your customers, but the FIL+ rules and guidelines are clear here. You are allowed to store one replica per organization at those also need to be geographically spread , not only with a VPN, but for real. Pushing all these machines online and fill them 100% with the dedicated datacap you apply for is not the way forward and not what decentralization is all about.
Again, sorry if this was not clear to you when you started this pyramid. I will forward this to the governance team. I advise to stop using the datacap immediately and not make things worse then they are already are as the community will need to thing about a path proceeding forward with this.
jevticgallonsd1466
commented
1 year ago I finally understand that no matter what I say, your ultimate goal will not change.
Question:1 I told you that Hugh-Top is our computing power customer, and we have transferred the earnings of computing power to him. I don't think there is any problem with this, and it has been going on for three months now. As for how he uses his earnings, we have no right to ask.
Question 2 I have already explained the VPN issue.
Question 3 We have not 100% packaged ourselves, maybe in the early stage our four (f02301, f03223, f0143858, f0240185) nodes have a high packaging ratio, but it will decrease later, and it will definitely not exceed 25%.
We have explained what we can. I don't think we have violated the rules.
@Kevin-FF-USA @raghavrmadya Arguing like this is pointless. Please help review it. Thanks
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago @jevticgallonsd1466 Your provided "responses" completely disregard the evident facts presented above. Your inquiries hold no significance in light of these facts.
You are entitled to your thoughts and beliefs, but facts remain facts, and abuse is abuse. It's as simple as that.
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago adding issue 1248 :
https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1248
90% of datacap sealed by Topblocks.
Aaron01230
commented
1 year ago For LDN https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1974 ,I am the signer of the first round , and do not know the next sealing transactions. For LDN https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/2054, the applicant promise they will not store more than 30% of Datacap to the nodes and I believe them and the report shows they did it.
I don't think we have any responsibility.
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago @Aaron01230, the information you provided is inaccurate. The self-dealing was evident in the initial CID report, and despite this, notaries proceeded to approve it.
woshidama323
commented
1 year ago I am Harry from Topblocks, We prepare a ppt to clarify our relationship with f01979669 and VPN usage but do not have enough time to share it during the Notary Governance meeting
TopBlocks_Response_For#913.pptx
Our sealing plan is gravely disrupted, considering our deep involvement with Filecoin. As a leading storage provider for Filet, the integrity of our borrowing process from our partner Filet has been severely compromised, exposing us to substantial financial losses and the imminent threat of liquidation. These detrimental consequences arise directly from an unsubstantiated complaint lacking any valid grounds. If left unresolved, this situation could trigger a domino effect, leading to a potential exodus of storage providers from the ecosystem.
alchemypunk
commented
1 year ago
Now we can see all the true.
peter6wei
commented
1 year ago This is Peter from TopBlocks. I have been focusing more on the operational growth and taking an observational role in the notary governance. Our team is maintaining a reasonable record.
It was my first time attending the Notary Governance meeting yesterday, and I would like to express my gratitude to everyone, especially Kevin FF for moderating.
Here are a few thoughts I'd like to share:
Baseless complaints like these are seriously harming our business. With the case still ongoing, we are experiencing significant financial losses and disruptions to our execution plan. @herrehesse @raghavrmadya , we would suggest closing this case for now. If new substantial findings are raised, the case can be reopened. In my opinion, we are all learning how to maintain civility in this community. We should consider the implications of issuing injunctions, as precedents are established through cases, similar to the US common law system. Inaccurate or unsubstantial precedents can have a long-lasting impact that may be underestimated initially.
During my visit to China this week, I had the opportunity to meet a few SPs. I was impressed by everyone's journey and stories. I'm looking forward to meeting more fellow SPs, PL, and PikNik teams next week during ESPA.
Thank you for taking the time to read, and best wishes,
Peter
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago Thank you for taking time here and answering.
We can conclude that you acknowledge that the transactions are made on the blockchain. You acknowledge that you form one organisation as business partners cooperating solely with the goal to distribute and get the datacap. Different Github handles have been used to apply for datacap in the LDN’s and VPN’s have been used to have the machines appear all over the globe to make the CID reports look healthy.
I would like to initiate the procedure to remove the remaining datacap as the datacap has been used in violation of the program. Secondly we will initiate the discussion with fellow notary’s and a proposal with a timeframe to avoid your miners getting new datacap
Hugh-Top
commented
1 year ago I think you're here just to create chaos. You use some dubious evidence and announce it as a fact in other LDNs, which is highly misleading. You are ignoring other people's speech content, it is not worth me to reply to you. If someone, like you, has a grudge against an SP, can they adopt your method to harm others' legitimate interests?
woshidama323
commented
1 year ago Hold on just one moment! It's a given that our transactions occur on the blockchain, they've always happened there. Why on earth would we need to 'admit' that as if it's some kind of wrongdoing? And where did we ever concede that TopBlocks and f01969779 are part of the same organization? Point out the exact place where we stated this! How dare you arrive at such conclusions? Why are you blatantly disregarding our clearly stated perspectives? What is your purpose in drawing such seriously misleading conclusions?
You need to get moving on this right now! Why not initiate a community vote today? And if the community disagrees with your proposal, Will you bear any consequences?
@raghavrmadya @Kevin-FF-USA as the moderator of this group, your intervention is needed. We've hit a deadlock where even clear English words are being grossly misinterpreted. Communication has become excessively difficult.
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago @woshidama323 @Hugh-Top @peter6wei @jevticgallonsd1466
None of you have presented any evidence in response to the data presented in this issue. Instead, you have primarily focused on explaining your identities, roles, and portraying yourselves as victims. I would like to suggest that you provide factual responses to the valid research that has been conducted, along with the corresponding conclusions:
Rather than creating a lot of noise, dismissing our findings as misinterpretation, and questioning the accuracy of our facts, I urge you to respond with substantial counterarguments and address the aforementioned points.
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago I think you're here just to create chaos. You use some dubious evidence and announce it as a fact in other LDNs, which is highly misleading. You are ignoring other people's speech content, it is not worth me to reply to you. If someone, like you, has a grudge against an SP, can they adopt your method to harm others' legitimate interests?
In my opinion you exploited the FIL+ program in a way to the sole benefit of your organisation. By doing this you are taking away profit (aka blockrewards) of honest players in the community. Plain said, you are taking something that does not belong to you.
Given all the evidence above the only thing you think about is your own reputation and financial gains… you want this removed asap. There is no single spike of regret of your actions here or a “hey, sorry, perhaps this was not the smartest thing to do after all” .
My opinion therefore stands. This issue should be kept open and the steps recommended should be followed ( removing datacap etc )
ndnccs
commented
1 year ago According to the observation "@cryptowhizzard" @herrehesse", from the same organization. I am curious, why there are two notaries in the same organization. Second, since the notary system, every community chaos is caused by them. Suggestion Proposal to remove the above two notaries.
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago According to the observation "@cryptowhizzard" @herrehesse", from the same organization. I am curious, why there are two notaries in the same organization. Second, since the notary system, every community chaos is caused by them. Suggestion Proposal to remove the above two notaries.
Lol … if we don’t like the evidence let’s make it disappear 🫠
Anyway, there is no chaos. We did not create chaos, we opened a governance issue to remedy this exploitation of Fil+ by Topblocks with clear solutions and evidence.
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago By the way:
Topblocks behaviour is also affecting others in the community with Fil-E applications for example. By providing false information to Jennifer in this issue this LDN got in trouble.
https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1248
ndnccs
commented
1 year ago Hi, I appreciate your professionalism, especially your technique. But your emotional intelligence is not good. You may not know how much influence implicated notaries have on FiL. Without them, it is impossible for fil computing power to grow so fast. It will face selling pressure, and the market price of FiL will be lower than it is now. It will do you no good if they are pushed out by you. "Blowing out other lamps will not make you brighter. Blocking the way of others will not make you go further."
ndnccs
commented
1 year ago If your community will fully follow the rules, it will be after all sectors are Fil+. After the search reward mechanism is perfected.
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago Hi, I appreciate your professionalism, especially your technique. But your emotional intelligence is not good. You may not know how much influence implicated notaries have on FiL. Without them, it is impossible for fil computing power to grow so fast. It will face selling pressure, and the market price of FiL will be lower than it is now. It will do you no good if they are pushed out by you. "Blowing out other lamps will not make you brighter. Blocking the way of others will not make you go further."
My personal opinion:
You say “without then it is impossible to grow fast”.
I explained that with this you take away block rewards of honest players. I don’t mind growing fast but this should be done in a honest way, not like this because then we loose the honest and bad players together.
Secondly the liquidation pressure is higher from people who don’t play by the rules and want to avoid getting their datacap slashed and funds blocked and getting caught. Honest players stay in the system much longer because they believe in it.
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago "Without them, it is impossible for fil computing power to grow so fast"
Datacap granted to datasets is meant to onboard new clients, add value to the ecosystem and bring the filecoin price to new highs. You are merely using it for fast growing, is the exact reason for the problems we found. The self dealing is against the rules and as was already noted by @cryptowhizzard:
We can conclude that you acknowledge that the transactions are made on the blockchain. You acknowledge that you form one organisation as business partners cooperating solely with the goal to distribute and get the datacap. Different Github handles have been used to apply for datacap in the LDN’s and VPN’s have been used to have the machines appear all over the globe to make the CID reports look healthy.
I would like to initiate the procedure to remove the remaining datacap as the datacap has been used in violation of the program. Secondly we will initiate the discussion with fellow notary’s and a proposal with a timeframe to avoid your miners getting new datacap
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago I kindly request the removal of this client and the remaining datacap. Despite several accusations, no evidence has been provided against it, merely biased suggestion without any facts. There has been no progress, so I urge you to take appropriate action.
I also recommend initiating a dispute or removal process for the notaries involved, as it appears that a significant portion of them are recurring abusers (see open issues).
woshidama323
commented
1 year ago @herrehesse @cryptowhizzard
Given your reasoning that transfers from a common account suggest a single entity, could you elucidate on the transaction matter in #1552? Are we to assume that all these SPs constitute one entity?
` DCENT bafy2bzaceahbjjhq6vgtvnxrvk4booxb7spsbrr7lidaeuzra7tf63qcnvl2o
DATACOM SYSTEMS (AU) PTY LTD bafy2bzaced7c2pfwha7a5lr43fsdjqjkvd4zhuiiylgyhmcjg2lh3hotpspc6 bafy2bzacedkegwgiw5lzn7mu4leexyjocwqh2t7ggnmz2xyibwupeh77fevgk bafy2bzacedw5afn3f4eywezjhwhmvwqsimzjyfin4pqj7dujrm7wie5mjh53m bafy2bzaced2vemdkk433dg6lie3huevhurqkqy55ql6d2wmp7yoi6ihbsfytg
PCCW Global, Inc. bafy2bzacectyifu2hazrqujgywo7hnj6uhgmrj7ve7o7bpb2bwq6ydsxuwfnk bafy2bzacecvuqweathayhyfpqikd5ikapgttugu6jfyfo2uejatz3y5v3x34g bafy2bzaceakqwlhjpkfp6jp3njialmwz3ej5rtrh6oz7emhvxsypo4dlc6wcw bafy2bzacedxykatd672bcjp5tge2zkexmkb5oqqwkgzovths3bkdhowguw7m4 bafy2bzacea7jeddnb2hd24nacnspcgocna2msqrgehkjoubkrtxz5mwcbipcw
PiKNiK & Company Inc. bafy2bzaceamwiqk5ha6oqswd3vniv4z4bm4s6q6md477qifsuhi5vbcwyolbe
Packet Host, Inc. bafy2bzacebmjcnsj575qw4weftbmodcxtbe4qgmfppn6acavtvbjvkd3u63fa `
Then we will raise a new issue for reporting your abuse issue.
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago @herrehesse @cryptowhizzard Given your reasoning that transfers from a common account suggest a single entity, could you elucidate on the transaction matter in #1552? Are we to assume that all these SPs constitute one entity?
` DCENT bafy2bzaceahbjjhq6vgtvnxrvk4booxb7spsbrr7lidaeuzra7tf63qcnvl2o
DATACOM SYSTEMS (AU) PTY LTD bafy2bzaced7c2pfwha7a5lr43fsdjqjkvd4zhuiiylgyhmcjg2lh3hotpspc6 bafy2bzacedkegwgiw5lzn7mu4leexyjocwqh2t7ggnmz2xyibwupeh77fevgk bafy2bzacedw5afn3f4eywezjhwhmvwqsimzjyfin4pqj7dujrm7wie5mjh53m bafy2bzaced2vemdkk433dg6lie3huevhurqkqy55ql6d2wmp7yoi6ihbsfytg
PCCW Global, Inc. bafy2bzacectyifu2hazrqujgywo7hnj6uhgmrj7ve7o7bpb2bwq6ydsxuwfnk bafy2bzacecvuqweathayhyfpqikd5ikapgttugu6jfyfo2uejatz3y5v3x34g bafy2bzaceakqwlhjpkfp6jp3njialmwz3ej5rtrh6oz7emhvxsypo4dlc6wcw bafy2bzacedxykatd672bcjp5tge2zkexmkb5oqqwkgzovths3bkdhowguw7m4 bafy2bzacea7jeddnb2hd24nacnspcgocna2msqrgehkjoubkrtxz5mwcbipcw
PiKNiK & Company Inc. bafy2bzaceamwiqk5ha6oqswd3vniv4z4bm4s6q6md477qifsuhi5vbcwyolbe
Packet Host, Inc. bafy2bzacebmjcnsj575qw4weftbmodcxtbe4qgmfppn6acavtvbjvkd3u63fa `
Then we will raise a new issue for reporting your abuse issue.
You are a true 🦸♂️ … a real warrior! You actually found out how blockchain works, true amazing. Because of this great result i will share and reveal the organization. They are called
Anchorage!!!!!
Congrats on your results. Now can we go back to work??
woshidama323
commented
1 year ago Welcome back to the business world. Now you agree that a financial transaction between two accounts doesn't mean an internal transaction inside an entity. Now you realize that your original allegation is insane.
I don't know which "whizzard" is talking about. It is pretty fun to debate yourself ?
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago Welcome back to business world. Now you agree that a financial transaction between two accounts doesn't mean an internal transaction inside an entity. Now you realize that your original allegation is insane.
Unless two organisations are really the same entity as confessed above. Their “business secret”.
jevticgallonsd1466
commented
1 year ago woshidama323
commented
1 year ago That's enough. It's futile to further waste our time on you. You hastily made conclusions on an issue you instigated, despite the glaring lack of sufficient evidence, which is not only irresponsible but also profoundly unfair. Despite presenting proofs, you dismiss them; despite our counterarguments, you resort to sophistry. Intriguingly, you're not even a part of the FILplus management team. Post the ESPA meeting, we intend to reintroduce topics related to 811 and involve a greater number of SPs and notaries in the discussions. We must express our gratitude for inadvertently uniting more SPs, although it might have compromised the FILPlus project. It's baffling, considering we've previously procured DC from you and even collaborated before. What exactly is your business rationale? How does this behavior benefit you?
herrehesse
commented
1 year ago @woshidama323 none of your claims hold any ground and you are completely unable to explain any of the accusations factually.
It’s endeed enough.
cryptowhizzard
commented
1 year ago That's enough. It's futile to further waste our time on you. You hastily made conclusions on an issue you instigated, despite the glaring lack of sufficient evidence, which is not only irresponsible but also profoundly unfair. Despite presenting proofs, you dismiss them; despite our counterarguments, you resort to sophistry. Intriguingly, you're not even a part of the FILplus management team. Post the ESPA meeting, we intend to reintroduce topics related to 811 and involve a greater number of SPs and notaries in the discussions. We must express our gratitude for inadvertently uniting more SPs, although it might have compromised the FILPlus project. It's baffling, considering we've previously procured DC from you and even collaborated before. What exactly is your business rationale? How does this behavior benefit you?
The best cost-efficient Filecoin mining machine - TopBlocks.pdf
This is a screenshot of the website. Topblocks offers these mining machines to its customers, including FiL+ . ( engage in FiL+, more blocks more profit ) They control them, they do the maintenance thus they form one organisation.
I won’t even start about the 110% luck rate 😂
woshidama323
commented
1 year ago This is a screenshot of the website. Topblocks offers these mining machines to its customers, including FiL+ . ( engage in FiL+, more blocks more profit ) They control them, they do the maintenance thus they form one organisation.
Could you please refrain from exhibiting ignorance or behaving childishly?
Issue Description
Two instances of abusive clients have been identified involving the following activities:
This situation serves as a prime illustration where the client assumes the role of the storage provider, receiving support from negligent notaries who fail to fulfil their responsibilities.
Impact
This organisation has the capability to accumulate datacap exclusively for its own miners, disregarding regional distribution and engaging in significant self-dealing. Such actions contradict the rules and guidelines of the Filecoin+ program, granting them undue financial advantages over entities striving to operate fair and decentralised storage provider businesses.
Details
Notaries Aaron01230 kernelogic METAVERSEDATAMINING NiwanDao stcouldlisa
zcfil Aaron01230 Bitrise0111 DaYouGroup kernelogic
Proposed Solution(s)
We propose the following actions to address the situation:
Timeline
Discussion at July 11th 2023 WG Call Community open audit until July 14th 2023 at 5 pm ET Decision announced async at 5:01 pm ET
Additional
Newly opened by the same client: https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/2067 Also self-deal application from topblocks: https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/2021