Closed cryptowhizzard closed 4 months ago
You should be removed because you're making the whole community discordant. Can you create one for yourself? I think you'll get a more complete picture of yourself.
I think I'm being framed by @cryptowhizzard . Our application-1935 has no dispute. Retrieval is successful! https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1935#issuecomment-1661534707
Can you just do anything before you jump to conclusions?
@BlockMakeronline , can you please respond to the dispute with objective facts and evidence?
We tried data retrieval before, and it worked. We've tried it again, and it worked again.
Hi, @raghavrmadya Is there anything I need to provide?
Based on multiple flags from the community in the T&T WG slack, calls as well as open disputes in the tracker, the following notaries is being recommended by me for removal from the main multisig
Especially since expressing ignorance towards other notaries in the community in issue 1935
It is community consensus that applications who are under dispute should not be signed. This specific application uses SP's who are known in LDN 1556 / 1557 / 1558 / 1559 and do not support retrieval.
Timeline The timeline for proposed changes will be two weeks, by Aug 14th.
Technical dependencies RKH is required to add/remove notaries
End of POC checkpoint (if applicable)