Open Lamparter opened 2 days ago
To rename, Files.App.Package makes more sense but we'd not rename or move until msixbundle is supported in the single packing project.
To rename, Files.App.Package makes more sense but we'd not rename or move until msixbundle is supported in the single packing project.
Yes you're right, like in FluentHub. However, that's how it currently is (Files.Package in Configuration Manager)
It's possible to publish a package from a single package project though, right?
I think it's like that in Rebound 11.
Bundles aren't supported yet
Description
It's unnecessary and somewhat confusing to have the name "Files.App (Package)" in the directory tree (
src
). It should better be namedFiles.Package
to match the configuration manager.Concerned code
N/A
Gains
Requirements
Comments
No response