search

filipows / angular-animations

:sparkles: Easy, Reusable Animation Utility library for Angular
https://filipows.github.io/angular-animations
MIT License
634 stars 89 forks source link

Can we have easing options exposed by IAnimationOptions #49

Open arnoldsimha opened 4 years ago

arnoldsimha commented 4 years ago

Hi, I really like this library. It allows us to focus on development and less on animations development. There is one thing I would like to have and this is an easing option that will allow the developers to decide the easing for the animations. Thank you

filipows commented 4 years ago

Hi @arnoldsimha, thank you for your feedback! I might have to look closer into that, to not over-complicate things. Do you have any particular use case in mind or it's more of a general thought?

Some of the animations are having different easing functions between keyframes, so should we expose all of the easing functions for a certain animation? (in some cases it could be 3 functions per animation)

arnoldsimha commented 4 years ago

Hi @filipows , Thank you for your response. I think it's possible to keep it simple. I saw that you're setting "easing" property as "ease": image

you can expose it through IAnimationOptions and allow developers to set the string, or even have list of allowed options :)

mckenzielong commented 4 years ago

Was also wondering if we could get this feature. It would be nice to achieve the emphasized easing mentioned in the material design reference:

https://material.io/design/motion/speed.html#easing

yousafravian commented 4 years ago

Hi @filipows , Thank you for your response. I think it's possible to keep it simple. I saw that you're setting "easing" property as "ease": image

you can expose it through IAnimationOptions and allow developers to set the string, or even have list of allowed options :)

Yes I was also looking for easing parameter but couldn't find one. Could you suggest any work around

filipows commented 4 years ago

Hi @yousafraza39142,

thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, I don't think there's a workaround for that atm.

Seems like this feature should be prioritised. I'll have a look at this in the upcoming days.