search

finos / FDC3

An open standard for the financial desktop.
https://fdc3.finos.org
Other
187 stars 109 forks source link

Update community.json #1152

Closed nkolba closed 1 week ago

nkolba commented 4 months ago

Added entries for Interop Security Scorecard and FDC3 Sandbox.

linux-foundation-easycla[bot] commented 4 months ago

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

netlify[bot] commented 4 months ago

Deploy Preview for fdc3 ready!

Name Link
Latest commit 9e319097e19b3e8089dc03c91b65c58b9964a93c
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/fdc3/deploys/666b1f7a9f964e0008c2a931
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1152--fdc3.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

kriswest commented 4 months ago

I'm not thinking about the categories these additions show up in, but then the default view is a single list with everything, alpha sorted. That will place two entries next to each other.

At the least, I think the sandbox could be merged into the existing entry for the product - plus its not really an example of using FDC3. The scorecard doesn't feel like either an example or training, nor a match for the other categories.

nkolba commented 4 months ago

@kriswest I think clear rules and criteria would make sense since other companies have multiple entries, there are other vendor specific implementations listed, and other entries make marketing claims. Not to mention, there is an element of marketing in anyone listing anything.

Both the Sandbox and the Security Scorecard are free tools that offer resources addressing very specific interests/needs the community has raised. The Scorecard does not site vendors, focus on vendor-specific features, or rate vendors. The Sandbox is free, hosted, runs in a browser, and doesn't provide any functionality beyond FDC3. I know many firms who use vendor desktop container implementations and also use the Sandbox as part of their toolkit as well as firms who probably wouldn't have tried FDC3 at all if there wasn't a no-install and out of the box way to do it. If other firms have similar resources to offer I'm more than happy to see them listed as well.

nkolba commented 4 months ago

@kriswest @robmoffat is there any update on this? Happy to make tweaks to the categories, but I'd like to know what the consensus is.

kriswest commented 4 months ago

Apologies, I haven't had time to circle around to a number of action items as yet. The minutes for the maintainers meeting that covered it are in the fdc3-maintainers channel.

From memory there were two things to do: adjust the categories in the community page (i.e. the categories the page uses) to better separate demos and other content and to research common content guidelines (like avoid the use of superlatives - there are two other entries that do so already) and add some to either the comments in the page (seen when you hit the edit button) or somewhere else suitable, along with a content disclaimer (as FDC3 is publishing content that was written by others).

nkolba commented 3 months ago

thanks @kriswest, these ideas make sense to have for the community page in general. What does it mean for this PR?

kriswest commented 3 months ago

@nkolba apologies for the delay - I'll try and set aside an hour at the end of the day today or tomorrow to take a look at the categories again and disclaimer so that we can close this out ASAP. If I manage to get something worked out I'll tag you and Rob to review.

kriswest commented 1 month ago

I sent a note about this PR on #1169 some time ago - it needs updating if you want to get it merged, otherwise there's nothing blocking it.

robmoffat commented 3 weeks ago

I've updated the category - can we merge this now?