Chris had this to say about the repeatability analysis figure from the WCSE poster
"Repeatability analysis (Figure 3 caption) says: As shown in the figure above, the shifts (calculated by subtracting the mean of the collapsed Likert scale data) were negligible implying a high degree of repeatability.
Question for you. I’m not sure this was the best way to do this (in hindsight). I think we should have looked at individual responses and mapped their shift (from one offering to another), and taken the mean of all shifts that way. Based on the caption, I’m assuming you calculated overall (Average) shift for the class data, as opposed to doing it on a per-student basis. I think looking at individual responses and taking the average of those may be better way to represent/discuss."
Chris had this to say about the repeatability analysis figure from the WCSE poster
"Repeatability analysis (Figure 3 caption) says: As shown in the figure above, the shifts (calculated by subtracting the mean of the collapsed Likert scale data) were negligible implying a high degree of repeatability.
Question for you. I’m not sure this was the best way to do this (in hindsight). I think we should have looked at individual responses and mapped their shift (from one offering to another), and taken the mean of all shifts that way. Based on the caption, I’m assuming you calculated overall (Average) shift for the class data, as opposed to doing it on a per-student basis. I think looking at individual responses and taking the average of those may be better way to represent/discuss."