firebase / firebase-ios-sdk

Firebase SDK for Apple App Development
https://firebase.google.com
Apache License 2.0
5.66k stars 1.49k forks source link

Cloud blocking functions errors are not handled properly #14052

Open amirandalibi opened 22 hours ago

amirandalibi commented 22 hours ago

Description

In my Swift app, errors returned from Firebase Blocking Functions are not properly handled, resulting in the following generic error message:

Error Domain=FIRAuthErrorDomain Code=17999 "An internal error has
occurred, print and inspect the error details for more information."
UserInfo={NSUnderlyingError=0x600000e8d0b0 {Error Domain=FIRAuthInternalErrorDomain Code=2 "(null)" UserInfo={NSUnderlyingError=0x600000cc2700 {Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=3840 "JSON text did 
not start with array or object and option to allow fragments not set. around line 1, column 0." 
UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=JSON text did not start with array or object and option to allow fragments not set.
around  line 1, column 0., NSJSONSerializationErrorIndex=0}}}}, NSLocalizedDescription=An internal error has occurred, print and inspect the error details for more information., FIRAuthErrorUserInfoNameKey=ERROR_INTERNAL_ERROR}

Blocking function

The blocking function is running on Node.js 20 using beforeUserCreated and throws an error in the following format:

throw new HttpsError("invalid-argument", "invalid email", {
  code: "invalid-email",
  message: "Please enter a valid email address to create your account.",
});

The expected raw error response from this blocking function should resemble:

BLOCKING_FUNCTION_ERROR_RESPONSE : ((HTTP request to http://127.0.0.1:9999/project-id/us-central1/beforeUserCreated returned HTTP error 400: {"error":{"details":{"code":"invalid-email"},"message":"invalid email","status":"INVALID_ARGUMENT"}})) 

The root cause stems from two issues in the Firebase iOS SDK that lead to an improperly formatted error.

  1. Parsing Issue in AuthBackend.swift In AuthBackend.swift, the SDK attempts to split the error message string by colons. The intent was to separate the initial part (shortErrorMessage) from the remaining part (serverDetailErrorMessage). However, splitting by : inadvertently captures portions of the URL, resulting in a truncated message ((HTTP request to http, which breaks the error handling.

Current code

https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/blob/32a6788e806b4a34ccaccdae8d7b638b5e63fa9b/FirebaseAuth/Sources/Swift/Backend/AuthBackend.swift#L315-L318

Suggested Fix

To address this, I propose updating the parsing logic to identify the first colon’s index and split the string at that point, preserving the intended structure:

let splitIndex = serverErrorMessage.firstIndex(of: ":")!
let shortErrorMessage = String(serverErrorMessage[..<splitIndex])
  .trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespacesAndNewlines)
let serverDetailErrorMessage = String(serverErrorMessage[serverErrorMessage.index(after: splitIndex)...] ?? "")
  .trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespacesAndNewlines)
  1. Hardcoded String Dependency in AuthErrorUtils.swift In AuthErrorUtils.swift, the blockingCloudFunctionServerResponse function relies on replacing a hardcoded string to extract JSON data from the error. This dependency fails because the string "HTTP Cloud Function returned an error:" is absent, leading to a JSON serialization error.

Current code

https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/blob/32a6788e806b4a34ccaccdae8d7b638b5e63fa9b/FirebaseAuth/Sources/Swift/Utilities/AuthErrorUtils.swift#L509-L528

Suggested Fix

To avoid hardcoded string dependencies, I suggest using regex to directly capture the JSON object within the error string, making the SDK more resilient to changes. Here is the updated function:

static func blockingCloudFunctionServerResponse(message: String?) -> Error {
  do {
    guard let message = message,
      let match = try NSRegularExpression(pattern: "\\{.*\\}", options: .dotMatchesLineSeparators)
        .firstMatch(
          in: message,
          range: NSRange(message.startIndex..., in: message)
        ),
      let range = Range(match.range, in: message)
    else {
      return error(code: .blockingCloudFunctionError, message: nil)
    }

    let jsonData = String(message[range]).data(using: .utf8) ?? Data()
    let jsonDict: [String: Any]? = try JSONSerialization
      .jsonObject(with: jsonData) as? [String: Any]
    let errorMessage = (jsonDict?["error"] as? [String: Any])?["message"] as? String
    return error(code: .blockingCloudFunctionError, message: errorMessage)
  } catch {
    return JSONSerializationError(underlyingError: error)
  }
}

With this fix, the Blocking Function error should be correctly handled, producing a clear and actionable message:

Error Domain=FIRAuthErrorDomain Code=17105 "invalid email" UserInfo={FIRAuthErrorUserInfoNameKey=ERROR_BLOCKING_CLOUD_FUNCTION_RETURNED_ERROR, NSLocalizedDescription=invalid email}

As recommended in the contribution guide, I wanted to share this approach before opening a pull request to gather any insights or feedback that could help further refine these fixes. Thank you for your time and consideration!

Reproducing the issue

step 1: throw a httpsError in your beforeUserCreated Blocking Cloud Function (can be any blocking function) step 2: create a user in the swift app and catch the error, here's an example code

do {
  try await Auth.auth().createUser(withEmail: email, password: password)
} catch {
  print("\(error)")
}

Firebase SDK Version

11.4.0

Xcode Version

Version 15.4 (15F31d)

Installation Method

Swift Package Manager

Firebase Product(s)

Authentication, Functions

Targeted Platforms

iOS

Relevant Log Output

No response

If using Swift Package Manager, the project's Package.resolved

No response

If using CocoaPods, the project's Podfile.lock

No response

google-oss-bot commented 22 hours ago

I couldn't figure out how to label this issue, so I've labeled it for a human to triage. Hang tight.

paulb777 commented 10 hours ago

@amirandalibi Thanks for sharing the issue and analysis. Your analysis sounds good to me and we would appreciate a pull request including a unit test that demonstrates the issue and fix. Also, my preference would be to use Swift Regular Expression syntax instead of NSRegularExpression.